logo
64% of commercial vehicle operators fail safety audit, says JPJ

64% of commercial vehicle operators fail safety audit, says JPJ

JPJ director-general Aedy Fadly Ramli said some companies had no safety action plans in place and did not display hotline numbers or the names of responsible officers on their vehicles for public complaints. (Bernama pic)
PETALING JAYA : The road transport department (JPJ) found that 64% of commercial vehicle operators failed an audit on mandatory safety requirements, in a recent nationwide operation.
Its director-general Aedy Fadly Ramli said the operation, which began on June 23, saw audits carried out on 133 companies operating commercial vehicles, Bernama reported.
He said only 48 companies passed the audit while the other 85 failed as they did not comply with JPJ Inspection and Safety Audit (Jisa) guidelines.
'The non-compliant companies comprised 43 lorry operators and 42 tour and express bus operators,' he was quoted as saying.
Among the key violations were the failure to appoint occupational safety and health officers (OSHO), lack of GPS installation in all vehicles and poor GPS monitoring practices.
Many companies also failed to record drivers' working hours, which must not exceed eight hours a day, and to ensure that drivers take a break of at least 30 minutes for every four hours of driving.
Aedy said some companies had no safety action plans in place and did not display hotline numbers or the names of responsible officers on their vehicles for public complaints.
'The department will submit the list of non-compliant companies to the Land Public Transport Agency (Apad) for further action, including recommendations for possible suspension or cancellation of operating licences,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tax rule change: No more 2pc deduction for deceased agents, dealers and distributors effective August 1, says IRB
Tax rule change: No more 2pc deduction for deceased agents, dealers and distributors effective August 1, says IRB

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

Tax rule change: No more 2pc deduction for deceased agents, dealers and distributors effective August 1, says IRB

PUTRAJAYA, June 30 — The Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) will no longer accept the two per cent tax deduction involving deceased agents, dealers or distributors (Resident Individuals) (EPP), effective Aug 1. In a statement today, LHDN said the decision was made as the term 'individual' under Section 2 of the Income Tax Act (ACP) 1967 is defined as a living person or 'natural person'. 'Therefore, if an EPP has passed away, they are no longer categorised as an individual under this provision. 'In the event that income is still received after the death of the EPP, it must be managed by the executor, administrator, heir or legal representative and reported under the Deceased Person's Estate (TP) file,' said the LHDN. The statement added that the executor, administrator, heir or legal representative of the deceased must register the TP file at any LHDN office by completing the Notification of Taxpayer's Demise (CP57) form and submitting supporting documents, including a copy of the death certificate and the grant of probate or letter of administration. In this regard, LHDN advised the paying company as well as the heirs' representatives or estate administrators to take note of the ruling and act accordingly in managing the deceased's income, in line with existing tax laws and procedures. For users' convenience, LHDN said Form CP57 can be downloaded from its official portal via quick access at According to LHDN, under Section 107D of the ACP 1967, companies are required to make a two per cent tax deduction on cash payments to a deceased EPP. The deduction is applicable to resident individuals who have been appointed by the paying company as EPPs and who receive payments from sales proceeds, transactions or schemes carried out in that capacity. — Bernama

Ex-investment banker jailed 2 years, fined RM1mil for securities fraud
Ex-investment banker jailed 2 years, fined RM1mil for securities fraud

Free Malaysia Today

timean hour ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Ex-investment banker jailed 2 years, fined RM1mil for securities fraud

Former investment banker Ruwan Amaresh Shaun Ponniah also pleaded guilty to carrying out fund management activities without a licence. (Pexels pic) PETALING JAYA : A former CIMB investment banker was sentenced to two years' imprisonment and fined RM1 million today for defrauding investors of RM201,000. Ruwan Amaresh Shaun Ponniah was sentenced by Kuala Lumpur sessions court judge Norma Ismail after he pleaded guilty to one charge of investment fraud under Section 179(b) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA). The Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) said the court took into consideration nine other similar charges under Section 179(b) of the CMSA. This consideration was made under Section 171A of the Criminal Procedure Code, which allows the court to bundle related or admitted offences into a single sentence, it said in a statement. Ruwan, a former associate director of debt capital markets at CIMB Investment Bank, was arrested and charged by the SC last September with 10 charges under Section 179(b) of the CMSA and an additional charge under Section 58(1) of the same Act. The SC said Ruwan also pleaded guilty today to the one charge under Section 58(1) of the CMSA for carrying out fund management activities without a licence. The court sentenced him to two years' imprisonment and ordered the jail term to run concurrently with the first offence. Ruwan will have to serve an additional six months' jail if he fails to pay the RM1 million fine. The SC said Ruwan had falsely represented to seven investors that he would invest their monies in shares listed on the Malaysian and foreign stock exchanges. However, the monies were for other purposes without the investors' knowledge. The offences took place between October 2018 and June 2020. Ruwan's guilty plea was made pursuant to his application for a plea bargain under Section 172C of the Criminal Procedure Code. He had claimed trial to all the charges and was granted bail of RM210,000 with one surety. On Feb 5, upon Ruwan's application to the High Court for a reduction in the bail amount, the sum was reduced to RM105,000. However, Ruwan was unable to post bail and has been held in remand at Sungai Buloh prison.

Armizan: Domestic Trade Ministry outlines three-pronged strategy as expanded SST enforcement begins tomorrow
Armizan: Domestic Trade Ministry outlines three-pronged strategy as expanded SST enforcement begins tomorrow

Malay Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Armizan: Domestic Trade Ministry outlines three-pronged strategy as expanded SST enforcement begins tomorrow

KOTA KINABALU, June 30 — The Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Ministry (KPDN) will use three approaches to ensure the smooth running of Op Kesan 4.0, in conjunction with the implementation of the Sales Tax review and expanded scope of the Service Tax tomorrow. Its minister, Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali said it includes implementing the data collection of prices and service charge by ministry price monitoring officers. 'The data will from the basis of comparing prices and service charges before and after the Sales and Service Tax (SST) rate review,' he said at a media conference after an engagement session with a Sabah small and micro traders here today. He said the standard operating procedure for managing complaints on charges, prices and supplies was a good approach in ensuring the operation achieved its objectives, adding that the ministry would take stern action against traders who raised prices indiscriminately, including fines of up to RM100,000 or three years' jail or both for individuals and fines of RM500,000 for companies. On Op Kesan 4.0, he said that it was under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 and its focus was to ensure traders do not take advantage by raising prices of items and services unreasonably, and in violation of the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011. The enforcement scope includes goods and services involved in the SST rate review, including monitoring of goods not involved in the review, such as basic necessities, he added. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store