logo
The Army saw a drop in sexual assault reports, while other services went up

The Army saw a drop in sexual assault reports, while other services went up

Yahoo01-05-2025

Reports of sexual assault dropped 13% in the Army in 2025, but the other three large services reported increases — 4.4% in the Navy, 2% in the Air Force and a small rise of less than 1% in the Marine Corps, according to the Department of Defense's annual report for fiscal year 2024.
In all, uniformed service members reported 6,973 cases of sexual assault across the military with the largest share of reports made by troops younger than 24.
The large drop in the Army's reported assaults drove the total across the military down 4%. The overall decrease continues a downward trend reported by the Pentagon in fiscal year 2023, when sexual assaults were down across the military services for the first time in a decade. In all, almost 700 fewer sexual assaults were reported in 2024 than in 2022, when reports were the highest in 10 years, according to Pentagon data.
The DOD did not do a prevalence analysis — a statistical estimate that uses the number of reported assaults to estimate a likely number of assaults that go unreported — for the most recent year but in fiscal year 2023, but officials estimated that the nearly 7,300 sexual assault reports received that year represented only a quarter of the estimated 29,000 service members likely impacted by sexual assault. A non-DOD analysis by Brown University researchers determined that total might have been as high as 73,700 assaults.
Dr. Nathan Galbreath, director of the Pentagon's Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office told reporters at a Thursday briefing that the DOD plans to conduct a prevalence survey with troops in late fiscal year 2025 'to update our past year estimates of both sexual assault and sexual harassment.'
'We intend for this number to decrease over time through our prevention efforts,' Galbreath said. 'We encourage greater reporting of sexual assault [in order] to connect victims with care and also to have the opportunity to hold offenders appropriately accountable.'
The majority of sexual assault reports continue to be filed by troops between 18 and 24 years old, Galbreath said. In the Air Force, where 16-19 year olds make up less than 4% of the service, they accounted for nearly a quarter of sexual assault reports.
In fiscal year 2024, 3,233 cases of sexual assault fell under DOD jurisdiction, while 1,059 were pursued by local authorities. Out of those taken up by military lawyers, 66%, or 1,380 cases, had 'sufficient evidence' for disciplinary actions which led to more than half of the offending service members facing administrative actions and discharges. For the 31% of service members who were court martialed, three-fourths of those ended in a conviction — an increase of 2% from the year before.
Around 15% of offenders received an Article 15, or non-judicial punishment. Most of these cases involved abusive sexual contact which is 'the least severe of the charges that constitute a crime under Article 120,' the Uniformed Code of Military Justice's charge for rape, Galbreath said.
A third of sexual assault cases did not receive disciplinary action because of insufficient evidence or because the victim declined to continue the UCMJ process. Only 1% of DOD cases lacked evidence or were found to be false.
In fiscal year 2024, there were 3,014 sexual harassment complaints filed, which was lower than the previous three fiscal years but substantially higher than 2018 to 2020. Nearly three-fourths of complaints were filed by women and 54% came from enlisted women between private and corporal or specialists.
Of the 463 substantiated cases with disciplinary actions, 22 led to a court-martial. More than half of the offenders were given adverse or administrative actions, while a quarter got non-judicial punishments and 9% received 'other corrective actions.'
In February, sexual harassment was added to the list of enforceable UCMJ charges that troops can face. The new charges are handled by the military services' Office of Special Trial Counsel as part of a military justice system overhaul that removed prosecutorial decisions out of troops' chain of command to expert counsel.
Galbreath said they expect that the OSTC will consider the new charge 'in their factors of what can be prosecuted under in cases that have been provided to them.'
The OSTC began handling criminal cases like sexual assault, harassment, murder, and child abuse in 2023, but it will take nearly three years until the DOD can judge the office's impact, Galbreath said.
Dr. Andra Tharp, director of, the Office of Command Climate and Well-Being Integration said orders to cut thousands from the Pentagon's civilian workforce could impact previously planned hirings for the service's sexual assault and harassment prevention program.
'Each of the military departments did have targets that they were aiming to hit in terms of hiring each year so any kind of pause is going to impact their ability to hit those targets,' Tharp said. 'We're really trying to get our arms around the total impacts of that.'
Tharp said when the DOD hiring freeze went into effect, it put a hold on 300 prevention positions posted on USA Jobs. However, Tharp said that her office is advising the services to seek hiring exemptions for the positions. So far, she said, she was aware that the Air Force had received approval for the exemptions.
The workforce cuts could also throw a wrench in the military's goal to move towards more full-time civilians in prevention positions by fiscal year 2027. The services intended to reduce the number of active service members working with the Sexual Harassment/Assault Response and Prevention Program as a collateral duty, a move that would 'return over 600,000 hours of initial training time and nearly 500,000 hours of continuing education hours every two years back to commanders,' Galbreath said.
However, under the 2027 plan, the DOD will still have around 3,400 collateral duty personnel on ships, subs and in other hard-to-fill locations who will receive the same training and proficiency requirements as full-time civilians.
Marine in top enlisted spot leaving the Pentagon after just 2 years
Army sergeant found guilty in spree of barracks break-ins and attempted murder
End of the 'yeet': the standing power throw is out as new Army fitness test goes 'sex-neutral' for combat jobs
Good luck figuring out the Air Force's algorithm for shaving waivers
Army cuts athletic trainers from fitness teams, with medics to take up slack

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dairy Council of California Joins Forces to Fuel Summer Learning, Nutrition and Fun Across California
Dairy Council of California Joins Forces to Fuel Summer Learning, Nutrition and Fun Across California

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dairy Council of California Joins Forces to Fuel Summer Learning, Nutrition and Fun Across California

June 3 Summer Meals Program Kickoff SACRAMENTO, Calif., June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- School may be out, but healthy meals and learning resources are in full swing this summer. As part of its ongoing cause to support the health of children and families, Dairy Council of California is partnering with school districts and local agencies to promote access to nutritious meals through USDA's Summer Nutrition Programs for Kids (SUN Meals) and Non-Congregate Summer Meal Program events. These programs play a critical role in supporting food security for children during the summer months. Dairy Council of California is honored to play a role in the upcoming SUN Meals To-Go event hosted by Lodi Unified School District on June 17 at Lockeford Elementary School, part of a Community Day of Action. This signature event supports the USDA Non-Congregate Summer Meals Program, which provides grab-and-go meals to help ensure children receive nutritious food even when traditional meal sites aren't accessible in rural communities. Dairy Council staff will be onsite volunteering and supporting the day's activities. For more details, visit the Lodi USD Summer Grab & Go School Meals event page or go to 'We see spikes in child hunger in the summer and summer nutrition programs are a lifeline for many families. Our involvement helps ensure these events support not only access to food, but also opportunities to promote lifelong healthy eating patterns and learning,' said Amy DeLisio, CEO of Dairy Council of California. 'June is Dairy Month, making it the perfect time to highlight the vital role milk and dairy foods play in children's health. As a primary source of calcium, milk helps build strong bones and teeth, and it also delivers protein, key vitamins and minerals that support muscle function —building strong bodies and fueling fun all summer long.' Dairy Council of California has already supported summer meal kickoffs in communities across California, including Fontana, Hesperia, Riverside, Rialto, Redlands, Lodi, and Val Verde Unified School Districts, with more events continuing throughout the season. Dairy Council's popular live cow assembly, has appeared at multiple Summer Meal kickoff events, giving students a chance to connect directly with agriculture while learning about where milk comes from and how it supports good health. Each participating summer meal site provides free meals to all children and teens 18 and under. Every meal includes milk, delivering essential nutrition to support children's growth and development. To find a summer meal site nearby, visit the USDA Summer Meals Site Finder at, You may also visit for an overview of all summer meals. To learn more about Dairy Council of California, visit About Dairy Council of California Since 1919, Dairy Council of California has been a trusted nutrition organization committed to elevating the health of children and communities. Through education, advocacy, and multisector collaboration, the organization promotes lifelong healthy eating patterns and advances the role of milk and dairy foods in improving nutrition security and supporting sustainable food systems. With more than a century of experience, Dairy Council of California continues to lead with evidence-based nutrition science, education and strategic partnerships to build healthier communities. Contact: Malynda ParsonsEmail: mparsons@ Phone: 916-633-7533 A photo accompanying this announcement is available at in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Senate Democrats file bill to prevent ban on transgender military service
Senate Democrats file bill to prevent ban on transgender military service

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Democrats file bill to prevent ban on transgender military service

Democratic lawmakers will submit a bill in the Senate on Tuesday that would reverse the Pentagon's new ban on transgender military service members diagnosed with gender dysphoria who now face being forced out if they had not previously self-identified as transgender. The "Fit to Serve Act" would prohibit the Defense Department from banning transgender service members from serving in the military. If passed, the law would prevent the Defense Department from denying access to healthcare on the basis of gender identity, and it would also prohibit the military from forcing service members to serve in their sex assigned at birth. It would also make it illegal for the military to discriminate against service members on the basis of gender identity. MORE: Transgender US service members will be separated from military, Pentagon memo says The Defense Department's policy was required by an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on his first day in office that banned transgender individuals from serving in the military. In outlining the policy in a memo issued in late February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote that " individuals who have a current diagnosis or history of, or exhibit symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria are incompatible with the high mental and physical standards necessary for military service." "We recruit and train the best and bravest to protect our country -- losing highly qualified service members, who meet strict standards to join the military, makes us less safe," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who is the lead sponsor of the bill that is being filed in the Senate on Tuesday, which was first announced last month. "By prohibiting this discrimination on the basis of gender identity, this legislation will help to ensure transgender individuals who are qualified to serve may do so" said Sen. Marie Hirono, D-Hawaii, one of the bill's co-sponsors. Under the Pentagon's new policy, transgender service members had until June 6 to self-identify and begin the process of voluntary separation. With the passing of that deadline, the Pentagon has begun a process of involuntary separation of service members diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which is defined as "psychological distress that results from an incongruence between one's sex assigned at birth and one's gender identity." Ahead of that deadline, the Pentagon said more than 1,000 service members had self-identified as having been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. It is unclear whether that number increased ahead of the deadline or how officials had reached that estimate. National Guard and Reserve service members have until July 7 to self-identify for voluntary separation. MORE: Transgender service members say they face 'heartbreaking' decision amid Trump ban: Leave military or get kicked out The Pentagon's new ban went into effect in early May shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could enforce the ban on transgender people in the military while legal challenges to the ban proceed in lower courts. Navy Cmdr. Emily Shilling, who is a lead plaintiff in one of the legal challenges, told ABC News that she has chosen to voluntarily separate. "Yes I am 'volunteering' to retire but I do want to make it clear that myself and most others I have spoken to in SPARTA feel it is under duress," said Shilling who is the president of Sparta Pride, an organization advocating for 2,400 transgender people in the military. "For me, it's the only way I believe I can continue to uphold my oath," said Shilling. "I'm stepping away from active duty service, but not service to my country. My fight is only beginning." Defense officials have said that as of last December, about 4,240 current active-duty, Guard and Reserve service members had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria. There are more than 2.1 million military service members serving on active-duty, Guard and the Reserves. Advocacy groups have put the actual number of transgender service members as being much higher, at around 15,000. Since 2014, the total number of diagnoses for gender dysphoria among service members was 5,773, with 1,000 of those having gone through gender-affirming surgery, according to a defense official. The total costs for treatments, hormones and surgeries during that time frame was $52 million, said the official. With the end of the voluntary separation period, transgender service members now face what could be a lengthy process that could end with their separation from military service. The process will begin with military commanders being told to identify people in their units who have a diagnosis or history of gender dysphoria or exhibit symptoms consistent with gender dysphoria. Once they have done that, a referral to an annual health checkup will be initiated, beginning what could be a lengthy process that could lead to their removal from the military. Pentagon officials have said those evaluations will be conducted during regularly scheduled annual physicals meaning it could be months before they take place. The Pentagon incentivized service members with gender dysphoria to voluntarily separate ahead of the June 6 deadline by offering benefit payment packages that would be more than double what would be received if they were to separate involuntarily. Those who voluntarily separated would not have to risk paying back the recruitment or retention bonuses they may have earned during their military service. The Democratic senators argue that instead of improving military readiness the implementation of the ban will have the opposite effect. "This ban undermines our military readiness and national security by removing thousands of talented, experienced service members and signaling to potential recruits that the military does not respect them, their colleagues, their family, or their friends simply because of who they are," said a description of the Fit to Serve Act. "It also wastes billions of taxpayer dollars invested in training these troops to become leaders to keep all of us safe." The bill is co-sponsored in the Senate by Warren, Hirono, Tammy Duckworth (Illinois), Kirsten Gillibrand (New York), Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin), Ed Markey (Massachusetts), Ron Wyden (Oregon), Jeff Merkley (Oregon),John Fetterman (Pennsylvania), Chris Van Hollen (Maryland), Bernie Sanders (Vermont), Andy Kim (New Jersey), and Cory Booker (New Jersey). Congressmen Adam Smith (Washington) Mark Takano (California), Chrissy Houlahan (Pennsylvania), Sara Jacobs (California), and Eric Sorensen (Illinois) are sponsoring the legislation in the House of Representatives. "By prohibiting this discrimination on the basis of gender identity, this legislation will help to ensure transgender individuals who are qualified to serve may do so," Hirono said. It remains to be seen how much bipartisan support the legislation could gain and whether it will be able to clear Republican majorities in both the Senate and the House. "If you are willing to risk your life for our country and you can do the job, it shouldn't matter if you are gay, straight, transgender, Black, white or anything else," said Duckworth who added that the ban "is disruptive to our military, hurts readiness and not only does nothing to strengthen our national security -- it actively makes things worse." "The Fit to Serve Act is a declaration that we will not stand by while our courageous troops are under political assault. Transgender service members meet the same rigorous standards, deploy worldwide, put in the same hard work and demonstrate the same dedication as any of their colleagues" said Jennifer Pike Bailey, Government Affairs Director of the Human Rights Campaign, one of the advocacy groups supporting the legislation. "President Trump and Secretary Hegseth are taking away their jobs, cutting off their health care benefits, and disregarding the immense sacrifices these service members and their families have made. It's a slap in the face to all who serve and puts our military readiness at risk," she added. "At a time when the United States faces growing threats around the world, banning them from the All-Volunteer Force will make Americans less safe," said Luke Schleusener, CEO of Out in National Security. "This legislation underscores that the fight to honor the service of thousands of transgender Americans in uniform -- and to strengthen America's national security -- is far from over." ABC's Deena Zaru contributed to this report.

Blues vs. Non-Blues 5-Year Enrollment Trends Analyzed by Mark Farrah Associates
Blues vs. Non-Blues 5-Year Enrollment Trends Analyzed by Mark Farrah Associates

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Blues vs. Non-Blues 5-Year Enrollment Trends Analyzed by Mark Farrah Associates

CANONSBURG, Pa., June 10, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Health insurance companies provided fully insured coverage for approximately 186.5 million people in 2024, an increase of over 12.3 million from 2020. Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) association members, parent organizations, and their subsidiaries insured about 37.5% of the total health insurance market. In the latest Healthcare Business Strategy report, Mark Farrah Associates (MFA), examined health insurance enrollment changes in key segments for Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) and Non-BCBS companies between 2020 and 2024. Some highlights include: Individual enrollment for BCBS companies increased 36.6% over the last 5 years, and non-BCBS companies reported a 106.1% increase during the same period. Fully insured Group enrollment, which includes the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), continued to experience decreases throughout the 5-year timeframe for both Blues and non-Blues plans. During the 5-year period, Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment experienced a 32.8% increase for BCBS plans, and non-BCBS MA enrollment saw a 32.3% increase. Total 4Q24 Medicaid enrollment for BCBS plans was over 15.2 million and nearly 62.5 million for non-BCBS companies. To read the FREE full text of "Five Year Health Enrollment Trends Comparing Blues & Non-Blues Plans", visit the MFA Briefs library on Mark Farrah Associates' website. Healthcare Business Strategy is a FREE brief that presents analysis of important issues and developments affecting healthcare business today. If you would like to be added to our email distribution list, please submit your email to the "Subscribe to MFA Briefs" on our website. About Mark Farrah Associates (MFA) Mark Farrah Associates (MFA) is a leading data aggregator and publisher providing health plan market data and analysis tools for the healthcare industry. Our product portfolio includes Health Coverage Portal™, County Health Coverage™, Medicare Business Online™, Medicare Benefits Analyzer™, 5500 Employer Health PLUS, and Health Plans USA™. For more information about these products, refer to the brochures available under the Our Products section of the website ( or call 724-338-4100. Follow us on LinkedIn! View source version on Contacts Mark Farrah AssociatesAnn Marie Wolfe, amwolfe@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store