WHO weighs priorities in new global health order after Trump unplugs funding
WHO faces US$600 million shortfall this year as US leaves
Annual assembly will prioritise high-impact work
'We've got to make do,' says one Western diplomat
LONDON/GENEVA, May 18 — Hundreds of officials from the World Health Organization will join donors and diplomats in Geneva from Monday with one question dominating their thoughts – how to cope with crises from mpox to cholera without their main funder, the United States.
The annual assembly, with its week of sessions, votes and policy decisions, usually showcases the scale of the U.N. agency set up to tackle disease outbreaks, approve vaccines and support health systems worldwide.
This year – since US President Donald Trump started the year-long process to leave the WHO with an executive order on his first day in office in January – the main theme is scaling down.
'Our goal is to focus on the high-value stuff,' Daniel Thornton, the WHO's director of coordinated resource mobilisation, told Reuters.
Just what that 'high-value stuff' will be is up for discussion. Health officials have said the WHO's work in providing guidelines for countries on new vaccines and treatments for conditions from obesity to HIV will remain a priority.
One WHO slideshow for the event, shared with donors and seen by Reuters, suggested work on approving new medicines and responding to outbreaks would be protected, while training programmes and offices in wealthier countries could be closed.
The United States had provided around 18 per cent of the WHO's funding. 'We've got to make do with what we have,' said one Western diplomat who asked not to be named.
Staff have been getting ready – cutting managers and budgets – ever since Trump's January announcement in a rush of directives and aid cuts that have disrupted a string of multilateral pacts and initiatives.
The year-long delay, mandated under US law, means the US is still a WHO member – its flag still flies outside the Geneva HQ – until its official departure date on January 21, 2026.
Trump – who accused the WHO of mishandling Covid, which it denies – muddied the waters days after his statement by saying he might consider rejoining the agency if its staff 'clean it up'.
But global health envoys say there has since been little sign of a change of heart. So the WHO is planning for life with a US$600 million hole in the budget for this year and cuts of 21 per cent over the next two-year period.
China takes lead
As the United States prepares to exit, China is set to become the biggest provider of state fees - one of the WHO's main streams of funding alongside donations.
China's contribution will rise from just over 15 per cent to 20 per cent of the total state fee pot under an overhaul of the funding system agreed in 2022.
'We have to adapt ourselves to multilateral organisations without the Americans. Life goes on,' Chen Xu, China's ambassador to Geneva, told reporters last month.
Others have suggested this might be a time for an even broader overhaul, rather than continuity under a reshuffled hierarchy of backers.
'Does WHO need all its committees? Does it need to be publishing thousands of publications each year?' said Anil Soni, chief executive of the WHO Foundation, an independent fund-raising body for the agency.
He said the changes had prompted a re-examination of the agency's operations, including whether it should be focussed on details like purchasing petrol during emergencies.
There was also the urgent need to make sure key projects do not collapse during the immediate cash crisis. That meant going to donors with particular interests in those areas, including pharmaceutical companies and philanthropic groups, Soni said.
The ELMA Foundation, which focuses on children's health in Africa with offices in the US, South Africa and Uganda, has already recently stepped in with US$2 million for the Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network known as Gremlin – more than 700 labs which track infectious disease threats, he added.
Other business at the assembly includes the rubber-stamping a historic agreement on how to handle future pandemics and drumming up more cash from donors at an investment round.
But the focus will remain on funding under the new world order. In the run up to the event, a WHO manager sent an email to staff asking them to volunteer, without extra pay, as ushers. — Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Borneo Post
10 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Lingering shadow: Why Covid-19's return demands vigilance, not panic
Just when we thought the coast was clear, the familiar shadow of Covid-19 has returned. Just when we thought the coast was clear, the familiar shadow of Covid-19 has returned, uninvited, to our headlines and our communities. For months, we've enjoyed a semblance of normalcy – masks tucked away, social calendars full, and the virus relegated to a footnote. But recent reports from Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, and the US, all echoing the World Health Organization's (WHO) warnings, deliver an urgent, undeniable message: the pandemic's final act hasn't been written yet. This new surge, born from a cocktail of public fatigue, fading immunity, and viral evolution, demands a rapid recalibration of our approach. Not panic, but a sharp, intelligent focus on risk-based vigilance. The numbers are speaking volumes. Thailand's astonishing nearly 66,000 new cases in six days; Singapore's over 14,000 in a similar period; and Malaysia's consistent weekly average of 600, leading to over 11,000 cases in early 2025 – these are not minor fluctuations. The WHO's global confirmation of an 11% test positivity rate, a level not seen since mid-2024, signals a widespread upward trend, particularly across Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific. This resurgence is happening because people have become lax. Our reduced masking increased social mixing, and critically, the natural waning of both vaccine and infection-acquired immunity has created the perfect storm for transmission. The primary driver of this current surge is the NB.1.8.1 variant, now officially a WHO Variant Under Monitoring. Its defining characteristic is high transmissibility, allowing it to outcompete previous variants quickly, and now represents over 10% of global sequences. However, and this is a crucial point to understand amidst the alarm, NB.1.8.1 does not appear more virulent. Medical experts confirm there's no clear evidence it leads to higher hospitalization or death rates than its predecessors. Moreover, our existing vaccines are still holding strong, especially in preventing severe disease. Grasping this distinction – easily transmissible but not more severe – is key to a calm, effective response. So, what's the urgent takeaway for you? It's about shifting from a generalized 'over' mindset to informed, risk-based action. While the general, vaccinated population may experience symptoms akin to a bad cold, vulnerable groups face significantly higher risks of severe complications. If you or someone you care for falls into categories like the elderly, young children, pregnant individuals, or those with underlying health conditions (diabetes, heart disease, etc.), immediate heightened precautions are non-negotiable. For these vulnerable individuals, the action plan is simple and crucial: · Mask Up: In crowded indoor areas, or if you feel unwell. · Monitor and Test: Be acutely aware of symptoms. With flu, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and adenovirus also circulating, prompt Covid-19 antigen testing is vital for proper diagnosis and management. · Consult Your Doctor: Seek early medical advice. High-risk individuals might need additional evaluations. Crucially, if you have chronic conditions, maintain strict adherence to your medication. · Stay Vaccinated: Ensure your boosters are current. The vaccines remain effective against current strains.


Malay Mail
17 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Letting it all out: Breaking the silence around men's mental health — Nurfilzah Emily Mohamad Khairuddin
JUNE 7 — Many men carry storms in their hearts that no one sees, just because the world often expects them to be silent warriors: strong, unshaken, and always composed. They walk through life bearing the weight of pain, pressure, expectations and grief all while being told to 'stay strong' and 'man up.' But this June, during Men's Mental Health Month we're breaking the silence. Because behind that silence, there is often a boy who was once told not to cry. A man who's tired of pretending. A heart that aches for someone to say, 'It's okay. You're allowed to feel.' Let's begin here, it's okay to cry. Tears are not a sign of weakness. They're a release, a cleansing. They say, 'This matters. I am hurting. I am human.' If only the world could hear the stories behind those tears such as the father trying to provide without losing himself, the young man struggling to find his worth, the husband silently grieving a miscarriage and the student battling anxiety behind good grades. These are not dramatic stories. They are real ones and they deserve to be spoken, heard and held with kindness. But men are often taught that silence equals strength. That showing emotions makes them 'less of a man.' That vulnerability is dangerous. So they bottle things up, mask their emotions, distract themselves with work, sports or scrolling but deep down they are running on empty and what happens when emotions don't have a voice? They find other ways to scream through anger, numbness, insomnia, health issues or sudden withdrawal. This isn't weakness. It's a sign he needs help. He needs a safe space. Here's the truth, asking for help is an act of bravery. There is no shame in seeing a counselor, reaching out to a friend or admitting that life feels overwhelming. — Chinnapong/Shutterstock pic via AFP Here's the truth, asking for help is an act of bravery. There is no shame in seeing a counselor, reaching out to a friend or admitting that life feels overwhelming. In fact, the moment you say 'I'm struggling', you take back your power. You allow healing to begin. You remind yourself that you're not alone and that pain doesn't have to be your permanent home. Professional help whether it's therapy, support groups or a warm conversation can be life-changing. No one should have to suffer in silence when healing is possible. And dear men, your emotions are valid. You don't have to 'get over it' quickly. You don't need to be okay just because others expect you to be. You're allowed to feel frustrated, confused, lost, broken, joyful, emotional, grateful all in the same breath. Your mental health matters just as much as your physical health. You matter. Not for how strong you appear but for who you are, deep down, when no one's watching. Find your safe people. Whether it's a friend who listens without fixing, a partner who understands your silence or a counsellor who creates space for your truth. Lean into that support. Healing happens in connection. You don't need to go through life feeling like you're a burden. You are not 'too much.' You are enough and there's space in this world for you to breathe, to rest and to be seen. Even the strongest trees bend with the wind, it doesn't make them weaker. It makes them real. This Men's Mental Health Month, let's break the silence. Let's check on our brothers, our fathers, our husbands and our friends. Let's normalise the words 'I'm not okay', and let's meet them with love not shame. Let's build a culture where men don't have to wear emotional armour all the time where they can feel, fall and rise again with support by their side. To every man reading this, know this with all your heart, you are not alone. You are not broken. You are not weak. You are a whole human being with a heart that deserves to be held gently. Speak your truth, cry when you need to, ask for help and never apologise for feeling. Because behind every silent man is not a void but a voice waiting to be heard. You don't have to hold it all in. Let it out. You are worthy of healing. You are worthy of peace. 'Even the moon has scars, yet it still shines. So will you.' * Nurfilzah Emily Mohamad Khairuddin K.B.; P.A. is a registered counsellor with Lembaga Kaunselor Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.


Free Malaysia Today
18 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
From hot sauce to Vaseline, parents get creative to reduce pacifier use
Strategies to reduce pacifier use or thumb-sucking range from hiding pacifiers to using deterrents like hot sauce. (Envato Elements pic) PARIS : A pacifier and/or thumb or finger sucking can help lull babies to sleep in the first months and years of their life. So much so that giving up this habit can become a real challenge. A recent US survey, conducted by the University of Michigan CS Mott Children's Hospital among more than 2,000 parents with at least one child aged one to six years, serves as a reminder that this habit is widespread. Around half of parents (51%) said that their children currently or previously used a pacifier, while about one-quarter of parents (23%) reported that their child currently or previously sucked their thumb or fingers. According to their feedback, these methods of self-soothing were typically used at bedtime or nap time (79% for pacifiers, 57% for thumb/finger sucking), when children were stressed or fussy (47% for both), or when watching TV or videos (10% for pacifiers, 24% for thumb/fingers). Only 18% said their child used a pacifier almost all the time (14% for thumb/fingers). While some children were perfectly capable of giving up this habit on their own, quitting sucking a pacifier or the thumb or fingers may required some training. And there are plenty of strategies available, as the responses of the parents who took part in the survey demonstrated. The most frequently cited methods include limiting the pacifier to bedtime, hiding it, or even pretending to have lost it! While 33% say they prefered a gentler approach, letting the child decide when to stop, a majority of parents opted for more classic methods, such as keeping a child's hand away from their mouth (61%) or explaining to the child that they were 'too old' for this kind of behaviour (25%). Others turned to more extreme tactics, such as cutting a hole in the pacifier (10%) to make it less appealing. Some even went so far as to put an unappetising substance on their child's thumbs and fingers, such as hot sauce or Vaseline! Susan Woolford, MD, a paediatrician at U-M Health CS Mott Children's Hospital and co-director of the Mott Poll, points out that there are many strategies for helping a child give up thumb or pacifier sucking, like reading a book or watching a video on the subject, or encouraging the child with small rewards. 'Substituting a stuffed animal or soft doll may also provide an alternate self-soothing option for the child,' the expert suggested in a news release. Dental health and speech development The survey also revealed that, according to parents, the 'right' age to stop pacifier use is between zero and two years (79%), while 15% consider it acceptable to break the habit at age three or over. A small proportion felt that they acted too late to stop their child's pacifier use (9%) or thumb/finger-sucking (16%). So, at what age should a child be encouraged to kick the habit? Recommendations vary from country to country: the Canadian Paediatric Society, for example, recommends stopping as early as 12 months, while the American Academy of Paediatrics advises a gradual reduction in the use of pacifiers and/or thumb sucking from 18 months. However, health professionals generally agree that this habit should be stopped altogether between the ages of two and four. Beyond that age, the risks to the child's health become more significant. Prolonged sucking can lead to misalignment of the teeth, deformation of the palate or malpositioning of the tongue, all of which can result in speech disorders (stuttering, lisping), as well as delays in language and vocabulary.