Ange Postecoglou lined up for managerial return... in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabian club Al-Ahli, the Asian Champions League winners, are interested in Ange Postecoglou, should they make a change of manager for next season.
Postecoglou was sacked by Tottenham Hotspur last week, as revealed by Telegraph Sport, but did not reveal his immediate plans in an emotional farewell statement to fans where he said they would be 'forever connected'.
The Australian, 59, is expected to receive offers from clubs over the summer given his success at Spurs where he delivered the club's first trophy in 17 years. However, their Premier League form suffered in the pursuit of silverware.
Al-Ahli are understood to be looking at Postecoglou as a potential target should highly rated German coach Matthias Jaissle leave.
Jaissle led the club to an AFC Champions League Elite triumph in May when they defeated Kawasaki Frontale in a final featuring Ivan Toney, Roberto Firmino, Riyad Mahrez and Edouard Mendy.
The young German coach, 37, has now been tipped to return to Europe. He was previously linked with the West Ham job before Graham Potter's appointment and more recently RB Leipzig in his homeland. His silverware this season came despite appearing under pressure at the start of the campaign when his team were struggling.
Postecoglou has previously worked in Asia when he was at Yokohama F Marinos in Japan and won the J1 League prior to winning the title in Scotland with Celtic. He was sacked at Spurs exactly two years after his appointment, with the Australian delivering on his promise of winning a trophy in his second season when Manchester United were defeated in Bilbao.
Spurs players paid tribute to Postecoglou following his sacking by chairman Daniel Levy, with captain Son Heung-min leading the way on social media. 'You paved the way despite the many obstacles that always existed and always will exist,' added Argentina centre-back Cristian Romero.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fifa, the Club World Cup and Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia's money appears to be underpinning the revamped Club World why has the country helped to bankroll an event that has struggled to generate interest, drawing criticism for the impact it could have on players, domestic leagues, and the environment?For those wanting to understand the forces at play over the next month of competition in the US, Miami's Hard Rock Stadium on Wednesday would be an ideal place to after all, is where Real Madrid will kick off their Club World Cup campaign, with new signing Trent Alexander-Arnold set to make his fact the Spanish giants were willing to pay Liverpool a reported £8m to secure the defender's early release so he could play in the tournament is testament to the staggering riches on offer. With a prize pot of $1bn (£750m), top European teams are in line to earn up to £97m if they win, leading to concerns such money could distort domestic leagues and skew competitive balance. Real's Saudi opponents - Al-Hilal - highlight another intriguing aspect of the Riyadh club are owned by the kingdom's Public Investment Fund (PIF).But the vast sovereign wealth fund's involvement in this competition does not stop December, sports streaming platform DAZN agreed to pay Fifa - football's world governing body - $1bn for the tournament's global broadcast was not the only surprise, because it also promised to make the live action available for free. This despite Fifa having previously struggled to find broadcast partners, and after DAZN had posted several billion dollars worth of losses over recent years. Then, a few weeks later, a subsidiary of PIF announced it had acquired a minority stake in DAZN for what it has since confirmed was $1bn - explaining at the time it was "an exciting opportunity to build on DAZN's significant successes in recent years by bringing more sports to fans and audiences around the world".Saudi ties with the Club World Cup strengthened further last week, when PIF became an official partner of an event Fifa president Gianni Infantino claims will "make football truly global".In a statement at the time, PIF claimed the sponsorship deal showed it was "at the forefront of growing football", noting the sport "plays a crucial role in the ongoing transformation" of the is there more to it than that? After all, Fifa had initially struggled to attract sponsors, and ticket sales for some games have been sluggish, with the event perhaps hampered by a complicated qualification system that means recently crowned domestic champions including Liverpool and Barcelona are not the event from seven teams to 32 has also sparked a legal complaint from both the international players' union and the body representing European leagues, who - despite Fifa denials - claim their concerns over a congested calendar and player workload have been ignored. 'Deeply flawed' Back in December, just a few days after Fifa announced its "landmark agreement" with DAZN, the governing body confirmed Saudi Arabia as the host of the 2034 World it is not just the timeline that has inevitably led to speculation over a possible connection between Saudi's investment in the expanded Club World Cup and that hugely controversial years of scrutiny over its human rights and environmental record, the Saudi bid for the World Cup was unopposed. Australia - the only other potential candidate - decided not to enter the running, hinting it was futile to do so after being given less than a month by Fifa to mount a stood by a fast-tracked process critics argued lacked transparency, and which it was felt effectively paved the way for the Saudis thanks to a decision that only bids from Asia and Oceania would be considered - even though the World Cup had been staged in the Middle East - in Qatar - as recently as sense of inevitability surrounding Saudi's bid was only reinforced after Fifa's evaluation report awarded it a record high score. Ratification was then confirmed by acclamation - in the form of applause - rather than a traditional vote, with only Norway's football federation abstaining, and criticising the bidding has defended Saudi's hosting of football's 2034 showpiece, insisting it can be a catalyst for social improvements, and Fifa insists it was an open and transparent process. But others remain McGeehan, of football campaign group Fair Square, told BBC Sport the World Cup process effectively acted "to ensure that Saudi Arabia was selected as host"."During this deeply flawed bidding process… Fifa sealed a commercially inexplicable broadcasting deal [for the Club World Cup] said to be worth $1bn with an entity that is now part-owned by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund."Fifa does not like the fact that many people look at these facts and conclude that there must be a linkage between them, but had it run a fair and transparent bidding process in the first place it wouldn't be under this scrutiny."Such sentiments are echoed by Infantino's predecessor Sepp Blatter, who claims the Club World Cup will "over-charge the international calendar".Replying to BBC Sport's questions via his lawyer, Blatter - who remains banned from football until 2028 for breaches of its ethics code - said: "It is obvious that without Saudi's investment, the Club World Cup could not be organised in the US... it's only through financial help of $1bn from Saudi Arabia that the [DAZN] coverage of this competition was possible."There is no more mystery... Saudi Arabia has taken control of international football."In a statement, a Fifa spokesperson rejected the suggestion that investment into the Club World Cup was from one country, saying it now had nine tournament sponsors and that "commercial momentum is strong".They insisted that Fifa has "a duty to develop the game globally and this new competition is in the best interests of football", with all profits redistributed to the clubs through prize money and a $250m 'solidarity' added that the Club World Cup "is not responsible for calendar congestion", noting that it takes place once every four years with a maximum of seven matches for the two finalists."We believe that this new Club World Cup will mark a turning point for club football worldwide…[it] is an event that football needed." 'The most streamed sports event ever' Speaking to BBC Sport from Miami before the Club World Cup's opening match, DAZN's emerging markets chief executive Pete Oliver defended the investment in what he calls "a fantastic competition", insisting it made commercial sense."We've been looking for a big property to take DAZN to the next step," he said. "This is an opportunity to establish ourselves as a global platform for football."Oliver said it was a "very logical deal" for DAZN, insisting the tournament would "take off" and was generating huge interest in regions such as South America."We think this will be the most streamed sports event ever. It will help us build a huge customer database," he added, pointing out DAZN had recouped some of its outlay by regionally sub-licensing rights to some about PIF's subsequent investment in the company, Oliver said: "People always speculate but I can tell you we're not being used as a pawn or anything like that."There was a lot that happened, but these things are not necessarily connected in any way. The investment we had from PIF was around a general investment, but also specifically to establish a partnership for the Middle East and North Africa region."We're an independent company... we're making our own decisions."PIF declined to comment, but sports business expert Callum McCarthy says their investment in DAZN "is expected to result in a Saudi-based sports broadcaster that will rival Qatar's beIN Sports across the Middle East."Saudi Arabia has wanted to own a sports broadcaster for well over a decade and has never really known how to pull it off," he says. "Fifa needed a global broadcaster for this tournament that could fund this thing, and DAZN now has a direct relationship with Fifa. All three parties have got what they wanted out of the equation." 'Marriage of convenience' Speaking on condition of anonymity, one senior FA source told BBC Sport that Saudi's support for the Club World Cup was "a marriage of convenience". The country - they believe - was always likely to stage the 2034 World Cup regardless of the backing of the Club World Cup, thanks to its unprecedented investment in sport, along with the money Fifa believed it could make by returning to the Middle East after Qatar felt Saudi's financial backing of the Club World Cup should be viewed as a "bailout" for Fifa, rather than an agreed plan. Fifa, the source said, would have initially been hoping to attract more interest from broadcasters and sponsors, but may have sought help from the Saudis."Sport in the kingdom is still largely known for boxing and horse racing," they said."With Al-Hilal involved in the Club World Cup, this helps establish the country as a footballing nation ahead of the World Cup in 2034, in a way that Qatar failed to do for 2022."Involvement in the Club World Cup may help tempt some players to join the Saudi Pro League. They'll be hoping it brings football to a wider public in their own country, and helps to tackle low attendances at some games."It is notable that Saudi club Al-Ahli has already booked a place in the 2029 Club World Cup. 'Opportunity for growth' Sources close to the Saudi government told BBC Sport the country's investment is purely based on an opportunity for growth in a new market it can also benefit from, as it develops its own plans to use football to boost the economy, boost tourism and help says it fully concurs with Infantino's recent claim that if the US and Saudi Arabia could develop their football industries, and there was less reliance on European football, the sport's annual GDP could double to more than half a trillion dollars in economic this helps explain why Fifa is reportedly already considering a 48-team Club World Cup in 2029 - in line with the expanded men's and women's World Cups."I think that concept could work, as long as the quality of the teams is high," says DAZN's Oliver."That could be very exciting."That is not how player unions will see such a prospect, as they insist their members are already at breaking point. Environmental campaign groups are also vehemently opposed to a competition that has gone from seven matches in a single city to 63 matches across 11 nothing else, this Club World Cup could reveal just how much more expansion the game is capable of, and willing to accept.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Cyriel Dessers Rangers transfer exit splits the Jury as Celtic urged caution over Evan Ferguson
Cyriel Dessers has agreed a deal with AEK - but should Ibrox chiefs really consider selling a striker who has fired 50 goals in his two years in Glasgow? ANDREW NEWPORT: If the fee is big enough then of course. Rangers have let far too much money slip through their fingers by failing to sell when the price is right. Dessers scores plenty - but misses more. He's 30 and his value will only decline from here. SCOTT MCDERMOTT: Only if the price is right. I'd keep Dessers to be second choice striker at Ibrox because of his excellent goal return. But he's 30 years old and is a high earner so if Rangers can make a profit on him with a sale of around £4million they have to consider it. MICHAEL GANNON: If Rangers can make a profit then it's worth taking the dosh. Dessers is on top dollar and he has delivered goals. He's still unreliable in big games, on big money and the wrong side of 30. Take the dosh and invest it. Is Ireland ace and rumoured Celtic target Evan Ferguson a better bet than countryman Adam Idah to lead the line for Brendan Rodgers' team? ANDY: He looked a proper prospect when he burst onto the scene with a hat-trick against Newcastle a couple of years back but he's only scored three goals since November 2023. Idah isn't the finish product either but at least he's been a regular contributor for Celtic. SCOTT: With both players playing at their best, I think Ferguson is a better striker. He has more natural ability, as well as being a powerhouse up front. But he's toiled for two years now in the Premier League and Rodgers sees real potential and development in Idah. MICHAEL: The Ferguson of 12 months ago would have been a good option but it's more uncertain now after a poor season. A loan deal late in the window could be an option but Celtic should be looking at cheaper targets before then. Ian Maxwell has shelved contract talks with Steve Clarke while the Scotland boss focuses on turning around his team's worrying form - but should Clarke stay on even if he leads the nation to the World Cup? ANDY: Maxxy is right to put negotiations on hold as breaking our World Cup duck is all that matters. If Clarke can do that job he'll get the keys to Scotland, never mind a new deal. SCOTT: If he gets us to the World Cup, that will solely be Clarke's decision because of course the SFA would want to keep him on after reaching three major tournaments. But with current form, the question is - will he still be in charge by the end of the campaign if it goes pear-shaped in Copenhagen? MICHAEL: Clarke has earned the right to do what he wants. If he leads the nation to the World Cup, he can do what he likes, even if he might be tempted to walk away on a high. Motherwell have gone foreign again after appointing Jens Berthel Askou as Michael Wimmer's replacement - but should they have looked closer to home? ANDY: You might have thought they'd have had second thoughts about going down that route given the way Wimmer left them in the lurch. But the German did a decent job in his short time and Fir Park and Well bosses will hope Askou can pick up where his predecessor left off. If he doesn't, a Robbie Neilson or Tony Docherty should be their next call. SCOTT: We don't know enough about Berthel Askou yet to make a judgement. But for what Motherwell wants to achieve in the Scottish Premiership, it's hard to not to feel that a manager like Robbie Neilson or Tony Docherty couldn't have done an excellent job there.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Celtic transfer clock is ticking on hot prospect as ghost of missed target hovers
It's difficult to judge a player when they are up against the international equivalent of the Dog and Duck pub team. Lennon Miller produced an impressive performance on his fist Scotland start against Liechtenstein – but it wasn't anything we didn't already know. Everyone is well aware of how good a player he is and it was clear he was levels above the opposition the other night. And it's also now obvious Celtic are going to have to get their skates on if they want to sign him. The clock is ticking – and the fee is rising. It's going to continue to rise by the week by the looks of it, and the longer it goes on, the more danger there is they will miss out. Fans will be fearing the ghost of John McGinn is hovering over the club again. No one will forget the fallout when they missed out on the midfielder when he was at Hibs and he ended up at Aston Villa. Brendan Rodgers wasn't happy at the time, especially when the cost was relatively low. McGinn was a top player back then but in fairness, I don't think many would have predicted he'd go on to captain Villa and lead them to the Champions League. But he'll always be the one that got away – and it could be the same with Miller. The circumstances are different with these players though and times have changed. McGinn was a bit older while Miller is not even 19 years-old yet. And I also suspect this time it will be down to whether Rodgers can see a role and a path for him at Parkhead. He certainly fits the bill when it comes to the profile of player Celtic go for and the club's model. Miller is already established but he's got bags of potential and development to come. Motherwell know it as well and they are right to hold out for top money. It's up to Celtic to meet their valuation. I always get impatient when it comes to these things. I know how football works and I know it can take time. But why risk things not working out? If he's a player they want, go and get him. It will only end up costing them in the long run. You look at the £11m spent on Arne Engels – another prospect – and the £9m on Adam Idah, and it's clear they are not scared to spend money. So if it costs £5m or £6m to land Miller – just go and do it. There is an argument about who he'd replace in the side and if he'd get game time immediately. Is he going to oust Reo Hatate or Engels, will he even go ahead of Luke McCowan after a solid first season and what would that mean for Paulo Bernardo, who has looked decent but had a poor end to the season? But from what you hear from Miller, he's a confident lad and he'd back himself to break into the side. And if that's the case and he does the business, then it would be a bargain. His value won't go down, that's for sure. Even if it didn't work out, it's hardly a disaster. Celtic have the money and they spent similar amounts on guys like Vasilis Barkas – and look how that went. I don't see it as a similar risk. Miller has already shown he can do it in Scotland and you'd imagine he'd reach greater heights training with better players every day. Celtic need to be careful because even if it gets to £8m or £10m, that's the kind of money found down the back of most EPL couches. Sunderland have been linked already but he shouldn't be tempted by that one. They'll go straight back down and would he rather be in the Champions League or the Championship? It's a no brainer for me. Celtic should be targeting the best homegrown talents, to add to the likes of Callum McGregor, James Forrest, Anthony Ralston and now Kieran Tierney, and it gives the team a Scottish core. The return of Tierney is a major boost. Listen, we know he's had injury issues and that is going to be a question mark. But there is absolutely no doubting his quality. If he stays fit he'll be a brilliant signing, it's as simple as that. There is a need for a strong back up though, just going on recent evidence. Tierney isn't going to play every minute of a 55 game season. He's just not. That means there needs to be a more than capable left back on the books to slot in some weeks or come off the bench. Greg Taylor would have been ideal but it looks like that ship has sailed, so Celtic need to address it. There's a few other matters to tackle as well. It looks like Celtic have cranked up a gear this week and there are several irons in the fire – with a lot of wingers linked with the club. The key is getting the deals done quickly. This is not a summer to be messing around, with the Champions League qualifier on the horizon. Lessons – like the McGinn one – have to be learned and if Rodgers has a vision for Miller then the club needs to get the chequebook out and make it happen.
