Chaos erupts as crowd swarms ICE agents detaining woman in Massachusetts
Two people were arrested and a family ripped asunder in Worcester, Massachusetts, when a crowd swarmed federal immigration agents as they snatched a woman ahead of Mother's Day.
One of those arrested was the woman's 16-year-old daughter, who was charged with reckless endangerment of a child, disturbing the peace, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest after she tried to block the vehicle her mother was in, while cradling her baby niece in her arms. Also arrested was Worcester School Committee candidate Ashley Spring, 38, who allegedly threw an unknown liquid at an officer, among other offenses. Both were later released, the Boston Herald reported.
About a thousand people gathered at the city green on Sunday to protest the arrest and the manner in which it was carried out. More rallies are set for Tuesday, WCVB-TV reported.
The chaos erupted Thursday when more than two dozen people surrounded agents as they apprehended the woman, whom ICE later identified as 'violent criminal illegal alien Ferreira de Oliveira.'
Worcester police said officers were there to deescalate the situation, but bystanders said they couldn't tell whether cops were protecting the public or the agents.
'We saw both federal and Worcester officers descend on a family with a level of aggression that you would use when apprehending someone who is known to be dangerous and carrying weapons,' Fred Taylor of the Worcester NAACP told WBZ-TV, while another said that the agents, some masked, refused to produce a warrant.
The mom being detained was 'truly screaming,' witness Dali RaRocha told WBZ. 'Those are the screams I have truly engrained in my ears right now.'
ICE claimed de Oliveira had been 'arrested by local police for assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, and assault and battery on a pregnant victim' and blamed 'the previous administration's open border policies' for her August 2022 entry into the U.S. Journalists at Boston.com scoured public records but could not find court filings to support ICE's claim.
Both ICE and the local police union called out City of Worcester district council member Etel Haxhiaj, claiming she had incited the crowd. Haxhiaj was seen chastising officers for their treatment of the teen and initially putting herself between the agents and the woman being taken away.
Worcester Mayor Joseph Petty directed the city manager and police chief to draft a policy spelling out how city officials should interact with ICE, MassLive.com reported.
'As someone who prides themselves on leading a welcoming city, I am devastated to hear about the separation of a family, especially with Mother's Day around the corner,' Petty told WBZ after the incident. "The fear of ICE tearing a family apart is the worst nightmare of so many in our city.'
_____
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
LA Protests: Trump's National Guard Move Sparks Legal Concerns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's announcement of the deployment of the National Guard in California to quell protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions has raised legal concerns. Why It Matters Federal immigration enforcement operations sparked protests across California for a second day in a row on Saturday. ICE carried out raids in Paramount, Los Angeles County, following similar actions at several locations throughout other parts of city on Friday. Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the move, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and the presence of the National Guard was "purposefully inflammatory," would "escalate tensions" and "erode public trust." What To Know On Saturday, the White House ordered the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles under a provision called Title 10 to "temporarily protect ICE and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions." The National Guard is a state-based military force that serves as both a state and federal reserve branch of the U.S. Army and Air Force. It typically operates under state command and is funded by the state. However, in some cases, troops may be assigned to federal missions while still under state control, with funding provided by the central government. The law referenced in Trump's proclamation allows National Guard troops to be placed under federal command, and permits this under three conditions: if the U.S. is invaded or faces the threat of invasion; if there is a rebellion or imminent rebellion against federal authority; or if the president is unable to enforce federal laws using regular forces. A protester stands on a burned car holding a Mexican flag at Atlantic Avenue on June 7, 2025, in Paramount, Los Angeles County, California. A protester stands on a burned car holding a Mexican flag at Atlantic Avenue on June 7, 2025, in Paramount, Los Angeles County, California. Apu Gomes/GETTY The memorandum from the White House reads: "To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the government of the United States." However, the law also stipulates that such orders should be "be issued through the governors of the states." It is not immediately clear if the president can activate National Guard troops without the order of that state's governor. Newsweek contacted the White House for clarification via email outside of regular working hours. "President Trump's deployment of federalized National Guard troops in response to protests is unnecessary, inflammatory, and an abuse of power," said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Security Project. The Trump administration has not invoked the Insurrection Act, according to anonymous U.S. officials who spoke to Reuters this weekend. The act of 1807 serves as the primary legal authority allowing a president to deploy the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or civil unrest. A memo issued by the White House on the matter specifies that the National Guard has been deployed to "temporarily protect ICE and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions, including the enforcement of federal law, and to protect federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur based on current threat assessments and planned operations." This means that National Guard troops will not be permitted to aid local law enforcement—they will be used to protect and provide logistic support to federal ICE agents. "There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves," Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center who specializes in military justice and national security law, wrote in a blog post. "There is the obvious concern that, even as they are doing nothing more than 'protecting' ICE officers discharging federal functions, these federalized troops will end up using force—in response to real or imagined violence or threats of violence against those officers. In other words, there's the very real possibility that having federal troops on the ground will only raise the risk of escalating violence—not decrease it." What People Are Saying A White House memo reads: "Numerous incidents of violence and disorder have recently occurred and threaten to continue in response to the enforcement of federal law by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other United States government personnel who are performing federal functions and supporting the faithful execution of federal immigration laws. In addition, violent protests threaten the security of and significant damage to federal immigration detention facilities and other federal property." Border czar Tom Homan on Fox News: "We're already mobilizing. We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight and we're gonna continue doing our job. This is about enforcing the law." He continued: "American people, this is about enforcing the law, and again, we're not going to apologize for doing it." California Governor Gavin Newsom on X, formerly Twitter, following the National Guard announcement: "The federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions. L.A. authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice. We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need." Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project: "By taking this action, the Trump administration is putting Angelenos in danger, creating legal and ethical jeopardy for troops, and recklessly undermining our foundational democratic principle that the military should not police civilians." Newsom's office also told Newsweek on Friday: "Continued chaotic federal sweeps, across California, to meet an arbitrary arrest quota are as reckless as they are cruel. Donald Trump's chaos is eroding trust, tearing families apart, and undermining the workers and industries that power America's economy." Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, told the Los Angeles Times: "It is using the military domestically to stop dissent. It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done." What Happens Next After Trump announced he was deploying National Guard troops on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said other measures could follow. Hegseth wrote on X that active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton, south of Los Angeles, were on "high alert" and could also be mobilized "if violence continues."
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 5th District deserves better than Andy Ogles. Here's why.
When I heard that U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles held a press conference at the State Capitol on Memorial Day, my first reaction was, "I guess he does know where Nashville is." Now in his second term, the 5th District Congressman has been scarce in the northernmost part of his district. Usually, you'll find him in Washington, at a Republican Party event in Williamson or Maury Counties, or on the other end of a telephone town hall where he can control the narrative and screen the questions. When he did make the trip to Nashville, he was in a locked building, holding constituents outside, while he accused Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell of obstructing justice. Ogles' accusation stems from the action taken by ICE and the Tennessee Highway Patrol in May that resulted in 468 traffic stops and the arrest of 196 people. According to Ogles, Mayor Freddie O'Connell has "weaponized his office to dox and surveil federal agents trying to stop violent criminals." For his part, Mayor Freddie O'Connell appears to take seriously his role to look out for all the residents of Nashville, while acknowledging that immigration enforcement can and will be carried out by federal authorities. Letters: Rep. Andy Ogles' telephone town hall meeting stifled dialogue with constituents "The trauma inflicted on families is long-lasting, and I'm doing everything in my power consistent with applicable law to protect anyone who calls Nashville home," O'Connell said. 'So yes, I continue to be concerned about the mechanism for these actions," he added, "and I think what they've demonstrated is that they can occur at times and locations of their choosing without our involvement.' Unfortunately, Ogles' reaction to ask two House committees to open an investigation into the mayor isn't a surprise. After all, he's known more for attention-grabbing stunts – like proposing a constitutional amendment to give President Trump a third term days into his second term – than he is for solving problems. When the state legislature gerrymandered the House districts, splitting Nashville into three, we were told this would give the city a greater voice in Washington. While most people saw through that thinly veiled argument, it's no less devastating to have representatives who are openly hostile to their constituents. I wonder how many times Andy Ogles has communicated with the mayor's office before this. What steps has he taken to understand the issues of not only his district, but the biggest, most dynamic city in the state? More: National Democrats to target US Rep. Andy Ogles as 'vulnerable Republican' in 2026 While the average citizen may struggle to get in touch with him, does he provide access to other elected officials to better understand their concerns, even if they hold differing political views? Immigration is a complex and challenging issue. There is a broad spectrum of people caught in the outdated and neglected laws of the United States – from known criminals to Dreamers brought to the country as babies. I believe elected officials, including O'Connell, are right to address these concerns with nuance and respect for human dignity. It would be great if Nashville had a partner in Washington with whom it could collaborate in navigating these issues, even when policy recommendations differ. I have no faith that Andy Ogles is that person. I encourage both the Democratic and Republican parties to begin recruiting an alternative for the 2026 election now. I believe in the will of the voters of the 5th District, even if their choice differs from mine. However, the entire district deserves a representative who will be accessible, listen respectfully, and seek solutions rather than engage in ideological grandstanding. Bob Faricy has lived in Nashville for 25 years, working in marketing leadership roles for various media organizations, including The Tennessean. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: TN Rep. Andy Ogles is known more for stunts than policy | Opinion
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
As ICE touts arrests, chaotic scenes emerge amid immigration crackdown
Chaotic scenes from immigration arrests around the country continued emerging over the weekend as President Donald Trump's crackdown widened. The arrests claimed immigrant mothers, restaurant workers and wanted criminals. Immigration authorities raided a popular San Diego Italian restaurant before the Friday dinner rush, arresting several kitchen workers, while community members confronted agents, according to video shared by a local CBS station. As heavily armed agents entered the restaurant, local residents screamed at them and filmed the scene. The agents wore tactical gear, including bulletproof vests emblazoned with the Homeland Security Investigations logo. "The agents fired sound grenades, flash-bang grenades, at the crowd," Pedro Rios, director of the Quaker American Friends Service Committee's U.S.-Mexico Border Program, told CBS. Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told FOX News that agents were doing their law enforcement duty during the raid. "We should be supported, not being called Nazis, not being villainized," he said. Earlier last week, ICE agents were seen arresting immigrants directly after their scheduled immigration hearings at a San Antonio, Texas, courthouse – doubling down on a tactic that has caused an outcry among immigrant advocates. "Families are being targeted at their most vulnerable time – attending their scheduled immigration hearings for what they believe to be progress in their cases," according to a statement by the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. The statement links to a video that appears to show ICE agents arresting a mother alongside four children inside the courthouse, including a minor with his hands zip-tied behind his back. Another video outside the same courthouse, undated but posted Friday, May 30, by advocacy group Unidos Podemos, showed the emotional scene of two mothers and a child being loaded by plainclothes agents into the narrow chamber of a vehicle outfitted to carry prisoners. The child stands on the bumper, his arms outstretched. He says in Spanish, "It's OK, Mom, I'm here. It's OK." ICE, which has a significant social media presence, has largely refrained from sharing emotional or chaotic arrest videos and instead posts mugshots of arrested immigrants with serious criminal records. The agency publicized its recent arrests of a Honduran man facing burglary and sexual battery charges, a convicted sex offender from El Salvador and a Venezuelan woman convicted of felonies in California and wanted on other charges in New York. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Immigration crackdown leads to chaotic scenes as ICE touts arrests
