logo
Does A Kentucky LLC Mean Private Capital Is Next For College Sports?

Does A Kentucky LLC Mean Private Capital Is Next For College Sports?

Forbes28-04-2025

MILWAUKEE, WI - MARCH 21: Kentucky Wildcats center Amari Williams (22) goes up for a shot during an ... More NCAA Division I First Round Mens Basketball game between the Troy Trojans and the Kentucky Wildcats on March 21, 2025 at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, WI. (Photo by Larry Radloff/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)
While the attention of collegiate sports is focused on the transfer portal and the pending House settlement, a decision by the University of Kentucky's ('Kentucky') board of trustees will likely have material and cascading consequences to the industry.
On Friday, Kentucky's Trustees approved the establishment of Champions Blue LLC ("Champions Blue"), an affiliate, to house the University's athletic department activities. Part of the stated reasons were governance, compensation, and revenue generation, but based on my experience in sports and private equity, and reading the President's pitch to trustees, I believe the primary goal is to be the first athletic department to receive private capital.
I also believe that other institutions will soon follow a similar model, which has obvious benefits but also potential potholes.
University of Kentucky President Eli Capilouto sits in the administration building on the UK campus ... More in Lexington, Kentucky, on Friday, Jan. 12, 2024. (Ryan C. Hermens/Lexington Herald-Leader/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
At Kentucky, it will be up to President Eli Capilouto to decide which intercollegiate assets and functions are transferred to Champions Blue. The entity will be wholly owned by another UK affiliate, Beyond Blue Corporation, raising questions on regulatory compliance and tax status. I'll leave that to the sports law experts in the media.
Instead, I'll focus on the financial aspects, which I think are significant; while Clemson University spun its revenue generation activities into a separate entity, and the Big 12 conference and Florida State University held exploratory talks, no institution has taken private capital into its athletic department - yet.
In its report to trustees, Capilouto's office emphasized incentives like governance, differentiated benefits and revenue generation. Clemson University touted the latter when it launched Clemson Ventures LLC last August.
But as the report also outlined, Champions Blue will allow Kentucky athletics to 'Restructure to accept new capital and approach permanent financial stability'. To be clear, that means direct investment from private capital firms right into athletic departments.
LEXINGTON, KY - JULY 29: Kroger Field (formerly Commonweath Stadium), home of the University of ... More Kentucky Wildcats football team in Lexington, Kentucky on July 29, 2019. (Photo By)
Private Capital has infinite potential structures, but essentially two categories: equity, where firm-sponsored funds take a stake in a business, and debt, where they lend money with the promise of future returns. Either option provides capital to support costs and fuel growth during periods of transformation, so it's easy to see the appeal for institutions like Kentucky given the current collegiate sports atmosphere.
The pending settlement between the House and the NCAA would allow schools to share portions of their revenue with athletes, estimated to reach almost $30m per year for a school like Kentucky. The NCAA would also be responsible for back pay to recent athletes of almost $2.8b, which will come from insurance, reserves and tournament distributions that schools like Kentucky regularly receive. Coach salaries (and buyouts), stadium renovations and training facilities are other examples of growing cash outlays outside of the settlement.
Investing in those areas are table stakes for an institution like Kentucky that wants to compete in athletics, and that money needs to come from somewhere. Enter Private Capital.
1990: The University of Kentucky fans hold up paper cut-outs of Kentucky head coach Rick Pitino ... More during a game at Rupp Arena in Lexington, Kentucky. Mandatory Credit: Allsport USA/ALLSPORT
These firms also provide business expertise and institutional governance, atypical for not-for-profit institutions. How does Kentucky allocate resources intelligently, recruit talented student-athletes, position their teams for sustained success, all while ensuring positive returns to the university that drives their mission? That's an issue Florida State likely wrestled with when they explored private equity last year. Their Athletic Director Mike Alford called it 'the future' of collegiate sports.
It's a fair question. In fact, some Private Equity leaders were lukewarm to the idea when surveyed earlier this year. And Ian Charles, who I respect greatly as a pioneer and titan in sports private equity, highlighted that media rights are negotiated at the conference level, and an unstable landscape, as reasons that his firm, Arctos, wouldn't be comfortable. To Charles' point, just last week, Judge Claudia Wilken withheld her approval of the House v NCAA settlement because of concerns over roster size restrictions, and the deal is now in jeopardy.
But Champions Blue was created under the presumption of a 'new era' of 'directly compensating student-athletes'. Whether it happens via this settlement or further litigation, the overwhelming presumption is that it will happen. So while the landscape is currently murky, the most beautiful lotus blooms from muddy waters (I love that quote).
First, while the collegiate sports regulatory landscape isn't predictable, the revenue streams certainly are, and that's ambrosia for PE. That's thanks to locked in media rights deals that count in the billions, and a very loyal customer base. Professional sports are an appealing asset class because customers are sticky for their entire lives. But according to market research, collegiate sports fans are even more loyal, and the most loyal of all, are fans in the Southeastern Conference (SEC). Kentucky plays in the SEC.
Second, private capital firms are skilled at surfacing value from undervalued assets. It's confusing that the National Basketball Association ('NBA') earns twice as much revenue as college football, with half the viewership. Other industry experts have pegged the gulf as wide as 5 to 10 times. All this despite collegiate brands, such as the Universities of Notre Dame, Southern California, Michigan and Texas, that rival professional sports.
And third, an unprecedented level of private equity firms have recently raised sports-centric funds. That's led to an unprecedented level of deals (disclosure: this data is via my firm The Ledge Company).
Private Equity Deals Across 10 Major Professional Leagues. Access Direct At SportsDealBase.com
Professional sports is a scarce resource/trophy asset, part of the reason teams are so valuable. These firms need to put their money somewhere. Now, the typical fund life ranges from 6 to 10 years, so some of those investments may hit the market again. But the market is saturated, and the LLC model that Kentucky is pursuing opens a gateway into a brand new frontier for investment.
First, historically universities have wholly owned their athletic teams. An affiliate structure, complete with outside investors and a profit-seeking focus, is a seismic shift, outside their core capabilities. Perhaps relatedly, Clemson Ventures recently hired Michael Drake, a 'longtime NBA and NFL executive', as their CEO.
SANTA CLARA, CA - JANUARY 07: A Clemson Tigers helmet is held up prior to the CFP National ... More Championship against the Alabama Crimson Tide presented by AT&T at Levi's Stadium on January 7, 2019 in Santa Clara, California. (Photo by)
Second, accepting private capital means accepting new expectations and priorities, such as growth and return targets. Yes, in certain aspects, the interests of private capital and the University align, such as on revenue generation; both entities will want to maximize the value they drive from collegiate athletics, to retain the best student-athletes and ensure sustained success. But many athletic departments don't make a profit, so what happens if cutting certain sports will improve the bottom line? Yes, private capital can be passive, but typically that's dictated by target-side leverage, as it was with the NFL. Not every collegiate institution has that weight.
Third, identifying the source of the sponsoring firm's funds, including their limited partners, can be complicated. Universities have robust processes to vet donations for regulatory compliance. For example, Section 117 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 requires semi-annual disclosures of foreign contributions that exceed $250,000 (there is proposed legislation to lower that to $50,000, and $0 from certain 'countries of concern'). How does that factor in? And who is guiding these new entities on flagging foreign funds? Yes, these are affiliates, but they, like Champions Blue, fall ultimately under the umbrella of the university. A matter for the legal experts as well.
Fourth, do athletic departments and institutions at-large have the inherent pace and capability to evaluate a large potential investment?
Not to belabor the point, but these are green field transactions. Institutions will have evaluated similar firms in the past for managing endowments, likely know advisors they trust, and have executives and trustees that have relatable experience. But an institutional process – a road map, often relied on for transactions – is unlikely to exist.
And finally, the impact of all this on Title IX, the regulation that requires gender equitable spending from institutions that receive federal funding. Another consideration for lawyers, though some have already suggested the proposed settlement itself violates Title IX.
LEXINGTON, KY - FEBRUARY 28: Cheerleaders of the Kentucky Wildcats perform on the court against the ... More Georgia Bulldogs on February 28, 2007 at Rupp Arena in Lexington, Kentucky. (Photo by)
If and when the house settlement is approved, it's expected to go into effect later this year. 'Gold rush' has the word 'rush' for a reason, and it just takes one match to light the fuse. To wit, when discussing the possibility earlier this year, Michael LaSalle, a partner at Shamrock Capital, presciently said 'You have to find somebody willing to be a trailblazer'.
I think that trailblazer is Kentucky.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas WCWS final win sets ESPN record with most-watched College softball game ever
Texas WCWS final win sets ESPN record with most-watched College softball game ever

USA Today

time6 hours ago

  • USA Today

Texas WCWS final win sets ESPN record with most-watched College softball game ever

Texas WCWS final win sets ESPN record with most-watched College softball game ever ESPN reported that the decisive Game 3 of the championship series averaged 2.4 million viewers and peaked at 2.7 million, making it the most-watched NCAA softball game ever. The Texas Longhorns made history at the 2025 Women's College World Series, capturing their first-ever national championship and setting new television viewership records across all three games of the finals. ESPN reported that the decisive Game 3 of the championship series averaged 2.4 million viewers and peaked at 2.7 million, making it the most-watched NCAA softball game ever. Games 1 and 2 also broke records, each averaging 2.1 million viewers—the highest ever for the opening two games of a WCWS final. Game 1 peaked at 2.8 million viewers, while Game 2 reached a peak of 2.6 million. The all-Texas matchup between the Longhorns and Texas Tech Red Raiders marked the first time since 2004 that both championship participants hailed from the same state, reviving the storied rivalry from their Big 12 days. The series spotlighted a marquee pitching showdown between Texas ace Teagan Kavan and Texas Tech's NiJaree Canady. Kavan, who entered the finals with a perfect 3-0 record against Canady, extended her dominance to 5-0 after two more victories in the championship series. Fans were treated to a dramatic three-game set. Game 1 delivered a classic pitchers' duel, featuring a controversial obstruction call and a bizarre game-winning hit for Texas in the sixth inning. The Red Raiders bounced back in Game 2, capitalizing on Texas errors to force a decisive Game 3. In the winner-take-all finale, the Longhorns erupted for five runs in the first inning, forcing Canady out of the game. A grand slam sealed Texas' commanding victory and their first national title in program history.

No Saratoga Summer For D. Wayne Lukas; High Costs Keep Trainer In Kentucky
No Saratoga Summer For D. Wayne Lukas; High Costs Keep Trainer In Kentucky

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

No Saratoga Summer For D. Wayne Lukas; High Costs Keep Trainer In Kentucky

No Saratoga Summer For D. Wayne Lukas; High Costs Keep Trainer In Kentucky originally appeared on Paulick Report. Hall of Fame trainer D. Wayne Lukas will not keep a string of horses stabled at Saratoga this summer, reports Instead, Lukas will maintain his Kentucky bases at Churchill Downs and Ellis Park. "If we get a colt that looks like he can run or something, we'll send him up there," Lukas told "We're going for just stakes. If we fit a race, we'll ship them up, but we're not going to stable there." Advertisement Lukas' reasoning for the decision was simple: high costs in Saratoga Springs, N.Y. The trainer estimates that it cost $30,000 just to house himself and his staff for the summer. Most trainers charge their owners a day rate which covers day-to-day costs like feed and payroll, but they rely on a portion of purse earnings to turn a profit. In 2024, Lukas' trainees earned a total of $315,525 at Saratoga, winning two races form 33 starts; of that total, a trainer typically earns 10 percent, or $31,525. Thus, after starting out the meet with a $30,000 deficit for housing costs, Lukas said he finished last year's Saratoga summer season in the red. "You've got to win a couple Grade 1s or one of those major races to break even from a trainer standpoint," Lukas told Regarding his current 3-year-old stable star, American Promise, Lukas could be targeting a ship north for the G2 Jim Dandy Stakes at Saratoga on July 26. Read more at This story was originally reported by Paulick Report on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.

Sovereignty's Two Wins Presents A Golfers What If
Sovereignty's Two Wins Presents A Golfers What If

Forbes

time9 hours ago

  • Forbes

Sovereignty's Two Wins Presents A Golfers What If

The 2025 Triple Crown series is now in the history books and Sovereignty has left some feeling as if they just completed a round of golf. What in the world is that supposed to mean?… Let us expound. Sovereignty enjoyed a royal run in Kentucky Derby 151 With two extremely powerful runs, Sovereignty has captured both the Kentucky Derby and the Belmont Stakes. Unleashed like a locomotive at the top of the stretch at Churchill Downs and Saratoga Race Course, this hard-closing colt ran past the front runners with relative ease. That means he was victorious in the bookend jewels. But what about the middle gemstone, the Preakness? Well, he didn't run in that one thusly forgoing the opportunity to become the fourteenth Thoroughbred to win all three. Impressive efforts on both the the first Saturday in May and at New York's signature event has left horse racing fans and sports fans in general uttering that same two-word phrase lots of golfers (especially myself) use on a regular basis…What If… What if I hadn't sliced that ball into the woods…What if I hadn't hit the ball right into the water…twice…What if I had made that three-foot putt…And what if I only took one stroke to get out of the sand trap… Back to the more important what if and Sovereignty. His two performances against some of the best three-year-old males in the world in a five-week span speaks to his quality. There is no doubt he has the talent to be a Triple Crown champion, but what if you throw another mile and three sixteenths race into that five-week period? What if he ran back in two weeks, win or lose would it have affected his Belmont run? What if he had won the Preakness, would that have changed his Belmont opposition?… Just days after his scintillating Kentucky Derby score, the decision was made to skip the Preakness and instead ready for a run at Belmont glory. The powers that be with ownership group Godolphin and hall of fame trainer Bill Mott deliberated and decided it was about what was best for Sovereignty. Refusing to allow the pressures of the general public to persuade them, the decision was made and they stuck with the plan. On June 7, another huge effort from a runner that had rested for five weeks solidified Sovereignty as the real royalty of the three-year-old male division. At the same time, however, the big 'what ifs' began flying like lightning bugs on a hot summer night. So, how do we summarize? The Sovereignty situation should be treated much like a hacker's golf round. Far be it for anyone with my golfing abilities to question another's game. It's better to simply enjoy the good shot or two you have and maintain a 'next swing' mentality. The what ifs only drive you crazy and will not change the number you write on the scorecard (unless your pencil has an eraser). Sovereignty didn't run in the Preakness and time does not rewind itself. Obviously, his team understands the game as his Belmont performance speaks volumes. Godolphin is one of the winningest stables in the game and Bill Mott has won over 5,000 races. Let's revel in those two wonderful wins and think about that next swing when he toes the track again.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store