Ex-Florence Housing Authority HR chief says board member threatened to punch him, forced his ouster in lawsuit
FLORENCE COUNTY, S.C. (WBTW) — A former Florence Housing Authority board member threated to punch the agency's then human resources director in the face before working to get him fired without cause, a newly filed federal lawsuit alleges.
Justin Hanna, who spent just over a year in his role with the authority, was fired on Feb. 22, 2023 for 'fighting, threatening, coercing, or intimidating fellow employees' and 'engaging directly' with Jerrod Moultrie, who was a board member at the time.
That came one day after Moultrie demanded during a board meeting that Clamentine Elmore — at the time the authority's executive director — reprimand Hanna after he corrected Moultrie for calling him the 'HR guy.'
Florence-Housing-Authority-federal-lawsuitDownload
'I can tell you this .. . You might want to find somewhere else to work, because you won't work here anymore,' Moultrie said near the end of the meeting. 'I'll get the last laugh, I promise you.'
Hanna's complaint — initially filed on April 7 at the state level — was moved to U.S. District Court's Florence division on Friday.
According to the lawsuit, Moultrie continued his aggression after the public portion of the meeting ended, at one point telling Hanna, 'I will punch you in the face,' leading Hanna to file a report with the Florence County Sheriff's Office.
Hanna was never given a pre-termination hearing or opportunity to explain his position and asked the authority's grievance board for a meeting on Feb. 28, which never happened.
Hanna is suing Moultrie, Elmore, former authority chief operating officer Pamela Stevens and board member Linda Barr-Williams on grounds of defamation, breach of contract, violation of the 14th Amendment and civil conspiracy.
* * *
Adam Benson joined the News13 digital team in January 2024. He is a veteran South Carolina reporter with previous stops at the Greenwood Index-Journal, Post & Courier and The Sun News in Myrtle Beach. Adam is a Boston native and University of Utah graduate. Follow Adam on X, formerly Twitter, at @AdamNewshound12. See more of his work here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 Money Moves the Middle Class Should Make as Elon Musk Steps Down From DOGE
Elon Musk is scaling back his involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to refocus on his business ventures, which have taken a hit in recent months. Read Next: Find Out: While DOGE lacks formal agency status and congressional backing, Musk's reduced role may still signal a shift in political focus around federal cost-cutting. For middle-class Americans, this shift is worth watching, especially as new budget proposals, potential changes to the federal tax code and debates over entitlements take center stage. Here are five money moves the middle class should make as Musk steps down from his leadership role at DOGE. Even as Elon Musk scales back from DOGE, government spending cuts are moving forward — just not in the way many, including Musk, had hoped. President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' cuts funding for key public programs like housing, education and food assistance, while boosting defense and infrastructure spending. For the middle class, that means less support from government programs and no meaningful tax relief. For example, according to the Tax Policy Center, middle-income households would receive an average tax cut of about $1,800, or about 2.4% of their after-tax income, under the bill. In contrast, households in the top 5% of earners would see their tax bill cut by an average of $21,000, or 4.3% of their after-tax income. Now is the time for households to review their household budget and plan for potential gaps. Households and individuals who rely on tax credits, student aid or healthcare subsidies should prepare for potential changes and explore ways to build financial resilience in case these safety nets are reduced or eliminated. Be Aware: Given the potential for policy shifts and economic volatility, it's prudent for middle-class households to bolster their emergency savings. Financial experts commonly recommend setting aside three to six months' worth of living expenses to navigate unforeseen challenges, such as unexpected expenses or income disruptions resulting from changes in federal programs or economic downturns. According to experts at Vanguard, 'If you spend $5,000 per month, your first emergency fund savings milestone should be $2,500 to cover spending shocks. For your longer-term goal of an emergency fund that will cover income shocks, aim to save $15,000 to $30,000 total.' DOGE's initiatives included attempts to reform entitlement programs. Although Musk has stepped back, discussions around modifying Social Security and Medicare continue. For example, according to an analysis by the Medicare Rights Center, an advocacy organization, earlier versions of Trump's bill included proposals that 'would strip health coverage from nearly nine million people with Medicaid and Affordable Care Act plans.' Healthcare advocates also said, 'CBO (Congressional Budget Office) projected that taken together, these proposals would cause 13.7 million people to become uninsured.' However, the final number of how many people could lose healthcare coverage hasn't yet been tallied. Middle-class Americans, especially those nearing retirement, should stay informed about potential changes and consider consulting financial planners to understand how adjustments might impact their retirement plans. Without Musk, DOGE layoffs could still have a significant impact on the economy. Cresset Capital market analysts found that 'the ultimate economic impact will depend on the final scale of workforce reductions, the ability of the private sector to absorb workers and whether government service disruptions affect broader economic activity.' With uncertainties surrounding federal policies, the same market analysts recommended 'maintaining a diversified portfolio and a long-term investment horizon.' Specifically, middle-class investors should also consider a diversified portfolio of assets, including stocks, bonds and other instruments, to protect against market volatility and policy-driven economic fluctuations. Understanding the implications of federal initiatives like DOGE is essential for middle-class Americans. By staying informed and consulting a financial advisor, individuals can better anticipate policy changes instead of reacting to the latest headlines. A well-informed perspective enables proactive decision-making and strengthens the ability to advocate for policies that reflect their financial interests and long-term goals. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 5 Money Moves the Middle Class Should Make as Elon Musk Steps Down From DOGE Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
After Uvalde, school mental health grants had bipartisan support. Now Trump is cutting them.
Schools will likely have to lay off social workers and counselors, and college programs designed to train mental health providers may shut down after the Trump administration decided it would stop funding grants created under a bipartisan law passed in response to mass school shootings. The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act came on the heels of the devastating 2022 school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, where an 18-year-old gunman killed 19 elementary schoolers and two teachers. Gun control remains a deeply divisive issue, but Democrats and Republicans agreed: Schools should get more money to address students' mental health needs. They set aside $1 billion to do that. When it came time to distribute that money, the Biden administration gave applicants the option to show how they planned to diversify the mental health profession and prepare educators to work with kids from diverse backgrounds-in a bid to help students who often have higher needs but struggle to access care outside of school. Now schools that tailored their proposals to meet that criteria appear to be among those losing their funding. "The Department has determined these grantees are violating the letter or purpose of Federal civil rights law; conflict with the Department's policy of prioritizing merit, fairness, and excellence in education; undermine the well-being of the students these programs are intended to help; or constitute an inappropriate use of federal funds," Brandy Brown, the deputy assistant secretary for K-12 education, wrote in an email to members of Congress the night of April 29. The Education Department has the authority to stop funding multiyear grant recipients, but it rarely does so. The state education agencies in Colorado, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin were among the grantees that lost their funding. So did the San Diego County Office of Education, Lincoln Public Schools in Nebraska, and Teachers College at Columbia University, which was supporting efforts in New York City schools. "Grant recipients used the funding to implement race-based actions like recruiting quotas in ways that have nothing to do with mental health and could hurt the very students the grants are supposed to help," Madi Biedermann, an Education Department spokesperson, wrote in an email to Chalkbeat. The Trump administration is objecting, in particular, to the Biden administration's decision to give schools more points on their grant application if they planned to increase the number of mental health staffers from diverse backgrounds or who were from the communities where they'd be working with kids. The federal notice didn't say what counted as "diverse," and it noted that any hiring strategies used by schools had to follow federal civil rights laws. "We were not there to say that this meant there had to be any type of racial quotas, or it had to be along the lines or race, or ability, or language," said Mary Wall, who until January served as the Education Department's deputy assistant secretary for P-12 education. "We simply said it would be wise and we encourage applicants to make hires of school-based mental health professionals that are reflective of the communities that they're serving." Many schools expected to get three or four more years of funding, but now the grants will run out in December. Wall said schools were well on their way to hitting the goal of hiring and training 14,000 mental health professionals, but these cuts put that at risk. "Not giving grant continuations has an extreme impact on whether or not the work can continue," she said. That's already happening in some places. Teachers College had begun training five graduate students to provide mental health services in schools, and was preparing to send offer letters to eight more when the college found out it had lost its $4.9 million five-year grant. The Trump administration ended it back in March when it terminated $400 million in funding for Columbia University. Those trainees, many of whom were bilingual or first-generation college students who couldn't otherwise afford graduate school were slated to work in high-need schools in Harlem and East Harlem-parts of New York City where many newly arrived immigrants live and families often struggle to find stable housing. Now, schools won't get the year of free services those trainees were going to provide, such as therapy and parent training. And there will be gaps in the future pipeline, too. "We were going to be producing professionals who would be working in these settings delivering school-based mental health services for years to come, ideally their entire careers," said Prerna Arora, an associate professor of psychology and education at Teachers College who was overseeing the grant. "We are in desperate need of these types of professionals." Cuts to mental health grants part of anti-DEI push The cuts appear to be part of the Trump administration's broader attacks on diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts and exemplify how the administration is using the Supreme Court's ruling that barred affirmative action in higher education to target a much wider set of DEI practices in K-12 schools. Already, the Trump administration has threatened to withhold federal education funding from states that won't sign off on its contested interpretation of what constitutes racial discrimination under federal civil rights law-a policy that's currently on hold as several legal challenges work their way through the courts. The Trump administration is investigating Chicago Public Schools for launching a Black student success plan and has sought to dismantle other practices, such as forming staff affinity groups based on race or allowing college students to participate in separate graduation ceremonies that celebrate their race or heritage. It is unclear exactly how many of the 265 grantees listed on the Education Department's website lost their funding and how much money was clawed back. On May 1, an Education Department spokesperson said they could not provide a list of which school districts, states, or colleges lost their funding. The Education Department told members of Congress that the terminated grants were worth $1 billion, but that is almost certainly an overestimate, Wall said, as many grantees had already spent a chunk of their money. The grants paid for 1,500 to 2,000 new mental health providers to work in schools across the U.S. in the first year alone, Wall said. It also appears some schools kept their grants. The Indiana Department of Education, Fort Wayne Community Schools in Indiana, and Normal Public Schools in Oklahoma all told Chalkbeat they hadn't been contacted about changes to their funding. The pandemic helped bring the need for more school-based mental health workers into sharp relief as many schools saw a spike in children experiencing depression, anxiety, or other kinds of stress. So did the many unaddressed warning signs exhibited by the teenage gunman in Uvalde, who spoke often of violence and targeted the classroom where he was once bullied. That, and similar cases in other school shootings, led Congress to invest in mental health staff as a school safety measure. With the help of federal COVID relief funds, many schools launched teletherapy services to address in-person staff shortages and to connect kids with bilingual therapists, male counselors, or mental health workers of color-who are often in especially short supply, but can form close connections with kids who look like them or who faced similar challenges growing up. While there isn't much research on the effects of pairing school-based mental health workers with kids of similar backgrounds, "we do know in research outside of the school environment that it's actually really beneficial for students of color to have therapists or mental health supports from folks within their own communities," said Nancy Duchesneau, a senior P-12 research associate who studies children's social and emotional well-being at the nonprofit EdTrust. "If you have students of color in a school, you really do want adults in the building-teachers, school counselors, mental health supports-who are of the same race and ethnicity to be able to better understand where students are coming from and make sure that the interventions or supports that they receive are not based on bias, but are truly based upon the needs of the students," Duchesneau said. Chris Rufo, the influential conservative activist, was the first to publicize the mental health grant cuts, the Associated Press reported. Rufo's social media posts have prompted the Trump administration to cancel other education spending. This time, Rufo posted examples from the grant proposals on the social media site X that he said were being used to "advance left-wing racialism and discrimination." The Education Department pointed to some of those same examples when explaining what it found objectionable about the grants. One grantee planned to hire 24 new school counselors and set a goal for eight to be people of color, an Education Department spokesperson told Chalkbeat. Other grantees said they would train therapists to address racial trauma or help mental health workers use a "critical compassion perspective," instead of a colorblind perspective that assumes race and skin color don't matter. Another grantee wrote that they were training the next generation of school counselors "to recognize and challenge systemic injustices, antiracism, and the pervasiveness of white supremacy." State officials condemn-and applaud-the cuts Some officials agreed with the move. In a statement, Ryan Walters, the superintendent of Oklahoma's schools, said he applauded the Trump administration for "taking bold action to eliminate these misguided programs." Oklahoma had planned to spend $1.9 million a year to help teachers, community members, and clinicians get retrained to work as mental health staff in schools before the state lost its funding. "These grants were never about addressing real mental health needs, they were about pushing a political agenda into our classrooms," Walters said in the statement, adding that his education agency was "forced" to apply for the money by state lawmakers. "We made our opposition clear then, and we stand by it today." Other state officials condemned the cuts. In Colorado, Jeremy Meyer, a spokesperson for the state's education agency, said the state was "deeply disappointed" by the Trump administration's decision to end Colorado's grant, which was expected to total $7.5 million over five years. Now the state will get just $1.5 million. The state was still rolling out its program to help schools recruit and retrain mental health staff so "no funds had yet been distributed to the field," Meyer wrote. Jill Underly, Wisconsin's state superintendent, said in a news release that the decision to eliminate $8 million of the state's planned $10 million grant was "indefensible" at a time "when communities are urgently asking for help." Already, she wrote, the federal grant had helped Wisconsin schools hire an additional 350 mental health staffers and helped enroll 500 new graduate students in the University of Wisconsin's certification program. "Kids don't get a chance to do-over their school experience while the federal government recalibrates its political agenda," Underly wrote. "These disruptions need to stop." Chalkbeat's New York bureau chief Amy Zimmer contributed reporting. This story was produced by Chalkbeat and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Trump pardon Diddy and end his trial?
Sean "Diddy" Combs is being tried in a New York courtroom for racketeering and sexual trafficking. Could that daily drama vanish instantly if President Donald Trump pardoned the embattled rapper? "Yes, it could," says Brian Kalt, law professor at Michigan State University College of Law, who focuses on legal issues and the presidency. According to Kalt, Trump — who appears to be in the middle of a pardoning spree — would be within his presidential rights to extend a preemptive pardon to fellow New Yorker Combs, who has been described by witnesses so far as violent and abusive. "These are federal charges (against Combs), so that's the main limit. The matter has be federal, it has to be criminal vs. civil, and related to something that's already been done," says Kalt. "But the person doesn't have to even be charged yet, or convicted. The Supreme Court has said preemptive pardons are OK." Trump weighed in on the possibility Friday, May 30, in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." 'Nobody's asked': President Trump doesn't rule out pardoning Sean 'Diddy' Combs Typically, one of the last gestures from an outgoing president is a pardon. In President Joe Biden's final days in office, he famously pardoned his son, Hunter, convicted of federal gun felonies and federal tax charges. At the end of Trump's first term, he granted clemency to political allies such as Roger Stone, found guilty of obstructing a congressional investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and related offenses. But pardons can take place during a president's term, says Kalt. The right was established in Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution, which among other things gives the president "power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment." Kalt says the power to pardon is derived from the British monarch's historic right and stems from a recognition that criminal law was often too harsh, and it was important to have a safety valve. "The president was the best person to be that safety valve because of his political accountability," he says. But that's where things get murky, he adds, noting that Republican lawmakers "don't appear willing to hold the president accountable" for granting pardons, meaning they aren't costing him in terms of political capital. In contrast, President Gerald Ford's controversial pardoning of disgraced President Richard Nixon was perceived so negatively "that it probably cost Ford re-election in 1976," Kalt says. In just over 100 days since taking office, Trump has issued pardons to a broad range of personalities. They include Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of the reality show "Chrisley Knows Best," who were convicted in 2022 of swindling $36 million from Atlanta banks and being tax evaders, and rapper NBA YoungBoy, who in 2024 was sentenced to two years in prison for weapons possession. He also pardoned former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, convicted of wire fraud and extortion, and Jan. 6 participant and "Bob's Burgers" actor Jay Johnston. The reason many presidents issue pardons at the end of their terms is precisely to avoid political fallout, says Kalt. In that sense, Trump's brash approach suggests he has no concerns about such ramifications. "I don't agree with these pardons on their merits, but the fact that he did them when he is politically accountable as opposed to slinking out the door does add some legitimacy to them in that sense," he says. "With pardons, you don't need Congress, you wave your magic wand and it happens. You can see the appeal for a president, particularly one like Trump." One can also see the appeal for those such as Combs, whose ordeal could end instantly should Trump's pardon "wand" wave his way. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Will Trump pardon Diddy? Trial could end, experts say
