
Islamic State reactivating fighters, eying comeback in Syria and Iraq
Live Events
EXPLOITING DIVISIONS
REACTIVATING SLEEPER CELLS
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Middle East leaders and their Western allies have been warning that Islamic State could exploit the fall of the Assad regime to stage a comeback in Syria and neighbouring Iraq, where the extremist group once imposed a reign of terror over millions.Islamic State (IS) has been attempting just that, according to more than 20 sources, including security and political officials from Syria, Iraq, the U.S. and Europe, as well as diplomats in the region. The group has started reactivating fighters in both countries, identifying targets, distributing weapons and stepping up recruitment and propaganda efforts, the sources said.So far, the results of these efforts appear limited. Security operatives in Syria and Iraq , who have been monitoring IS for years, told Reuters they foiled at least a dozen major plots this year.A case in point came in December, the month Syria's Bashar Assad was toppled.As rebels were advancing on Damascus, IS commanders holed up near Raqqa, former capital of their self-declared caliphate, dispatched two envoys to Iraq, five Iraqi counter-terrorism officials told Reuters. The envoys carried verbal instructions to the group's followers to launch attacks. But they were captured at a checkpoint while travelling in northern Iraq on December 2, the officials said.Eleven days later, Iraqi security forces, acting on information from the envoys, tracked a suspected IS suicide bomber to a crowded restaurant in the northern town of Daquq using his cell phone, they said. The forces shot the man dead before he could detonate an explosives belt, they said.The foiled attack confirmed Iraq's suspicions about the group, said Colonel Abdul Ameer al-Bayati, of the Iraqi Army's 8th Division, which is deployed in the area. "Islamic State elements have begun to reactivate after years of lying low, emboldened by the chaos in Syria," he said.Still, the number of attacks claimed by IS has dropped since Assad's fall.IS claimed responsibility for 38 attacks in Syria in the first five months of 2025, putting it on track for a little over 90 claims this year, according to data from SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors militants' activities online. That would be around a third of last year's claims, the data shows.In Iraq, where IS originated, the group claimed four attacks in the first five months of 2025, versus 61 total last year.Syria's government, led by the country's new Islamist leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, did not answer questions about IS activities. Defence Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra told Reuters in January the country was developing its intelligence-gathering efforts, and its security services would address any threat.A U.S. defence official and a spokesperson for Iraq's prime minister said IS remnants in Syria and Iraq have been dramatically weakened, unable to control territory since a U.S.-led coalition and its local partners drove them from their last stronghold in 2019.The Iraqi spokesperson, Sabah al-Numan, credited pre-emptive operations for keeping the group in check.The coalition and partners hammered militant hideouts with airstrikes and raids after Assad's fall. Such operations captured or killed "terrorist elements," while preventing them from regrouping and carrying out operations, Numan said.Iraq's intelligence operations have also become more precise, through drones and other technology, he added.At its peak between 2014 and 2017, IS held sway over roughly a third of Syria and Iraq, where it imposed its extreme interpretation of Islamic sharia law, gaining a reputation for shocking brutality.None of the officials who spoke with Reuters saw a danger of that happening again. But they cautioned against counting the group out, saying it has proven a resilient foe, adept at exploiting a vacuum.Some local and European officials are concerned that foreign fighters might be travelling to Syria to join jihadi groups. For the first time in years, intelligence agencies tracked a small number of suspected foreign fighters coming from Europe to Syria in recent months, two European officials told Reuters, though they could not say whether IS or another group recruited them.The IS push comes at a delicate time for Sharaa, as he attempts to unite a diverse country and bring former rebel groups under government control after 13 years of civil war.U.S. President Donald Trump's surprise decision last month to lift sanctions on Syria was widely seen as a win for the Syrian leader, who once led a branch of al Qaeda that battled IS for years. But some Islamist hardliners criticised Sharaa's efforts to woo Western governments, expressing concern he might acquiesce to U.S. demands to expel foreign fighters and normalise relations with Israel.Seizing on such divides, IS condemned the meeting with Trump in a recent issue of its online news publication, al-Naba, and called on foreign fighters in Syria to join its ranks.At a May 14 meeting in Saudi Arabia, Trump asked Sharaa to help prevent an IS resurgence as the U.S. begins a troop consolidation in Syria it says could cut its roughly 2,000-strong military presence by half this year.The U.S. drawdown has heightened concern among allies that IS might find a way to free some 9,000 fighters and their family members, including foreign nationals, held at prisons and camps guarded by the U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). There have been at least two attempted jailbreaks since Assad's fall, the SDF has said.Trump and President Tayyip Erdogan of neighbouring Turkey want Sharaa's government to assume responsibility for these facilities. Erdogan views the main Kurdish factions as a threat to his country. But some regional analysts question whether Damascus has the manpower needed.Syrian authorities have also been grappling with attacks by suspected Assad loyalists, outbreaks of deadly sectarian violence, Israeli airstrikes and clashes between Turkish-backed groups and the SDF, which controls about a quarter of the country."The interim government is stretched thin from a security perspective. They just do not have the manpower to consolidate control in the entire country," said Charles Lister, who heads the Syria program at the Middle East Institute, a U.S. think tank.Responding to a request for comment, a State Department spokesperson said it is critical for countries to repatriate detained nationals from Syria and shoulder a greater share of the burden for the camps' security and running costs.The U.S. defence official said Washington remains committed to preventing an IS resurgence, and its vetted Syrian partners remain in the field. The U.S. will "vigilantly monitor" Sharaa's government, which has been "saying and doing the right things" so far, the official added.Three days after Trump's meeting with Sharaa, Syria announced it had raided IS hideouts in the country's second city, Aleppo, killing three militants, detaining four and seizing weapons and uniforms.The U.S. has exchanged intelligence with Damascus in limited cases, another U.S. defence official and two Syrian officials told Reuters. The news agency could not determine whether it did so in the Aleppo raids.The coalition is expected to wrap up operations in Iraq by September. But the second U.S. official said Baghdad privately expressed interest in slowing down the withdrawal of some 2,500 American troops from Iraq when it became apparent that Assad would fall. A source familiar with the matter confirmed the request.The White House, Baghdad and Damascus did not respond to questions about Trump's plans for U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria.The United Nations estimates IS, also known as ISIS or Daesh, has 1,500 to 3,000 fighters in the two countries. But its most active branches are in Africa, the SITE data shows.The U.S. military believes the group's secretive leader is Abdulqadir Mumin, who heads the Somalia branch, a senior defence official told reporters in April.Still, SITE's director, Rita Katz, cautioned against seeing the drop in IS attacks in Syria as a sign of weakness. "Far more likely that it has entered a restrategising phase," she said.Since Assad's fall, IS has been activating sleeper cells, surveilling potential targets and distributing guns, silencers and explosives, three security sources and three Syrian political officials told Reuters.It has also moved fighters from the Syrian desert, a focus of coalition airstrikes, to cities including Aleppo, Homs and Damascus, according to the security sources."Of the challenges we face, Daesh is at the top of the list," Syrian Interior Minister Anas Khattab told state-owned Ekhbariya TV last week.In Iraq, aerial surveillance and intelligence sources on the ground have picked up increased IS activity in the northern Hamrin Mountains, a longtime refuge, and along key roads, Ali al-Saidi, an advisor to Iraqi security forces, told Reuters.Iraqi officials believe IS seized large stockpiles of weapons left behind by Assad's forces and worry some could be smuggled into Iraq.Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein said Baghdad was in contact with Damascus about IS, which he told Reuters in January was growing and spreading into more areas."We hope that Syria, in the first place, will be stable, and Syria will not be a place for terrorists," he said, "especially ISIS terrorists."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
Does Iran have enough money to fight Israel in an extended war? Its first response was low-cost drones
Iran's economy, crippled by 32% inflation and $33bn reserves, struggles to match Israel's $223bn war chest. Sanctions and stagnant growth tilt prolonged conflict in Tel Aviv's favour. read more People walk near a damaged building in the aftermath of Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, June 13, 2025. Reuters Iran's economy, crippled by 32% inflation and $33bn reserves, struggles to match Israel's $223bn war chest. Sanctions and stagnant growth tilt prolonged conflict in Tel Aviv's favour. The West Asian tension entered new territories in the early hours of Friday, with Israel's air force launching a massive attack on Tehran, targeting Iranian military leadership and its nuclear enrichment sites. Hours later, Iran responded with over a hundred drones, low-cost ones, to target Israeli sites. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While Israeli attacks caused a lot damage to Iranian nuclear sites and killed Iranian Army chief Mohammad Bagheri and also the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) chief Hossein Salami, and some top nuclear scientists, Iranian counter-attack failed to cause much damage as per reports. Why Israel attacked, now Israeli defence forces put out multiple statements on social media and to the press saying that Iran had reached 'the point of no return' in its nuclear enrichment programme, which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described as a threat to the 'survival' of his country. The Israeli military said Iran secretly advanced a plan for the 'technological advancement of all parts of the development of a nuclear weapon'. 'In recent months, accumulated intelligence information has provided evidence that the Iranian regime is approaching the point of no return,' the IDF says in a statement. 'The convergence of the Iranian regime's efforts to produce thousands of kilograms of enriched uranium, alongside decentralized and fortified enrichment compounds in underground facilities, enables the Iranian regime to enrich uranium to military-grade levels, enabling the regime to obtain a nuclear weapon within a short period of time,' the military says. How challenging it is for Iran Iran faces significant economic constraints that would severely limit its capacity to sustain an extended conflict with Israel. Despite recent increases in military spending, structural weaknesses, sanctions, and dwindling resources undermine Tehran's financial resilience. Iran looks economically vulnerable as it enters a military conflict with Israel. Stagnant growth and soaring prices Iran's real GDP growth is projected at just 0.3 per cent in 2025, a sharp downgrade from earlier estimates of three per cent by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Chronic inflation, recorded at 32 per cent in January 2025, erodes purchasing power, with 27 per cent of Iranians living on less than $2 a day. Iranian currency, the rial, has collapsed to over 1 million per US dollar, slashing the real minimum wage to $120 monthly. Such instability strains public finances and limits the government's ability to fund prolonged military operations. Oil exports and sanctions US sanctions under President Trump have cut Iran's oil exports, with production expected to fall by 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) in 2025. Despite allocating 420,000 bpd (24 per cent of exports) to military funding — valued at $12.7 billion — revenue remains constrained. Iran observes predict steeper export declines of 500,000 bpd, exacerbating fiscal shortfalls. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Foreign reserves and public debt Iran's gross international reserves stood at $33.8 billion in January 2025, a fraction of its 2015 peak of $128.4 billion. By comparison, Israel's reserves hit a record $223.6 billion in May 2025. Tehran's limited reserves restrict its capacity to import essential goods or stabilise its currency during a conflict. Military spending versus Economic reality Iran's 2025 military budget tripled to $12.7 billion as said above, signalling a shift from diplomacy to militarisation. However, this prioritisation comes amid a growing fiscal deficit and industrial stagnation, with 50 per cent of production capacity halted in some sectors due to energy shortages. The economy's reliance on oil—coupled with sanctions—makes sustained military investment precarious. Iran's adversary: Israel enjoys economic resilience Israel's economy grew 3.4 per cent in Q1 2025 despite ongoing conflicts, supported by robust tech exports and a $223.6 billion forex reserve. Defence spending will rise to $45 billion in 2025, funded by a diversified economy and international alliances. Unlike Iran, Israel benefits from US security guarantees and access to global financial markets, providing a strategic cushion. What to make of the conflict as strategic implications * Resource asymmetry: Israel's reserves are 6.6 times larger than Iran's, enabling longer war sustainability. * Domestic pressures: Iran's 'resistance economy' is buckling under sanctions and inflation, risking public unrest if military spending deepens austerity. * External support: Iran's reliance on China for oil sales and Russia for military tech is vulnerable to US pressure, while Israel enjoys unwavering Western backing despite Trump's frequent public disapproval of Netanyahu's policies. While Iran has ramped up military expenditure, its economic fragility and Israel's financial robustness make an extended war unsustainable for Tehran without external intervention or rapid sanctions relief — both look unlikely unless other West Asian powers such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates change their stance dramatically.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Israel Strikes Iran Over Its Nuclear Program
Israel launched a wide-ranging attack on Iran's nuclear program overnight, striking dozens of targets in an operation that pushes the region into a new conflict with uncertain consequences. An Israeli military official said the attack targeted Iran's nuclear program and other military sites, as well as Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists. Dozens of planes wrapped up the first wave of the attack before dawn Friday, Israel said. 'We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment program. We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear weaponization program. We targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz. We targeted Iran's leading nuclear scientists working on the Iranian bomb. We also struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile program,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Iranian state TV reported explosions and showed smoke rising in the capital, Tehran. The strike came hours after U.S. and Israeli officials had warned one was imminent and cut short a U.S.-led effort to resolve the standoff over Iran's nuclear program diplomatically. Iran has warned it would respond to any attack by striking Israel and potentially American bases in the region. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared a state of emergency and warned his population that Iran was expected to retaliate for the attack by firing missiles and drones at Israel. President Trump said on social media that he remains committed to finding a diplomatic solution but that Iran must give up the possibility of developing a nuclear weapon. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. wasn't involved in the strikes, noting that Israel advised the Trump administration it would take action for its own self-defense. He also warned Iran not to attack U.S. interests or personnel in the Middle East. The attack comes just days before U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff was to meet his Iranian counterparts in Iran for a sixth round of nuclear talks. The U.S. has said Iran must give up the ability to enrich uranium needed to build a bomb. Iran has refused, leaving the talks at an impasse. The Israeli military official said Iran had been secretly working to build a nuclear weapon in recent months. Israel's move to try to resolve the issue militarily is a gamble. Iran has dispersed its nuclear sites across the country and has buried them deep underground. Any military strike would require a sustained effort and several rounds of fighting before either the regime agrees to give up its nuclear program or is toppled, former Israeli officials and security experts said. Western and Israeli officials have said military action could set back an Iranian nuclear program at least a year, but there is considerable uncertainty over the estimate. Meanwhile, Iran is expected to respond with attacks of its own that could send the conflict spiraling. The two exchanged direct blows last year for the first time, with Iran firing hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel. Israel responded with strikes that damaged Iran's missile program and took out much of its air defense, leaving it more vulnerable to an attack on its nuclear program. 'If a conflict is imposed on us,' Iranian Defense Minister Amir Aziz Nasirzadeh said Wednesday, 'all U.S. bases are within our reach, and we will boldly target them in host countries.' An attack also could spur Iran to build a nuclear weapon. Tehran will also likely stop cooperating with international inspectors, leaving its program more opaque to the U.S. and its allies. Advocates of a strike said Israel had a limited window of opportunity to exploit the damage it has done to Iran's air defenses and to allies such as the Lebanese militia Hezbollah, which might previously have joined a retaliatory strike on Israel. Netanyahu raised the possibility of strikes with Trump in a phone conversation Monday, according to two U.S. officials. Soon after, the U.S. began moving some diplomats and military dependents out of the Middle East. Write to Dov Lieber at and Alexander Ward at Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
'Nothing to do with us': The wide gap between what US says, wants, and knows
Caught between diplomacy and deterrence, the US tries to manage the consequences of an ally's war it claims not to support read more The on Iranian nuclear and military sites on Friday have reignited tensions across West Asia placing Washington in a strategically delicate position. As Israel pursues what it claims is self-defence, the US is treading carefully between alliance solidarity, diplomatic ambitions and military caution. The gap between what the US says, wants and knows has never been more visible—or more consequential. What the US says: Diplomatic distance with a warning In the immediate aftermath of Israel's strikes, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio stressed that 'we are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region.' He issued a direct warning to Tehran: 'Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD His remarks echo the administration's broader attempt to shield US forces from becoming collateral in a rapidly escalating conflict. Rubio's statement came just hours after President Donald Trump publicly warned Israel not to go forward with the attack. Trump had said that Israeli action at this moment could 'ruin chances for a peacefully negotiated solution,' referencing the upcoming sixth round of nuclear talks with Iran scheduled for Sunday in Oman. Despite that warning, Israel proceeded. Rubio later confirmed that Israel had 'advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence,' but offered neither endorsement nor criticism of the operation—reflecting the US administration's desire to distance itself without disavowing its closest regional ally. What the US wants: Preventing a nuclear Iran Behind the carefully worded neutrality is a core strategic demand: Iran must never develop a nuclear weapon. President Trump has made this unequivocal, stating, 'They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple, they can't have a nuclear weapon.' That goal places the US in quiet alignment with Israeli concerns even as it stops short of actively participating in Israel's military decisions. The consistency of this position across party lines is telling. Congressional voices, including Senator Lindsey Graham, have adopted a combative tone. 'Game on,' Graham said, framing the moment as a test of Western resolve. Senate Majority Leader John Thune backed up the administration's messaging by reaffirming support for US defensive posture should Iran retaliate against American interests. Though public denials of involvement continue, the message to Tehran remains forceful: no nuclear weapons—by diplomacy or deterrence. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What the US Knows: Escalation is likely While maintaining a public stance of restraint, the US is clearly preparing for the possibility of retaliation. President Trump acknowledged that American forces in the region were being repositioned: 'They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place.' Embassy staff have been evacuated in Iraq and departures were authorised in Bahrain and Kuwait signalling that the administration is treating the situation as imminently volatile. Rubio further noted that 'President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners.' Intelligence assessments have reportedly warned of Iranian plans to target American bases in the Gulf if they perceive the US as complicit. Even without direct involvement, the US is now exposed to the consequences of Israel's military gambit. And Trump told a Fox News anchor that he was 'aware' of the Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. A delicate balancing act The Trump administration's current posture reflects a multi-layered strategy: project diplomatic distance to preserve peace talks, signal support for Israel's fundamental security concerns and protect American personnel from retaliation. Rubio's measured tone—acknowledging Israel's reasoning without endorsing it—reflects that high-wire act. The shadow over Oman The sixth round of nuclear negotiations between the US and Iran, scheduled to take place this Sunday in Oman, now hangs by a thread. Tehran may view Israel's actions—and Washington's refusal to condemn them—as proof that diplomacy is futile. At the same time, Iran's leadership is under domestic pressure to respond forcefully. What was supposed to be a breakthrough round could now become a post-mortem on a collapsing diplomatic process. Three realities, one crisis The current US stance is shaped by three overlapping realities. It publicly denies involvement, it adamantly opposes an Iranian nuclear weapon, and it quietly braces for the fallout of a conflict it did not initiate but cannot entirely escape. Whether diplomacy or confrontation prevails in the coming days will depend not only on Iran's next move , but on how credibly the US can manage the contradiction between what it says, what it wants and what it already knows.