Seven popular cars banned from parking in UK car parks due to new 'length rule'
Drivers who own high end cars including Kia, BMW, Tesla and Range Rover are now banned from parking their vehicles in UK car parks.
Owners of seven popular cars from top-selling brands like BMW, Kia, and Mercedes have been hit with a startling revelation that they're now banned from parking in public car parks. This unexpected ban arises from an obscure regulation about the length of parking spaces.
Autocar has confirmed with five local councils that vehicles too lengthy for their provided spots are now officially prohibited from using any council-operated car parks. Vehicles exceeding five metres in length will find no space in these car parks, where the parking bay size maxes out at just 4.8 metres.
As cars have generally increased in size over time, this poses an issue as councils stand ready to penalise drivers whose vehicles overflow the boundaries of parking bays, the Express reports. New Forest Council shed light on the issue: "The standard parking space has remained at a consistent size for several decades.
"However, national research has shown that on average, cars have got larger over time, both in width and in length."
They pointed out the rising growth in vehicle dimensions which has drastically increased over the years.
The council stated: "In 1965 the top five models sold in the UK had an average width of 1.5 m and average length of 3.9 m, compared to an average width of 1.8 m and length of 4.3 m for the top five sellers of 2020."
Some of the luxury best selling vehicles which could be affected by the ban include the Mercedes S-Class, Tesla Model S and the BMW 7 Series.
Swanky SUVs such as Range Rovers, Audi A8, the Kia EV9 and the opulent Rolls Royce Cullinan are also at risk but there are others including high end sports car which would also be barred.
An FOI request from Autocar was submitted to every council in the UK.
They enquired whether they planned to extend parking bays to accommodate longer cars, now a common sight on British roads, as many have not been updated for decades.
Five local authorities so far in Wokingham, South Hampshire, Broadland, South Suffolk and West Devon, have informed Autocar that they had effectively prohibited any cars which don't fit into their spaces.
Wokingham Council has now published the details of the FOI on its website.
The council was asked: "Are cars exceeding a certain length banned from any of your car parks?"
In response, the council stated: "We have a limit on size of vehicle and weight of vehicle allowed to use the car parks these were introduced at different dates as shown below.
"Since June 2023 All motor vehicles whose maximum length does not exceed 5,00 metres and overall height exceeds 2.10 metres and whose gross weight does not exceed 3050 kilogrammes, except for access."
Owners of the cars which are potentially at risk will need to keep an eye out on updates from their local council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
12 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Keir Starmer promises to build warships in Scotland in boost ‘for generations'
The Prime Minister is due to visit Glasgow on Monday 'BUILDING THE FUTURE' Keir Starmer promises to build warships in Scotland in boost 'for generations' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) LABOUR will secure Scots shipbuilding's future 'for generations to come', the PM will announce on Monday. We can reveal Sir Keir Starmer will commit the UK Government to constructing warships here. 4 Sir Keir Starmer has promised to build warships in Scotland Credit: Alamy 4 The Prime Minister said his plans will boost jobs and investment along the River Clyde Credit: Alamy 4 Sir Keir Starmer said, 'Scotland is the beating heart of the UK's shipbuilding industry' Credit: AP The 'always on' supply line will boost jobs and investment along the Clyde. The Labour leader will visit Glasgow on Monday with Defence Secretary John Healey to outline plans to spend three per cent of GDP on defence within a decade as part of a strategic review. He promised Scotland would see a 'defence dividend' from the major increase in investment in the Armed Forces. On Sunday, Sir Keir said: 'Scotland is the beating heart of the United Kingdom's shipbuilding industry. 'For over a century, workers on the Clyde and Rosyth have been the backbone of Britain's maritime strength. 'Scottish shipbuilding backs thousands of secure, well-paid jobs. "But people aren't just building ships, they're building the future strength of the Royal Navy and national security.' He added: 'Through the Strategic Defence Review, our UK Labour government is backing the Scottish shipbuilding industry for generations to come. "Scotland will see a defence dividend from our record investment.' The SDR also commits the MoD to 'create conditions for sustained innovation and industrial support to the Navy'. Douglas Ross kicked out of FMQs for rowdy behaviour The UK Government has already committed £41billion to build four Dreadnought-class nuclear subs — with Faslane expected to maintain them. Last week, the first Type 31 frigate was unveiled at Babcock's yard at Rosyth in Fife. And the first Type 26 frigate, HMS Glasgow, was named by the Princess of Wales at BAE Systems' Scotstoun yard in Glasgow last month. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'We are yet to see the detail of the Spending Review, but given Scotland's significant naval shipbuilding expertise, we would expect that any future contracts will provide a substantial contribution to our economy. 'Historically SMEs in Scotland receive one of the lowest proportions of defence spending in the UK (under two per cent compared to almost 13 per cent in the North East). "It is vital the UK Government follows through on its commitment to reform defence procurement so that more Scottish SMEs can successfully bid for defence contracts. 'We are committed to ensuring Scotland is the home of manufacturing innovation, but our long-standing position is that we do not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions.'
Auto Car
a day ago
- Auto Car
Matt Prior: I bought an Audi A2 for £500 – and it's brilliant
One of the things people love to say about the Audi A2 is that it was ahead of its time. It's the opinion people seem to hold most about the small Audi. And I get that: if you pulled the wraps from it today, it would still look modern. In October last year, Audi did just that, when it revealed the A2 E-tron concept restomod to celebrate the car's 25th anniversary, and it looked as fresh as a piglet. But if the A2 was 'ahead of its time', it must still be a long, long way ahead of its time, because more than a quarter of a century after it was launched, the world is not oversupplied with compact aluminium four-seaters that weigh less than 900kg and measure 3.8m long. No, instead the family car market is filled with very un-A2ish things: steel, heavy and crossovery. Influentially, and financially, the Audi A2 was a dead end. Audi sold just 176,000 of them globally over five years, at a time when Ford was selling 125,000 Focuses, in the UK alone, every year. The car that has come closest to following it, spiritually, was perhaps the BMW i3. BMW sold fewer than 25,000 of those a year too. And yet, and yet. What we once called Audi's 'nearly successful' A2 must have made a cultural impact because, believe me, people do like to talk about it. I've written about thousands of different cars over the years but my inbox has never known anything like the correspondence I've received since I bought an A2 in February. I've heard from the owners' club, talked with an owner who also has a McLaren F1, and heard from a guy who owns eight A2s. My car's previous owner was grateful I picked it up early, because he didn't want his mum to visit and see it was going. I still don't know enough about the A2, but I'm starting to see how it's adored. And it's easy to understand why.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Centrelink recipient wins massive $250,000 payout after his insurer refused to pay up when his $65,000 BMW was wrecked
A Centrelink recipient has been awarded $250,000 after his insurer refused to pay him out when his $65,000 BMW was damaged while parked on a street. Insurer IAG had rejected the man's claim after his BMW was written off following a collision, but the owner of the vehicle hit back and filed a case with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). IAG rejected the man's case on the basis the collision scenario was 'implausible', the Daily Telegraph reported. In the case filed with the AFCA, the man refuted every allegation made against him and won. The insurance giant said the man, who has not been identified, claimed the driver had 'motive' to make a false claim because he stood to benefit financially from the claim and Centrelink benefits appeared to be his main income. Hitting back at the insurer, the man said he earned up to $40,000 a month trading on the stock market and with cryptocurrencies. The man had purchased the BMW for $65,000 days before initially insuring the vehicle for $280,000 and subsequently lowering it to $250,000. AFCA's adjudicator revealed phone recordings showed the man hadn't known how much to insure the car for, with the insurer informing him the average value for his BMW was between $175,000 and $325,000. The collision took place seven months later after the man and his partner had left it parked on a street and taken an Uber to a restaurant. IAG said the man had 'opportunity' and questioned why he hadn't taken the car to the restaurant or found a secure car park for the vehicle. The man said that he and his partner had decided they would have a drink at the restaurant. He also explained that because the street had no parking restrictions he saw no reason why he should waste time driving his car home before the meal. Although the adjudicator accepted these explanations, the insurer continued to lodge further allegations. IAG said the man had not been frank as he failed to mention he was disqualified from driving, he had a previous claim and he didn't call the police after discovering his car was damaged. The insurer also said the damage to the BMW was 'malicious'. A report from the insurer's crash investigator said the collision likely occurred due to a reversing truck doing a three-point turn on an unsuitable stretch of road. 'The report does not provide any specific information as to why the roadway is not conducive to a three-point turn being conducted,' the adjudicator said. The unnamed adjudicator ruled in the complainant's favour and the man received $250,000 plus interest. 'I accept there are inconsistencies, but I am not persuaded these alone, even when considered together, satisfy the burden of proof to establish the complainant has acted fraudulently or failed to be truthful and frank, to the degree where it would allow the insurer to decline the claim,' the adjudicator said. An IAG spokesman said an investigation can be required for certain claims due to the cost and importance of identifying possible fraudulent claims. But the financial settlement was immediately awarded to the man in question as soon as AFCA stated the decision.
