US strikes severely damaged Iran's nuclear facilities, CIA head says
US strikes caused "severe damage" to Iran's nuclear facilities after a leaked report downplayed the extent of the operation, CIA Director John Ratcliffe said on Wednesday.
According to Ratcliff, key sites had been destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the "course of years". He stopped short of declaring that Iran's nuclear programme had been outright eliminated.
The new intelligence assessment comes a day after a leaked early assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) played down the extent of the destruction and concluded that key components of Iran's nuclear programme could be restarted in months.
It also mentioned that much of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium had been moved by Iran before the US struck the sites over the weekend — a claim the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said on Thursday was a possibility.
Trump initially said that the use of US bunker-buster bombs on the Fordow and Natanz uranium enrichment sites was a "spectacular military success" that "obliterated" the key locations.
He denied media reports about the assessment from the DIA, posting on social media on Wednesday that the "fake news" media had "lied and totally misrepresented the facts".
Also on Wednesday, US President Donald Trump and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to cast doubt on the scale of the damage inflicted on the sites.
During the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump told journalists that the "intelligence was very inconclusive".
"The intelligence says we don't know. It could've been very severe. That's what the intelligence suggests," he said, later reversing his claim by saying that the Iranian programme had been set back "decades".
Hegseth described the damage to the facilities as "moderate to severe", although he rejected the DIA report, calling it false.
US officials have also pointed to conclusions made by the Israelis. On Wednesday, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the US strike on the Fordow facility "rendered it inoperable" and that the combined effort of Israeli and US strikes had "set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years".
'Either too early to know or you know'
Experts say that drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult only days after they have taken place.
Jeffrey Lewis, a professor of nonproliferation at the Middlebury Institute, told AP that, "either it's too early to know, or you know" about the damage to the sites.
A spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry said the facilities have suffered significant damage, although declined to elaborate in detail which facilities had sustained the most damage and to what extent.
Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, said on Tuesday that the sites had seen "extensive damage" as a result of the conflict.
The IAEA assessed that access roads close to the underground facility and an entrance at the Furdow site were hit. At the Natanz site, the IAEA said in its initial assessment that two impact holes from US strikes were found above the underground halls that had been used for enrichment and storage.
As the row over the extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear sites continues, diplomatic efforts to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear programme are also gaining traction.
Trump said that US and Iranian officials would meet soon to resume a dialogue that was interrupted by nearly two weeks of open conflict between Israel and Iran.
"I don't care if I have an agreement or not," Trump said, because Iran was too badly damaged to even consider rebuilding its programme. "They're not going to be doing it anyway. They've had it."
The IAEA has rejected an "hourglass approach" involving different assessments of how many months or years it would take Iran to rebuild its programme, saying that such efforts distracted from finding a long-term solution.
Iran still had the "technical knowledge" and "industrial capacity" to rebuild its programme, Grossi said, adding that his priority was allowing IAEA inspectors back to the sites to conduct a thorough assessment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
17 minutes ago
- France 24
Battered by war, Tehran responds with repression and paranoia
The Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not appeared in public since the start of the conflict with Israel on June 12, delivering only recorded video messages to his countrymen and giving the impression of a man sheltering for safety in his bunker. In a new recorded video on Thursday, Khamenei claimed victory over Israel and the United States, his first official statement since the start of the ceasefire on June 24. Until a few days ago, communications with the supreme leader were very complicated. In hiding with his family and protected by the Vali-ye Amr special forces unit of the Revolutionary Guards, Khamenei spoke to his commanders only through a close aide, suspending electronic communications for fear of giving away his location. In the aftermath of Sunday's US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, sources told the IranWire website that several Iranian political figures – including former president Hassan Rouhani, former speaker of Iran's parliament Ali Larijani and former head of the judiciary Sadiq Larijani – had tried in vain to contact Khamenei to ask him to open direct negotiations with the United States. Shock theory But the ceasefire does not mean the Iranian supreme leader and his regime are now safe. Since the Hamas attack on Israel of October 7, 2023, any "ceasefires in the region have not held", says Jonathan Piron, a historian specialising in Iran at the Etopia think tank in Namur, Belgium. "Sporadic strikes have been carried out, often by Israel – as in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip – where every truce has failed." Such a scenario could be repeated with Iran, which is now "very weakened" and has "little room for manoeuvre in confronting Israel, which is now dominant in the region", he says. The Israeli military could continue to target strategic Iranian installations. "We are witnessing a form of 'stability within instability', which is likely to last,' Piron says. It remains to be seen how the Iranian regime will choose to react. Under the circumstances, the regime itself will 'tend to stick together to avoid seeing elements of dissent emerge in the population or in reform movements", says Piron. Even if certain political factions "are sometimes in opposition or even hate each other", they "stand together' in the face of the external threats because "their common interest takes precedence over their divisions". He notes that "authoritarian regimes faced with instability" are even less open to compromise and often harden their positions. In a sign of the regime's precarious situation, Khamenei has named three senior clerics as candidates to succeed him if he is killed, according to the New York Times, citing three Iranian officials. The supreme leader is the head of state, appointed for life by a clerical body called the Assembly of Experts. Normally, the process of appointing a new supreme leader would take several months, with the Assembly of Experts choosing from their own list of names. But according to officials interviewed by the New York Times, Khamenei 'wants to ensure a quick, orderly transition and to preserve his legacy' and has made the unusual decision to instruct the Assembly of Experts 'to choose his successor swiftly from the three names he has provided'. Ayatollah Khamenei's son Mojtaba, also a cleric, with close ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, was once considered the favourite. But he is not among the candidates to succeed his father, officials told the New York Times. Mojtaba Khamenei's views echo those of his father on all the important issues, from the repression of opponents of the regime to the adoption of a hard line with foreign enemies. 'Some people put forward a 'shock theory': if Khamenei dies, it could undermine the regime," says Clément Therme, author of the book " Idées reçues sur l'Iran" ("Preconceived Ideas about Iran') to be published in August. Spy hunt Since Israel's surprise attack on Iran, fears of infiltration by Mossad at the highest levels of the security and intelligence apparatus have shaken the Iranian leadership. "The hard core of the regime is entering a phase of acute paranoia," says Piron. The Israeli strikes of the first few days of the offensive, which "decapitated the command of the Revolutionary Guards" and hit strategic nuclear sites, revealed "the deep infiltration of Israeli intelligence services into the heart of Iranian power". The current climate of extreme suspicion could push the regime to withdraw even further from the population. "The leader could begin to make appearances only in very controlled stage-managed events," says Piron, adding that this paranoia could also be "turned against the population, perceived as an internal enemy to be monitored, or even repressed". A large part of the Revolutionary Guards staff has been decimated, including members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force, and those who have stepped in to fill vacant roles have yet to establish their legitimacy. "We still don't really know much about those who have been promoted, even though they seem to have worked with the people who have been eliminated. So we're not dealing with novices," says Piron. "It remains to be seen whether those newly promoted can gain each other's trust – and, above all, gain the trust of the Supreme Guide." Among the new leaders, the few names that have been made public are from the generation that lived through the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988) – former 'brothers in arms', which gives them 'common references", Piron observes. "The assassinations by Israel have accelerated the process of generational renewal" within the IRGC, says Therme. "This will perhaps give rise to a new organisation within the system. But we shouldn't think that a young radical will be 'better' than an old radical. In fact, everyone is ideological. The Islamic Republic is an ideocracy." The Guardians' oil windfall Even weakened by war – with a shaky security apparatus, a damaged military, a shattered nuclear infrastructure and facing regional isolation following the strike on a US base in Qatar – the Iranian regime still has the capacity to replace those who have been eliminated and rebuild what has been destroyed. It can survive "as long as it has oil revenues and no one is prepared to send in ground forces to defeat them - even if it is not safe from a Kurdish revolt", says Therme. The Israeli strikes spared Kharg Island, site of the oil terminal that handles over 90 percent of Iranian crude oil exports. In a remarkable Truth Social post on Tuesday, US President Donald Trump seemed to signal a complete reversal of US sanctions on Iran's oil exports, saying that, 'China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran.' A senior White House official later said the longstanding sanctions would remain, Bloomberg reported. The Iranian regime 'is indeed in a very weak position. But it has not been defeated", says Piron. There is a risk that in its damaged state the Iranian authorities will fall back on a time-honoured strategy of cracking down, he adds. Faced with a population already suffering from the war and a social and economic crisis, the regime could step up the pressure to prevent any dissent: The hundreds of arrests and the recent increase of executions are the first signs of this. By using a pre-emptive strategy, the regime is aiming to discourage protests within the country. A popular uprising remains a possibility, Piron says, although there is no way of predicting it. "All it would take is a symbolic event to rekindle protest," says Piron. Popular resistance to the regime was not at all in evidence while the war was going on, 'But it may be possible now that the conflict is over.'
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Netanyahu seeks to postpone trial summons after Trump backing
Trump's move in support of Netanyahu over the case drew criticism from some Israeli politicians, including a member of the Israeli leader's own coalition and the leader of the opposition. It came days after Trump and Netanyahu declared victory over Iran in a 12-day conflict that saw Israel bombard the Islamic republic and US planes also drop powerful missiles on its nuclear installations. In a filing to the tribunal, Netanyahu's lawyer Amit Hadad said the premier's testimony should be delayed in light of "regional and global developments". "The court is respectfully requested to order the cancellation of the hearings in which the prime minister was scheduled to testify in the coming two weeks," the filing said. It said Netanyahu was "compelled to devote all his time and energy to managing national, diplomatic and security issues of the utmost importance" following the conflict with Iran and during ongoing fighting in Gaza where Israeli hostages are held. Trump on Wednesday described the case against Netanyahu as a "witch hunt". In a message on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the Netanyahu trial "should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero", after the end of the war with Iran. Netanyahu on Thursday thanked Trump for his "heartfelt support for me and your incredible support for Israel and the Jewish people". "I look forward to continue working with you to defeat our common enemies, liberate our hostages and quickly expand the circle of peace," Netanyahu wrote on X, sharing a copy of Trump's Truth Social post. Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid said in an interview with news website Ynet: "We are thankful to President Trump, but... the president should not interfere in a judicial trial in an independent country." Corruption charges Israel's longest-serving prime minister, Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing in the trial, which has been delayed many times since it began in May 2020. In a first case, Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, are accused of accepting more than $260,000 worth of luxury goods such as cigars, jewellery and champagne from billionaires in exchange for political favours. In two other cases, Netanyahu is accused of attempting to negotiate more favourable coverage in two Israeli media outlets. One of Netanyahu's coalition allies, Simcha Rothman of the far-right Religious Zionism party, also called for Trump to stay out of the court case. "It is not the role of the president of the United States to interfere in legal proceedings in the State of Israel," said Rothman, who chairs the Israeli parliament's judicial affairs committee. Rothman, a vocal critic of what he argues is judicial overreach, however said that "the management of Netanyahu's cases is transforming the image of the State of Israel from a regional and global power into a banana republic." National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, the leader of another far-right party in Netanyahu's coalition, backed Trump's call, branding the trial politically motivated. Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said it was "distorted, unreasonable, contrary to the basic sense of justice" to continue Netanyahu's trial while Israel is at war, also backing Trump's call to drop the charges. During his current term since late 2022, Netanyahu's government has proposed a series of far-reaching judicial reforms that critics say were designed to weaken the courts. Netanyahu has requested multiple postponements in the proceedings, most recently citing the ongoing war in Gaza since April 2023, later in Lebanon and earlier this month in Iran.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
FIFA faces quandary over US and Iran involvement at 2026 World Cup
FIFA is facing questions about how it will manage the involvement of both the US and Iran at next year's World Cup, just days after Donald Trump ordered the bombing of three Iranian nuclear facilities. The US became involved in the recent 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran, which ended with an American-brokered ceasefire on Tuesday, when it dropped bunker-buster bombs on several targets inside Iran over the weekend. The mission was hailed by the Trump administration as a profound blow to Iran's nuclear programme, despite a US intelligence report later casting doubt on its effectiveness. Meanwhile, Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei claimed on Thursday that the US had "achieved no gains from this war". Amid the tension between the two countries, questions have been raised about the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which will be co-hosted by the US and in which Iran will compete. Next year, Iran can only avoid matches in the US if they are placed in Group A, which is exclusively played in Mexico, another of the tournament's three hosts. According to the tournament system, if Iran tops Group A, it will play its round of 32 and round of 16 matches in Mexico. However, if they advance further into the knockout rounds, they would have to move to the US, potentially opening the door to unprecedented diplomatic and security issues. Under FIFA regulations, there is no provision that would prevent Iranians from playing on US soil, even though the Trump administration recently imposed a travel ban on Iranian nationals. An exemption could apply to Iran's football squad and its staff. Internal FIFA consultations are expected to be held ahead of the draw for the tournament in December. The final decision on the groupings will be made by the FIFA Council, which is chaired by the organisation's President Gianni Infantino, who has close ties to Trump. The FIFA Competitions Organising Committee - which includes representatives from the hosts Canada, Mexico and Iran and which is chaired by UEFA President Aleksander Čeferin - will play an advisory role. The European position could set a precedent, as UEFA decided in 2022 to separate Ukraine and Belarus in the draw for European competitions, following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Euronews has reached out to FIFA for comment about the US and Iran's involvement at next year's tournament. The Iranian national team secured its qualification to the World Cup for the fourth consecutive time in March. It competed in the last tournament in Qatar in 2022, where it faced its American counterpart in a match that attracted widespread political and media attention.
