'Exciting' new study shows anti-smoking pill Varenicline could work for vape addicts
A new study exploring the use of a popular anti-smoking pill to help young people quit vaping is being hailed as "exciting" by Australian researchers.
The study, conducted by Massachusetts General Hospital in the United States and published by peer-reviewed journal JAMA, recruited more than 200 young people to test out the effectiveness of anti-smoking drug Varenicline on those who frequently vape.
Varenicline, commonly branded Chantix in Australia, is a prescription-only pill for adults that binds to nicotinic receptors in the brain, effectively blocking the pleasant effects of nicotine on the brain.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, it shouldn't be used as a person's only method of quitting smoking but in conjunction with other supports like behavioural therapy.
How does it work?
Researchers divided up 254 people aged between 16 and 25 years old who used e-cigarettes regularly into three groups.
All three groups had access to behavioural counselling and text message support.
Photo shows
A boy sits on a school bench holding a vape.
The first national anti-vaping campaign doesn't revive graphic imagery of tar-filled lungs or people in their deathbeds, but raises a different fear.
Group one was given the Varenicline pill to take twice a day and group two was given a placebo.
Group three was only given access to the counselling and text support program.
Researchers found 51 per cent of group one weren't vaping at 12 weeks compared to 14 per cent in the group two.
Group one also continued to have higher rates of abstinence after 24 weeks.
Researchers said while there were signs of withdrawal and some side-effects, it appeared the pill helped people quit vaping over a near six-week period.
"Varenicline, when added to brief, remotely delivered behavioural counselling, is well-tolerated and promotes vaping cessation compared with placebo in youth with moderate to severe addiction to vaped nicotine," the report said.
The study used bio-verification to ensure participants were sticking to the experiment.
Researchers did acknowledge there were potential limitations based on how people interacted with the behavioural counselling aspect of the survey, and some of those surveyed had engaged in intermittent tobacco use before the experiment.
Why do we care?
There are about 1.63 million youths in the United States who currently use e-cigarettes regularly.
"To our knowledge, this is the first pharmacotherapy trial for nicotine vaping cessation in youth," the report said.
Australian researchers say the study would need further checks before clinicians could start prescribing the pill to young people for vaping.
(
ABC Gold Coast: Dominic Cansdale
)
Researchers said finding effective treatment for nicotine addiction in young people was particularly important given recent evidence indicated it made them more likely to "rapidly transition" to having a substance abuse disorder.
It also increased their chances of smoking tobacco.
"Most youth who develop addiction to vaped nicotine have never regularly smoked tobacco and wish to quit vaping, highlighting the importance of these findings that an available pharmacotherapy is effective and well tolerated for vaping cessation in this population," the report said.
The federal health department found about 5 per cent of 12- to 17-year-olds vaped regularly, and more than 9 per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds used e-cigarettes daily, according to a 2023 study.
University of Western Australia public health professor Jonine Jancey said recent legislation changes around vaping has restricted children's access to e-cigarettes.
"Although this is positive finding, we should not become complacent," she said.
Dr Jancey said while varenicline had proven to be effective, particularly for adults attempting to quit vapes, the jury was still out on whether the same approach would work for young people.
"Young Australians are different to the rest of the population in regards to their developmental factors, the unique ways they look at vaping, and their social and cultural contexts, which can influence their vaping behaviours and reasons to quit," she said.
"There is emerging evidence on the effectiveness of Varenicline to support over 18s to quit vapes but this medication has not proven to be effective in promoting long-term quitting in this group. "
University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health associate professor Emily Stockings said the research was exciting due to its targeting of young people.
Vaping and smoking expert Dr Emily Stockings has written extensively about how important it is for young people to avoid nicotine addiction.
(
ABC News: Molly Slattery
)
"Varenicline is highly effective and safe for smoking cessation in adults, but there has not been enough evidence to support the use of it for youth under age 18," she said.
"This will be very welcome news to young people who are struggling with vaping dependence, and for clinicians who are grappling with how to address the very high levels of nicotine addiction in young people that don't seem to be responding to traditional treatments like nicotine replacement therapy."
Dr Stockings said further investigation needed to be done into how safe and effective varenicline is for young people before it can be prescribed in Australia.
She said it was also critical patients were offered behavioural supports in order to quit, and to not just rely on the drug.
"The earlier young kids can quit vaping, the easier it is, and the better it is for their long-term health,"
she said.
"If nicotine use goes untreated, nicotine dependence can develop, which can make it incredibly difficult to quit down the track."
The study was funded by National Institutes of Health grants, and it was peer-reviewed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Aussie grandmother diagnosed on her birthday with lung cancer, the same disease that killed husband
A grandmother has been diagnosed on her birthday with the same cancer that killed her husband 18 years ago. Jenny Egan was delivered the shocking news that a large mass had been found on her lung on May 7, when she was meant to be celebrating turning 64. Egan, from Fishing Point in NSW, is now preparing to begin treatment for stage four lung cancer which has grown onto her chest wall and spread into her adrenal gland. 'I was just crying. I was devastated for my kids having to go through this again,' Egan told of the moment she learned her life had been turned upside down. '(My husband) was given 12 months and that's how long he lived.' Egan, a patient transfer officer with State Medical Assistance, set an appointment with a doctor when she started feeling serious chest pain whenever she coughed, laughed or would lie down. But she almost cancelled the booking on the day because, by then, the pain had subsided. Going to the appointment, she had tests and less than 24 hours later — on her birthday — she was hauled back in to hear the shocking news. 'I was thinking 'oh my God. How can I have lung cancer?' There's no pain and I didn't feel any different to how I have always felt,' she said. Doctors told her the cancer could not be surgically removed. She will begin radiation for the metastatic lesion on her adrenal gland next week, followed by chemotherapy and radiation to her lung. Her daughter, Brittney Egan, said the treatment 'will hopefully extend her chances of being with us for a little while longer, but with her strength, we are hoping for more'. 'We are so thankful on where things are today with treatments because 15 years ago the doctors would have palliated (Egan) and not given her very long left with us,' she said. 'It's going to take me' Egan, a grandmother-to-two and mother-of-two, said she will continue to fight. 'It is going to take me but I don't know when. I don't know much time I have,' she said. 'I'm on a bit of a rollercoaster ride — laughing one moment and then in a ball crying the next. 'I'm not giving up. I've been knocked down a thousand times before but I will not give up.' Egan told her health blow comes after she was the victim of a scam last year that left the fiercely independent grandmother unable to dip into her super or savings to cover mounting out-of-pocket costs. Loved ones and strangers have chipped in generously via a GoFundMe to help with medical and living expenses. Egan said she was 'overwhelmed' by those offering to help in her time of need. National Lung Cancer Screening Program Lung cancer is among the most common cancers in Australian men and women, with more than 15,000 cases diagnosed in 2024. It is Australia's deadliest cancer, with more than 9000 deaths attributed to lung cancer in 2022. The Lung Foundation Australia is hopeful a National Lung Cancer Screening Program being launched in July will help detect cases earlier, when treatment is most effective. The program aims to save 12,000 lives over the next decade by using CT scans to look for lung cancer in high-risk people without any symptoms. 'There's hope that the tide will turn and it will be far more common that people will be diagnosed at earlier stages of the disease like other common cancers in Australia, giving people better treatment options and the opportunity to live well for longer,' Lung Foundation Australia chief executive Mark Brooke told To be eligible for the program, you need to be between 50 and 70 years of age and have a history of cigarette smoking.


Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Erin McNaught and Stace Cadet's son, 7 months, diagnosed with brain tumour
Erin McNaught and Stace Cadet have been left heart-broken after their seven-month-old son was diagnosed with a brain tumour. The 43-year-old model - who was previously married to musician Example - and the Australian record producer had noticed a "rapid decline" in their little one Obi's behaviour and happiness in recent weeks. The couple took him to hospital, where a neurosurgeon delivered the heart-breaking news that he has a "large brain tumour" on the right side of his brain, leaving the pair "absolutely shattered". In a joint post on Instagram, they wrote: "For the last few weeks we have noticed a rapid decline in Obi's behaviour and happiness. He was having problems eating, sleeping and most recently, keeping his head straight. Late on Tuesday, as a precaution we took our little man in for an MRI under instruction from our Doctor. At about 6:00pm Tuesday night we met with a neurosurgeon who broke the heartbreaking news that Obi has a large brain tumour on the right side of his brain. We are absolutely shattered and the last few days have been our hardest days. (sic)" Erin and Stace Cadet "remain hopeful" the mass can be removed and their boy can be "happy and healthy" again. They added: "Our team at the Queensland Children's Hospital have been incredible and we remain hopeful that we can remove the mass and get Obi healthy and happy, pending the results. We have a long and difficult road ahead us but are so lucky to have our family and friends' support at this time and we're keeping focussed on getting our little boy back." The couple welcomed Obi into the world last October. Stace Cadet - whose real name is Stasi Kotaras - said at the time: "We are so in love with him, we can't believe he's finally here. "Fair to say we didn't get a lot of sleep when we got home from the hospital last night. Mostly because we can't take our eyes off him." Erin added: "It wasn't the easiest pregnancy and a little touch and go at times but having him home with us now, has made us quickly forget the tough moments."

Sky News AU
8 hours ago
- Sky News AU
More than a dozen Aussie sunscreens fail to meet SPF claims on their labels, consumer group Choice finds in shock new report
More than a dozen favourite Australian sunscreens have failed to meet their SPF claims, according to a shock report by consumer group Choice. Twenty SPF 50 or 50+ products from different brands and retailers were subject to the test, which Choice said was conducted by experts in an accredited sunscreen lab. Sixteen of the 20 sunscreens under the microscope did not meet the SPF ratings stated on their labels, with only four living up to their claims, the analysis found. The worst performer, according to the report, was Ultra Violette's Lean Screen Mineral Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen which returned an SPF rating of four despite being labelled as 50+. Some Cancer Council products, including its SPF 50+ Ultra Sunscreen and Everyday Value Sunscreen SPF 50, tested at almost half their advertised ratings at 24 and 27, respectively. Woolworths' Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ returned a rating of 27. Choice CEO Ashley de Silva said a follow up analysis was conducted for Ultra Violette's Lean Screen given the astonishing test result. "We were really shocked to see the results for Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF 50+ product, so much so that we actually decided to test a different batch at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results," he said in a statement. "Those tests found the product had an SPF of five - an almost identical result to our initial testing." A spokesperson for Ultra Violette said the company does not accept the results "as even remotely accurate". "Lean Screen contains 22.75 per cent zinc oxide, a level at which, when applied sufficiently, would render a testing result of SPF 4 scientifically impossible," a spokesperson said. Among the top performers included La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen SPF 50+ which tested as providing a higher protection rating of 72. Neutrogena's Ultra Sheer Body Lotion returned a slightly higher SPF of 56, over its printed label of 50, while the Cancer Council's Kid Sunscreen SPF 50+ tested at 52. Popular makeup brand Mecca Cosmetica's To Save Body Hydrating Sunscreen had an SPF of 51, according to the report. Choice has called on the Therapeutic Goods Administration to conduct its own compliance testing in the wake of the analysis, as it urges the ACCC to investigate any misleading SPF claims. "Currently, the TGA relies on reports provided by manufacturers to ensure the safety, quality and efficacy of sunscreen products," Mr de Silva said. "Unfortunately, these reports may not be providing the accurate information consumers need when choosing sunscreens for themselves and their families." However, Mr de Silva noted the consumer group's testing does not mean sunscreen is not effective. "While some specific sunscreens did not meet their claimed SPF, a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or even 20 still offers a significant amount of sunscreen protection, and any sunscreen is better than none at all," he said. A TGA spokesperson confirmed to it is investigating the findings and will "take regularly action as required". The authority said it cannot comment on whether individual products may be subject to investigation, or compliance and enforcement activity due to privacy and legal restrictions. "The TGA acknowledges that there is variability in SPF testing results across laboratories, which is largely due to current reliance on human subject testing," a spokesperson said. "Limited inter-laboratory calibration may also lead to inconsistencies in methodologies and results. "While encouraging progress is being made internationally toward in-vitro sunscreen testing which would improve consistency of results, this will not eliminate the need for human subject testing, particularly for verifying water resistance claims." The TGA reiterated the importance of using sunscreen in addition to other sun safety measures such as wearing a wide-brimmed hat, protective clothing and sunglasses. "We note that a number of the products Choice tested provided results in the range of SPF 30," the regulator said. "It is important to note that SPFs in the range of 30 to 59 provide 'High protection', while a SPF of 60 or higher (SPF 50+) provides 'Very high' protection. "Therefore, products with an SPF of 30 are effective to use. "Consumers are also advised that, irrespective of the SPF rating, sunscreens should be applied liberally and reapplied frequently." A spokesperson for the ACCC said it is considering the issues raised in Choice's report in accordance with its Compliance and Enforcement Policy. "The ACCC will engage closely with the Therapeutic Goods Administration in considering the allegations," a spokesperson said in a statement to "In addition to obligations under therapeutic goods legislation, businesses also have obligations under the Australian Consumer Law, including an obligation not to make false or misleading representations." has contacted the Cancer Council and Ultra Violette for further comment.