Team USA Sends Strong Message to Sue Bird on Thursday
Team USA has officially named former basketball star Sue Bird as the new managing director of the USA Basketball Women's National Team.
The announcement was made Thursday morning on X by the official USA Basketball account, which shared a congratulatory message along with a video of Bird discussing her new role.
Advertisement
'New title, same mission: winning gold. 🥇,' the caption writes. '@S10Bird is taking on a new challenge as the first managing director of the 🇺🇸 USA Basketball Women's National Team!'
Bird, a five-time Olympic gold medalist and WNBA champion, brings her leadership and experience to this new position.
According to the video, Bird explains that this role was kind of "in the air" for her, and she has had many conversations over the past few years with Team USA Basketball about the position.
"When I sat down with it, it just became a no-brainer to want to take on this responsibility, to want to have this role, to want this program to continue winning gold medals," the former Seattle Storm player explained.
Sue Bird at the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris, France © Kyle Terada-Imagn Images
Bird was the No. 1 overall pick in the 2002 WNBA Draft and spent her entire 21-year career with the Storm, becoming the league's all-time assists leader. In 2025, she was elected as part of the Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame.
Advertisement
Off the court, she's a strong advocate for social justice and LGBTQ+ rights. Bird retired in 2022, leaving behind a legacy of excellence and impact.
She was a key member of the USA Women's Basketball Team in 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016 and 2020, helping lead the team to five consecutive Olympic gold medals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
18 minutes ago
- CNET
French Open 2025: How to Watch, Stream Boisson vs. Gauff Free From Anywhere
Home-turf wildcard Lois Boisson is on a fairytale run at the French Open, but she'll have to pull off another shock to keep it going today, as she faces world No. 2 Coco Gauff. Below, we'll outline the best live TV streaming services to use to watch the match as it happens, wherever you are in the world, and how to use a VPN if it's not available where you are. The Dijon-born 22-year-old is currently ranked 361st in the world, but is just one win away from a Grand Slam final after wins against top-10 stars Jessica Pegula and Mirra Andreeva. Standing in the way of another giant killing is 2022 finalist Coco Gauff, who reached today's semifinal after coming through her biggest test so far this year at Roland Garros. She beat fellow American Madison Keys, 6-7, 6-4, 6-1, on Wednesday. This semifinal clash takes place on Court Philippe Chatrier at Roland Garros in Paris on Thursday, June 5. The game is set to get underway no earlier than 6 p.m. CET local time in France. This makes it an 12 p.m. ET or 9 a.m. PT start in the US and Canada, and a 5 p.m. BST start in the UK. For tennis fans in Australia, the match is set to get underway at 3 a.m. AEST. Lois Boisson has reached the semifinals in her French Open to watch Lois Boisson vs. Coco Gauff in the US The French Open will be shown across TNT Sports channels -- TNT, TBS and truTV. You can also watch every match shown on TV, plus hundreds of others not available, on the TNT channels on Max. Four of the five major live-TV streaming services include the TNT Sports channels (every one but Fubo), but the cheapest way to watch the French Open is by signing up for a month of Max. Max Max Every match for $17 per month You need the $17 a month Standard plan to watch live sports on Max. You could also opt for the $21 a month Premium plan that adds 4K streaming. Max will show 900 matches from the French Open, including more than the 800 that are exclusive to Max and won't be shown on TNT Sports networks. You'll be able to watch up to four matches at once with Max's multiview feature. Read our Max review. See at Max How to watch the French Open free from anywhere with a VPN If you find yourself unable to view the tournament locally, you may need a different way to watch -- that's where using a VPN can come in handy. A VPN is also the best way to stop your ISP from throttling your speeds on game day by encrypting your traffic. It's also a great idea if you're traveling and find yourself connected to a Wi-Fi network and you want to add an extra layer of privacy for your devices and logins. With a VPN, you're able to virtually change your location on your phone, tablet or laptop to get access to the game. So if your internet provider or mobile carrier has stuck you with an IP address that incorrectly shows your location in a blackout zone, a VPN can correct that problem by giving you an IP address in your correct, nonblackout area. Most VPNs, like our Editors' Choice, ExpressVPN, make it really easy to do this. Using a VPN to watch or stream sports is legal in any country where VPNs are legal, including the US, UK and Canada, as long as you have a legitimate subscription to the service you're streaming. You should be sure your VPN is set up correctly to prevent leaks: Even where VPNs are legal, the streaming service may terminate the account of anyone it deems to be circumventing correctly applied blackout restrictions. Looking for other options? Be sure to check out some of the other great VPN deals taking place right now. Sarah Tew/CNET ExpressVPN Best VPN for streaming ExpressVPN is our current best VPN pick for people who want a reliable and safe VPN and it works on a variety of devices. It's normally $13 a month but if you sign up for an annual subscription for $100 you'll get three months free and save 49%. That's the equivalent of $6.67 a month. Note that ExpressVPN offers a 30-day money-back guarantee. See at ExpressVPN How to watch or stream Lois Boisson vs. Coco Gauff in the UK Tennis fans in the UK will need to subscribe to Eurosport or the streaming service Discovery Plus to watch the French Open. Sarah Tew/CNET Discovery Plus Carries the French Open in the UK A subscription to Discovery Plus in the UK costs £7 per month or £60 for the year. The service is available on a wide array of devices and also includes access to all Eurosport TV channels. See at Discovery Plus How to watch or stream Lois Boisson vs. Coco Gauff in Canada Canadian tennis fans can watch the tournament via streaming service TSN Plus. Existing TSN cable subscribers can watch at no extra charge using the details of their TV provider. You also watch the French-language broadcast on RDS. How to watch or stream Lois Boisson vs. Coco Gauff in Australia free Good news for sports fans Down Under. They can watch the French Open without paying a cent, thanks to free-to-air broadcaster Channel 9. That also means you'll be able to watch the tournament live online via its streaming service 9Now. Aussies also have a second option for streaming the action from Roland-Garros via pay TV sports network Stan Sport, which is livestreaming every match on every court without ads. A Stan Sport subscription costs AU$15 per month on top of a AU$12 Stan subscription. Quick tips for streaming the French Open using a VPN
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the Trump travel ban means for the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympic Games
GENEVA (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump often says the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Los Angeles Olympics are among the events he is most excited about in his second term. Yet there is significant uncertainty regarding visa policies for foreign visitors planning trips to the U.S. for the two biggest events in sports. Trump's latest travel ban on citizens from 12 countries added new questions about the impact on the World Cup and the Summer Olympics, which depend on hosts opening their doors to the world. Here's a look at the potential effects of the travel ban on those events. What is the travel ban policy? When Sunday ticks over to Monday, citizens of 12 countries should be banned from entering the U.S. They are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Tighter restrictions will apply to visitors from seven more: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Trump said some countries had 'deficient' screening and vetting processes or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. How does it affect the World Cup and Olympics? Iran, a soccer power in Asia, is the only targeted country to qualify so far for the World Cup being co-hosted by the U.S., Canada and Mexico in one year's time. Cuba, Haiti and Sudan are in contention. Sierra Leone might stay involved through multiple playoff games. Burundi, Equatorial Guinea and Libya have very outside shots. But all should be able to send teams to the World Cup if they qualify because the new policy makes exceptions for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' About 200 countries could send athletes to the Summer Games, including those targeted by the latest travel restrictions. The exceptions should apply to them as well if the ban is still in place in its current form. What about fans? The travel ban doesn't mention any exceptions for fans from the targeted countries wishing to travel to the U.S. for the World Cup or Olympics. Even before the travel ban, fans of the Iran soccer team living in that country already had issues about getting a visa for a World Cup visit. Still, national team supporters often profile differently to fans of club teams who go abroad for games in international competitions like the UEFA Champions League. For many countries, fans traveling to the World Cup — an expensive travel plan with hiked flight and hotel prices — are often from the diaspora, wealthier, and could have different passport options. A World Cup visitor is broadly higher-spending and lower-risk for host nation security planning. Visitors to an Olympics are often even higher-end clients, though tourism for a Summer Games is significantly less than at a World Cup, with fewer still from most of the 19 countries now targeted. How is the U.S. working with FIFA, Olympic officials? FIFA President Gianni Infantino has publicly built close ties since 2018 to Trump — too close according to some. He has cited the need to ensure FIFA's smooth operations at a tournament that will earn a big majority of the soccer body's expected $13 billion revenue from 2023-26. Infantino sat next to Trump at the White House task force meeting on May 6 which prominently included Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. FIFA's top delegate on the task force is Infantino ally Carlos Cordeiro, a former Goldman Sachs partner whose two-year run as U.S. Soccer Federation president ended in controversy in 2020. Any visa and security issues FIFA faces — including at the 32-team Club World Cup that kicks off next week in Miami — can help LA Olympics organizers finesse their plans. 'I don't anticipate any, any problems from any countries to come and participate,' LA Games chairman Casey Wasserman told International Olympic Committee officials in March. He revealed then, at an IOC meeting in Greece, two discreet meetings with Trump and noted the State Department has a 'fully staffed desk' to help prepare for short-notice visa processing in the summer of 2028 — albeit with a focus on teams rather than fans. 'Irrespective of politics today,' Wasserman said in March, 'America will be open and accepting to all 209 countries for the Olympics.' FIFA and the IOC didn't immediately respond to requests for comment about the new Trump travel ban. What have other host nations done? The 2018 World Cup host Russia let fans enter the country with a game ticket doubling as their visa. So did Qatar four years later. Both governments, however, also performed background checks on all visitors coming to the month-long soccer tournaments. Governments have refused entry to unwelcome visitors. For the 2012 London Olympics, Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko — who is still its authoritarian leader today — was denied a visa despite also leading its national Olympic body. The IOC also suspended him from the Tokyo Olympics held in 2021. ___ AP soccer: and AP Olympics at
New York Times
24 minutes ago
- New York Times
What would a 2025 Belmont Stakes win mean for Journalism's legacy?
Ten years ago this Friday, 90,000 people rose to their feet and exhaled in catharsis. Even in the shadows of a city that knows how to celebrate big moments, the roar that rose from Long Island on June 6, 2015, rivaled anything a sports fan could conjure. As American Pharoah came around the final turn and bore down on the Belmont Stakes finish line, disbelief gave way to stupor. And when 37 years of Triple Crown futility finally and officially evaporated, the cheers for Pharoah somehow grew louder, the stupor turning into awe for the colt's incredible triumph. Advertisement When, just three years later, Justify matched American Pharoah's efforts to win his own Triple Crown, it felt like horse racing was entering a golden age. Instead, not only has the Triple Crown entered yet another dry spell, but no horse has won even two legs of the famed horse-racing gauntlet. Even more, of the 109 horses who have entered the Kentucky Derby since 2019, only two — War of Will in 2019 and Mystik Dan, last year's Derby winner — went on to race in both the Preakness and the Belmont. Which leads us to the present day, and a horse named Journalism. The bay colt's commitment to all three legs of the Triple Crown defies convention, and as he preps to load into the starting gate for the Belmont on Saturday, he's chasing his own little slice of history. Despite a messy start at the Derby and a harrowing ride down the stretch in the Preakness, Journalism finished second in Louisville and won in Baltimore. Were he to win on Saturday at the Belmont, he would be the first horse aside from Pharoah and Justify in 20 years (Afleet Alex did it in 2005) to win two and come close to winning all three Triple Crown contests. He'd also be the first to capture two wins and a place since the beloved Smarty Jones in 2004. (Smarty did it in reverse order, winning the Derby and Preakness before finishing second by a heartbreaking length at the Belmont). Only one horse since has even come close. In the mashed-up COVID season, Authentic won the Derby (run in September) and took second in the Preakness (run in October), but he did not run in the June Belmont. 'If [Journalism] were to win, it would confirm the suspicions that this is truly a special horse,' says David Grening, the New York correspondent for the Daily Racing Form. 'To run in all three is hard enough; to run well is truly rare.' Advertisement Special, however, lives a hair off the edge of great, and in any sport, greatness is the goal. In horse racing, greatness is defined by a three-race stretch run over a five-week period. So what, then, would be Journalism's legacy were he to go two for three in the Big Three? The answer, like a lot of things in horse racing, is complicated. The way he has run to date certainly shows a fierceness that is nothing shy of extraordinary. At the Derby, Bob Baffert's front-running Citizen Bull took a hard right to get clear of the rail from the one hole. That caused what could be best described as a horse bottleneck at the start of the race, forcing Journalism to come from much farther back than his trainer, Michael McCarthy, would have liked. 'Because of that, he was 10th and out of position, and in horse racing, position is everything,' says longtime horse racing writer Dick Jerardi. 'With that kind of field, the rider has to go sooner than he wants, and out of the final turn, he was only a length ahead of Sovereignty, and that brought the best closer into the race.' True to form, Sovereignty closed with gusto to beat Journalism by 1 1/2 lengths. Then at the Preakness, Umberto Rispoli kept Journalism on the rail to save some ground, but that also put the horse behind a wall of other horses. At the top of the stretch, the jockey somehow squeezed a 1,000-pound animal through the eye of a needle. Journalism bullied his way between Clever Again and Goal Oriented to find daylight and win. Clever Again's trainer, Steve Asmussen, less than thrilled with the contact, said Rispoli rode the Preakness favorite 'like a rented mule.' 'The bravery he showed going through that hole, whether you want to credit the jockey or the horse — that colt is tough,' says Ken McPeek, who trained Mystik Dan through three Triple Crown races. 'No question he is some kind of tough. And he's fearless, which is obviously a great thing.' In so many ways, Journalism is (or at least could be) just getting started. He is just 3 years old, and the Belmont will be his eighth start. To date, his worst finish came in his debut; he crossed third. Despite the opinions of the general public, whose interest peters out post-Belmont, his legacy may not be finalized at Saratoga, where the Belmont Stakes will be run this weekend while its namesake track completes renovations. Advertisement There is recent precedent for a great horse earning his stripes post-Triple Crown. In 2007, Curlin finished third in the Derby, won the Preakness and lost by a head to the filly Rags to Riches in the Belmont. Impressive but not great by Triple Crown standards. Yet Curlin then went on to place third in the Haskell that August, win the Jockey Club Gold Cup and win the Breeders' Cup Classic, two races that included older horses. At the end of the year, he was named Horse of the Year. He repeated the feat in 2008, winning Horse of the Year again before retiring as the highest North American money-winner at the time, with $10.5 million to show for his efforts. But Journalism, a son of Curlin, would be an odds-defier were he to keep racing and keep winning. Smarty Jones and Afleet Alex never raced after the Triple Crown season, both done in by injuries. Justify retired immediately after the Belmont, his entire racing career lasting a whopping 118 days. American Pharoah went on to win the Haskell, take second at the Travers and win the Breeders' Cup Classic, cementing his legacy before retiring for a lucrative breeding fee. 'Going 2-1-1 would make him special, but what he could do afterwards really elevates where he could measure up,' says Grening. 'To me, what can really determine this horse's legacy is what he does after the Triple Crown.' Though they are well aware of the rare company Journalism could join, those associated with the horse, of course, are not terribly interested in talking legacy or what's next. 'Needless to say, it would be an enormous honor,' says Aron Wellman, one of the majority owners. 'That said, we're not taking anything for granted or allowing ourselves to get too far out in front of ourselves.'' With good reason. While only an eight-horse field, the Belmont includes some legit contenders, top among them Derby-winner Sovereignty. McPeek, for one, is a Sovereignty fan and has been since Louisville. 'I thought he was one of the easiest selections or wagers for the Derby that I've ever seen in my life,' McPeek says. He likes Bill Mott's horse even more now, what with the extra rest he's received by not running in the Preakness, and he's running at the same Derby distance at which he's already won. Another contender horse people are keeping an eye on is Baeza, who finished third in the Derby. Advertisement For now at least, the line says that Journalism will go off as the favorite. Just as he did in the Derby. Just as he did in the Preakness. Whether a win will be good enough to cement his greatness is up for debate. 'But it would be great for the game,' Jerardi says. 'You don't have to sit out the Preakness. You can still do it. The really good ones, they can do it. That's really what it comes down to. If you have a good enough horse, it's doable. He's good enough.'' (Photo by Rob Carr / Getty Images)
