logo
Harvard Sues Over Trump Barring Foreign Students' US Entry

Harvard Sues Over Trump Barring Foreign Students' US Entry

Mint2 days ago

Harvard University sued to stop the Trump administration from barring its international students' entrance to the US, adding to a high-stakes legal battle between the government and the school.
Harvard asked a judge on Thursday to immediately halt President Donald Trump's proclamation that the university's foreign students will no longer be able to enter the country. The amended lawsuit expands on one the university filed on May 23 over another US effort to stop Harvard from enrolling international students.
Trump said Wednesday that Harvard's refusal to provide records about international student misconduct poses a national security risk. His executive action blocked Harvard's foreign students and researchers from entering the country. Last month, the administration revoked the school's ability to sponsor their visas.
'We hope the court will act swiftly,' Harvard President Alan Garber said in a statement. 'While the court considers our request, contingency plans are being developed to ensure that international students and scholars can continue to pursue their work at Harvard this summer and through the coming academic year.'
Trump's proclamation further escalated his feud with the oldest and richest US university, where foreign students make up 27% of the campus population. Harvard has also sued over the US freezing more than $2.6 billion in federal funding.
Both lawsuits claim Trump is illegally retaliating against Harvard, violating the school's free speech rights because it failed to adhere to his wishes. The White House and Department of Homeland Security didn't immediately respond to messages seeking comment.
Trump's actions are 'part of a concerted and escalating campaign of retaliation by the government in clear retribution for Harvard's exercising its First Amendment rights to reject the government's demands to control Harvard's governance, curriculum, and the 'ideology' of its faculty and students,' lawyers for the university said in the filing in Boston federal court.
Trump's order claims Harvard is 'no longer a trustworthy steward of international student and exchange visitor programs,' accusing the school of failing to address conduct violations and an increase of 'violent crime rates' on campus.It also criticizes Harvard's researchers for partnering with Chinese colleagues in ways it says could advance Beijing's military modernization effort.
The proclamation places a six-month suspension on international students and exchange visitors seeking to do research. It also directs Secretary of State Marco Rubio to review whether the visas of existing foreign nationals at Harvard should be revoked. The US would make an exception for 'any alien whose entry would be in the national interest,' according to the proclamation.
The university has said that it has been in regular contact with DHS and supplied the legally required data and additional disciplinary information on international students.
US District Judge Allison Burroughs has temporarily barred the government from revoking Harvard's participation in its Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which is run by the Department of Homeland Security.
Harvard's more than 7,000 students and researchers who hold visas 'have become pawns in the government's escalating campaign of retaliation,' lawyers for the university said in the lawsuit. 'The proclamation is a patent effort to end-run this court's order.'
Harvard's undergraduate student body president, Abdullah Shahid Sial, went home to Pakistan after the school year ended. Now, whether he comes back to campus for his junior year is 'totally in the hands of U.S. immigration offices.'
'I think the Trump administration has done a very good job of making international students feel unwelcome,' said Sial, 20. 'I feel unwelcome.'
If a judge blocks Trump's latest directive, the case could eventually end up at the Supreme Court. In 2018, the high court ruled that the president has sweeping authority to restrict entry into the country. That 5-4 ruling upheld Trump's travel ban, which barred entry by people from a group of mostly Muslim countries.
The president has sought to reshape Harvard's policies on a wide range of issues, including admissions and faculty hiring practices, citing the pro-Palestinian protests and incidents of antisemitism that rocked college campuses after Hamas' October 2023 attack on Israel started the war in Gaza.
Trump has said he wants to cap Harvard's foreign student enrollment at 15%, revoke its tax-exempt status and cancel its remaining federal contracts.
In another action Wednesday against universities, the Trump administration announced that it was asking an agency to revoke the accreditation of Columbia University.
The case is Harvard v. US Department of Homeland Security, 25-cv-11472, US District Court, District of Massachusetts .
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud goes public: Timeline of their tumultuous partnership
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud goes public: Timeline of their tumultuous partnership

Hindustan Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Elon Musk and Donald Trump's feud goes public: Timeline of their tumultuous partnership

President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk's relationship seems to have taken a downward spiral in the past few days. The pair that once grabbed every opportunity to praise each other's work have now resorted to engaging in frequent social media spats due to a difference of opinion over Trump's new 'Big, Beautiful Bill'. The confrontation reached a peak on Thursday (June 5), after Musk's exit from the Department of Government Efficiency (DoGE). Considering the events of the past year, it may be hard to believe that Musk hasn't always been Trump's biggest fan. During Trump's first run for presidency back in 2016, Musk openly expressed his support for Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton in an interview with CNBC, labeling her environmental and economic policies 'the right ones'. "I feel a bit stronger that he is not the right guy. He doesn't seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States,' Musk said of Trump at the time. Once Trump beat Clinton in the 2016 race to the White House, Musk retained ties with the federal government due to the close contractual interaction between NASA and his company SpaceX. He was also a part of several White House advisory boards such as Trump's Manufacturing Jobs Council. However, when Trump decided to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accords in 2017, Musk publicly voiced his disapproval of the decision by tweeting, 'Climate change is real. Leaving Paris is not good for America or the world.' Trump, however, felt differently and publicaly called Musk a 'great guy' during a 2020 SpaceX launch in Florida. It was in May 2022, that Musk decided to switch his allegiance from blue to red and publically declared his support of the Republican Party, calling the Democrats a 'party of division & hate'. Even though Musk decided to rally behind the GOP, it didn't automatically ensure his support for Trump as the right man for the job. He instead supported Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, a long-time rival of Trump, and even joined a Twitter livestream in May 2023 to support his campaign for the presidency. Despite a social media feud with Trump in 2022, Musk took the call to reinstate Trump's Twitter account after buying the company in October of that year. His account had previously been suspended from the platform following the US Capitol attack on January 6, 2021. This move came four days after Trump announced his third run for the presidency. It was after an assassination attempt during his election rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, that Musk first announced public support for Trump's presidency via a social media post. Trump and Musk came together on an X livestream to share their views on various political topics during which the Tesla CEO expressed a willingness to serve in government by posting a picture of him as a representative of a new department: DoGE. Musk reportedly became the largest spender in the 2024 presidential election by contributing about a quarter of a billion dollars for several Republicans' campaigns, specifically that of Trump. He was then spotted standing next to the presidential candidate in an October rally back at the Pennsylvania location of Trump's failed assassination attempt while wearing a 'Make America Great Again' cap and calling him the only candidate 'to preserve democracy in America'. One of Trump's first moves after returning to the White House was to pass an executive order that materialized DoGE into reality. Musk and former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy were now tasked with identifying and cutting down on wasteful spending and frauds in the bureaucracy. The President also attended a SpaceX 'Starship' launch in Texas during this time to express his support for Musk. January 2025 Trump gave Musk a special shoutout during his election night victory speech by calling him an 'amazing guy' and saying, 'A star is born.' As head of the DoGE, Musk took active measures to cut costs but failed to meet his target of saving up to $1 trillion during his time in office which would have helped cut down on the $36 trillion US debt and possibly circulate stimulus checks among the American population. He was soon included in the President's inner circle as a trusted advisor and regularly attended cabinet meetings or traveled aboard Air Force One. When Trump opponents protested against Musk's company, the President rolled onto the White House's South Lawn in a red Tesla to publically announce support for the car and his friend. He took to social media to applaud Musk for doing a 'FANTASTIC JOB' and said that he would buy a brand new Tesla the very next day. Due to flaking investor confidence in the Tesla CEO's ability to devote time to the company and the lapse of the 130 days for special government employees like Musk, Trump announced that his confidant would soon be leaving DoGE. 'You're invited to stay as long as you want. At some point, he wants to get back home to his cars,' said Trump during a cabinet meeting. During a May 29 CBS interview, Musk expressed his disappointment with several provisions in Trump's new public spending bill which he felt would increase the budget deficit and undermine all the work he had been trying to do at DOGE. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' he said. Trump gave the former DoGE head a farewell the next day as he left office by saying, 'Elon's really not leaving. He's going to be back and forth, I think, I have a feeling.' Once out of office, Musk started voicing his criticism of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' in harsher terms by labeling it a 'disgusting abomination." Trump subsequently threatened to cancel Musk's governmental subsidies and contracts. Musk clapped back by claiming that Trump would not have won the presidency without him. Musk reshared posts critical of the President on his page including one that demanded Trump's impeachment. During the spar, Trump blamed Musk's social media lash-out on his decision to end tax credits for electric vehicles. The feud reached a peak on Thursday when Musk dropped a bomb by claiming that Trump is intentionally shielding the full release of the Epstein files due to his involvement in the case.

Trump travel ban shows ‘deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran
Trump travel ban shows ‘deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump travel ban shows ‘deep hostility' towards Iranians, Muslims, says Iran

Iran on Saturday lambasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries, including Iran, and said that it showed "deep hostility" towards Iranians and Muslims. Iran's foreign ministry posted a statement on X quoting a senior official and said, "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law." Separately, Iran on Saturday slammed the new sanctions imposed by the United States targeting over 30 individuals and entities that Washington said are part of a "shadow banking" network linked to Tehran. It said that the network has laundered billions of dollars through the global financial system. "The new U.S. sanctions ..., are illegal and violate international law, and are further evidence of the deep and continuing hostility of the U.S. ruling regime towards the Iranian people," foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said in a statement, Reuters reported. Earlier on Wednesday, Trump issued a full-entry travel ban on nationals from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Burma (Myanmar), Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Meanwhile, partial restrictions will also be enforced on Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela, limiting immigrant and non-immigrant visas due to high overstay rates or insufficient collaboration between law enforcement. The travel ban was justified by the White House, which cited Taliban control in Afghanistan, Iran and Cuba's state-sponsored terrorism, and Haiti's influx of illegal migrants during the Biden regime. Additionally, countries like Chad (49.54% B1/B2 visa overstay rate) and Eritrea (55.43% F/M/J overstay rate) were flagged for disregarding US immigration laws. 'We will restore the travel ban, some people call it the Trump travel ban, and keep the radical Islamic terrorists out of our country that was upheld by the Supreme Court," Trump had said. The travel ban was also upheld by the Supreme Court which ruled that 'it is squarely within the scope of Presidential authority' and noted that it is 'expressly premised on legitimate purposes'.

Justice department's decision, not mine: Trump on Kilmar Abrego Garcia's US return
Justice department's decision, not mine: Trump on Kilmar Abrego Garcia's US return

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Justice department's decision, not mine: Trump on Kilmar Abrego Garcia's US return

US President Donald Trump said that it was the Department of Justice, not him, that made the decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to the United States after he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. The decision has drawn criticism from opponents of Trump's immigration policies, who say it shows how civil rights can be ignored in the government's rush to deport Garcia, a 29-year-old Salvadoran national, was returned to the US to face federal charges for alleged human smuggling over several years. According to Attorney General Pam Bondi, he was flown back to stand trial after having been wrongly deported from Maryland on March 15, two months before any charges were formally an immigration judge's 2019 ruling that restricted his deportation due to the risk of gang-related persecution in El Salvador, Abrego Garcia was sent to the country, where he was briefly detained in a high-security facility known as the Terrorism Confinement Center. In an interview with NBC News, Trump emphasized that the decision to return Abrego Garcia was handled by the Justice Department. 'That wasn't my decision. The Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine," he said, adding that he hadn't discussed the matter with El Salvador's President Nayib Garcia, who has a wife and child, both US citizens, living in Maryland, made a court appearance in Nashville, Tennessee on Friday. His arraignment is scheduled for June 13. He will remain in federal custody until found guilty, he will serve his sentence in the US before facing deportation once again. The Trump administration has claimed he is affiliated with the MS-13 gang, a charge his attorneys firmly deny. One of his lawyers, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, rejected the accusations as "fantastical."Trump said he believes the case should be straightforward, accusing Abrego Garcia of having a 'horrible record of abuse' toward women, although no supporting details were inputs from ReutersTune InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store