New Hampshire's Medicaid program faces threats on both the federal and state level
Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican, speaks with reporters in her office Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2025. Ayotte has proposed several changes to Medicaid aimed at cutting down the cost of the program that would increase the financial burden on recipients. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin)
After being found floating in a pool in Florida following a drug overdose, Shawn Cannizzaro — a Boston native — moved to Littleton to get help with his substance use disorder at a recovery house.
'I'm saying to myself, 'What am I doing going to Littleton, New Hampshire?' he said. 'It's a blizzard out. It's the end of January. I'm coming off every drug you can imagine — alcohol, crack, cocaine, heroin, everything. I am a mess, and I do not want to live anymore.'
Three years after arriving in Littleton, Cannizzaro was sober and beginning to thrive. So he decided to try to help others facing the same struggles. He's now the owner of Hope 2 Freedom Recovery Homes, an organization that operates several sober living homes in Claremont.
'I've been in and out of sober living houses my entire life, and now I own four of my own,' he said. 'I just celebrated six years clean a couple weeks ago.'
Cannizzaro said it's Medicaid — the U.S.' public health insurance program for people with low income or high needs — that makes this work possible. The program funds treatment for 90% of people at his sober living homes. But Medicaid didn't just help his clients.
'This is important on a lot of different levels for me,' Cannizzaro said.
Cannizzaro explained that his organization provided him some income, but not enough to buy private insurance, so he got on Medicaid himself. He said after dealing with some health issues, he was able to earn enough money to no longer need Medicaid.
Cannizzaro, who is one of several who spoke at an event in Manchester last week about how Medicaid helped them, isn't alone in using Medicaid to address substance use disorder. Medicaid paid for 21% of all substance use disorder treatment in the U.S., and 7.2% of Medicaid recipients ages 12 to 64 have a diagnosed substance use disorder, according to analysis of recent years' Medicaid claims data by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
More broadly, around 80 million people across the U.S. receive health care coverage through Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Programs, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported. In New Hampshire, that number is around 183,000.
Medicaid, which is operated jointly by states and the federal government, also finances around 2 of every 5 births in the U.S. — a little over 1 of 5 in New Hampshire — and Medicaid is the primary payer for about 2 of every 3 nursing home patients both across the U.S. and in New Hampshire specifically, per CMS and KFF.
In New Hampshire, the program could be scaled back if proposals from Republican leaders on both the national and federal level come to fruition.
Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution last week outlining a framework for the federal budget — an early step in the lengthy federal budgeting process. That framework seeks to impose a series of spending cuts in order to reduce the federal deficit and introduce tax cuts. Experts believe for the government to make these cuts happen, it would need to remove an estimated $800 billion from Medicaid nationwide, which has drawn concern from Medicaid recipients and advocates.
'What is so frustrating about that is that this is not being done because we have a national emergency,' U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, New Hampshire's Democratic senior senator, said. 'This is being done so that the Republicans in Congress and President Trump and Elon Musk can come up with $2 trillion in cuts so they can pay for their tax breaks for the wealthiest in this country.'
In New Hampshire, the concern is particularly acute due to a so-called trigger law the state passed in 2018 that would cut state funding for New Hampshire's Medicaid program if federal funding falls below a certain level.
In 2014, New Hampshire lawmakers expanded Medicaid using federal funding from the Affordable Care Act, creating what is now known as the Granite Advantage Program. This program has since brought Medicaid to an additional 60,000 New Hampshire residents, according to state figures reported in January. In total, Medicaid in New Hampshire costs $2.5 billion to operate each year, $1.4 billion of which comes from the federal government.
Then, in 2018, state lawmakers passed the trigger law, which dictates that if federal funding for Medicaid expansion falls below 90% of the cost of the program (though previous laws had also set triggers at different rates), the state will revoke the funding it devotes to the expansion program and eliminate it.
U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan, New Hampshire's Democratic junior senator, described Medicaid as 'a pillar of American life,' arguing 'it helps strengthen our economy, our workforce, and the health of our people. It's indispensable to families who are trying to make ends meet.'
Before becoming senator, Hassan was New Hampshire's governor and oversaw the 2014 Medicaid expansion.
'We did it on a bipartisan basis,' she said. 'And we did it because we recognized that there were people who wanted to go to work but couldn't go to work because they had health conditions and they couldn't get health coverage, so they couldn't get better.'
She said she consistently heard from people who went on Medicaid, got healthier, and then no longer needed Medicaid because they were able to earn more when they were healthier.
U.S. Rep. Maggie Goodlander, a Democrat who represents New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District, called Medicaid, in addition to Medicare and Social Security, 'the lifeblood of our communities.'
Still, a lot more must happen for these cuts to materialize. There appear to be major differences between the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.
U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, told reporters in the Capitol last week he won't vote to approve Medicaid cuts. He's also alluded to other differences the two chambers have.
'There's a lot of distance between where the House and the Senate are on this,' Hawley said.
President Donald Trump also said he wants to see Medicaid maintained. However, he has been perhaps even more forceful in calling for the tax cuts he and his congressional allies instituted through the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act during his first term to be extended. Many have argued doing both without raising the deficit — a nonstarter for many Republicans — would be infeasible.
'We know we're going to be in a fight to protect these mission critical programs,' Goodlander said.
Asked about whether she is concerned about Congress cutting Medicaid enough to activate New Hampshire's trigger law, Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican, said 'I can't deal in hypotheticals.'
As this fight over Medicaid unfolds in Washington, Ayotte is working to scale back the cost of Medicaid in her own state. The governor is proposing state level changes to the program that would shift more financial cost to Medicaid recipients and tighten eligibility for the program in New Hampshire.
If adopted, Ayotte's new state budget, and the accompanying policy-related 'trailer bill,' would add premiums for some recipients, increase pharmacy cost-sharing, and end the already winding down continuous eligibility system.
The proposed premiums would require Medicaid recipients, with children, who earn 255% of the federal poverty level and those without children who earn between 100% and 138% of the poverty level to make a payment of up to 5% of their household income in order to receive coverage. As for the co-pays, the proposal would change the amount Medicaid recipients pay for their prescriptions from $1 or $2 to $4 per prescription (unless that exceeds 5% of household income). Finally, it would end continuous enrollment, which began during the COVID-19 pandemic and allowed people to stay on Medicaid even after they no longer met the requirements; that system has already ended, but the state needed time to disenroll recipients.
Ayotte also proposed a change meant to make the program more cost efficient. Her proposal would allow Medicaid to purchase name-brand drugs instead of generics if they were cheaper — it had previously been required to purchase generics as a cost-saving measure, but recent market developments have meant name brands are sometimes cheaper.
Ayotte predicted these changes would save the state about $27 million.
'We obviously tried to be thoughtful in how we did this,' she said, adding that they'll include a provision to allow people experiencing hardship relief from the premiums and stressing that eligibility would not change.
Ayotte defended the move by pointing out how permissive New Hampshire's eligibility requirements are comparatively.
'New Hampshire has among the highest eligibility in terms of who's covered for Medicaid in the nation,' she said. 'People aren't even eligible to get Medicaid above 255% of poverty in 26 states.'
Indeed, New Hampshire ranks sixth among U.S. states and territories for most expansive income eligibility requirements for children, as of May 2024, according to KFF. If you include only children ages 1 to 5, New Hampshire has the most expansive eligibility requirements for Medicaid of any state or territory except Washington, D.C.
'My proposal is one that, regardless of what happens in Washington, is meeting our financial needs in New Hampshire to maintain eligibility and to sustain the budget for essential services,' Ayotte said.
State House Deputy Democratic Leader Laura Telerski, a Nashua Democrat, said Ayotte's proposals 'sound like an income tax to low-income and working families just to access health care.'
Telerski noted that this 5% premium could cost a single parent with two kids making $67,000 annually about $280 a month to keep their children's health care. As for adults who make between 100% and 138% of the poverty level, Tellerski pointed out that these people make between roughly $15,500 and $22,000.
'These are extremely low-income people,' she said, 'These individuals barely have enough money to put a roof over their head or find sufficient food. And they're also going to be subjected to a 5% fee based on their income.'
Telerski argued these premiums would push eligible people off Medicaid because they can't afford premiums.
'I think it's great that we have been able to provide coverage for these families,' she said, discussing New Hampshire's expansive eligibility. 'But to take away that benefit that they have for their kids to get health care and putting a price tag on it is only gonna put kids at risk. It's only going to make working families have to make very hard choices on how they're gonna put together their monthly budgets.'
Telerski did, however, say she likes the rule change on purchasing name-brand drugs. She also acknowledged the current budget cycle 'is gonna be tough' fiscally. However, she'd rather look at limiting other programs like the education freedom accounts to find savings.
'(Ayotte) said in her budget address that her budget will protect the most vulnerable,' she said. 'Well, I see no one more vulnerable than children and extremely low-income people and people with disabilities.'
Conservatives have long criticized Medicaid expansion for being too expensive and covering too many people.
Even before Trump took office in January, the Cato Institute, an influential conservative think tank, called for the now-president to place a cap on Medicaid funding sent to each state, saying he could save the federal government $300 billion annually.
'This health program has grown explosively because the federal government subsidizes state program expansion in an uncontrolled manner,' the organization wrote.
Locally, the Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy, a New Hampshire-based conservative think tank, has also decried how much Medicaid has expanded and advocated for those expansions to be halted.
'These expansions are unsustainable for both the state and federal governments,' the think tank's president Andrew Cline wrote in a 2023 blog post. 'Eventually, some level of financial discipline, however small or limited, will have to be imposed. … Any discussion of expanding Medicaid coverage or eligibility should start with the understanding that current spending levels are unsustainable.'
Among the groups that rely on Medicaid the most are people with disabilities.
Stephanie Patrick, executive director at the Disability Rights Center-NH, said cuts to Medicaid 'could be devastating' for people with disabilities in New Hampshire.
'People with disabilities rely on Medicaid for not just health care,' she said, 'but for the services they need that aren't covered by private health insurance.'
People with disabilities can use Medicaid to receive the nonmedical supports they need to live in the community, such as a direct support professional or case management.
Katie Philips, of Dover, is one of those people.
'If we lose Medicaid, it would just hurt so much,' Philips said at last week's Manchester event tearfully. 'It's just been so helpful to me to have it.'
She said Medicaid has allowed her to see her doctor even though she isn't critically ill. It's also allowed her to get medications she needs.
'And I'm able to live on my own, which I'm doing a really good job at,' she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump called for troops to enter Los Angeles amid rioting in the Californian city that stemmed from protests against immigration enforcement. The Republican president is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to L.A. to quell the intense violence, despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Monday morning. This is a developing story. Updates to follow.


Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says
BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard Group, and the asset management arm of State Street (STT) are headed to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, Josh Sisco and Silla Brush of Bloomberg reports. Lawyers from the companies are set to urge a federal judge to dismiss the case. The suit claims the firm have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared. Confident Investing Starts Here:
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrails vs. contrails Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. Cloud seeding While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. Geoengineering While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. Taking focus In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said. ___ Associated Press writers Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida, and Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, contributed to this story.