
Protected Maryland Wildlands At Stake In Laws For Electric Power Line
Bear Creek in Garrett County, Maryland
Controversial legislation is moving through the Maryland General Assembly to okay building overhead transmission lines in three wildland areas to power several states and may jeopardize 28 endangered species and millions in federal funds for wildlife projection.
A pair of mirror proposed laws House Bill 1270 and Senate Bill 399 are passing various legislative states in both chambers despite overwhelming local opposition. The legislation seeks to construct part of a large-scale, 105-mile, 500 kilovolt transmission line from Virginia to Pennsylvania and cut through three untouched and protected Maryland wildlands.
The legislation is called 'Natural Resources - Wildland Areas - Overhead Transmission Lines.' HB 1270 is sponsored by Delegate Jim Hinebaugh, Jr., a retired U.S. Army colonel, while SB 399 is spearheaded by Sen. Mike McKay, a business owner.
Many opponents to the legislation have submitted testimony about a lack of public hearings and participation prior to bills being introduced in the General Assembly.
The bills seek to exempt parts of three protected areas in the Big Savage Mountain Wildland, Bear Pen Wildland and Dan's Mountain Wildland from being designated as a wildland area and instead be subject to a certificate of public convenience and necessity to build the transmission line. The bills would mandate the state Public Service Commission to require the company (NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic Inc.) applying for permission to obtain 'a certificate of public convenience and necessity' to build the overhead transmission line and 'provide wildland impact mitigation guarantees.'
In Jan. 31, 2025, submitted written testimony to Senate Bill 399, Maryland General Assembly
At issue are the protected lands and the species that live there which would be forever disrupted in Maryland for a project that benefits electricity consumers who live in other states as well as corporate interests.
The state has been protecting the three areas—Big Savage Mountain Wildland (2,879 acres), Bear Pen Wildland (1,517 acres) and Dan's Mountain Wildland (4,047 acres)—as the highest classification of wildlands defined as primitive areas untouched by urban civilization that 'can offer the experience of solitude and self-reliance. These wildlands are usually lands located at higher elevations that protect watersheds and are ecologically vulnerable to human interferences,' according to a Maryland General Assembly 2025 Fiscal Policy Note about the impact of HB 1270.
The fiscal policy note underscored that commercial enterprises and permanent roads, use of motorized equipment/vehicles and structures or installations are not allowed in the wildland areas.
In addition, to allow construction of the overhead transmission lines could disallow federal funding of which Maryland was allocated $9.2 million in under the Pittman-Robertson Act in fiscal year 2024.
The protected wildlands also together provide a habitat for two endangered bat species, a rare Appalachian cottontail rabbit and 25 other known rare, threatened, or endangered species.
Submitting testimony in support of the legislation were 14 testimonies, including one from T.R. Robinette, president of the Allegany County Farm Bureau Inc.: 'After the transmission is completed that habitat which is currently wildland will go back to wildland habitat. To go around the wildlands would take more personal property including farmland and residential areas.'
Another proponent was Billy Bishoff of the Garrett County Farm Bureau. 'Our reasoning is that our agricultural lands are equally important as wildlands. We are not advocating for the construction of a transmission line. We just believe that if it is built that it should follow a path that minimizes the impact on all lands. Our concern is that efforts to avoid wildlands will impact more of our land.'
Also representing other agriculture interests was Tyler Hough, government relations director of Maryland Farm Bureau, who submitted support for the legislation as having less of an impact to farms. However, Hough stressed 'Maryland Farm Bureau's support of HB1270 is in no way in support of the construction of the NextEra Energy proposed transmission line through Garrett and Allegany County.'
Lobbyist Jamie DeMarco, representing the Chesapeake Climate Action Network Action Fund, encouraged passage of the legislation and noted that NextEra has the project contract. 'When compared to other potential alternative transmission routes the proposed Wildlands route would have less impacts to residents, farms, and businesses. In addition, the Wildlands route would affect less forest clearing, wetlands, and trout streams. It would also cost less for Marylanders as it is a much shorter route,' DeMarco stated in written testimony.
In the Senate, there seven testimonies submitted in favor of the SB 399, including a letter from NextEra Energy Transmission MidAtlantic, which is developing the MidAtlantic Resiliency Link (MARL) transmission line. The entire project would build a new 105-mile, 500 kilovolt transmission line from Fredrick County, Va., to Greene County, Penn. And contain a Maryland section at the potential wildlands site in Allegany and Garrett counties.
Kaley Bangston, NextEra Energy regulatory and political affairs director, submitted written testimony backing the bill. She said it would exempt 'a small portion of land to allow for the MARL line to route adjacent to an existing transmission line owned and operated by FirstEnergy which also routes through Wildlands. While we believe this routing option provides the least impact to the region, we are actively performing a routing study and taking feedback from local stakeholders as we make these routing decisions.'
Kurt R. Schwarz, conservation chair emeritus of the Maryland Ornithological Society, urged legislators in written testimony against passing the legislation since building the electric transmission lines there would 'destroy these ecosystems, habitats, or rare plants. ..Our members visit these Wildlands to admire the birds that live there. Big Savage Mountain, Bear Pen, and Dan's Mountain Wildlands all provide valuable habitat for our declining bird populations. North America has lost almost 30% of its birds since 1970. Loss of habitat is one on the major causes of these declines.'
Schwarz explained many reasons why the Maryland Ornithological Society is strongly against passage of the legislation. He predicted placing the overhead transmission lines will fragment the unbroken forests in these wildlands for already declining bird species populations that live inside forest interiors. 'Trees are felled along the line, and vegetation below the lines is permanently suppressed. Support roads destroy and fragment additional forest,' he noted. Also the forests are vital for the other creatures living there—native brook trout and a rare mammal called a fisher, which is related to weasels and otters.
A fisher in a tree.
'The proposed transmission line corridor through Western Maryland is part of a larger project to meet the exclusive demands of data centers in Northern Virginia,' Garrett County Forestry Board Chair Will Williams stated in testimony. The board promotes stewardship of Maryland forests. 'There is no map of the exempted transmission line routes being proposed by the bill. There has been no determination that these high-voltage electric lines will serve the interests of the State and its people when there are other forms of energy to be considered that are less intrusive,' Williams added.
Brent Walls, riverkeeper at the Potomac Riverkeeper Network, subjected a two-page letter objecting to the legislation that would enable NextEra to 'cut a 200 foot path through' Maryland wildlands, "fracturing the vitality.' Furthermore, passage of the legislation would 'undermine the integrity of legislation that has been in place for 52 years and set a precedent that any for profit company can legislate a taking of Wildlands.'
Another opponent was Dawn Beitzel, from Engage Mountain Maryland, who echoed concern about the infrastructure project causing 'irreversible impacts on wildlife habitats, water quality, and the natural beauty that defines these areas' as well as disrupting migrating species, forever changing landscapes and introducing invasive species. 'Additionally, there are alternative routes and technologies available to deliver necessary energy infrastructure without compromising protected wildlands. Advancing such options would align with Maryland's commitment to conservation and sustainability while still meeting the state's energy needs,' Beitzel added.
Opposing the Senate bill was Emily Tarsell, president of Health Choice Maryland: 'Our protected wild lands are protected for a reason. Invasions into these publicly held lands would set a bad precedent for the ability of public-private partnerships to engage in land grabs. The public would lose access to these protected sites while gaining nothing. Development of wild lands would be costly for electric consumers and a gift to private developers and corporate data centers.'
David Mosher, of the Maryland chapter of Sierra Club, submitted detailed testimony outlining a series of negative outcomes if enacted. His contentions included the following: 'Our Wild Lands are a significant source of revenue to the State. Wildlife are critical to Maryland's tourism industry. Wildlife watching in Maryland generates over $450 million in economic activity annually in the State each year. This proposal could lead to revenue losses to local businesses and municipalities of millions of dollars.'
Delegates gather on the floor in the House Chamber for a session of the Maryland General Assembly
As of March 26, the bills continued to move through and gain steam as they winded through both chambers. HB1270 was in its 3rd reading. The Senate version (SB 399) had sailed through to the 1st reading in the opposite chamber.
If passed by the legislature and enacted by Gov. Wes Moore, either bill would become law Oct. 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
No Kings protests to hit Chicago streets
Protesters are taking to the streets in Chicago and the suburbs Saturday for what organizers are lauding as the largest single-day anti-President Trump rally since the start of the administration. Why it matters: The widespread movement will run counter to Trump's multimillion-dollar military parade in D.C. The big picture:"No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance," the group's website proclaims. "From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism." No Kings events adhere to a shared commitment to nonviolent protest and community safety. Organizers are trained in de-escalation and work closely with local partners to ensure peaceful and effective actions nationwide. Zoom in: There's a rally in Daley Plaza at noon Saturday, but also events stretching from Beverly to Jefferson Park, and suburbs including Joliet, Oak Park, Evanston and Gurnee. Protesters are planning to gather across the state, stretching from Rockford to Carbondale, according to No Kings. Zoom out: Dozens of pro-democracy advocacy groups are partnering to organize the No Kings events. What they're saying:"Donald Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday," the No Kings website said. "A spectacle meant to look like strength. But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." By the numbers: No Kings organizers are estimating protests in more than 1,500 cities across the country. Context: Trump proposed a military parade on his 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. The Army predicts it will spend between $25 million and $45 million on the plan, an estimate that doesn't include the costs of the Secret Service or law enforcement. D.C. is not known for having military parades, but Trump has been vying for one since his first term. Yes, but: No, Kings are not scheduled to have an organized protest in Washington, D.C. "We want to create contrast, not conflict," said Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, one of the partner groups. "The choice to hold No Kings events in every city but D.C. is a deliberate choice to keep the focus on contrast, and not give the Trump administration an opportunity to stoke and then put the focus on conflict." Catch up quick: Within a month earlier this year, anti-Trump activists rallied during Hands Off!, 50501, May Day and Tesla Takedowns protests. Plus: For anyone who wants some laughs and entertainment Saturday, The Free America Festival (Obviously) show takes the stage Saturday from noon—3pm at The Raven Theatre.


Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Military Parade Update: Thousands of Soldiers to Appear in DC
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Thousands of soldiers will descend on Washington D.C, as tanks roll down the streets and aircraft fly overhead, in an American military parade that coincides with President Donald Trump's birthday. The event, being run by organizers America250, will take place on Flag Day this Saturday (June 14) and is being held to mark the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. U.S. military units participate in the National Memorial Day Parade on Constitution Avenue in Washington, DC, May 26, 2025. U.S. military units participate in the National Memorial Day Parade on Constitution Avenue in Washington, DC, May 26, 2025. ALEX WROBLEWSKI/AFP via Getty Images Why It Matters The parade also happens to fall on Trump's 79th birthday, which has sparked speculation that the event was his idea, given it was a relatively last-minute addition to the festivities. His previous attempt to hold a military parade was thwarted during his first presidency. In any case, anti-Trump demonstrators are planning a "No Kings" protest targeting the event this weekend. It is unclear whether Trump personally requested the parade, or whether the event was initiated by organizers. Newsweek has emailed America250 seeking clarification and comment. What To Know Reports first surfaced that Trump was planning a military parade to coincide with his birthday back in April, with the news apparently coming as a surprise to local officials. It did not give the organizers much time to prepare the event, but work was already well underway on a host of other events to mark the Army's 250th anniversary, such as community outreach activities and displays about the military's history. Now the Washington, D.C, parade has also been added to the mix, new details are emerging about what spectators can expect. The parade will kick off at 6:30 p.m. ET and will last for three hours until 9:30 p.m. "The parade will take place on Constitution Ave NW between15th Street and 23rd Street," according to the America250 website. "Guests are invited to convene along the parade route or view from the Washington Monument Grounds." Around 200,000 are expected to attend, officials told Business Insider, which reported that 6,700 troops are scheduled to participate, including soldiers on active duty and in reserve, special forces and the National Guard. Some will be wearing the uniforms worn by soldiers in historic battles. In addition, 28 M1A1 Abrams tanks bearing 120mm cannons will roll through the city and 50 aircraft will take to the skies, including helicopters, such as Black Hawks, Chinooks, and Apaches. Not all National Guards' units will be represented in the event, with Oklahoma among those saying its units are not planning to be participating. Trump has tried unsuccessfully to launch military parades during his first term. His hopes for a massive military parade to "top" other countries' processions were thwarted during his first term in 2018 and again in 2019. Some critics had compared the president's ambitions to the bloated military spectacles seen in dictatorships, such as the parades in honor of Kim Jong Un in North Korea, or the propaganda displays in authoritarian regimes like China and Russia. Retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden told the media at the time: "That's just not our style." Other criticisms leveled at the president over his plans included what was deemed to be an astronomical cost to taxpayers of hosting such an event, and the damage likely to be caused to city roads by heavy military equipment. What People Are Saying U.S. President Donald Trump posted a video update on his Truth Social platform, saying: "We're honoring the 250th anniversary of the greatest fighting force in history, the United States Army. We will celebrate a spectacular military parade in Washington DC, like no other. "For two and a half centuries, the men and women of America's army have dominated our enemies and protected our freedom at home. This parade salutes our soldiers' remarkable strength and unbeatable spirit. You won't want to miss it! Just don't miss this one. It's gonna be good. "Thundering tanks and break-taking flyovers will roar through our capital city as nearly 7,000 soldiers march in historic uniforms from every major war since the Revolution. Join us for this once-in-a-lifetime celebration. I think it's gonna be better and bigger than any parade we've ever had in this country." He made no mention of his birthday, instead focusing on the celebration of the armed forces, but he promised: "I'm going to be there. I'll be watching the entire event. It's gonna be something very, very special." The America250 website says: "With President Donald J. Trump in attendance, this historic celebration will feature powerful displays of patriotism, including flyovers, military vehicles, living history reenactments, and moving tributes to the courage, sacrifice and commitment of our men and women in uniform. Let us honor the past, celebrate the present, and inspire the future of American service." Arlington County Board Chair Takis Karantonis told the Washington City Paper in April that exact plans for a parade had not yet been discussed, saying the board was caught off-guard by the White House. He added: "I would hope the federal government remains sensitive to the pain and concerns of numerous [military] veteran residents who have lost or might lose their jobs in recent federal decisions, as they reflect on how best to celebrate the Army's anniversary." What Happens Next Organizers are likely to be spending this week finalizing preparations while units are likely to be practicing ahead of the parade. Those wishing to attend should visit to reserve their spot.


Politico
5 hours ago
- Politico
The state of labor laws halfway through 2025
QUICK FIX LABOR REPORT CARD: Even as federal labor legislation remains stalled, several states have raced to pass their own laws cracking down on child labor and supporting gig workers. As most legislatures wrap up business for the year, here's what state lawmakers have accomplished. Portable benefits: Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey signed a bill that established portable benefits accounts for independent contractors, allowing workers to easily transfer their benefits between employers. Tennessee jumped on the bandwagon a day later when Gov. Bill Lee signed the Voluntary Portable Benefit Plan Act. Republicans have long touted the upside of portable benefits plans as a way to support independent contractors. Democrats, on the other hand, have maligned such plans, arguing that they don't offer the same security as traditional employee plans. Apprenticeships and youth labor laws: Multiple blue states have passed legislation aimed at protecting and developing pathways for young people. Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson signed HB 1644, a bill that increases fines for employers that violate child labor laws and requires the state's labor board to conduct inspections before issuing new permits. Maryland Gov. Wes Moore expanded his state's registered apprenticeship program. The legislation aims to grow the state's economy as the region struggles with the fallout of the Trump administration's overhaul of the federal workforce. 'In partnership with the General Assembly, we are building pathways to work, wages, and wealth — even as the White House seeks to lay off thousands of employees,' Moore said in a statement shortly before signing the Registered Apprenticeship Investments for a Stronger Economy Act. Almost, but not quite: Workplace safety advocates suffered a setback when Illinois failed to join other Democratic-led states in passing its Warehouse Worker Protection Act. Gov. JB Pritzker vetoed the bill over technical disagreements with the state's Democratic legislature, arguing that it didn't clearly spell out how his administration would enforce penalties against employers who don't provide rest breaks or implement productivity requirements for workers. In case you forgot: Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are still unveiling major labor legislation despite GOP control of Congress that may make it hard to advance. — PRO Act: Makes it easier for unions to organize and collectively bargain by strengthening the National Labor Relations Act. The bill was reintroduced by Reps. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) in the House, and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) unveiled a companion bill the Senate. — Faster Labor Contracts Act: Prevents employers from slow-walking union negotiations by requiring talks to begin within 10 days after a union is recognized. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced the bill in March. GOOD MORNING. It's Monday, June 9. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. Send feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@ lukenye@ rdugyala@ and gmott@ Follow us on X at @NickNiedz and @Lawrence_Ukenye. And Signal @nickniedz.94. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. IMMIGRATION SHIFTING STRATEGY: The Trump administration is accelerating immigration enforcement efforts in workplaces after initially targeting criminals and international students. 'Last week, at a student housing complex under construction in Tallahassee, Fla., masked immigration agents loaded dozens of migrants into buses headed to detention centers,' The New York Times' Lydia DePillis and Ernesto Londoño reported Saturday. 'In New Orleans, 15 people working on a flood control project were detained.' At least 500,000 more undocumented immigrants could be caught in the administration's growing raids after the Supreme Court ruled in May to revoke the Temporary Protected Status that allowed migrants from Venezuela, Cuba, Haiti and Nicaurgua to work in the U.S. In the crosshairs: Trump's move to send the National Guard to quell unrest in Los Angeles this past weekend came after ICE raids that led to the arrest of David Huerta, president of SEIU California and SEIU-United Service Workers West. Huerta was released from the hospital after sustaining injuries during his arrest but remains in custody, according to SEIU leaders. 'The labor movement will not tolerate retaliation against those who speak out against injustice,' SEIU 503 leaders said in a statement. 'We demand Huerta's immediate release and an end to efforts to intimidate activists through fear. Defending immigrant families is not a crime—it is a moral duty.' More from California: "Escalating ICE raids pull California Democrats back into immigration fight,' from our Dustin Gardner. LOOK WHO'S BACK: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a metal worker deported earlier this year, is back in the U.S. to face federal human trafficking charges after the Supreme Court ruled in April that he was illegally removed from the country. 'The Trump administration had insisted that it had no power to compel El Salvador to return Abrego Garcia, but in recent weeks there were signs that officials had begun to engage with El Salvador and its president, Nayib Bukele, about bringing Abrego Garcia back to the United States,' our Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney wrote. Don't thank me: Trump said in an interview with NBC News that bringing Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. wasn't his decision and that the Justice Department 'decided to do it that way,' our Ben Johansen reported. Unions THE RELATIONSHIP THAT KEEPS ON GIVING: Teamsters President Sean O'Brien attacked Elon Musk on social media after the Tesla CEO's high-profile falling out with Trump over disagreement about provisions in Republicans' 'big beautiful bill.' 'Let's get one thing straight: @realDonaldTrump wasn't elected by Elon,' O'Brien wrote on X last week. 'He won because working people have had enough of ego-driven billionaires like @elonmusk who want to run away to Mars only after they eliminate every decent job in this country.' O'Brien went on to say that Musk would 'abandon America' and called out the former DOGE leader for Tesla's floundering stock price. The X posts are the latest public show of support from O'Brien toward Trump after he appeared at the Republican National Convention last year. No drama for now: Aides for Trump and Musk spoke last week and the two men have since dialed back their public attacks, our Dasha Burns and Julia Marsh reported. In the Workplace PENNIES FOR YOUR THOUGHTS: Right-wing influencers have enjoyed increased eyeballs on their content after Musk updated X's rules to allow more creators to earn money from their posts. For some, however, the new engagement isn't bringing huge financial gains. Dominick McGee, a creator on X with 1.5 million followers, has earned on average $55,000 a year — amounting to less than the minimum wage with the long hours he spends on the platform — despite receiving an invitation to a White House press briefing for new media and spending hours stoking online outrage. The New York Times' Stuart A. Thompson has more. IN THE STATES NOT A BIG FAN: The 15,000-member Professional Engineers in California Government union sued Gov. Gavin Newsom's office and the state's human resources office over a return-to-office policy that would require workers to be in the office four days a week beginning in July, The Sacramento Bee reported. The filing is the latest challenge to the order, which unions have argued violated labor law because the state failed to meet with labor groups before announcing the directive. A spokesperson for the state's Department of Human Resources declined to comment on pending litigation. More state news: 'Maryland launches new loan program for laid-off federal workers,' from Maryland Matters. WHAT WE'RE READING — Opinion: 'Why on Earth Should Air Traffic Controllers Be Pro-Trump?' from The New York Times. — 'More Federal Workers Are Flooding the Job Market, With Worsening Prospects,' from The New York Times. — Opinion: 'Baltimore must look out for its tipped workers,' from The Baltimore Sun. — 'The stealth Senate dealmaker who could deliver Trump's tax cuts,' from our Benjamin Guggenheim for Pro subscribers. THAT'S YOUR SHIFT!