
‘Our constitution is easy prey': GOP lawmakers work to shut down liberal ballot initiatives
In 2018, Toni Easter held a party in her yard in St. Louis to promote what would become a successful ballot initiative on redistricting — only to see it overturned when Republican lawmakers in Missouri put a competing initiative on the ballot.
Then last year, she collected signatures in the successful effort to enshrine abortion rights in the Missouri Constitution. This year, the legislature approved a new referendum to try to reverse it.
'Our civil rights are being taken away,' said Easter, a retired fashion industry executive and co-founder of Respect Missouri Voters. Her group is working to put another measure on the Missouri ballot in 2026, one that would bar the state's lawmakers from overturning citizen-approved initiatives.
Liberal activists in conservative-led states are facing similar challenges around the country. Republican lawmakers are working to cut off ballot measures that enact progressive policies by making it harder for citizen-led measures to qualify for a vote or be enforced.
Locked out of power in Washington and in many statehouses, progressive activists have launched citizen initiatives to try to notch wins. Eleven states, for example, have backed abortion rights through citizen-approved initiatives since the Supreme Court's Dobbs ruling in 2022 ending a federally guaranteed right to abortion.
'State lawmakers have been using their power to subvert the will of the people,' said Chris Melody Fields Figueredo, the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center's executive director. The center tracks and helps promote ballot measures. 'They can't win fairly, so they've been rewriting the rules, no matter what the majority wants.'
Conservative legislators around the country argue that moneyed interests from outside their states are fueling efforts to rewrite state constitutions in irresponsible ways. They argue the process itself is vulnerable to fraud, given the frequent use of paid canvassers to collect the voter signatures needed to put initiatives on the ballot.
'Our constitution is easy prey,' South Dakota state Sen. John Hughes, a Republican, argued during a committee hearing this year. He sponsored a successful resolution that will ask the state's voters next year to increase the threshold for passage to 60%, up from a simple majority.
Nearly half the states allow citizen initiatives, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. State legislative efforts to restrict these kinds of ballot initiatives, however, have soared in recent years with at least 148 bills introduced this year, up from 76 during 2023 legislative sessions, according to a tally by the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center.
South Dakota, which in 1898 became the first state in the country to allow an initiative and referendum process, has seen an array of ballot proposals in recent years. A successful effort in 2022 expanded Medicaid, while a failed initiative last year would have instituted a nonpartisan, top-two primary system for elections like the one used in California.
If Hughes' effort is successful, South Dakota will join a handful of states, including Florida, with thresholds greater than 50%. Lawmakers in two other states, North Dakota and Utah, have also moved to ask voters to lift their thresholds to 60%.
'There is a groundswell of out of-of-state interests that want South Dakota to operate on a direct democracy basis, which is not how our government operates,' Hughes testified. 'Our constitution needs to be soberly and cautiously amended.'
Florida's 60% bar led to the defeat of two recent citizen-led initiatives that won majorities – a move to enshrine abortion rights, which received 57% of the vote, and to legalize recreational marijuana, which drew 56%.
Here are several other examples of recent changes made by Republicans:
In Arkansas, the state's GOP-controlled legislature mandated that petition canvassers review a photo ID from each potential signer. And a new law gives Attorney General Tim Griffin the authority to reject proposed constitutional amendments with ballot language deemed higher than the eighth-grade reading level – a power Griffin has already exercised to disqualify potential measures this year.
In Florida, a new law limits who can collect signatures to put proposed constitutional amendments on the ballot and bars an organization from sponsoring more than one initiative at a time. It also requires voters to include identifying information – such as the last four digits of their Social Security number – when they sign a petition.
In Montana, a new law requires paid signature gatherers approaching voters to wear badges disclosing that they are paid and listing their state of residence.
In Oklahoma, Gov. Keith Stitt recently signed a law mandating that no more than 10% of signatures for a ballot measure can come from counties with 400,000 or more people. Critics say the capping the number of signatures gathered in cities will make it nearly impossible to put initiatives on the ballot. Supporters say it will give rural voters a greater voice in the process.
The fight over citizen-led initiatives dominated Missouri's legislative session, which saw the Republican-controlled legislature approve overturning a measure passed by voters last year that guaranteed paid sick leave and cost-of-living increases to the minimum wage.
Missouri lawmakers also voted to put a new abortion referendum on the ballot that would repeal one approved by voters just seven months ago, guaranteeing a right to abortion until fetal viability. Doctors believe fetus viability to be around 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy.
The new initiative, authored by GOP state Sen. Adam Schnelting, would ban most abortions, with exceptions only for medical emergencies, fetal anomalies and cases of rape and incest, up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. An aide to Schnelting declined an interview.
During floor debate last month, the Republican argued that proponents of the 2024 abortion-rights initiative had misled Missourians into believing women would be 'dying in our hospitals' because they were denied care.
'But most Missourians do not want abortion on demand,' he said.
Respect Missouri Voters, the group Easter helped found, is now seeking volunteers to get an initiative on the 2026 ballot that would bar lawmakers from overturning citizen-led initiatives.
If successful, it would demonstrate that 'people can reclaim their power,' she said, 'and we could actually have effective governance that represents us and our needs.'
The group is hoping to raise $300,000 and recruit 2,500 volunteers by the end of this month so it can start collecting signatures in July.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Puerto Rico's Democratic Party boss offers rare endorsement of Andrew Cuomo for NYC mayor
The head of the Democratic Party of Puerto Rico is endorsing Andrew Cuomo for mayor of New York City, marking an unusual foray into Big Apple politics for the organization, which typically only focuses on issues local to the island. Luis Dávila Pernas, the party's chairman, made the endorsement official in a new campaign ad that Cuomo's team was set to air on television and digital platforms during Sunday's Puerto Rican Day Parade in Manhattan. Cuomo's camp said it's spending about $100,000 on airing the ad over the course of a week. 'Andrew Cuomo always has and always will stand with the people of Puerto Rico,' Dávila Pernas says in the 1-minute ad, which the Daily News got a preview of before it hit television and online. Dávila Pernas then lists off how Cuomo, as governor, traveled to Puerto Rico in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria in 2017 to 'coordinate aid' when President Trump's first administration 'failed to act.' Again, in 2020, when devastating earthquakes rocked the island, Dávila Pernas notes in the ad, Cuomo was back on Puerto Rico with National Guard troops to help local leaders rebuild. 'As we come together for this year's Puerto Rican Day Parade, let's remember: When Puerto Rico needed an ally, Andrew Cuomo was there,' Dávila Pernas adds in the spot. Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 amid accusations of sexual misconduct and of having mismanaged nursing home policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, is expected to march in Sunday's Puerto Rican Day Parade along Fifth Ave. Many other local politicians typically also march in the parade, including Mayor Eric Adams, who isn't running in this month's Democratic mayoral primary, having dropped out of it in the wake of the Trump administration's controversial dismissal of his corruption indictment. The new ad highlights how Cuomo, who denies engaging in wrongdoing as governor, is seeking to appeal to Puerto Ricans in particular and Hispanic voters more broadly. New York City is home to a number of large Hispanic communities seen as key constituencies in local elections. 'I am honored to have Chairman Luis Dávila Pernas' support and look forward to continuing to work with and support the Puerto Rican community any way I can as the next mayor of New York City,' Cuomo told The News. Cuomo remains the favorite to win the June 24 Democratic mayoral primary, according to most polls. Some recent surveys, though, have shown Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, who is polling in second place, cutting into Cuomo's lead, as the election looms less than three weeks away. _____
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
News Analysis: A political lesson for L.A. from an unrestrained president
When racial justice protests roiled cities across America at the depths of the pandemic, President Trump, then in his first term, demonstrated restraint. Threats to invoke the Insurrection Act and to federalize the National Guard never materialized. This time, it took less than 24 hours of isolated protests in Los Angeles County before Trump, more aggressive than ever in his use of executive power, to issue a historic order. 'The federal government will step in and solve the problem,' he said on social media Saturday night, issuing executive action not seen since civil unrest gripped the nation in the 1960s. It was the latest expression of a president unleashed from conventional parameters on his power, unconcerned with states' rights or the proportionality of his actions. And the targeting of a Democratic city in a Democratic state was, according to the vice president, an intentional ploy to make a political lesson out of Los Angeles. The pace of the escalation, and the federal government's unwillingness to defer to cooperative local law enforcement authorities, raise questions about the administration's intentions as it responds to protesters. The administration skipped several steps in an established ladder of response options, such as enhancing U.S. Marshals Service and Federal Protective Service personnel to protect federal prisons and property, before asking the state whether a National Guard deployment might be warranted. Read more: Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means? Local officials were clear that they did not want, or need, federal assistance. And they are concerned that Trump's heavy-handed response risks escalating what was a series of isolated, heated clashes consisting of a few hundred people into a larger law enforcement challenge that could roil the city. The president's historic deployment prompted fury among local Democratic officials who warned of an infringement on states' rights. Trump's takeover of the California National Guard, Gov. Gavin Newsom said, was prompted 'not because there is a shortage of law enforcement, but because they want a spectacle.' 'Don't give them one,' he said. Vice President JD Vance, calling the anti-ICE protesters 'insurrectionists,' welcomed the political pushback, stating on X that 'one half of America's political leadership has decided that border enforcement is evil.' Protests against ICE agents on Friday and Saturday were limited in scale and location. Several dozen people protested the flash raids on Friday afternoon outside the Metropolitan Detention Center, with some clashing with agents and vandalizing the building. The LAPD authorized so-called less-lethal munitions against a small group of 'violent protesters' after concrete was thrown at an officer. The protest disbursed by midnight. On Saturday, outside a Home Depot, demonstrators chanted 'ICE go home' and 'No justice, no peace.' Some protesters yelled at deputies, and a series of flash-bang grenades was deployed. Read more: Photos: A fierce pushback on ICE raids in L.A. from protesters, officials 'What are you doing!' one man screamed out. Times reporters witnessed federal agents lobbing multiple rounds of flash-bangs and pepper balls at protesters. Despite the limited scale of the violence, by Saturday evening, the Trump administration embraced the visuals of a city in chaos compelling federal enforcement of law and order. 'The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Saturday night. 'These criminals will be arrested and swiftly brought to justice. The commander-in-chief will ensure the laws of the United States are executed fully and completely.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in a statement Saturday, said the administration is prepared to go further, deploying active-duty U.S. Marines to the nation's second-largest city. 'This is deranged behavior,' responded California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom. Trump's decision Saturday to call in the National Guard, using a rarely used authority called Title 10, has no clear historic precedent. President Lyndon Johnson cited Title 10 in 1965 to protect civil rights marchers during protests in Selma, Ala., but did so out of concern that local law enforcement would decline to do so themselves. Read more: 2,000 National Guard troops will be sent to L.A. amid clashes over immigration raids By contrast, this weekend, the L.A. County Sheriff's Department said it was fully cooperating with federal law enforcement. 'We are planning for long-term civil unrest and collaborating with our law enforcement partners,' the department said in a statement. The 2,000 Guardsmen called up for duty is double the number that were assigned by local authorities to respond to much wider protests that erupted throughout Los Angeles in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder in 2020. Tom Homan, the president's so-called border czar, told Fox News on Saturday evening that the administration was 'already ahead of the game' in its planning for a National Guard deployment. 'This is about enforcing the law, and again, we're not going to apologize for doing it,' he said. 'We're stepping up.' National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, deploying around federal buildings in L.A. County. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs," Trump wrote on Truth, his social media platform, "then the federal government will step in and solve the problem." Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why did Trump deploy the National Guard to LA protests? How many have been arrested? What to know
WASHINGTON – National Guard members have started to arrive in Los Angeles after President Donald Trump ordered thousands of troops to the area over tense protests targeting the administration's crackdown on immigration enforcement. With demonstrations set to continue in the afternoon, area officials have declared an unlawful assembly and responded to protests over the weekend by firing tear gas, pepper spray and flash-bang concussion rounds toward gathering crowds. Video footage of some of the protests showed dozens of green-uniformed security personnel with gas masks, lined up on a road strewn with overturned shopping carts as small canisters exploded into gas clouds. Demonstrators allege the Trump administration's immigration enforcement has violated civil and human rights. The sweeping immigration efforts, a hallmark of Trump's second term, has also caught up people legally residing in the country and led to legal challenges. "Now they know that they cannot go to anywhere in this country where our people are, and try to kidnap our workers, our people – they cannot do that without an organized and fierce resistance," said protester Ron Gochez, 44. But where are the protests taking place? How is California Gov. Gavin Newsom responding? Here's what to know: More: Illegal border crossings at record lows as crackdown spreads Trump ordered approximately 2,000 National Guard troops to help quell the protests in Los Angeles, where helmeted police in riot gear clashed with protesters who opposed tougher federal actions against undocumented immigrants. Some protesters hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Trump signed a memo June 7 deploying the guardsmen 'to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester.' 'The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs,' she said in a statement. On June 7, a large protest erupted in the city of Paramount in Los Angeles County, about 15 miles south of downtown Los Angeles. It came as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents conducted enforcement operations in the area and arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations. About 350 to 400 protesters had gathered, and some were seen throwing objects at agents. Since then, demonstrations have widened out across parts of Los Angeles. A second protest in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday night attracted approximately 60 people, who chanted slogans including "ICE out of L.A.!" The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said two deputies were taken to an area hospital for injuries, but they have since been released, according to multiple reports. Demonstrators have also reported injuries. One skirmish involved the arrest of a union leader, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, who said he was injured and detained by ICE. Newsom wrote in a post on X on June 7 that the move from the federal government to deploy National Guard troops is 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' "LA authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice. We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need," Newsom wrote, alleging "This is the wrong mission and will erode public trust." The Department of Homeland Security said that ICE operations have resulted in the arrests of 118 undocumented immigrants last week in Los Angeles, including five alleged gang members and others with criminal records for smuggling, drug trafficking and assault. Los Angeles police confirmed early on June 8 that one person had been arrested in connection with the demonstrations, along with several others who were detained but not yet formally charged, according to multiple reports. Contributing: Bart Jansen, USA TODAY; Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What to know about tense immigration protests in Paramount, LA