Is he still in charge? Supreme leader's absence raises alarm in Iran
Hezbollah supporters carry photos of Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has not been seen publicly in nearly a week. PHOTO: EPA
Is he still in charge? Supreme leader's absence raises alarm in Iran
TEHRAN – With the nation watching, the host on Iranian state television asked the question that so many people in Iran – from the political elite to people on the street – were wondering.
'People are very worried about the supreme leader,' the host said to an official from Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's office on June 24. 'Can you tell us how he is?'
He noted that viewers had sent a flood of messages asking the same thing. But the official, Mr Mehdi Fazaeli, the head of Ayatollah Khamenei's archives office, did not give a straight answer.
Instead, Mr Fazaeli said he, too, had received numerous inquiries from officials and others worried about the ayatollah after the furious bombing campaign by Israel and the United States.
'We should all be praying,' Mr Fazaeli said.
'The people who are responsible for protecting the supreme leader are doing their job well,' he added. 'God willing, our people can celebrate victory next to their leader, God willing.'
Ayatollah Khamenei, who has the final say on key decisions in Iran, has not been seen publicly or heard from in nearly a week, despite the extraordinary crisis that his country has faced.
In the past few days alone, the US bombed three of Iran's nuclear facilities, Iran retaliated by firing ballistic missiles at a US base in Qatar, and Iran and Israel agreed to a ceasefire that went into effect Tuesday morning.
Through it all, Ayatollah Khamenei – who officials say has been sheltering at a bunker and refraining from electronic communication to prevent assassination attempts against him – has remained absent, issuing no public statements or recorded messages.
His absence has surprised and unnerved everyone from political insiders to the general public.
Mr Mohsen Khalifeh, editor-in-chief of Khaneman, a daily newspaper focused on real-estate development, said in an interview that Ayatollah Khamenei's 'days-long absence has made all of us who love him very worried'.
Acknowledging a possibility that two weeks ago would have seemed unthinkable, Mr Khalifeh added that if Ayatollah Khamenei were dead, his funeral procession would be 'the most glorious and historic'.
As the supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei has the last word on all major state matters. As the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, he would be expected to approve any military decision as significant as the attack on the US base or the ceasefire deal with Israel.
The ceasefire agreement, requested by US President Donald Trump and mediated by the emir of Qatar, appears to have been brokered swiftly. Yet, senior military commanders and government officials have been evasive about whether they have met or spoken with Ayatollah Khamenei in recent days.
Uncertainties ahead
His public silence has led to a flurry of speculation and doubt: How involved has Ayatollah Khamenei been in the most recent decisions, given the many potential difficulties or delays in reaching him? Is he still supervising the country on a daily basis? Is he injured, sick or even alive?
Mr Hamzeh Safavi – a political analyst and son of General Yahya Safavi, a Revolutionary Guard commander and top military adviser to Ayatollah Khamenei – said Iran's security officials believed Israel might still try to assassinate Ayatollah Khamenei, even during a ceasefire. So, he said, they are enforcing extreme security protocols, including limited contact with the outside world.
'There is a pragmatic view taking hold for managing the country out of this crisis,' he said, by empowering other leaders, like President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Still, Mr Safavi said he believed that Ayatollah Khamenei was weighing in on key decisions remotely.
Even so, some of Ayatollah Khamenei's supporters are posting on social media and telling one another in text messages that they cannot feel Iran has been victorious in the war against Israel until they see or hear from the supreme leader.
Four senior Iranian officials, familiar with current policy discussions in the government, said in Ayatollah Khamenei's absence, politicians and military commanders were forming alliances and vying for power.
These factions have different visions of how Iran should move forward with its nuclear programme, its negotiations with the US and the standoff with Israel.
The faction that appears to have the upper hand at the moment is pushing for moderation and diplomacy, the four officials said. It includes Mr Pezeshkian, who has publicly signalled his willingness to return to the bargaining table with the US even after Mr Trump bombed Iran's nuclear facilities.
Mr Pezeshkian's allies include the head of the judiciary, Mr Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, who is close to the supreme leader, and the new commander of the armed forces, Major-General Abdolrahim Mousavi.
The Iranian government is trying to ride the wave of nationalist fervour that has emerged in reaction to Israel's withering air strikes, which officials say have killed more than 600 people in Iran.
Tehran's National Symphony performed at an outdoor concert in Azadi Square – a symbolic landmark named 'freedom' – in Tehran on June 24. A light show followed with pictures of emergency responders projected on the arch-like tower at the center of the square.
Iran's plan for its damaged nuclear facilities remains a looming question.
Both the foreign minister, Mr Abbas Araghchi, and the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, Mr Mohammad Eslami, have said in interviews with local news media that Iran will rebuild and revive its nuclear programme and continue enriching uranium.
Mr Sanam Vakil, director for the Middle East and North Africa at Chatham House, a research group, said Ayatollah Khamenei's absence was notable and a sign that Iran's leaders were being 'extremely careful and security-minded'.
'If we don't see Ayatollah Khamenei by Ashura,' an important religious procession for Shi'ite Muslims observed in Iran in early July, Mr Vakil said, 'that is a bad sign. He has to show his face.' NYTIMES
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defence chief says
No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defence chief says WASHINGTON - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on June 26 said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend. US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities with more than a dozen 13,607kg bunker buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far the strikes may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Mr Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference. US President Donald Trump, who watched the news conference, echoed his defence secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything. 'The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility,' Mr Trump, without providing evidence, wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. Several experts cautioned this week that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike early on the morning of June 21, and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the US and United Nations nuclear inspectors. They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing 'unusual activity' at Fordow on June 19 and 20, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on June 22 that most of the near weapons-grade 60 per cent highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack. The Financial Times, citing European capitals, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since its stockpile was not concentrated in Fordow. Mr Hegseth's comments denying those claims came at a news briefing where he accused the media of downplaying the success of US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme following a leaked, preliminary assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months. Mr Hegseth said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear programme was severely damaged by recent US strikes, and that it would take years to rebuild. Media hatred In the news conference, Mr Hegseth spent large portions of the time criticising the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias. 'It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad,' Mr Hegseth said. 'There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined,' he said. Mr Trump, who announced the press conference on Truth Social early on June 26 , praised it as: 'One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!' On X, Mr Hegseth thanked Mr Trump for his praise. During the press conference, the top US general largely stuck to technical details, going into the history of the bunker busting bombs used. General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on June 21. Gen Caine declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the US strikes. He also said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice. 'I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defense chief says
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force General Dan Caine, speak during a press conference at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., June 26, 2025. REUTERS/Idrees Ali WASHINGTON - U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program over the weekend. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth said. After the strikes, several experts also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike early Sunday morning and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear inspectors. They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the near weapons-grade 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack. Hegseth's comments denying those claims came at a news briefing where he accused the media of downplaying the success of U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program following a leaked, preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months. Hegseth said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged by recent U.S. strikes, and that it would take years to rebuild. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
US defence chief Hegseth says strikes on Iran 'most complex, secretive' military op in history
Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has vowed not to surrender to the US, warning that any repeat aggression would come at a great cost. US President Donald Trump has doubled down on his claim that nuclear sites in Iran had been "obliterated". Meanwhile, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has held a press conference at the Pentagon, praising Mr Trump for spearheading the most "complex and secretive" military operation in history. Toni Waterman reports from Washington DC.