Asia-Pacific Countries Endorse Bold Steps For Greener, Resilient Cities At UN Assembly
Bangkok, 25 April 2025
Countries across the Asia-Pacific region have agreed to intensify cooperation to drive sustainable and resilient urban development, adopting a new resolution at the close of the 81st session of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) today. The resolution highlights the urgency of addressing challenges such as climate risks, infrastructure gaps, overcrowding and social inequalities amid fast-paced urbanization.
'The solutions lie within the diversity of our region,' shared United Nations Under-Secretary-General and Executive Secretary of ESCAP Armida Salsiah Alisjahbana in her closing remarks. 'We have deftly navigated through past crises and emerged stronger together. Our capabilities will provide solutions to our contemporary challenges and allow us to anticipate those that have yet to emerge.'
Governments committed to expanding regional and subregional partnerships to share know-how, align urban policies with the Sustainable Development Goals, and support local authorities in building livable and inclusive cities. The resolution calls for greater investment in digital innovation, low-carbon transport, nature-based solutions and climate- and disaster-resilient infrastructure.
The resolution also recognizes the critical role of city leaders and community networks in shaping urban futures. It encourages local action through integrated planning, sustainable financing and climate-smart strategies that respond to unique national and local contexts.
As the region becomes increasingly urban, countries emphasized the importance of ensuring equitable access to services for all, advancing gender equality, and creating employment and entrepreneurship opportunities that leave no one behind.
A second resolution adopted at the session responds to intensifying water-related challenges driven by climate change in the region. ESCAP member States expressed concern over increasing water stress, the growing frequency and severity of water-related disasters, and the alarming retreat of mountain glaciers and thawing permafrost, which threaten both ecosystems and livelihoods. It urges countries to adopt integrated water management approaches, enhance institutional capacity, invest in resilient infrastructure, and involve youth, civil society and communities in decision-making.
Another key outcome from the session focuses on the need for targeted international support to help middle-income countries address ongoing development hurdles. The adopted text advocates moving beyond income-based metrics by incorporating vulnerability indices and underscores the value of South-South and triangular cooperation, while reiterating that these efforts must complement, not replace, North-South cooperation. Countries additionally adopted a fourth ESCAP resolution reaffirming their commitment to advancing digital inclusion and transformation in the region.
Around a thousand delegates from 43 member States, associate members and observer countries as well as various stakeholder groups and international organizations attended the session held from 21 to 25 April in Bangkok.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
44 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Leaked files reveal China is using AI to erase history of Tiananmen Square massacre
By Bang Xiao , ABC Photo: Getty Images Hundreds of pages of classified documents leaked to the ABC have offered an unprecedented glimpse into China's infamous censorship regime. It has grown faster, smarter and increasingly invisible, quietly erasing the memory of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre from public view. Thirty-six years on, Beijing still has not disclosed the official death toll of the bloody crackdown on a pro-democracy gathering on June 4, when more than 1 million protesters were in the square. Historians estimate that the People's Liberation Army (PLA) killed anywhere from 200 to several thousand people that day. More than 230 pages of censorship instructions prepared by Chinese social media platforms were shared by industry insiders with the ABC. They were intended to be circulated among multi-channel networks or MCNs - companies that manage the accounts of content creators across multiple social and video platforms like Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok. The files reveal deep anxiety among Chinese authorities about the spread of any reference to the most violently suppressed pro-democracy movement in the country's history. The documents instruct MCNs to remove any content that depicts state violence and include compilations of text, images and video content for reference. The reference material includes graphic scenes of the People's Liberation Army opening fire on civilians, while others say students attacked the soldiers. The ABC understands that the material is being used by frontline content censors to train artificial intelligence tools to moderate vast amounts of content, under the direction of the Cyberspace Administration of China - the country's top internet regulator. China's vast censorship regime relies on hundreds of thousands of human moderators to keep social media platforms compliant. There is also a structured process for censoring posts. Every post is first scanned by AI systems - known as a machine review - which are particularly sensitive to any references to the Tiananmen anniversary. When the ABC asked the Chinese-made AI chatbot DeepSeek to tell us about the massacre, it answered: "That topic is beyond my current scope. Let's talk about something else." Chinese AI chatbot DeepSeek repeatedly refused to answer the ABC's questions about the Tiananmen Square massacre. Photo: ABC / Bang Xiao One of the documents, a 2022 training manual for censors working for Douyin directly referenced the world-famous Tank Man image, labelling it a "subversive picture". The document also said that any visual metaphor resembling the sequence of one man facing four tanks - even "one banana and four apples in a line" - could be instantly flagged by an algorithm designed to pick up references to the massacre, especially during the first week of June. And when an uploaded video gains traction or matches sensitive patterns, it enters a "traffic pool" and may be escalated through four levels of human checks. Lennon Chang, a cyber risk expert from Deakin University, told the ABC that AI had made the censorship of visual and symbolic references far more feasible in real-time. "Even if you replace the tank man image with bananas and apples, the algorithm has learned the pattern," Chang said. "They use computer vision, natural language processing and real-time filtering. It doesn't change the nature of censorship, but it makes it more powerful." The guidelines also prohibit seemingly innocuous symbols such as candles and flowers that could be interpreted as commemorative. Chang explains that this shift toward algorithmic filtering has deepened the risk of historical amnesia. "If censorship keeps going and is increasingly powered by AI, our future generations might not be able to know what happened," he said. "The data they see will already be filtered and sanitised. It creates a fake world - a fake history." The leaked documents also shed light on the lives of censors, who work under close oversight from the Cyberspace Administration. All censors are required to pass multiple exams to ensure they are vigilant and can respond swiftly to remove potentially risky content - a crucial safeguard to prevent platforms from being suspended or shut down by authorities. Everything visible online needs to be checked: videos, images, captions, live streams, comments and text. Algorithms are trained to detect visual cues, while human censors are on alert for coded language, disguised symbols and unusual emoji combinations that may signal dissent. Documents also show censors must meet strict productivity targets - some are expected to review hundreds of posts per hour. Their behaviour, accuracy and speed are tracked by internal monitoring software. Mistakes can result in formal warnings or termination. One former and three current workers at ByteDance, the owner of TikTok and Douyin, also spoke to the ABC about their jobs. The employees requested anonymity as they feared repercussions. They said their colleagues suffered from burnout, depression and anxiety due to constant exposure to disturbing, violent or politically sensitive content. One said working as a censor was like "reliving the darkest pages of history every day, while being watched by software that records every keystroke". They are normally paid with a modest salary - often less than $1,500 a month - though the psychological toll is severe. Even though TikTok and Douyin are both owned by Bytedance, they operate as separate platforms. TikTok serves a global audience and is governed by international laws and moderation standards, while Douyin is available only in mainland China and operates under domestic regulations, subject to heavy censorship and direct government oversight. In some cases, platforms in China allow low-risk content to remain online - but under a shadow ban. This means the content is visible to the user who posted it and a limited pool of users. The ABC has reached out to ByteDance for comment. For decades, the first week of June has coincided with routine "system maintenance" - often a euphemism for intensified censorship around the Tiananmen anniversary. Social media platforms like Weibo and WeChat also enforce heavy censorship, especially after a politically sensitive event. A 2022 manual for censors working on the Weibo platform said the Tiananmen massacre was a "sensitive incident" that must "never be shown". It grouped it with a wider ban on content critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or the party chief, President Xi Jinping. Liu Lipeng, a former content moderator for Weibo, says the lead-up to the anniversary is widely known in the industry as a "censorship season", where all staff are on duty and no mistakes are tolerated. "It's the most important event in the whole censorship system. Nothing is as significant," he told the ABC. "Censors must flag any objects arranged in parallel like the tanks, before there was AI. "If a censor can't understand something, they'll send it to a group chat for team discussions." Another document outlines that there is no permanent rule book for censors, as instructions from the government can change daily, with new keywords and forbidden terms added to content filters at any time. Censors are trained to err on the side of caution. One internal memo summarised the approach bluntly: Chang warns that the implications of AI censorship extend beyond China. "If misleading data continues to flow outward, it could influence the AI models the rest of the world relies on," he said. "We need to think hard about how to maintain databases that are neutral, uncensored and accurate - because if the data is fake, the future will be fake too." Despite China's increasing use of AI to automate censorship, Liu believes Chinese people's intelligence will continue to outsmart the technology. While he worries future generations may struggle to access truthful information, he believes people will find new ways to express dissent - even under an airtight system. "After working as a censor for years, I found human creativity can still crush AI censors many times over," he said. The ABC contacted DeepSeek and Weibo for comment. - ABC
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Liberal Lee Jae-myung projected to win South Korea presidency in martial law 'judgment day'
By Joyce Lee and Ju-min Park , Reuters Lee Jae-myung, left, the presidential candidate for South Korea's Democratic Party, and his wife Kim Hye-gyeong acknowledge supporters as they await the final results of the presidential election in Seoul on June 4, 2025. Photo: AFP / Anthony Wallace South Korea's liberal party candidate Lee Jae-myung led with more than 85 percent of the votes counted in Tuesday's snap presidential election, six months to the day after he evaded military cordons to vote against a shock martial law decree. His conservative rival, Kim Moon-soo of the People Power Party, conceded the race and congratulated Lee. Lee's victory stands to usher in a political sea change in Asia's fourth-largest economy, after the backlash against the martial law brought down Yoon Suk Yeol , the conservative outsider who narrowly beat Lee in the 2022 election. Nearly 80 percent of South Korea's 44.39 million eligible voters cast their ballots, the highest turnout for a presidential election in the country since 1997, with Lee terming the polls "judgment day" against Yoon's martial law and the PPP's failure to distance itself from that decision. Preliminary vote tallies and exit polls by the country's major broadcasters had Lee defeating Kim by comfortable margins. A joint exit poll by broadcasters KBS, MBC and SBS, which has in previous elections mostly been in line with the final results, put Lee on 51.7 percent and Kim on 39.3 percent. A separate survey by broadcaster JTBC put Lee on 50.6 percent and Kim on 39.4 percent. Channel A also predicted a Lee win by similar margins. Reuters has not independently confirmed the results of the surveys. The decree and the six months of ensuing turmoil, which saw three different acting presidents and multiple criminal insurrection trials for Yoon and several top officials, marked a stunning political self-destruction for the former leader and effectively handed the presidency to his main rival. Yoon was impeached by the Lee-led parliament , then removed from office by the Constitutional Court in April, less than three years into his five-year term, triggering the snap election that now stands to remake the country's political leadership and foreign policies of a key US ally. Lee has accused the PPP of having condoned the martial law attempt by not fighting harder to thwart it and even trying to save Yoon's presidency. Kim was Yoon's labour minister when the former president declared martial law on 3 December. "I was here on December 3 after martial was declared and December 14 when Yoon was impeached," said Choi Mi-jeong, 55, a science teacher who gathered outside parliament to hear Lee speak after the election. "Now Lee Jae-myung is becoming president. I hope he will become a leader who supports ordinary people, not vested interests, not a small number of riches." In a brief speech to those supporters, Lee said he would fulfil the duties of the office if he wins as expected. He also vowed to bring unity to the country, revive the economy, and seek peace with nuclear-armed North Korea. Official results were expected to be certified by the National Election Commission on Wednesday morning after ballots were sorted and counted by machine, then triple-checked by election officials by hand to verify accuracy. Just hours later, the inauguration ceremony is planned. Park Chan-dae, acting leader of Lee's Democratic Party, told KBS that the projections suggested voters rejected the martial law attempt and were hoping for an improvement in their livelihoods. "I think people made a fiery judgment against the insurrection regime," he said. The winner must tackle challenges including a society deeply scarred by divisions made more obvious since the attempt at military rule, and an export-heavy economy reeling from unpredictable protectionist moves by the United States, a major trading partner and a security ally. Both Lee and Kim pledged change for the country, saying a political system and economic model set up during its rise as a budding democracy and industrial power are no longer fit for purpose. Their proposals for investment in innovation and technology often overlapped, but Lee advocated more equity and help for mid- to low-income families while Kim campaigned on giving businesses more freedom from regulations and labour strife. Lee is expected to be more conciliatory toward China and North Korea, but has pledged to continue the Yoon-era engagement with Japan. Kim branded Lee a "dictator" and his Democratic Party a "monster," warning if the former human rights lawyer becomes president, nothing will stop them from working together to amend laws simply because they do not like them. "The economy has gotten so much worse since December 3, not just for me but I hear that from everybody," Kim Kwang-ma, 81, said. "And we as a people have become so polarised... I wish we could come together so that Korea can develop again." There were no female candidates running in Tuesday's election for the first time in 18 years. Despite polls showing wide gaps between young men and women, gender equality was not among the key policy issues put forward during this election, a stark contrast from the 2022 vote. "One thing I am a bit frustrated about with mainstream candidates whether Lee Jae-myung or other conservative candidates is they lack policy on women or minority groups," said Kwon Seo-hyun, 18, a university freshman and first-time voter who went out to the streets for anti-Yoon protests following his martial law. -Reuters
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
Oral Questions for 3 June 2025
Questions to Ministers CHLÖE SWARBRICK to the Prime Minister: E tautoko ana ia i nga korero me nga mahi katoa a tona Kawanatanga? Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? Rt Hon CHRIS HIPKINS to the Prime Minister: Does he stand by all his Government's statements and actions? LAURA McCLURE to the Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety: What recent announcements has she made about reforming WorkSafe? NANCY LU to the Minister of Finance: What recent announcements has she made about business tax? Hon BARBARA EDMONDS to the Minister of Finance: Does she stand by her statement about the Budget that "Wages are forecast to grow faster than the inflation rate, making wage earners better off, on average, in real terms"; if so, what is the effect on wage growth over the forecast period of removing the $12.8 billion from future pay equity claims? Dr VANESSA WEENINK to the Minister responsible for RMA Reform: What announcements has he made on reforming national direction under the Resource Management Act 1991? TANYA UNKOVICH to the Minister for Resources: What announcements has he made regarding energy security in New Zealand? Hon Dr AYESHA VERRALL to the Minister of Health: Does he stand by his statement in relation to emergency department wait times, "I expect Health New Zealand to empower clinicians at local levels to fix bottlenecks in real time"; if so, is he confident this has occurred ahead of winter 2025? Dr HAMISH CAMPBELL to the Minister of Education: What announcements has she made regarding learning support as part of Budget 2025? Hon MARAMA DAVIDSON to the Prime Minister: E tautoko ana ia i nga korero me nga mahi katoa a tona Kawanatanga? Does he stand by all of his Government's statements and actions? Hon JAN TINETTI to the Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety: Does she stand by her proposed changes to WorkSafe; if so, why? PAULO GARCIA to the Associate Minister of Housing: What recent announcements has he made about social housing tenancies? Question to Member Hon Dr DUNCAN WEBB to the Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee: Why did he respond to the referral by the House to the Finance and Expenditure Committee of the Regulatory Standards Bill with a six-month reporting deadline by issuing a call for submissions with a four-week deadline? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
