Ukraine reports major Russian strikes overnight (VIDEOS)
Ukrainian officials have claimed that Moscow launched multiple waves of missile and drone strikes on Kiev and other cities across the country overnight. The Russian Ministry of Defense has yet to comment.
Multiple explosions were reported across several districts of Kiev and its suburbs early Friday morning, with mayor Vitaly Klitschko claiming that Ukrainian air defenses were engaging incoming missiles and drones. The official initially said that debris had only fallen on the territory of non-residential buildings. He later claimed that at least four people were killed and 20 injured.
Surveillance footage reportedly captured by a CCTV camera somewhere in the Kiev region appeared to show the moment a US-supplied Patriot air defense system attempted to engage an incoming missile with four interceptors before apparently being hit.
🇷🇺 New footage from Kiev shows U.S.-supplied Patriot PAC-2 and PAC-3 systems launching interceptors amid a Russian Iskander missile strike.Multiple impacts visibly captured on camera despite defensive launches. pic.twitter.com/cxivXJbzpC
Blasts were also reported in the western regions of Ternopol and Lviv, in the western Ukrainian city of Lutsk, in Kremenchug in central Ukraine, and elsewhere across the country.
Multiple blurred out videos shared across Ukrainian social media appeared to show the aftermath of the strikes, but the exact locations and the facilities targeted were hard to verify.
The Russian Defense Ministry has not yet issued a statement on the incident. Moscow regularly carries out drone and missile strikes on Ukrainian military infrastructure, insisting that its operations do not target civilian facilities – and blaming Kiev for placing its air defenses in densely populated areas.
On Sunday, Ukrainian drones struck multiple Russian airbases in a coordinated assault targeting long-range, nuclear-capable bombers. Moscow said that most of the incoming drones were intercepted, without confirming any irreparable losses or carrying out any immediate military response.
Kiev also targeted multiple civilian sites in acts of railway sabotage over the weekend, killing at least seven people and injuring over 120 in what Moscow branded acts of terrorism.
Russian President Vladimir Putin told his US counterpart Donald Trump in a phone call on Wednesday that Moscow 'will have to respond' to the attack on the country's nuclear deterrent. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the retaliation would be carried out 'when and how our military deems appropriate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Mission: Regrettable – Ukraine's drone strike blows up in its face
For most people, June 1st is a cheerful date – the start of summer, a celebration of children. But from 2025 onward, it may also be remembered as the day Ukraine launched its largest covert operation in Russia since the start of the conflict. While the full impact of the operation is still unclear, estimates suggest anywhere from a handful to several dozen Russian aircraft were damaged or destroyed. The precise details will likely remain shrouded in speculation. What is certain, however, is that the Russian military must rethink how it defends strategic facilities. The traditional approach – based on intercepting missiles and deploying advanced air-defense systems – has proven inadequate against cheap drones that can be assembled from off-the-shelf parts and launched from almost anywhere. That lesson is now painfully clear. But the military will draw its own conclusions. Our focus should be on the political meaning of what happened. Make no mistake – this was not just a military act. Like much of what Ukraine does, this was political theater, staged for a very specific audience: Donald Trump. Kiev's objective was simple. Derail the Istanbul negotiations and paint Russia as the intransigent party. How? By provoking a furious response – one that would make headlines, stir outrage inside Russia, and force Moscow to walk away from the table. The idea was to provoke a reaction that Ukraine could then parade before Washington. The message? 'See? We told you they don't want peace. Arm us more!' It's not the first time they've tried this tactic. From the attack on the Kursk Bridge to the shelling of Donbass civilians, Ukraine has repeatedly used provocation as a diplomatic weapon – seeking to engineer Russia's diplomatic isolation by sabotaging any steps toward negotiation. And yet, once again, it didn't work. Despite outrage from parts of Russian society, Moscow did not take the bait. Our delegation flew to Istanbul as planned. There, negotiators presented Ukraine with a memorandum reiterating the same terms previously offered. Not a step back. At the same time, humanitarian agreements were reached – including a new exchange of prisoners and the return of fallen fighters' remains. So did Russia 'turn the other cheek'? Hardly. Moscow has adopted a strategy one might call an 'Italian strike' – doing the bare minimum to deny our enemies a propaganda victory, while withholding the kind of breakthroughs that would reward bad-faith behavior. Yes, the humanitarian measures agreed upon in Istanbul are important. But let's not kid ourselves – they are not steps toward a peace settlement. Politically, the situation is unchanged. However, there is a deeper issue now at play – one with far more serious implications. On June 1st, Ukrainian forces didn't just target military bases. They targeted components of Russia's nuclear deterrent. Under our official doctrine, an attack on the strategic nuclear infrastructure is grounds for the use of nuclear weapons. Now, no one is suggesting we nuke Kiev over a few aircraft, no matter how advanced or expensive. That would be disproportionate. But here lies the paradox: If Russia does nothing, it risks undermining the credibility of its own deterrence posture, and that sends a dangerous message. In the Western capitals and among Ukrainian hawks, there are already whispers: 'If they didn't respond to this, maybe they'll tolerate even more.' That may sound absurd – but that's how these people think. Their fantasies become policy more often than one would like. So what is the answer? Let's be honest: repeating slogans like 'our response will be success on the battlefield' won't cut it here. Ukraine's leadership isn't acting out of military logic, but emotional desperation. Their calculation is political. So Russia's response must be political, too – emotionally resonant, unmistakably firm, and, above all, creative. This doesn't mean rash escalation, but we can't rely on the old playbook. Hitting the same military targets again and again achieves little. Striking Ukraine's energy infrastructure? Done. Launching another missile as a 'demonstration'? Predictable. Escalating to mass casualties? Unnecessary and, frankly, counterproductive. So what's left? Innovation. Russia must now think asymmetrically. That might mean a covert action so unexpected that it catches Ukraine completely off guard. Or it could involve striking symbolic targets that shift the psychological balance. The key is to remind Kiev – and its patrons – that nothing they do goes unanswered, and that the cost of provocation will always outweigh the benefit. In truth, Russia has spent too long responding conventionally to a conflict that is anything but conventional. Our adversaries deal in optics, symbols, and theater. To counter that effectively, we must speak the same language – without abandoning our principles or resorting to theatrics of our own. The June 1st attack was not a turning point. But it was a warning. Not just about drones or airfields, but about perception and power. The next move, as always, is Russia's to make. And this time, it must be something they don't article was first published by the online newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia indicated readiness to prioritize POW swap with Ukraine
The Russian delegation made it clear to the Ukrainian team during the latest round of direct talks in Istanbul that Moscow was willing to prioritize and expedite a prisoner exchange, as well as the repatriation of the dead, Deputy Defense Minister Aleksandr Fomin has revealed. His comment came shortly after Russia on Saturday accused Ukraine of refusing to accept the return of its own POWs and the remains of its fallen troops on 'strange' pretexts. A major prisoner exchange, focusing on those heavily wounded and those under 25, was among the key points agreed upon by Moscow and Kiev during the negotiations in Türkiye on June 2. Additionally, Russia unilaterally offered to repatriate the bodies of over 6,000 slain Ukrainian military personnel as a humanitarian gesture. Speaking later on Saturday, Fomin stated that 'while discussing this topic with the Ukrainian delegation [in Istanbul], we specifically emphasized our readiness to address these issues on a priority basis and as swiftly as possible.' He added that on returning to Moscow, Russian officials immediately began preparing for the swap. Fomin characterized the discussions on the matter earlier this month as 'productive' and yielding 'concrete agreements.' He stressed that Russian officials had relayed their proposals to the Ukrainians in advance and that Moscow had been ready to conduct the swap this week, having dispatched its technical team to the Belarus-Ukraine border to work out the specifics. 'Yet, we still have not received Kiev's agreement to conduct humanitarian operations,' the deputy defense minister explained, adding that Ukrainian officials did not show up at the meeting point. Fomin said that Kiev has yet to provide a reason for the delay in the swap. He expressed hope that Ukrainian authorities would soon act on Moscow's proposal, emphasizing Russia's readiness to honor the agreement reached in Istanbul on Monday. Following the first round of direct talks in Istanbul last month, Moscow and Kiev successfully conducted a large prisoner exchange.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine reneging on key peace deal pledge – what we know so far
Ukraine has 'unexpectedly postponed' a prisoner exchange with Russia that was among the key outcomes of negotiations held on Monday in Istanbul, Moscow's top negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, has said. He also stated that Kiev had refused to accept hundreds of bodies of its fallen the talks in Türkiye earlier this week, the two delegations agreed to exchange at least 1,000 prisoners, prioritizing those heavily wounded and those under 25. On top of that, Russia unilaterally offered to repatriate the remains of over 6,000 slain Ukrainian military personnel as a humanitarian Saturday, Medinsky said that Moscow had provided Kiev with a list of 640 heavily wounded and younger prisoners. However, 'the Ukrainian side unexpectedly postponed… the exchange of prisoners of war for an indefinite period,' the official stated, adding that the Ukrainian team 'did not even arrive at the exchange site.' According to Medinsky, Ukraine gave 'various and rather strange' pretexts for this. The official called on 'Kiev to strictly adhere to the schedule and all agreements that had been reached and to immediately begin the exchange,' stressing that the Russian team is on site and 'fully ready to work.'Russia's top negotiator revealed that Ukraine also refused to accept the bodies of its fallen troops, even though the 'first batch of frozen remains of 1,212 Ukrainian soldiers has already arrived in refrigerated trucks at the exchange area.' Russian Defense Ministry representative, Lt. Gen. Aleksandr Zorin confirmed that this was the case, noting that Moscow had four other convoys, each carrying 1,200 sets of remains, ready for transfer as well. 'We confirm our full readiness to implement the Istanbul agreements. We are prepared to transfer all bodies and proceed with the prisoner exchange as agreed,' the official a statement on Saturday, Kiev's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War said that 'instead of a constructive dialogue, we are once again faced with manipulation and attempts to use sensitive humanitarian topics for informational purposes.' Ukrainian authorities further insisted that Russian allegations 'do not correspond to reality or to previous agreements – neither regarding the prisoner exchange nor the repatriation of bodies.' The headquarters claimed that Ukraine had submitted its lists of prisoners to be exchanged, but Russia presented 'alternative lists,' which were not previously agreed upon. It also suggested that while an agreement on the repatriation had indeed been reached, no date had been set, with Moscow undertaking 'unilateral steps.'On Wednesday, Medinsky announced that Russia was ready to begin the swap on June 7, 8, and 9, and that this 'would again become the largest prisoner exchange.' Following the first round of direct talks in Istanbul last month, Moscow and Kiev conducted a massive prisoner swap. Earlier this week, the Russian official also expressed readiness to accept any remains of fallen Russian troops that Ukraine may be holding. Additionally, Moscow offered during the talks to establish temporary humanitarian pauses in specific areas of the battlefield, lasting two to three days, so that both sides could gather the remains of their soldiers. Medinsky said Kiev's negotiators initially supported the idea, only for Vladimir Zelensky to publicly reject the proposal shortly thereafter. According to the Russian presidential aide, the two belligerents had agreed to establish special medical commissions to help create exchange lists for severely injured soldiers 'without the need to wait for big political decisions.' The swaps would be held regularly 'in a routine manner,' Medinsky announced at the Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told RIA Novosti that Ukraine's refusal to accept the bodies of its own dead shows that the 'Kiev regime does not care about its own citizens, either alive or dead.' Speaking to RT, Russian MP Dmitry Belik described Kiev's actions as 'beyond the pale… barbarity [and] absolutely inhumane behavior, whatever flimsy reasons Kiev is giving.' The lawmaker suggested that Ukrainian authorities could be refusing to accept the return of fallen troops to avoid paying compensation to their relatives. State Duma Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Leonid Slutsky echoed this sentiment, saying that 'such behavior is [an example] of rare cynicism,' showing total disregard for the memory of Ukraine's own fallen two rounds of talks between Russia and Ukraine, held on May 16 and June 2, respectively, were the first since the spring of 2022, when Kiev unilaterally pulled out. David Arakhamia, the head of the Ukrainian delegation at the time, later stated that the decision was made following a visit to Kiev by then-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who he said had advised the Ukrainian government not to sign anything and 'just fight.' Johnson has rejected that account. During the latest round of talks earlier this month, Russia and Ukraine exchanged draft memorandums outlining a roadmap toward an eventual peace deal and indicated a willingness to continue direct contacts.
