Mongolia PM resigns amid protests over his son's lavish lifestyle
Mongolian prime minister Luvsannamsrain Oyun-Erdene has resigned after losing a confidence vote in parliament.The vote followed days of mass protests over corruption allegations - fuelled by social media posts about his son's lavish birthday party and engagement.Oyun-Erdene, who took office in 2021, will remain as caretaker PM until a successor is appointed within 30 days."It was an honour to serve my country and people in times of difficulties, including pandemics, wars, and tariffs," he said after the vote.
He had to stand down as he fell short of a majority, or 64 of the 126-seat parliament. Some 82 lawmakers took part in the secret ballot, 44 of whom voted for Oyun-Erdene, while 38 voted against him. Hundreds of protesters, many of them young people, had been taking to the streets for two weeks before the vote, demanding Oyun-Erdene's resignation.In particular, they pointed to his family's - especially his son's - apparent lavish lifestyle, questioning the source of their wealth.Mongolians have circulated on social media an extravagant wedding proposal by Oyun-Erdene's son, as well as expensive fashion items. Oyun-Erdene has rejected allegations of corruption, accusing critics of launching a smear campaign against him.
According to Transparency International, a watchdog, Mongolia has seen worsening corruption since Oyun-Erdene came into power. Last year, it was ranked 114th out of 180 countries in terms of government transparency.A former communist state sanwiched between Russia and China, Mongolia has been transitioning to democracy since the fall of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s.Corruption is a persistent problem. Last year, US prosecutors sought to forfeit former Mongolian PM Sukhbaatar Batbold's two New York apartments that he allegedly bought using stolen mining funds.Batbold, who served from 2012 to 2015, denied wrongdoing.In recent years, Mongolia has sought to build closer ties with the West, counting the United States and European countries as part of its "third neighbour" foreign policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Four men jailed over ‘egregious' NHS bribery and corruption offences
Four men convicted of bribery and corrupt practices over the awarding of NHS contracts worth £6 million have been jailed. Alan Hush, 68, Adam Sharoudi, 41, Gavin Brown, 48, and Gavin Cox, 60, were convicted following a trial at the High Court in Glasgow which followed an investigation at health boards across Scotland. The offences, which took place between 2010 and 2017, included bribery, corruption, and other offences under the Proceeds of Crime Act. Hush and Sharoudi were additionally convicted of charges of fraud. Sharoudi and Brown, directors of Ayrshire-based telecommunications firm Oricom Ltd, were jailed for eight years and seven years respectively when they were sentenced at the court on Thursday, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) said. Hush, who was telecommunications manager at NHS Lothian, was sentenced to eight years in jail, while Cox, who was head of IT and infrastructure at NHS Lanarkshire, was jailed for six years. In a sentencing statement later published online, Lord Arthurson said: 'The public are entitled to expect that their fellow citizens will not seek to subvert public officials in the diligent exercise of their duties, and public officials in their turn should know that succumbing to bribery will result in the handing down by the court of immediate and significant custodial terms. 'The reach and character of the corruption and in particular the corrupt relationships engaged in by all of you, when considered as a whole, was on a grand scale.' The trial at the High Court in Glasgow lasted 65 days. Sineidin Corrins, deputy procurator fiscal for specialist casework at COPFS, said: 'This is an outstanding result for justice in Scotland. 'As prosecutors, we have shown an unwavering commitment to pursuing and investigating this matter. This was a betrayal of public trust. 'These four men colluded to create a sophisticated criminal scheme. The public will rightly be shocked by the scale of their criminality. 'The scale of this offending against our public health service is particularly egregious. 'The systematic abuse of position by public officials, who accepted inappropriate benefits including cash, holidays and entertainment in exchange for contract advantages, strikes at the heart of public trust. 'It serves as a reminder that procurement processes exist to ensure fair competition and value for public money. When these processes are corrupted, all of society bears the cost. 'The prosecutorial journey has been complex and demanding. It required forensic examination of thousands of documents, hundreds of witness statements, and detailed financial analyses to establish the full extent of this criminal activity. 'The digital evidence, particularly text messages and emails exchanged between the accused, proved pivotal in exposing the true nature of these arrangements. 'This was a meticulous investigation and one which reflects the enduring partnership working between specialist Crown Office prosecutors, NHS Counter Fraud Services and Police Scotland, who worked tirelessly over many years. 'Their unflinching dedication to serving the interests of justice, regardless of complexity or duration, deserves recognition.' The four men will now be subject to confiscation action under proceeds of crime legislation to recover monies illegally obtained. Brown and Sharoudi were also banned from being company directors for 10 years. Gordon Young, head of NHSScotland Counter Fraud Services at NHS National Services Scotland, said: 'This is a landmark conviction for fraud, bribery and corruption of individuals who sought to exploit the NHS for personal gain. 'This successful prosecution reaffirms NHS Scotland's commitment to safeguarding vital funds for patient care as intended by the taxpayer. 'These sentences send a strong and unequivocal message that fraud, bribery and corruption within the NHS will not be tolerated, and we will act decisively against anyone who threatens its integrity.'
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
BBC Learning English - Learning English from the News / Turkey protests after political rival jailed
(Photo by Umit Turhan Coskun/NurPhoto via Getty Images) ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ The story Ekrem Imamoglu, mayor of Istanbul, has been jailed on corruption charges. Since then, there have been days of protests, leading to violent clashes between protestors and the authorities. Imamoglu is seen as the main political rival to Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has been either prime minister of president since 2003. Since being jailed, the main opposition party in the country declared Imamoglu their candidate for the 2028 presidential election. His university degree had recently been annulled – cancelled – which means he is not allowed to stand for election. News headlines Sixth night of protests in Turkey as Erdogan hits out at unrest BBC Erdogan Bets World Will Turn a Blind Eye to Turmoil in Turkey Bloomberg Turkey's Authoritarian Turn Jacobin Key words and phrases hits out at strongly criticises Businesses hit out at the government's plans to increase corporate taxes. turn a blind eye ignore something bad I've been turning a blind eye to your lateness for far too long... You need to start arriving on time! authoritarian turn a movement towards authoritarian government The trend towards strong national leaders is evidence of a growing authoritarian turn across the world. Next If you like learning English from the news, click here. Learn more expressions like 'turn a blind eye' in The English We Speak.
Times
a day ago
- Times
South Korea election results: divisive ‘scrappy fighter' wins
Every day, and with increasing intensity over the past week, Kim Se-eui and his staff have gathered in a basement studio in Seoul to dedicate themselves to the downfall and disgrace of South Korea's next president. All day, the team marshal film footage and jazzy graphics to create the nightly broadcast that Kim delivers live on YouTube. From time to time it features scandals involving celebrity singers or actors. But as South Koreans prepared to vote in the presidential election, its focus shifted to the man heading towards overwhelming victory: Lee Jae-myung, leader of the left-wing Democratic Party. Claims of corruption, accusations of communist sympathies, allegations of sleazy behaviour by Lee's son — all of it is contentious, much of it is unproven and some of it may be defamatory. Kim cheerfully owns up to having more than a hundred separate legal actions under way against him but shows no sign of relenting. 'This election is a huge decision that will determine the fate of Korea,' he said, shortly before going on air. ' Lee Jae-myung is a very close friend of China, North Korea and Russia. This is very frightening. If Lee is not stopped, the future of Korea will be dark.' Every night, the 70-minute programme is watched by anything from a few hundred thousand to a few million people who agree with him. On Tuesday, Lee won a comprehensive victory, giving him a powerful mandate for his plans for economic reform and engagement with North Korea, and giving him respite from the corruption charges that had threatened to end his political career. He was declared the victor after 98 per cent of the votes were counted. Polls gave Lee 49.2 per cent of the vote, according to Yonhap news agency, compared with 41.5 per cent for his closest rival, Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party. Victory had been predicted by opinion polls, but the margin of projected victory exceeded the most recent, which had suggested late gains for Kim. Conceding defeat, Kim said he 'respectfully accepts the choice of the people'. Lee told a crowd of supporters outside the National Assembly: 'We've proved that that power is not to be used for the president's personal interests, but for the bright future of this country,', appearing to reference his conservative competitor's previous use of martial law. Lee said that the 'first duty' voters had given his future government was to 'recover the democracy of the country'. The second was to 'restore' the country's faltering economy. But the result disguises one of the most distinctive facts about Lee: the divisive character of his politics. For all his popularity, a large minority of South Koreans oppose him with a vehemence bordering on hatred. He gives his campaign speeches in a bulletproof vest after being stabbed in the neck last year by one enraged citizen. This year, at least two supporters of the man he seeks to replace, the impeached former president Yoon Suk-yeol, set themselves on fire in protest at what they saw as Lee's persecution of their leader. South Korean politics has always been polarised, between left and right and between different regions of the country, but since December the divisions have become more painful and bitter than ever. It was then that Yoon, after laws he proposed were repeatedly blocked by the opposition majority in parliament, took the extraordinary step of declaring martial law. The attempt at a presidential coup appalled most South Koreans and was blocked by MPs, including some from Yoon's own party; apart from being impeached, he faces criminal charges of insurrection. The debacle was a gift to Lee, who narrowly lost the 2022 election to Yoon. But rather than allowing the consequences of Yoon's self-destructive act to play themselves out, Lee and his party pursued him with a relentless aggression that struck many in Korea as excessive, passing more than 30 impeachment motions against the former president, ministers and senior officials. 'Democracy requires some sort of consensus-based politics and … I don't think [Lee] is the man for that,' said Steven Denney, a Korea expert at Leiden University. 'He's not a consensus builder. He's not a man of the centre. He's a rough-and-tumble, scrappy fighter who is more likely to persecute those on the other side than he is to shake their hand.' Those who hate Lee point to the various legal cases, including criminal charges of corruption, ongoing against him, none of them yet resolved. But the odium that he arouses may also be connected with his background. • Why do South Korean presidents have such a high disaster rate? Lee will not be South Korea's first working-class president but none has had a more deprived upbringing. His family could not afford to send him to secondary school. Instead, he worked in a factory where he suffered a permanent disability after his arm was caught in a machine. He studied on his own to win a scholarship to study law at university; then went on to become mayor of the city of Seongnam and governor of Gyeonggi, South Korea 's most populous province. His doctrine of 'Meoksanism', which can roughly be translated as 'bread-and-butter-ism', prioritises practical issues such as jobs, housing and social welfare over abstract ideology. But to nervous members of the South Korean elite, in a country with high levels of inequality, it has about it a whiff of class warfare. Conscious of the accusations that he is pro-North Korean, Lee has attempted to position the Democrats as what he calls a 'centrist-conservative' party. There is no evidence that Lee is a communist sympathiser, although, like all of South Korea's previous left-leaning presidents, he is likely to seek engagement rather than confrontation with North Korea. On Tuesday, he told supporters at a rally he would resume dialogue with the northern neighbour. 'Creating peace is a more certain way of creating security,' Lee said. With such a decisive lead, he has little motivation to spell out many specifics. He has been polite but vague about President Trump; aides say that he is still working out his approach to China. His greatest and most fundamental challenge may be the one closest to home, and the one that contradicts his instincts: how to soothe his enemies and restore a measure of unity to scared and angry South Koreans.
