Florida set to become second state to ban fluoride in municipal drinking water
Lawmakers in Florida approved a bill to prohibit certain additives in drinking water, effectively banning fluoride, and the measure now goes to Gov. Ron DeSantis for a signature. If it's finalized, Florida will become the second state to ban fluoride in municipal drinking water.
The Florida Farm Bill includes language banning the use of any additive in a public water system that does not meet the new definition of a 'water quality additive': a chemical or substance used in public water to specifically address drinking water standards, contaminants or quality.
The Florida House of Representatives approved the bill by a vote of 88-27 on Tuesday, two weeks after the Senate voted 27-9 in favor.
'We are not debating the efficacy of fluoride in any way. … We hold that a free American and Floridian has the right to decide what goes into their body no matter what elected officials may believe is good for their citizens or not,' Rep. Danny Alvarez, a Hillsborough County Republican and a sponsor of the House bill, told CNN.
Fluoride can stop early tooth decay by putting minerals back into enamel. It also makes teeth more resistant to acid and interferes with bacteria's ability erode teeth.
More than 70% of Floridians who use community water systems receive fluoridated water, according to Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, who issued guidance in November recommending against community water fluoridation, citing its potential health effects.
In March, Utah became the first state to ban fluoride in public drinking water. Utah's ban takes effect May 7. Some cities have also gotten rid of fluoride from their water, and more are considering the change.
The Florida vote comes after US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has called fluoride 'an industrial waste,' pledged that the Trump administration will advise utilities to stop adding it to public water.
Kennedy said during a Cabinet meeting Wednesday that he's confident DeSantis will sign the bill and that he's 'looking at the science now' in order to change federal fluoride regulations.
Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral that's found in soil, rocks and water to varying degrees. It is also a byproduct of fertilizer production.
On the recommendation of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization, many cities have added fluoride to their treated drinking water for decades to help protect teeth from cavities.
The CDC reiterated its faith in the health benefits of fluoride in 2015, naming water fluoridation one of the '10 Greatest Public Health Achievements of the 21st Century.' The ADA has also emphasized that 'eighty years of community water fluoridation at optimal levels has proven to be safe and effective at reducing tooth decay to improve oral health.'
However, research has showed that exposure to fluoridated water during pregnancy is associated with increased neurobehavioral problems in children, and a federal review concluded that higher levels are linked with lower IQ in kids. Last year, a federal judge ordered the US Environmental Protection Agency to regulate fluoride in drinking water because of potential risks to children from high levels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sparse Attendance, Confusion and Disorganization: Dismal Scenes From Trump's Military Parade
Donald Trump threw a military parade in honor of the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary on Saturday, June 14 (a date that happens to be the president's birthday) to the tune of $25 to $45 million. But unfortunately for Trump, photos and videos from the big day show sparse attendance and a lack of organization from top to bottom. I just got back from the Trump parade and I have to say it was legitimately the worst executed mass attendance event I've ever seen One overarching thought: how do you spend $80 million and fumble the basics?Many more thoughts – — Doug Landry (@dougblandry) June 15, 2025 50 Thirteen founder Doug Landry shared a series of tweets that documented many issues with the parade Saturday. Landry described the event as 'legitimately the worst executed mass attendance event I've ever seen' before sharing photos of a sparsely populated Washington Mall, the single checkpoint to which approximately 15,000 people were sent, maps that failed to offer clear direction, dozens of empty checkpoints, and empty VIP bleachers. Those scenes were replicated by HuffPost deputy editor Phil Lewis, who shared his own photos on BlueSky. YouTube Brian Tyler Cohen slammed the event on the same platform. 'Donald Trump does NOT want you to share this footage of his pathetically tiny birthday parade crowd,' he captioned a video of attendees. Trump shared a portion of his speech from the event on Truth Social, as well as an uncharacteristically brief summation of the day: 'What a GREAT Parade. THANK YOU, ARMY!' The parade prompted several 'No Kings' rallies and protests held on the same day across the United States. The post Sparse Attendance, Confusion and Disorganization: Dismal Scenes From Trump's Military Parade appeared first on TheWrap.
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Why did those apartments for the poor cost D.C. more than $1 million each?
The June 8 front-page article 'D.C. apartments for the poor exceeding $1 million to build,' which highlighted the high costs of a handful of developments financed in part with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credits program, did not reflect typical costs of developments financed by the credit program. The credit, which has been the primary federal incentive for the construction of rent-restricted apartments for low-income families since 1986, has generated construction of more than 54,000 properties containing more than 3.7 million affordable homes nationwide. The vast majority have been built at comparable costs to similar buildings serving higher-income households — even as credit-financed properties must meet a host of federal and local labor, environmental and approval requirements and achieve standards of quality and durability far beyond the typical market-rate project. Stockton Williams, Washington The writer is executive director of the National Council of State Housing Agencies. Jubilee Housing appreciated the June 8 front-page article highlighting the cost of producing affordable housing in D.C. The affordable housing crisis remains one of the most pressing issues of our time, and we must harness every possible solution to meet the need. That said, the article's focus on the cost efficiency of Ontario Place, which Jubilee Housing is developing, missed a crucial point: Cost per unit is only one part of a complex picture and often a misleading one. Ontario Place provides 52 affordable homes, and nearly half are large enough for families. A lower per-unit-cost design with mostly one-bedroom units could have yielded more smaller units — and a more typical per-unit cost — but it would have been able to house fewer people overall. Maximizing family-size units not only meets District policy goals; in this project, it was actually 10 percent less expensive per person housed than the original design with mostly one-bedrooms and studios. We agree that in most jurisdictions, affordable housing developments are expected to achieve numerous additional policy goals. These include local hiring, higher wage scales and environmental sustainability features. Though those are worthy goals, such requirements can add 10 percent to 25 percent to project costs in D.C. On top of this, bond financing and low-income housing tax credits, which provide more favorable rates but higher transaction fees, are inherently more expensive than market-rate financing. That is especially true for smaller projects such as Jubilee's, where the percentage of financing costs is higher. Until viable alternatives exist, these remain a cost of doing business. Also, for decades, affordable housing was built where land was cheap, placing families far from transit, jobs, fresh food and quality schools. That strategy failed. Continuing it while expecting different outcomes is, as they say, the definition of insanity. Yes, affordable housing in D.C. is expensive, and it is a strategic investment. Affordable housing providers must meet public policy mandates and, in doing so, create economic value across the region. More important, Jubilee delivers what D.C. needs most: high-quality, affordable, family-size homes close to amenities and resources. Economist Raj Chetty has shown that the highest predictor of future success is the Zip code we live in, and other experts have shown that families in high-opportunity neighborhoods see long-term income gains — estimated at a combined $1.4 million over a decade for Ontario Place residents. The on-site aquaponics farm that some commentators have focused on will generate a combined $500,000 in annual wages for the people it employs and $920,000 annually in public savings from reduced reincarceration and reduced health incidents. The project will generate nearly $10 million in long-term public benefit. To break cycles of poverty, we must embrace innovation. We shouldn't just focus on per-unit development costs but also on how many lives can be supported by that investment. Alex Orfinger, Arlington The writer is chair of the board of Jubilee Housing. The June 8 front-page article on publicly funded housing in D.C. underscored an alarming and indefensible failure in the city's approach to affordable housing. The fact that so-called affordable apartments exceed $1 million per unit to construct is not just unsustainable — it's outrageous. This is further evidence that Democratic Mayor Muriel E. Bowser's housing strategy is completely out of touch with the lived reality of most District residents. While the city pours $100 million into the Housing Production Trust Fund, we see little oversight and even less affordability. Developers are racking up extravagant costs while D.C. taxpayers foot the bill. There is no justifiable reason taxpayers should be asked to subsidize $1 million apartments under the false promise of affordability. We must demand an immediate audit of all Housing Production Trust Fund expenditures, freeze new luxury-affordable projects and refocus the city's housing investments toward cost-effective, community-based development. The District needs leadership that prioritizes working families. D.C. can and must do better. Ernest E. Johnson, Washington The writer is a Democratic candidate in the D.C. mayoral race. The Post's June 5 online editorial 'Eliminating the tipped minimum wage has been a disaster' shared only part of the story of D.C.'s restaurant industry after the covid-19 shutdowns. Full-service employment, after fully recovering from the covid-19 pandemic in 2023, has remained at levels consistent with pre-pandemic employment, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And D.C.'s food service employment has outpaced those of Maryland and Virginia. BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data shows that the restaurant industry in D.C. is growing, including in full-service restaurants that employ tipped workers. Wages for tipped workers have shown steady growth thanks to Initiative 82. And BLS data shows that average wages for staff in full-service restaurants rose above their pre-shutdown level. But let me be clear: I do not want to minimize the challenges our local restaurants are experiencing. Like so many families here in the District, restaurants have been hit hard by rising food prices and federal layoffs in the wake of the Trump administration's policies. Even before President Donald Trump took office, my colleagues and I sought to spur economic opportunities for our small businesses and restaurants through legislation, including through the Restaurant Revitalization Act, which was passed last year. Good policy must be guided by good data, and the numbers do not justify going back on our word to workers. The data shows that wages have been rising and that the number of restaurants has increased since I-82 was implemented. As a council, our responsibility is to make our economy work for everyone and not balance our budgets by rolling back wages and protections for working families. Janeese Lewis George, Washington The writer represents Ward 4 on the D.C. Council. The Editorial Board is right that Initiative 82 has been bad for both D.C.'s restaurants and workers. The BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages shows D.C. has lost about 5 percent of its restaurant jobs since the law went into place. That's over four times higher than the losses seen in surrounding Maryland and Virginia counties. The District's workers have lost over $11.8 million in earnings since the law took effect because of a loss of income from tips. With this context, it's easy to see why even the city's leadership is taking measured steps to stop the law's devastation. Rebekah Paxton, Arlington The writer is research director for the Employment Policies Institute. I agree with the June 5 online editorial, 'Eliminating the tipped minimum wage has been a disaster.' Implementing Initiative 82 was a misguided effort rooted in policy frameworks that don't align with the realities of the city's hospitality industry. The policy disproportionately targets large chain restaurants with large staffs and also hurts the city's diverse food scene. Initiative 82 has hurt local restaurants in two key ways: First, it ignored the ripple effects of payroll hikes. Increasing base wages doesn't just affect take-home pay — it also increases payroll taxes and administrative costs. The law mandates higher operational costs within D.C. that put restaurants here at a competitive disadvantage relative to restaurants in Virginia and Maryland. Second, under the previous law, restaurants were already required to ensure that tipped workers made at least minimum wage. If tips fell short, employers were legally obligated to make up the difference. And, the service fees that have been introduced to cover rising costs are revenue to the restaurants that do not have to be distributed to staff. Ironically, under the new system, there is potential for some servers to earn less than they did before, with diners paying less in tips because of those service fees. The city should return to the previous system, which minimized costs for businesses while still guaranteeing a safety net for workers. It's encouraging that The Post's Editorial Board opposed both Initiative 82 and its predecessor, Initiative 77. But many restaurant workers and diners have come to a similar conclusion far too late. Jonathan Halperin, Washington
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Statement from the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation on the Passing of ADDF Co-Founder and Co-Chairman Leonard A. Lauder
The Lauder Family's Vision and Catalytic Funding Through the ADDF Helped Seed and Transform the Alzheimer's Research Landscape NEW YORK, June 15, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- It is with deep sorrow and profound admiration that the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF) shares the passing of Co-Founder and Chairman, Leonard A. Lauder. A visionary philanthropist, cosmetics industry icon, and steadfast champion in the fight against Alzheimer's disease, Lauder's legacy is woven into the very fabric of the ADDF and the progress it has driven toward understanding, treating, and ultimately curing Alzheimer's. "Leonard Lauder was a once-in-a-generation visionary whose leadership, along with his brother Ronald, reshaped the Alzheimer's research landscape," said Dr. Howard Fillit, Co-Founder and Chief Science Officer of the ADDF. "From the very beginning, Leonard understood that Alzheimer's does not just impact the patient, it affects entire families. The Lauder family recognized the emotional, financial, and societal toll of this disease, and built the ADDF to accelerate the discovery and development of treatments that could change the trajectory for patients and their loved ones. Leonard's vision, generosity, and humanity spanned across his business acumen to his philanthropic endeavors, touching countless lives, and his legacy will endure in every breakthrough we help bring forward." Lauder and his brother, Ronald S. Lauder, co-founded the ADDF in 1998 with Dr. Fillit in honor of their mother, Estee Lauder's, battle with Alzheimer's. At a time when Alzheimer's research funding was sparse and interest from the private sector limited, the Lauder family recognized the urgent need for treatments and created a bold new venture philanthropy model to achieve this mission, combining the rigor of scientific research with the agility and entrepreneurialism of venture capital. For over more than 27 years, the Lauders' leadership helped shape the ADDF into the world's leading philanthropic funder of drug discovery and development research. Under the Lauders' guidance, the ADDF has: Invested more than $370 million into over 765 drug discovery programs across 21 countries Catalyzed more than $3 billion in follow-on funding from pharmaceutical companies, venture capital firms, and government agencies, helping to de-risk early-stage science and attract broader investment into Alzheimer's research Played a pivotal role in the development of the first biomarkers for Alzheimer's by providing early seed funding for Amyvid, the first FDA-approved PET scan for Alzheimer's; PrecivityAD, the first Alzheimer's blood test to market; and Lumipulse, the first Alzheimer's blood test to receive FDA approval Established the Diagnostics Accelerator (DxA) in partnership with Bill Gates and other visionary philanthropists to advance affordable, accessible diagnostic tools, a critical step toward earlier detection and intervention Advanced a diverse pipeline of treatments by pioneering the biology of aging approach, now central to the field, with over 70% of drugs targeting disease pathways such as inflammation, neuroprotection, vascular health, and synaptic function, paving the way for Alzheimer's to be treated with combination therapy and precision medicine, as in cancer Brought forward a precision prevention approach, combining lifestyle interventions and therapeutics to slow the progression or prevent the onset of Alzheimer's altogether Through all these achievements, Lauder and his family remained deeply committed to the ADDF's mission. "Leonard's impact on the ADDF, and on the field of Alzheimer's research more broadly, is immeasurable," said Mark Roithmayr, Chief Executive Officer of the ADDF. "He brought a sense of urgency to this work that pushed us all to do more and move faster. He believed that patients and families deserve better and he committed himself fully to building a world in which effective treatments are not only possible, but inevitable. His leadership, his generosity, and his humanity will continue to guide the ADDF's mission every day." Lauder's impact extended across business, culture, and philanthropy. Yet for those who worked alongside him at the ADDF, he will be remembered most for his compassion, clarity of purpose, and unwavering belief in progress. He understood that Alzheimer's is a deeply human and societal challenge, one affecting memory, identity, and dignity. The ADDF honors Lauder's legacy by reaffirming our commitment to conquer Alzheimer's for the millions of patients and families living with this devastating disease. About The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF)Founded in 1998 by Leonard A. and Ronald S. Lauder, the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation is dedicated to rapidly accelerating the discovery of drugs to prevent, treat and cure Alzheimer's disease. The ADDF is the only public charity solely focused on funding the development of drugs for Alzheimer's, employing a venture philanthropy model to support research in academia and the biotech industry. The ADDF's leadership and contributions to the field have played a pivotal role in bringing the first Alzheimer's PET scan (Amyvid®) and blood test (PrecivityAD®) to market, as well as fueling the current robust and diverse drug pipeline. Through the generosity of its donors, the ADDF has awarded more than $370 million to fund 765 Alzheimer's drug discovery programs, biomarker programs and clinical trials in 21 countries. To learn more, please visit: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
