
Budget 2025: Principals In Marlborough Welcome Slashing Of Kahui Ako
Article – Kira Carrington – Local Democracy Reporter
In 2020, the New Zealand Principals Federation, which represented hundreds of school principals, called on the Government to end the programme, saying that the meagre benefits did not justify the $110m per year price tag.
A Marlborough school principal has welcomed the Government's decision to slash the school-clustering programme Kahui Ako Communities of Learning.
The Government announced that the programme would be disestablished as part of Budget 2025, with its funding being redirected into a $770 million investment into learning support.
Riverlands School principal Bradley Roberts said he believed that the almost $1m that went into Piritahi, Marlborough's Kahui Ako, could be better used elsewhere.
'Most of the people involved in the Kahui Ako were not even aware of how much resource went into them,' Roberts said. 'The Piritahi Kahui Ako … cost $950,000 a year to run.'
The Piritahi Kahui Ako was a collection of 21 schools and six kindergartens, representing 6000 students across the region.
Teachers nominated and approved by a school's principal and board of trustees could take paid time away from their usual tasks to foster collaborative teaching and leadership practices across schools; with the goal of lifting student achievement in Marlborough.
Roberts, who conducted a 20-week sabbatical research project on Kahui Ako, said the programme did little to lift student achievement, and suffered from 'too many parameters'.
'We could have done a lot more with the $950,000 if we [schools] were given more control over that resource,' Roberts said.
Roberts said most of the funding went towards extra pay for teachers and principals.
'The money went into people's back pockets. It didn't really go into initiatives or resources,' Roberts said.
In 2020, the New Zealand Principals' Federation, which represented hundreds of school principals, called on the Government to end the programme, saying that the meagre benefits did not justify the $110m per year price tag.
'I talked to 18 different Kahui leaders and principals as part of my research, and 18 out of 18 said if they could re-imagine the resource they would put it into learning support,' Roberts said.
Seddon School principal and Piritahi Kahui Ako co-leader Anita Phillips said the group was looking at data for under-served students to see how the schools could work together to better support them.
'Our [Kahui Ako] would come into schools to support those people, and then the principal co-leads would look at what needed to be done at a leadership level to ensure that everyone had adequate access to information or new thinking … around how best to meet the needs of the children.'
Phillips said Kahui Ako particularly focused on supporting Māori students.
'[Kahui Ako] did a huge focus for a very long time on culturally responsive practices, and we have really strong connections with local iwi now as a result,' she said.
'There has been an awful lot of teacher professional development that's come out of our Kahui Ako … network support, for sure.'
'One of the biggest impacts that we can have for children is to upskill our teachers.'
While Phillips said she was disappointed about the axing of the programme, she welcomed greater investment into learning support.
'We all want money to our children, right? Learning support is huge,' she said.
'If it's genuinely being directed to learning support and we genuinely benefit as a region … particularly if we are going to benefit with learning support co-ordinators, because we've been immensely under-served in that area.
'That will soften the blow somewhat.'
Principal of Marlborough Boys' College and board member for Witherlea School Jarrod Dunn said some of the work of the Kahui Ako needed to continue once the programme was gone.
'There will still be work that needs to be done, and I guess the school's going to have to fund that.
'If they're not funding those roles that we've got teachers in at the moment … It's how do we continue to fund those roles, given that the money and the staffing [was coming] through Piritahi Kahui Ako?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
14 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Pressue on Agriculture Minister to deliver on KiwiSaver promise
The heat is on the agriculture minister to deliver this term on a pre-election promise to unlock KiwiSaver so it can be used to buy a first farm, and not just a house. At the moment if you have been contributing to KiwiSaver for three years you can withdraw almost all the money to buy a first home to live in, although there a few exceptions. Federated Farmers has launched a petition urging the government to losen the rules for accessing the retirement scheme saying it will turbo charge the next generation of farmers and deliver on a committment that Todd Mclay made during a meeting in Morrinsville. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay spoke to Lisa Owen. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.


Scoop
34 minutes ago
- Scoop
ACT MP Welcomes Changes To Anti-Stalking Bill, Calls For Urgent Action On Newer Forms Of Abuse
ACT MP Laura McClure is welcoming changes made at select committee to strengthen the proposed anti-stalking law, but says more must be done to protect New Zealanders from modern forms of digital abuse, particularly sexually explicit deepfakes. 'I'm pleased to see the Government respond to public concern about stalking with more robust and practical legislation,' says McClure. 'Patterns of abusive behaviour deserve to be recognised by the law, and these changes will help victims seek justice. 'But we can't stop here. As technology evolves, so do the tools of harassment and abuse. Sexually explicit AI-generated deepfakes made without consent are a fast-growing threat, especially to young people and women. 'I have a members' bill in the ballot that would create a specific offence for the creation and distribution of non-consensual sexually explicit deepfake content. This should be adopted as a Government Bill. 'Deepfakes are harming real people today, and the law is failing to keep up. 'The same commitment to protecting stalking victims should extend to those targeted by synthetic sexual abuse. We need clear, targeted laws so police can act, courts can prosecute, and victims can get justice.'

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan
By Kira Carrington, Local Democracy Reporter Brendan Kearney speaks at the Marlborough District Council's Local Water Done Well hearing. Photo: LDR/Kira Carrington Residents have spoken against the Marlborough District Council's preferred water services model at a Local Water Done Well hearing on Monday. The Government requires councils to choose from five water service delivery options ‒ a modified status quo (an in-house council department), a single council-controlled organisation, a multi-council-controlled organisation, and two types of trusts. The Marlborough District Council's preferred option is to create a standalone Water Services Organisation owned and controlled by the council. The council said it would find greater efficiencies to deliver better service at a lower cost, and have more borrowing capacity to maintain and improve the region's water infrastructure. But Marlborough residents aren't convinced. Of about 45 submissions made, 58 percent wanted to keep water services in-house, compared to 13 percent who preferred the standalone organisation. The remainder did not indicate a preference. Five people spoke on their submissions at a hearing in the council chamber on Monday, and they were all opposed to a standalone organisation. Brendan Kearney, who used to be chief executive of a council-controlled organisation in Canterbury, said there was no proof that a separate organisation would be more efficient, and setting up and funding a separate entity could cost ratepayers more. It would "inevitably duplicate some overhead costs", Kearney said. He said he saw no reason for water services to be removed from a council that had maintained its water systems relatively well. "[Water] assets are in good or very good condition. That's a credit to the current council and past councils as well. Council also has low debt relative to its peers. "This is compelling evidence, in my view, that the council has performed well and will continue to do so." To create a separate organisation, Kearney said the council would need to appoint directors, manage a new relationship with the organisation, and manage the organisation's own agenda. "A standalone company is no guarantee of good governance." Kearney said there also needed to be balance in who footed the water infrastructure bill between the ratepayers of today and of tomorrow. "It's unfair to gift hundreds of millions of dollars ... to the next generations completely debt free. That means the past generations paid too much. "On the other hand, it's unfair to get those assets, billions of dollars of assets, fully debt funded ... it's unfair on future generations. "Something in between those two extremes needs to happen." Submitter Lauchy Hynd said that creating a separate organisation to take on debt outside the council books was not sustainable. "What happens when we default?" Hynd said. "We're leveraging [water assets] by three to five times to borrow money against them. "This looks to me like Three Waters from the back door. "You can kick the can down the road and borrow recklessly, but I appeal to you to act boldly on behalf of the people." Submitters also voiced concerns about allowing an unelected and "unaccountable" organisation to take control of water services. "How do we maintain the ownership and the status of [water] assets in the hands of the people of Marlborough, when we're divesting them to an unelected group?" Hynd said. Submitter Bob Watson said he was worried about the potential to more easily privatise a separate organisation, pointing how the United Kingdom's water management became privatised. Ten regional water authorities were formed in 1974, which the UK government then sold to the private sector in 1989. "I think that the potential for private ownership ... basically our water utilities to be sold off to another entity, and for us to lose the democratic voice, would be terrible," Watson said. "I like the idea that [we're] here with people that have represented the community who can speak for us." The coalition Government had previously said that privatisation of water services was not on the table. The council would make its final decision on water services delivery on June 26, and submit its plan to the Government for approval by 3 September . LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.