
With insulin killings, the murder weapon is often hiding in plain sight
When a lifesaving drug — insulin — is used as a murder weapon, medical professionals are likely unprepared to consider that the difficult-to-detect medication was used to commit a crime, according to a forensic pathologist who worked on the recent case of a West Virginia pharmacist convicted of fatally dosing her husband.
Dr. Paul Uribe, a former military medical examiner who consults as a pathologist across the United States and helped solve a string of insulin murders at a West Virginia veterans hospital, told NBC News that there appear to be few protocols showing pathologists and emergency room doctors how to best handle the cases.
'You're not going to stumble across an insulin homicide,' Uribe said. 'You have to have a suspect and you have to look for it, because if you're not looking for it, you're not going to find it.'
For more on the West Virginia murder, tune in to 'Devil's in the Details' on 'Dateline' on April 25 at 9 ET/8 CT tonight.
While such crimes are rare, Uribe said, some recent cases in the U.S. have had a staggering number of victims. In Pennsylvania, a nurse confessed to trying to kill 19 people with insulin at five facilities between 2020 and 2023. Seventeen of her patients died. At the West Virginia veterans hospital, a nurse admitted in 2021 to killing seven elderly patients with insulin.
Uribe said he knows of no protocols promoted by organizations for ER doctors or medical examiners and knows of only one state — West Virginia — where lawmakers have sought to reckon with this apparent lack of awareness. A bill introduced this year in the state Legislature seeks to require emergency rooms to test patients for insulin when they're admitted with possible symptoms of insulin poisoning.
Jonathan Jones, the former president of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine, said that while the organization is concerned about insulin overdoses, it does not believe in 'legislating medical care.'
'The best medical care is provided by properly educated, trained and board-certified physicians and not by legislators,' he said in an email to NBC News. 'We believe in continuing medical education around this issue and all others applicable to the physician's specialty but oppose treatment mandates and repercussions.'
He did not respond to a request for comment about whether ERs need stronger guidelines.
Asked if forensic pathologists need better protocols, Reade Quinton, president of the National Association of Medical Examiners, said: 'I am not sure that is the right question. What medical examiners need is unobstructed access to scene information, witness statements and medical records so we can perform a complete and independent death investigation.'
The lead sponsor of the West Virginia bill did not respond to requests for comment. But the parents of Michael Cochran — who was killed by his pharmacist wife and for whom the bill is named — believe the legislation could serve as a model for the country. And it could help others avoid the gut-wrenching search for answers that they endured for years.
'They won't have to wait for a result like we had to wait,' Cochran's mother, Donna Bolt, told 'Dateline.' 'Six years.'
Seven dead patients at VA hospital
Uribe's first insulin homicide case was at the veterans hospital in Clarksburg, West Virginia. Then a pathologist with the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Uribe said he was asked in late 2018 to examine a series of mysterious deaths among elderly patients, all of whom were found to have had severe hypoglycemia, or low blood sugar.
The condition can be caused by excessively high doses of insulin, which acts as a lifesaving regulator of blood sugar for people with diabetes.
Some of the veterans were diabetic, Uribe recalled, but others were not. He said he was asked to find a 'smoking gun' that could prove insulin was the murder weapon.
For emergency room physicians and pathologists, he said, this can be a difficult task because of how quickly the body metabolizes insulin. The test cited in the West Virginia legislation — known as a 'c-peptide' test — can measure insulin, Uribe said, but timing is key: It has to be conducted before doctors provide treatment for low blood sugar, he said.
'Because once you give that person glucose, that triggers the body's natural release of insulin, and it'll throw off the insulin c-peptide measure,' he said.
Many smaller hospitals often do not have the tests available, he added.
Uribe cited two possible methods for pathologists to document insulin. One of the most common ways of administering the medication is through an injection, and it can briefly linger in the body's tissue at an injection site, he said. Researchers have also documented insulin in postmortem vitreous fluid, a substance found in the eyeball, he said.
In West Virginia, the bodies of seven veterans were exhumed and Uribe tested injection site tissue samples, he said. The tests revealed trace amounts of insulin in some of the victims, including those who were not diabetic and had never been prescribed the medication, he said.
'That was the definitive proof they had been injected with insulin,' he said.
Reta Mays, a nursing assistant at the hospital, was eventually identified as a suspect in the killings. She admitted to administering the lethal doses, pleading guilty to seven counts of second-degree murder and one count of assault with intent to commit murder in connection with the death of an eighth man. Mays was sentenced to seven life sentences.
A fatal dose from a pharmacist
In Uribe's second case, pharmacist Natalie Cochran was convicted in January of giving her husband a fatal dose of the drug in a plot that prosecutors said was aimed at covering up a multimillion-dollar fraud that she perpetrated on friends and family.
But it took years for the case to be resolved.
In February 2019, Michael Cochran was hospitalized in an unresponsive state before he was removed from a ventilator and placed in hospice. He was 38. His death certificate listed his manner of death as 'natural.'
Michael Cochran's emergency room records showed that when he was admitted to the hospital, his blood sugar had plummeted, even though he had no history of diabetes, Uribe said. No insulin test was done at the time, he said.
But Tim Bledsoe, a detective with the West Virginia State Police, came to suspect that Natalie Cochran may have played a role in her husband's death, and during a search of her home, he discovered a partially used vial of insulin in her fridge.
Knowing that no one in the home was diabetic, he asked Natalie Cochran about the vial, Bledsoe told 'Dateline.' She told the detective she kept it there for a neighbor's diabetic son, Bledsoe said. But the neighbor, Jennifer Davis, denied this and told 'Dateline' that Natalie Cochran said she'd asked for the insulin for herself, claiming that she was using it to recover from a cancer diagnosis that prosecutors later said she faked.
She asked for the insulin the morning Michael Cochran first became sick, Davis said.
Two years after Michael Cochran's death, his wife was indicted on a murder charge. An autopsy had been performed seven months after his death, but by then his body was in an advanced state of decomposition and the medical examiner ruled his cause of death undetermined, Bledsoe said.
It isn't clear why an autopsy was not done immediately after his death, nor is it clear if any steps were taken in the examination to try and document postmortem insulin. The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, which oversees the state medical examiner, did not respond to a request for comment.
Uribe said it's unlikely any postmortem evidence of insulin could have been found given how much time passed between when Michael Cochran would have been given the drug and when he died.
The undetermined finding, combined with a lack of physical evidence, led the Raleigh County district attorney to drop the case, according to the county's current top prosecutor, Tom Truman.
'If you don't have the medical examiner saying homicide, you've got a big problem,' he told 'Dateline.'
Another exhumation — and then a conviction
But two years later, the charge was refiled after Uribe was asked to examine the case. During a second exhumation and autopsy, Uribe said that he searched for possible injection sites but that Michael Cochran's remains were skeletal by that point and the examination yielded nothing.
Still, Uribe said no other reason that could explain Michael Cochran's plummeting blood sugar — such as sepsis or a rampant infection — had been documented in his medical records. Combined with other circumstances surrounding Michael Cochran's death, Uribe ruled the death an insulin homicide.
At trial, an endocrinologist who testified for the prosecution agreed that no other explanation could account for Michael Cochran's hypoglycemia.
Natalie Cochran's lawyers acknowledged that she defrauded friends and relatives — she'd pleaded guilty in a separate federal fraud and money laundering case — but they said she had nothing to do with her husband's death, which they attributed to a lethal mix of workout supplements, steroids and possibly his own use of insulin.
On Jan. 29, after two hours of deliberation, a jury convicted Natalie Cochran of first-degree murder. She was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole.
To Uribe, this case and the killings at the veteran's hospital underscore the need for better insulin overdose guidelines.
For physicians, he said, those protocols could include watching out for red flags like severely low, unexplained blood sugar in a nondiabetic person, or unexplained low potassium, known as hypokalemia, which can also be fatal and caused by excessive insulin.
And they need to ensure that they administer a c-peptide test before treatment, he said.
Pathologists should search for possible injection sites, he said, and they should try testing vitreous fluid, he said.
'If you're able to detect that in the vitreous fluid of someone who's not a diabetic, who's never been prescribed this medication and has no history of them being injected, that could legitimately tell you something,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
How RFK Jr. is quickly changing U.S. health agencies
WASHINGTON — In just a few short months, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has begun to transform U.S. health policy: shrinking staff at health agencies, restructuring the focus of some regulators and researchers, changing Covid vaccine regulations and reshaping the mission of his department to focus more on alternative medicine. The directives are all part of the same issue set that drove a slice of health-conscious, left-leaning Americans to eventually vote for a Republican president whose favorite meal is from McDonald's, Trump and Kennedy catered to a type of voter who has grown distrustful of America's health care establishment — but possibly fomented a new type of distrust in federal health policy along the way. Bernadine Francis, a lifelong Democrat who backed Joe Biden for president in 2020 before supporting Donald Trump in 2024, told NBC News in an interview that she approves of Kennedy's efforts so far, despite his 'hands being tied' by entrenched forces in the administration and in Congress. 'From what I have seen so far with what RFK has been trying to do,' she said, 'I am really, really proud of what he's doing.' Francis is among the voters who left the Democratic Party and voted for Trump because 'nothing else mattered' apart from public health, which they — like Kennedy — felt was going in the wrong direction. Concerns about chemicals in food and toxins in the environment, long championed by Democrats, has become a galvanizing issue to a key portion of Trump's Republican Party, complete with an oversaturation of information that in some cases hasn't been proven. It's wrapped up, as well, in concerns about the Covid vaccine, which was accelerated under Trump, administered under Biden and weaponized by anti-vaccine activists like Kennedy amid lockdowns and firings in the wake of the devastating pandemic. 'We knew in order to get RFK in there so he can help with the situation that we have in the health industry, we knew we had to do this,' said Francis, a retired Washington, D.C., public school administrator, who said she left her 'beloved' career because she had refused the vaccine. 'It seemed to me, as soon as [Biden] became president, the vaccine was mandated, and that was when I lost all hope in the Democrats,' Francis told NBC News, referring to vaccination mandates put in place by the Biden administration for a large portion of the federal workforce during the height of the pandemic. There are not currently any federal Covid vaccine mandates. There have been 1,228,393 confirmed Covid deaths in the United States since the start of the pandemic, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How RFK Jr.'s picks are changing public health agencies Dr. Marty Makary, Kennedy's hand-picked commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration and a John Hopkins scientist and researcher, told NBC News in an interview that he wants to transform the agency, which he said faced 'corruption' over influence from the pharmaceutical and food industries. 'I mean, you look at the food pyramid, it was not based on what's best for you, it was based on what companies wanted you to buy,' he said, referring to the 1992 and later iterations of official government nutritional guidance. He said there would be 'entirely new nutrition guidance' released later this year, as soon as this summer. He praised the FDA's mission of research and regulation, saying the agency is 'incredibly well-oiled, and we've got the trains running on time.' He also highlighted the 75-page 'Make America Healthy Again' commission report — which focused on ultraprocessed foods and toxins in the environment — as having set 'the agenda for research' at the FDA, HHS and agencies overseeing social safety net programs such as Medicare and food stamps moving forward. (The MAHA report initially cited some studies that didn't exist, a mistake that Kennedy adviser Calley Means said was a 'great disservice' to their mission.) 'I think there's a lot we're going to learn. For example, the microbiome, which gets attention in the MAHA report, needs to be on the map. We don't even talk about it in our medical circles,' Makary said. 'The microbiome, food is medicine, the immune response that happens when chemicals that don't appear in nature go down our GI tract.' Pressed on other areas of the administration, like the Environmental Protection Agency, making decisions that run counter to the pro-regulatory ideas presented in the MAHA report, Makary said he can 'only comment on the FDA' where they are 'committed to Secretary Kennedy's vision.' But Kennedy's public health agenda goes beyond looking at the food supply and chemicals. Recently, Kennedy said in a video posted on X last month that the Covid vaccine is no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, a change in CDC guidance that skipped the normal public review period. Days later, after critics questioned the decision and raised concerns over a lack of public data behind the move, the administration updated its guidance again, urging parents to consult with their doctors instead. Pressed about the confusion and whether Americans are now trading one side of public distrust in the health system for another, Makary defended Kennedy, who has been criticized for spreading misinformation. 'My experience with Secretary Robert F. Kennedy is that he listens. He listens to myself, he listens to Jay Bhattacharya, listens to Dr. Mehmet Oz, he listens to a host of scientists that are giving him guidance,' Makary argued, referring to the director of the National Institutes of Health and the administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, respectively. 'So he may have big questions, but the questions he's asking are the questions most Americans are asking.' The intersection of medicine and healthy lifestyle choices Dr. Dawn Mussallem, a breast cancer oncologist and integrative medicine doctor — a physician who combines conventional treatments with research-based alternative therapies — has tried to help her patients wade through medical misinformation they encounter online and in their social circles. Mussallem has an incredible story of personal survival: While in medical school, she was diagnosed with Stage IV cancer and, after conventional therapies like chemo saved her life, was diagnosed with heart failure. After undergoing a heart transplant, Mussallem ran a 26-mile marathon just one year later. 'I learned a lot in medical school, but nothing compared to what I learned being a patient,' said Mussallem, who dedicates, on average, 90 minutes each in one-on-one sessions with her patients. 'This is not about any one political choice. But we know lifestyle matters.' For example, a new study from the American Society of Clinical Oncology that finds eating food that lowers inflammation in the body may help people with advanced colon cancer survive longer. Mussallem's mission, along with her colleagues, is to elevate the modern medicine that saved her life, as well as encouraging her patients to live healthy lifestyles, including regular exercise, minimally processed foods, less screen time, more social connection and better sleep. But politics do get in the way for millions of Americans who are inundated daily with social media influencers and 'nonmedical experts,' as Mussallem puts it, who stoke fear in her patients. 'Patients come in with all these questions, fears,' she said. 'I've heard this many times from patients, that their nervous system is affected by what they're seeing happening in government.' Mussallem acknowledges that 'a lot of individuals out there' have questioned traditional medicine. For her, it isn't one or the other — it's both. 'We have to trust the conventional medicine,' she said. 'With the conventional care that marches right alongside more of an integrative modality to look at the root causes of disease, as well as to help to optimize with lifestyle, is where we need to be.'


NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Ghost networks leave patients struggling to find care
Guy and Michelle Mazzola struggled to find care for their two-year-old son with autism when many of the providers listed within their insurer's network ended up being unavailable. NBC News' Vicky Nguyen reports in our series 'The Cost of Denial.'


NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
‘Ghost networks' are harming patients, but attempts to eliminate them have fallen short
The clock started ticking when Michelle Mazzola's son, Guy, was diagnosed with autism before his second birthday. Doctors told her the sooner Guy received therapy for his nonverbal communication and behavioral challenges, the better chance he had of reaching his full potential — and perhaps entering a kindergarten with neurotypical students. Like many parents, Mazzola hoped to find therapists who were covered by their insurance. So she consulted a directory of providers listed as 'in-network' on her insurance company's website. Mazzola spent two weeks calling providers on the list, but found no viable options. 'Probably 50% of the time no one answered the phone or the phone number was wrong,' she said. 'Then you would get people on the phone and they'd say, 'Yeah, we have about a nine-month wait list.'' Watch NBC Nightly News with Tom Llamas tonight at 6:30 p.m. ET/5:30 p.m. CT for more. She had stumbled upon what's informally known as a 'ghost network' — a directory of providers that are largely unreachable, out of network or don't accept new patients. Studies suggest it's common to encounter these networks while looking for covered care. By prolonging the search for a provider, ghost networks can delay patients' ability to get diagnosed and treated, or cause them to forgo care altogether. But regulatory efforts to force insurance companies to update their directories or penalize them for inaccurate provider information have fallen short, prompting some patients to turn to the courts. A class action lawsuit filed last year on behalf of federal employees in New York against Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield claims the company's ghost networks amount to deceptive advertising by making people think they're purchasing insurance with an extensive list of in-network providers. The suit further claims that inaccurate directories help insurance companies 'evade the costs' of covering people's care. It alleges that plaintiffs who could not rely on Anthem's directory were forced to use out-of-network doctors, saddling them with thousands of dollars in extra costs. In moving to dismiss the case, Anthem has argued that federal law pre-empts the plaintiffs from suing as members of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. Mazzola, who lives in Connecticut and runs a construction company with her husband, is not a plaintiff in the suit. She estimated that she pays about $7,000 out of pocket each month for Guy's care, even after appealing denied claims and getting reimbursed for some out-of-network costs. She believes she wouldn't have to pay that sum if the providers in Anthem's directory were available. 'You take it at face value when you're buying a plan that this is what I'm getting,' Mazzola said. 'I would have gladly gone to any of those [in-network] providers if they actually were taking patients.' If you are dealing with bills that seem to be out of line or a denial of coverage, care or repairs, whether for health, home or auto, please email us at Costofdenial@ A spokesperson for Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield said the company meets access requirements outlined under state law. 'We also work hard to ensure that our provider directories are up-to-date and as accurate as possible, which requires a shared commitment from providers to update their information when there are any changes,' the spokesperson said. Anthem said its provider network offers most of the services Guy needs, but due to the specialized nature of those services, it can be challenging to get appointments immediately. The company said it reviewed the list of providers that Mazzola tried to contact and found five errors related to incorrect phone numbers or addresses, which it said it will work with providers to fix. NBC News reached out to 21 providers listed in Anthem's network, and found 20 either didn't take patients Guy's age or had no availability for months. Another class action lawsuit filed in April on behalf of state and local employees in New York against Carelon Behavioral Health, which provides health care services through insurance plans, claims that ghost networks delayed plaintiffs' access to mental health treatment. Carelon said it does not comment on pending litigation. The two class action suits are among the first to challenge insurance companies over ghost networks, said Steve Cohen, a lawyer at Pollock Cohen in New York who is representing the plaintiffs in both cases as well as Mazzola. 'Patients are in need of help,' Cohen said. 'They call provider after provider who are listed in this directory to get no answer, to be told it's not a doctor's office, to be told they don't accept the insurance. It's incredibly frustrating and often complicates getting medical care. It's dangerous.' A widespread problem Mazzola's experience is familiar to many, regardless of their insurance plan or health issue. 'The vast majority of the time, a doctor's information is not going to be correct,' said Dr. Neel Butala, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine who co-founded a company that uses artificial intelligence to help large health plans improve provider data. Butala reviewed physician directories from five large health insurers and found that 81% of entries had inconsistencies, such as address errors or the wrong specialty being listed for a physician. His findings were published in JAMA Network Open. A government review of Medicare Advantage plans found that the share of inaccurately listed provider locations ranged from nearly 5% to 93%, depending on the directory. Ghost networks can pose a particular challenge to finding mental health providers, many of whom have long patient waitlists or have stopped taking insurance. After calling nearly 400 listed numbers for mental health providers in New York, the state attorney general's office found that 86% were ghost entries. Staffers on the Senate Finance Committee similarly contacted 120 mental health providers listed as in-network by Medicare Advantage plans, and found that ghost entries made up more than 80%. 'In my view, it's a breach of contract for insurance companies to sell their plan for thousands of dollars each month while their product is unusable, unusable due to a ghost network,' Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said at a Senate hearing on mental health access in 2023. Anneliese Hanson, who was a network market manager at Cigna Behavioral Health until several years ago, said she felt pressure to make provider networks seem more robust to appeal to current or prospective members. 'If our target was to have 100 autism specialists within a certain [geographic area], we would be working towards meeting that target on paper, rather than actually checking and ensuring that there were 100 autism providers,' Hanson said. A Cigna spokesperson said the company takes rigorous measures to ensure its directory is updated and accurate, and has a dedicated team of specialists to help patients access behavioral care quickly and conveniently. In response to Hanson's comments, the spokesperson said: 'These untrue and inflammatory assertions have no basis in reality, neither back then nor today.' Cohen said that federal and state standards require insurance companies to offer an ample number of in-network health care providers within a defined distance of the patient's home. Those requirements may encourage insurers to pad their directories, he said. But Butala pushed back on that idea: 'I don't think there's any actually bad actors,' he said. 'I think everyone wants to get this right.' Butala said there's an incentive for insurance companies to put out the right information, since a bad member experience could cause them to lose customers. One explanation for ghost networks, he said, is that providers report doctors' information in a way that's conducive for billing, but isn't necessarily accessible to patients. Insurers often receive data that's difficult and time-intensive to comb through, he said. 'I think it's just a really hard problem to solve,' he said. A better solution? Mazzola said she and her husband, also named Guy, have been fortunate enough to afford their son's autism therapy so far. The younger Guy, now 2, is not speaking yet but has gotten better at making eye contact and using sign language to communicate words. But the Mazzolas still feel the insurance system didn't work for them as promised. 'You pay for insurance your whole life, hoping [a diagnosis] never happens, but when it does, that you can put your head on the pillow at night knowing they're going to be there for you. And that just wasn't the case,' Guy Mazzola said. Legal and medical experts say some protections against ghost networks exist, but aren't consistently enforced. Under the No Surprises Act, a federal law that took effect in January 2022, private health plans are required to verify and update their provider directories at least every 90 days. If a member receives out-of-network care because the directory information was inaccurate, insurance companies must reimburse them for any costs that exceed the in-network price. Patients can also file complaints to state regulators, who have the authority to fine companies for directory errors. But a ProPublica investigation last year determined that such fines are rare. In an average year, fewer than a dozen fines are issued by insurance regulators for directory errors, the investigation found — and even then, the penalties are small. One solution that might reduce the prevalence of ghost networks is a centralized directory of providers that all health plans could refer to. But health policy experts see that as a long-term goal that would be difficult to implement. Butala said AI can help insurers scrub their directories for errors. 'I don't think health plans are skimping on throwing people at the problem,' he said. 'I think they've been throwing too many people at the problem, and now they realize maybe AI can actually make it better.' But the Mazzolas also think insurance companies should be willing to pay more providers, so it's not a challenge to offer services in-network. 'I'm not anti-business. I'm not anti-profit, but there's an ethical side of it, too,' Michelle Mazzola said. 'Something needs to be done.'