Jury told to consider accused's drugs use in baby murder trial
Jurors in a baby murder trial have been told to find the defendant not guilty of murder if they believe his cannabis consumption meant that he did not intend to kill her.Thomas Holford, 24, has admitted the manslaughter of Everleigh Stroud, who was rushed to hospital in April 2021, but denies murder and assault causing actual bodily harm.The court previously heard how Mr Holford, of Ramsgate, claimed he had no memory of the incident and had smoked multiple cannabis joints on the evening he attacked his daughter.The jury at Canterbury Crown Court will retire after hearing closing arguments, due to begin on Thursday.
Everleigh suffered severe brain damage as well as broken legs and ribs after she was shaken by Mr Holford at just five weeks of age. Her life support was removed in May 2022.
Lies told
Mr Justice Fordham told the jury: "If you think he was so intoxicated that he did not intend to harm her, you must find him not guilty of count one [murder]."The sole issue for you to determine on count one is whether the prosecution have proved that there was an intention to kill or cause really serious injuries." On count two, assault causing actual bodily harm, jurors were told to decide if injuries to Everleigh's anus, allegedly caused by her father, were deliberate or accidental.Mr Holford has also admitted telling three lies after his arrest but the jury were told this is not always an indication of guilt."If you decide the explanation is, or is maybe true, then you must not hold it against him, you must not convict wholly or mainly because he told lies," Mr Justice Fordham added.The trial continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hazardous waste among 30,000 tonnes of rubbish dumped in woods linked to organised crime
A monumental clean-up operation has commenced in Kent to remove 30,000 tonnes of hazardous waste illegally dumped in a woodland in Kent. The extensive effort at Hoad's Wood in Ashford, coordinated by the Environment Agency, is expected to take a year to complete. The vast quantities of harmful material, which first appeared in 2023, a re piled up to 15ft high in some areas of the woodland. Much of the discarded refuse, comprising household and construction waste, had already undergone mechanical treatment, with the Environment Agency noting "pockets of hazardous waste" within the mounds. The illegal dumping has prompted a significant criminal investigation, with three arrests made in February this year. Authorities are pursuing a "significant number" of lines of inquiry as they continue to probe the organised crime links behind the environmental devastation. This week marked the loading of the first lorries with the contaminated material, destined for safe disposal facilities, signalling the start of the extensive removal process. Emma Viner, enforcement and investigations manager at the Environment Agency, said: 'Today marks an important step in the journey of bringing Hoad's Wood back as a sanctuary for both wildlife and people.' The clean-up operation is reportedly expected to cost up to £15 million. Hoad's Wood has been designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest by Natural England and is home to rare plants and wildlife which may struggle to recover after the waste is removed. Ian Rickards, area manager at Kent Wildlife Trust, told the PA news agency: 'The habitat that's there is destroyed and lost but … it is possible to create a habitat within there which will work with the woodland and have some benefit to wildlife.' So far 170 trees have had to be cut down because of the polluted soil at the site. Mr Rickards said that buzzards, foxes, badgers and deer, along with fungi, wild flowers and invertebrates, have all suffered from the illegal dumping. He continued: 'There's only one direction to go really from this, you can't … it shouldn't really be able to get any worse, hopefully lessons have been learnt because what would (be) worse is if this happens somewhere else.' Nature minister Mary Creagh said the Government is 'determined' to crack down on waste criminals. The lorries which began their work this week are likely to keep running until Christmas. After Christmas, the Environment Agency and contracted waste services company, Acumen, will assess how much of the perimeter of the site has also been damaged. There was concern amongst workers as to what will happen to the site when the clean-up is finished and the agency's court order allowing them to control the site expires. Ms Viner said: 'The Environment Agency aren't the landowners here at Hoad's Wood but we are supporting conversations between different parties to look at the future. 'So, we're not just going to walk away, we are involved in supporting those conversations and will be going forward.' Mr Rickards said he was concerned that the Environment Agency could walk away from the site without setting a clear path for its future. 'I'm hoping the Environment Agency and the other agencies' goal here is to restore this woodland as best as possible,' he said.
The Sun
39 minutes ago
- The Sun
Hardman con Charles Bronson bids for freedom as he faces ninth parole hearing after 50 years inside
HARDMAN con Charles Bronson is preparing for his ninth parole hearing since his minimum jail term expired in 2003. The lag — repeatedly given more time inside for violence and hostage-taking — appears before a panel in October. A source said Bronson, now 72 and calling himself Charles Salvador, had been trying to avoid bust-ups at HMP Woodhill, Bucks. They added: 'He insists he has changed. He has high hopes of being successful this time.' Luton -born Bronson, real name Michael Peterson, was convicted of armed robbery in 1974, aged 21. Apart from two brief spells, he has been inside ever since. He told his last failed parole bid in 2023 that he had done 'more porridge than Goldilocks and the Three Bears' and was sick of it. At that hearing Bronson said he could now better control his emotions. He said: "I was battling against the system. "It was my way of getting back and there's nothing like wrapping a governor up like a Christmas turkey. "I have slept in body belts, I have slept in strait-jackets. But how much longer have I got to go? "I'm ready now, I'm a chilled-out man, I feel comfortable in myself. "I handle situations 100 times better than I used to." 1
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Moment 92-year-old is arrested at home over murder and rape of a pensioner almost 60 years ago
This is the moment a 92-year-old man was arrested at his home for the alleged rape and murder of a woman nearly six decades ago. Police bodyworn camera footage captured pensioner Ryland Headley being detained on suspicion of killing of Louisa Dunne in what was Britain's oldest cold case review. A trial into the murder of the 75-year-old in Bristol on June 27, 1967 remains ongoing. But after the video of Headley's arrest was shown to the jury, Avon and Somerset Police released the clip publicly - sharing what are the first images of the defendant. In the footage, a startled-looking Headley asks cops 'where are you getting this from?' as he is arrested. The video starts with officers turning up to his home in Ipswich, Suffolk, and asking if Headley can open up his door. He responds by asking 'who are you?' and then when he is told it's the police, he states: 'No, no. You can't come now. What do you want to come in for?' The female police officer adds: 'I'll explain, because it's a bit sensitive so we'd like to come in to speak to you properly please.' Headley tells cops: 'I've just got up and I'm very sick. I'm very sick. Not well at all.' The startled defendant then asks: 'What is this about?' The officer responds: 'I'll tell you inside because we don't want other people hearing. So can we just come inside and get you seated?' A second officer is heard telling him: 'I'm here today because I'm arresting you on suspicion of the rape and murder of Louisa Dunne, which happened in Bristol, in June 1967. 'The reason I'm arresting you is because the police have investigative material that indicates that you were responsible for that rape and murder of Mrs Dunne, which happened at Britannia Road in eastern Bristol, June 1967.' Throughout, Headley repeats 'yeah' at regular intervals. The officer then reads him his rights and Headley adds: 'Wait, wait. Where are you getting all this from?' The officer states: 'We have investigative information, so we have material that suggests that it is yourself and we need to arrest you and take you into custody so we can conduct an interview with you. 'So we can hear your events and interview you about it.' The trial was told Louisa's body was found by neighbours the morning after the horror attack in 1967. However, in the decades that followed no-one was brought to justice over her death, Bristol Crown Court heard. Her skirt, along witih other items from the scene, were kept in storage and were recently reexamined to try and make a breakthrough. Jurors have been told there is 'extremely strong' scientific evidence to suggest semen samples found on the skirt came from her alleged murderer. Giving evidence, a forensic scientist told jurors that recent direct DNA matches linking semen samples from Mrs Dunne's pubic hair and the blue skirt suggested they were 'one billion times' more likely to have come from Headley than from anyone else. An earlier statement from pathologist Dr Albert Hunt, who carried out Mrs Dunne's autopsy, revealed the cause of her death as asphyxiation due to strangulation and pressure on the mouth. Headley, of Ipswich, Suffolk, denies raping and murdering Ms Dunne in June 1967. The trial continues.
