logo
Remembering the fall of Saigon

Remembering the fall of Saigon

CBS News27-04-2025

At the end of the Vietnam War, South Vietnamese soldiers swarmed a Pan Am airliner to save themselves from the rapidly-advancing North Vietnamese army. CBS News correspondent Bruce Dunning, who was on board, reported: "They left their wives, their children, their aged parents on the runway, while they forced their own way on board, a rabble of young enlisted men. … The plane raced down the taxiway, swerving to avoid abandoned vehicles, perhaps even running over people."
This every-man-for-himself rout played out across South Vietnam as communist forces from the north launched their final offensive.
"The question was not, 'Will they attack at some point,' but 'When will they do it'?" said Stuart Herrington, now 83, who was one of only a handful of American military personnel still left in Vietnam. "The map in my office began to show more and more red arrows, all pointing south."
A map showing North Vietnamese troop movements in the last days of the Vietnam War.
CBS News
President Gerald R. Ford called South Vietnam's collapse "a great human tragedy," and ordered the immediate airlift of Vietnamese orphans – some mere babies who'd been born only weeks earlier.
CBS News correspondent Murray Fromson witnessed what happened next, when the plane carrying the children crashed into a field about five miles from the end of the runway, killing 78 orphans and 35 Americans were killed. "What can one say except, 'When will the misery in this country ever stop?'" Fromson said.
With Vietnam rapidly approaching what Secretary of State Henry Kissinger called "the worst case," he cabled American Ambassador Graham Martin: "We must evacuate our people and do so as soon as possible."
Americans and Vietnamese flooded Tan Son Nhat Airport outside Saigon. But enemy shelling killed two Marines standing guard there – Darwin Judge and Charles MacMahon, the last Americans to die in Vietnam.
Retired Marine Gerry Berry was a helicopter pilot aboard the armada of American ships off the coast. "The North Vietnamese bombed and rocketed the runway at Tan Son Nhat, so the runway became unusable," he said. "Helicopters were the last resort, and at 10:45 on the morning of 29 April 1975, Ambassador Graham Martin gave the order to commence Operation Frequent Wind, which became the largest helicopter evacuation in history."
Frantic to find a way out, civilians mobbed the U.S. Embassy. "The last place, the last hope, the last refuge where you could go and maybe still get a helicopter," said Herrington.
Jerome Thomas was a Marine guard at the embassy: "There were women at the gate just saying, 'Please, just take my baby, take my baby.' And we had to tell them, 'We cannot take your baby.' There were people that were getting crushed because of the crowd in the back were pushing."
Berry said, "The crowd inside the embassy grounds is just huge, and it's never getting any smaller. You don't know how this thing is working, how it's going to end."
Berry landed his helicopter in the Embassy's parking lot: "I actually landed at the embassy about one o'clock and said, 'My orders are to pick up the ambassador.' The Marine security guard runs into the embassy, comes back and says, 'Well, the ambassador's not ready to go.'"
Instead, Berry and 70 other helicopter crews began lifting out Americans and Vietnamese.
Col. Stuart Herrington (lower right) helped with the evacuation at the U.S. Embassy compound in Saigon on the final day of the Vietnam War.
Courtesy Fall of Saigon Marine Association
As darkness fell, Thomas, a 19-year-old Marine, was ordered to lower the American flag: "This was the last time the American flag was going to fly over Vietnam," he said. "Heartbreaking."
America's war in Vietnam was now in its final hours.
About four o'clock in the morning, Berry says, he could see North Vietnamese tanks coming down the road, "because their lights are on. They're driving down the highway."
Herrington said, "Everybody was afraid. The North Vietnamese Army was advancing on Saigon."
With the last helicopters going out, Airborne Commander radioed for crews to "max it out."
Herrington told the crowd in the embassy parking lot, "'Get into a double line. Everybody's going to go. Nobody will be left behind.' I repeated that over and over and over, that everyone was going to go, and I really believed it."
There were 420 Vietnamese still in the parking lot when new orders came in: "All U.S. must come out now."
Herrington had promised "Nobody left behind," but orders were orders. "I said to the Vietnamese, 'I gotta take a leak,' and I walked into the door of the embassy, and scooted up the stairs," he said.
I asked, "What did it feel like, telling that lie?"
"I felt horrible," Herrington replied. "I felt like I had given them my word, that our country had given them our country's word, and it all went to crap."
Berry recalled, "I land on the embassy roof at 4:56 in the morning on 30 April 1975. And I called the Marine security guard over and I said, 'You go tell the ambassador this helicopter's not leaving the roof until he's on board.' And then in my best aviator voice I said: 'The president sends.'"
"Order from the President? Did you have authority?" I asked.
"I have no authority to do that at all," Berry replied. "But I mean, there's got to be an end here. Two minutes later, his whole entourage are up, ready to go."
Ambassador Martin brought the American flag with him. Flying out, Berry radioed the call sign: "'Tiger, Tiger, Tiger,' which means the ambassador's out, so everybody knows."
It was late afternoon in Washington when Henry Kissinger announced the news: "Our ambassador has left, and the evacuation can be said to be completed."
Except it wasn't. In 1996, Kissinger recalled during an off-the-record talk to the Army War College, "I come back from the press conference, and I find out that they had left the Marines behind that were guarding the embassy."
The last American fighting men in Vietnam were barricaded on the roof as Saigon was about to fall.
Their sergeant, Juan Valdez, is 87 now, and living in a memory care unit – but some things you don't forget. "It's been so many years now," he said. "We thought for sure that we were going to be left there. You kind of swallow hard, you know, because by that time the tanks were passing by from the Vietnamese."
Doug Potratz, who was on the roof with Valdez, said, "It felt like the Alamo for a while. We didn't know if we were going to be the last people and be overrun."
Thomas said, "The question that was going through everybody's mind was, should we fight or should we surrender? And everybody there, to a man, was like, we're fighting, you know, because Marines never surrender."
Portratz said, "It was the lowest point, I think, in my life. We're thinking about all the people that have died, literally thousands and thousands of Americans, and it was all gone."
"We were there for two, two-and-a-half, maybe three hours waiting," said Valdez, "and then all of a sudden at a distance we saw two choppers coming back."
Two helicopters went back for the Marines. The first one picked up 22, and the second the final 11. The radio communication from the Airborne Commander said: "11 pax on board including the commander. All the Americans are out. That is it."
A blurry picture captured the moment.
"I was the last one to go aboard," said Valdez. "Because I was in charge of them, and whether I stayed behind, so be it, you know, but you always take care of your men first."
He was the last man out.
Sgt. Juan Valdez (rear) was the last person to board the final chopper carrying Americans out of South Vietnam.
Courtesy Juan Valdez
For more info:
Story produced by Mary Walsh. Editor: Joseph Frandino.
See also:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WorldPride is in Washington, D.C. this year. The Trump administration is prompting fears, mixed emotions.
WorldPride is in Washington, D.C. this year. The Trump administration is prompting fears, mixed emotions.

CBS News

time18 minutes ago

  • CBS News

WorldPride is in Washington, D.C. this year. The Trump administration is prompting fears, mixed emotions.

What we know about canceled LGBTQ events at the Kennedy Center This year, WorldPride is coming to Washington, D.C. A series of events, organized by the nonprofit InterPride, aims to bring visibility and awareness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer issues to an international stage. This year's location is leaving the community conflicted about showing up to the nation's capital amid an administration that has targeted them. Zoe Stoller, a licensed social worker based in Philadelphia, said they're excited to be amongst the queer and trans community at WorldPride, but told CBS News the Trump administration has "definitely been on my mind." "D.C. is not necessarily a place that many people would think of as super safe and comfortable right now, given the current administration and their attacks on the LGBTQ community, especially trans people, especially trans youth," they said. Meg Ten Eyck, founder and CEO of travel platform EveryQueer and vice chairman of the board of directors for the International LGBTQ Travel Association, has been to dozens of Pride events across the world, from the miles-long parade at New York City's WorldPride to a Pride in Kyiv, Ukraine in 2015 that was targeted with Molotov cocktails amid protests. "What is happening socially and politically changes the feeling of the Pride that you are attending," she said, adding she anticipates WorldPride this year is going to bring "an astronomical amount of fear and sadness from people" as well as some potential violence. "I think the community is terrified, and I think our instinct as humans is to want structure and to want answers," she said. "There will be a lot of people who are drawn to this particular pride as a giant 'F*** you' to the administration, and there will be a lot of people who are incentivized into negative behaviors that may not necessarily be characteristic of who they are because of that fear and misinformation and general dissatisfaction with human rights violations that are happening in a lot of different ways." New York City's annual Pride March commemorates the 1969 uprising by members of the LGBTQ community at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village. Bing Guan/Bloomberg via Getty Images Comments across social media have also highlighted the mixed emotions. In a video about WorldPride posted to TikTok earlier this month, a top comment with more than 2,000 likes says: "Being real... I'm not going this year. I'm scared." Another reads: "Couldn't pay me enough to attend a mass gathering like this in this political climate." But others had a different take, including this commenter who wrote: "Don't let them make us scared we deserve happiness too." While some may choose to skip this year's events due to safety concerns, Stoller predicts their absence will be filled with others eager to take a stand. "Folks who may not have attended in the past, might not have felt motivated to show up, to protest, to be in this current political climate and make their voices heard — those folks might come out of the woodworks," they said. For those with layered identities, navigating Pride this year is even more complex. David D. Marshall, founder and CEO of Journey to Josiah Inc., a Baltimore-based adoption nonprofit, said the feeling of a "robust need to fight" is met with the reality that, for people of color, showing up is a "a whole different experience" to White LGBTQ people. "There is a fear in general when it comes to black people, because there is a direct target put on our backs when it comes to any sort of protest," he said, adding "it's a time for people of different privilege, or allies, to show up." And for others, more pressing matters are taking precedence over the problems posed by Pride. "When we're thinking about the grand scheme of things, (Pride) just hasn't been on the list," Marshall admitted, adding his own organization is grappling with federal funding cuts and those in his circles are "fighting to maintain our own livelihoods" amid the dismantling of DEI – diversity, equity and inclusion – roles. "The option to fold is not there, because the work still needs to be done. The need has not gone anywhere but there are now some additional barriers," he said. Why is WorldPride in D.C.? While the Trump administration has rolled back several protections for LGBTQ people, especially for trans individuals, WorldPride locations are bid on years in advance, meaning the nation's capital was decided before President Trump was re-elected. "No one could have anticipated what was going to happen," Ten Eyck said, adding there are fears around what the administration may do if there are protests on federal land, since it would be their jurisdiction. "(For some people), federal charges result in you losing your career and your income and your stability." But there's an important distinction between who's in office and who makes up the city, she added. "Yeah, (Mr.) Trump has the White House and sort of lives in D.C., but the District of Columbia goes deeply democratic in every single election, regardless of who's in the federal administration. So, having and hosting a large global pride celebration is aligned with the citizens of D.C.'s politic and will, but it is not aligned with the federal government stance." Members and allies of the LGBTQ community cheer on a Pride car parade as it leaves from Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC. Drew Angerer / Getty Images Stoller, who has more than 50,000 Instagram followers, has seen this contrast causing discussions among their online community as well, with many questioning whether it's safe or appropriate to attend. "D.C. still can be a very safe, open, accepting place. But of course, the people who are in charge, who now are living in D.C. definitely affect the vibes and feelings of that," they said. The Trump administration has already made itself known ahead of the celebration. Last month, several Pride events at the Kennedy Center were canceled or relocated as the institution pivots under President Trump's leadership. June Crenshaw, deputy director of nonprofit organization Capital Pride Alliance that is helping host to WorldPride, said the organization is finding other paths for the celebration, but added, "the fact we have to maneuver in this way is disappointing." According to the WorldPride website, "top-to-bottom safety protocol" is in place, assuring the same level of preparation as high-security events like inaugurations. "Efforts include pre-event web-related surveillance, on-site security/police, advanced life support stations, roving medic teams, aerial surveillance and anti-scaling systems and barricades where applicable," the site notes. "The 2-day street festival will be fenced with a secure entrance. Capital Pride is augmenting DC's efforts with additional private security." How to celebrate Pride outside of Washington, D.C. If unsure about attending WorldPride this year, Stroller encourages people to prioritize their emotional and physical safety above all else. "If you are feeling worried for your safety, for your emotions, for your well-being, listen to your gut," they said. People march during the Pride Parade in Boston, Massachusetts. JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images Black LGBTQ people are also having to figure out another approach "that may not necessarily be showing up in these very public spaces," Marshall added. "Does that mean that one group has decided not to fight? No, it's a matter of how. What is going to be the thing that is not going to cost us our lives?" he said. Ten Eyck adds there are plenty of ways to "show up" for the community without being in Washington physically, including supporting your local Pride party or LGBT center as well as "putting your money where your morals are." "If you're a federal employee who can fight from the inside, if you're a teacher who can fight from the inside, if you're a public health professional who can fight from the inside, we need you more in those roles than we need you on the National Mall," she said.

Map Shows Where Americans Are Being Detained Overseas
Map Shows Where Americans Are Being Detained Overseas

Newsweek

time18 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows Where Americans Are Being Detained Overseas

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. More Americans are being held in Venezuela than in any other foreign country, the State Department revealed last week, buried in a travel warning urging U.S. citizens not to travel to the troubled South American nation. While a spokesperson for the department told Newsweek they could not provide specific numbers of wrongful detentions abroad out of security concerns, there are at least 43 U.S. citizens currently being held hostage or in wrongful detention, based on data provided by a group that advocates for Americans held overseas. President Donald Trump and his administration have taken an urgent approach to bringing detained Americans home, securing the release of 47 people since January 20. Dozens more remain either imprisoned in or unable to leave a foreign country. "The thing we need to keep in mind when we talk wrongful detention, this is hostage taking by foreign powers," Elizabeth Richards, director of hostage advocacy and research at the Foley Foundation, told Newsweek. "We are not looking at legitimate charges or legitimate judicial processes, as we understand them in United States. When we talk capture countries, we're talking about countries, and the leaders in those countries, who have purposely decided to treat human beings as bargaining chips." The Foley Foundation, set up in memory of the journalist James Foley who was brutally murdered by ISIS in 2014, advocates for the return of Americans being held overseas. Its most recent annual report, published in March, tracks those detained and released in the past year. It estimates that 54 Americans were held hostage or wrongfully detained in 17 countries in 2024, with between six and nine in Venezuela, eight in China, five in Russia and four in Afghanistan. Others were held in Egypt, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian Territories. What Is Wrongful Detention? Wrongful detention does not refer to the roughly 98 percent of American arrests overseas each year linked to legitimate law enforcement and judicial processes, the Foley Foundation says. In other words, it does not include those arrested following alleged criminal or civil actions in which evidence of a crime has been made public. The federal government typically allows those to play out in the respective country's legal system. In order for the State Department to consider a detention "wrongful", a case has to pass through a series of tests known as the Levinson Criteria. That includes whether a person is being held purely because they are an American citizen, if the foreign country is doing so in order to influence the U.S. government, and even if the person is being held in violation of the foreign country's own laws. Richards told Newsweek that this criterion does not cover all Americans who cannot come home. "Now we know the U.S. government doesn't publicly put out any numbers, and when we say 43 Americans, we count exit bans in our numbers," Richards said. "Our understanding is the U.S. government currently doesn't count exit bands as wrongful detentions, though we think that might be evolving, and we would hope that the U.S. government would eventually treat exit bands as any other type of wrongful detention." Exit bans stop people from leaving the country they are in, though they are not held in a prison or jail. The Foley Foundation estimated that around a quarter of Americans wrongfully held last year were subjected to such orders. A spokesperson for the State Department told Newsweek that the department does not provide specific numbers on wrongful detentions due to privacy, security and "other reasons." A Difficult Dance of Diplomacy Left: U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Marc Fogel back to the United States after being released from Russian custody, at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. Right: US-Russian ballet dancer Ksenia... Left: U.S. President Donald Trump welcomes Marc Fogel back to the United States after being released from Russian custody, at the White House on February 11, 2025 in Washington, DC. Right: US-Russian ballet dancer Ksenia Karelina and her boyfriend South African boxer Chris van Heerden embrace as she arrives at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, following her release from Russia on April 10, 2025. More Al Drago/ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images On May 6, the White House put out a list of some of the 47 Americans the Trump administration had successfully brought back to the U.S. since January, including ballerina Ksenia Karelina, held in Russia for 14 months, and Marc Fogel, a teacher also held in Russia for several years. While high-profile cases like these receive the bulk of media attention, Richards said many wrongfully detained Americans remain overseas without much hope. "Sometimes it's difficult for families to get attention to their case and we only know cases where there's public information available, or the family has come to us for support," she said. "Some families will choose to be quiet, choose not to work with anyone and that's fine, that their right, and we work with plenty of families too, where we don't publish the name of their loved one," she added. "But that's always the choice of that family advocating for them, but if we don't have clear metrics, it makes it difficult I think for the general public to understand the scale and the scope of the problem." The State Department spokesperson told Newsweek that President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were committed to bringing all Americans unjustly detained overseas home, but factors such as a lack of U.S. embassy or poor diplomatic relations can make the work of State Department officials difficult. Many Americans wrongfully detained are held for months or years. George Glezmann was taken by the Taliban in Afghanistan, where there is no longer an American embassy, and held for 836 days. He was finally released in March. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro speaks to supporters as he celebrates the results of the parliamentary and regional elections at the Bolivar square in Caracas on May 25, 2025. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro speaks to supporters as he celebrates the results of the parliamentary and regional elections at the Bolivar square in Caracas on May 25, 2025. FEDERICO PARRA/AFP via Getty Images Venezuela, highlighted by the State Department on May 27, also does not have a U.S. embassy. The relationship between the two countries remains strained. "Venezuelan security forces have detained U.S. citizens for up to five years without respect to due process, in harsh conditions—including torture—frequently based solely on their U.S. nationality or U.S. passport," the department said in a press release. The Foley Foundation noted in its annual report that through the end of 2024, the State Department had not included those held in Venezuela as wrongfully detained. The Trump administration's announcement last week, which included a warning for Americans not to travel to Venezuela over fears of wrongful detention, marked a shift in U.S. foreign policy. Work Ongoing to Bring Americans Home The Bring Our Families Home project, funded by the Foley Foundation, lists the names and faces of those still wrongfully held abroad, including Wilbert Castaneda, an American sailor and father of four who was "forcibly disappeared" by the Venezuelan government, according to the project. The project lists nine others it is actively working on behalf of to secure their release, from Venezuela, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Afghanistan. Humanitarian organizations like the Foley Foundation and Amnesty International are continuing their work to free U.S. citizens alongside the federal government. In 2024, 17 Americans were released — including three hostages — with some freed as part of prisoner exchanges. That number has been far surpassed already in 2025, with the White House making the announcement in early May that the new administration had already secured the release of 47 Americans. "We are tracking more returns so far for this year than all of 2024, so that is excellent and we would love to see that continue," Richards said, adding that she believes there is always more which could be done by the government. "One challenge we know our families routinely face is just trying to get U.S. government leaders to meet with them, to learn the stories of their loved ones, and trying to get that up to the president of the United States."

Philippines defense boss throws cold water on large F-16 buy from US
Philippines defense boss throws cold water on large F-16 buy from US

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Philippines defense boss throws cold water on large F-16 buy from US

SINGAPORE — The Philippines' defense secretary cast doubt on a $5.6 billion purchase of American F-16 fighter jets approved in April, saying Manila hasn't yet decided whether to move forward with the sale. Speaking on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue, a defense summit held in Singapore, Gilberto Teodoro said the Philippines hadn't yet received a formal offer to purchase the fourth-generation fighters. Even if it had, he said, his department doesn't know whether it wants them. 'As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing on the table for me to consider,' he said in an interview. In April, the U.S. State Department approved the potential sale of 20 F-16 fighter jets to the Philippines, as part of a package that also included missiles, bombs and other ammunition. The total was valued at just under $5.6 billion, which would have commanded a massive share of the Philippines' defense budget. Manila spends about $6 billion, or 1.3% of its GDP, on its military each year, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, a think tank. Teodoro referred to the purported sale as 'media hype,' without explaining why the State Department initially approved it. 'We have not even decided, number one, when we will acquire a multi-role fighter and what model,' he said. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited the Philippines in March as the U.S. upgrades its alliance with the country in an effort to better compete with China. The two met again over the weekend in Singapore, where Hegseth warned that the military threat Beijing poses 'could be imminent' and urged allies to spend more on defense. To some Philippine officials, the sale of fighter jets was a sign of long-term U.S. commitment and a show of trust that their military could handle such advanced equipment. But soon after the announcement other officials from the country began to question how they could afford such a large purchase without American assistance. The U.S. sent the Philippines $500 million in long-term security aid last year but would need Congress to pass more in order to continue such support. During the Biden administration, the U.S. and Philippines agreed on a 'roadmap' of weapons to purchase in the years ahead as Manila upgrades its military. That plan largely consists of equipment to help survey and protect the Philippines' vast coastlines, not high-end fighter jets. At the conference here, Teodoro had a testy exchange with Chinese delegates in attendance, who asked critical questions about the Philippines' alliance with the United States. Chinese coast guard vessels routinely harass Philippine ships in the South China Sea, which Beijing claims as its own despite a contrary ruling in 2016 from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. 'China has a lot of trust building to do to be an effective negotiating partner,' Teodoro said during remarks on stage. 'We have to call a spade a spade.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store