logo
New Hampshire's Medicaid program faces threats on both the federal and state level

New Hampshire's Medicaid program faces threats on both the federal and state level

Yahoo05-03-2025

Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican, speaks with reporters in her office Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2025. Ayotte has proposed several changes to Medicaid aimed at cutting down the cost of the program that would increase the financial burden on recipients. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin)
After being found floating in a pool in Florida following a drug overdose, Shawn Cannizzaro — a Boston native — moved to Littleton to get help with his substance use disorder at a recovery house.
'I'm saying to myself, 'What am I doing going to Littleton, New Hampshire?' he said. 'It's a blizzard out. It's the end of January. I'm coming off every drug you can imagine — alcohol, crack, cocaine, heroin, everything. I am a mess, and I do not want to live anymore.'
Three years after arriving in Littleton, Cannizzaro was sober and beginning to thrive. So he decided to try to help others facing the same struggles. He's now the owner of Hope 2 Freedom Recovery Homes, an organization that operates several sober living homes in Claremont.
'I've been in and out of sober living houses my entire life, and now I own four of my own,' he said. 'I just celebrated six years clean a couple weeks ago.'
Cannizzaro said it's Medicaid — the U.S.' public health insurance program for people with low income or high needs — that makes this work possible. The program funds treatment for 90% of people at his sober living homes. But Medicaid didn't just help his clients.
'This is important on a lot of different levels for me,' Cannizzaro said.
Cannizzaro explained that his organization provided him some income, but not enough to buy private insurance, so he got on Medicaid himself. He said after dealing with some health issues, he was able to earn enough money to no longer need Medicaid.
Cannizzaro, who is one of several who spoke at an event in Manchester last week about how Medicaid helped them, isn't alone in using Medicaid to address substance use disorder. Medicaid paid for 21% of all substance use disorder treatment in the U.S., and 7.2% of Medicaid recipients ages 12 to 64 have a diagnosed substance use disorder, according to analysis of recent years' Medicaid claims data by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
More broadly, around 80 million people across the U.S. receive health care coverage through Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Programs, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported. In New Hampshire, that number is around 183,000.
Medicaid, which is operated jointly by states and the federal government, also finances around 2 of every 5 births in the U.S. — a little over 1 of 5 in New Hampshire — and Medicaid is the primary payer for about 2 of every 3 nursing home patients both across the U.S. and in New Hampshire specifically, per CMS and KFF.
In New Hampshire, the program could be scaled back if proposals from Republican leaders on both the national and federal level come to fruition.
Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution last week outlining a framework for the federal budget — an early step in the lengthy federal budgeting process. That framework seeks to impose a series of spending cuts in order to reduce the federal deficit and introduce tax cuts. Experts believe for the government to make these cuts happen, it would need to remove an estimated $800 billion from Medicaid nationwide, which has drawn concern from Medicaid recipients and advocates.
'What is so frustrating about that is that this is not being done because we have a national emergency,' U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, New Hampshire's Democratic senior senator, said. 'This is being done so that the Republicans in Congress and President Trump and Elon Musk can come up with $2 trillion in cuts so they can pay for their tax breaks for the wealthiest in this country.'
In New Hampshire, the concern is particularly acute due to a so-called trigger law the state passed in 2018 that would cut state funding for New Hampshire's Medicaid program if federal funding falls below a certain level.
In 2014, New Hampshire lawmakers expanded Medicaid using federal funding from the Affordable Care Act, creating what is now known as the Granite Advantage Program. This program has since brought Medicaid to an additional 60,000 New Hampshire residents, according to state figures reported in January. In total, Medicaid in New Hampshire costs $2.5 billion to operate each year, $1.4 billion of which comes from the federal government.
Then, in 2018, state lawmakers passed the trigger law, which dictates that if federal funding for Medicaid expansion falls below 90% of the cost of the program (though previous laws had also set triggers at different rates), the state will revoke the funding it devotes to the expansion program and eliminate it.
U.S. Sen. Maggie Hassan, New Hampshire's Democratic junior senator, described Medicaid as 'a pillar of American life,' arguing 'it helps strengthen our economy, our workforce, and the health of our people. It's indispensable to families who are trying to make ends meet.'
Before becoming senator, Hassan was New Hampshire's governor and oversaw the 2014 Medicaid expansion.
'We did it on a bipartisan basis,' she said. 'And we did it because we recognized that there were people who wanted to go to work but couldn't go to work because they had health conditions and they couldn't get health coverage, so they couldn't get better.'
She said she consistently heard from people who went on Medicaid, got healthier, and then no longer needed Medicaid because they were able to earn more when they were healthier.
U.S. Rep. Maggie Goodlander, a Democrat who represents New Hampshire's 2nd Congressional District, called Medicaid, in addition to Medicare and Social Security, 'the lifeblood of our communities.'
Still, a lot more must happen for these cuts to materialize. There appear to be major differences between the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.
U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, told reporters in the Capitol last week he won't vote to approve Medicaid cuts. He's also alluded to other differences the two chambers have.
'There's a lot of distance between where the House and the Senate are on this,' Hawley said.
President Donald Trump also said he wants to see Medicaid maintained. However, he has been perhaps even more forceful in calling for the tax cuts he and his congressional allies instituted through the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act during his first term to be extended. Many have argued doing both without raising the deficit — a nonstarter for many Republicans — would be infeasible.
'We know we're going to be in a fight to protect these mission critical programs,' Goodlander said.
Asked about whether she is concerned about Congress cutting Medicaid enough to activate New Hampshire's trigger law, Gov. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican, said 'I can't deal in hypotheticals.'
As this fight over Medicaid unfolds in Washington, Ayotte is working to scale back the cost of Medicaid in her own state. The governor is proposing state level changes to the program that would shift more financial cost to Medicaid recipients and tighten eligibility for the program in New Hampshire.
If adopted, Ayotte's new state budget, and the accompanying policy-related 'trailer bill,' would add premiums for some recipients, increase pharmacy cost-sharing, and end the already winding down continuous eligibility system.
The proposed premiums would require Medicaid recipients, with children, who earn 255% of the federal poverty level and those without children who earn between 100% and 138% of the poverty level to make a payment of up to 5% of their household income in order to receive coverage. As for the co-pays, the proposal would change the amount Medicaid recipients pay for their prescriptions from $1 or $2 to $4 per prescription (unless that exceeds 5% of household income). Finally, it would end continuous enrollment, which began during the COVID-19 pandemic and allowed people to stay on Medicaid even after they no longer met the requirements; that system has already ended, but the state needed time to disenroll recipients.
Ayotte also proposed a change meant to make the program more cost efficient. Her proposal would allow Medicaid to purchase name-brand drugs instead of generics if they were cheaper — it had previously been required to purchase generics as a cost-saving measure, but recent market developments have meant name brands are sometimes cheaper.
Ayotte predicted these changes would save the state about $27 million.
'We obviously tried to be thoughtful in how we did this,' she said, adding that they'll include a provision to allow people experiencing hardship relief from the premiums and stressing that eligibility would not change.
Ayotte defended the move by pointing out how permissive New Hampshire's eligibility requirements are comparatively.
'New Hampshire has among the highest eligibility in terms of who's covered for Medicaid in the nation,' she said. 'People aren't even eligible to get Medicaid above 255% of poverty in 26 states.'
Indeed, New Hampshire ranks sixth among U.S. states and territories for most expansive income eligibility requirements for children, as of May 2024, according to KFF. If you include only children ages 1 to 5, New Hampshire has the most expansive eligibility requirements for Medicaid of any state or territory except Washington, D.C.
'My proposal is one that, regardless of what happens in Washington, is meeting our financial needs in New Hampshire to maintain eligibility and to sustain the budget for essential services,' Ayotte said.
State House Deputy Democratic Leader Laura Telerski, a Nashua Democrat, said Ayotte's proposals 'sound like an income tax to low-income and working families just to access health care.'
Telerski noted that this 5% premium could cost a single parent with two kids making $67,000 annually about $280 a month to keep their children's health care. As for adults who make between 100% and 138% of the poverty level, Tellerski pointed out that these people make between roughly $15,500 and $22,000.
'These are extremely low-income people,' she said, 'These individuals barely have enough money to put a roof over their head or find sufficient food. And they're also going to be subjected to a 5% fee based on their income.'
Telerski argued these premiums would push eligible people off Medicaid because they can't afford premiums.
'I think it's great that we have been able to provide coverage for these families,' she said, discussing New Hampshire's expansive eligibility. 'But to take away that benefit that they have for their kids to get health care and putting a price tag on it is only gonna put kids at risk. It's only going to make working families have to make very hard choices on how they're gonna put together their monthly budgets.'
Telerski did, however, say she likes the rule change on purchasing name-brand drugs. She also acknowledged the current budget cycle 'is gonna be tough' fiscally. However, she'd rather look at limiting other programs like the education freedom accounts to find savings.
'(Ayotte) said in her budget address that her budget will protect the most vulnerable,' she said. 'Well, I see no one more vulnerable than children and extremely low-income people and people with disabilities.'
Conservatives have long criticized Medicaid expansion for being too expensive and covering too many people.
Even before Trump took office in January, the Cato Institute, an influential conservative think tank, called for the now-president to place a cap on Medicaid funding sent to each state, saying he could save the federal government $300 billion annually.
'This health program has grown explosively because the federal government subsidizes state program expansion in an uncontrolled manner,' the organization wrote.
Locally, the Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy, a New Hampshire-based conservative think tank, has also decried how much Medicaid has expanded and advocated for those expansions to be halted.
'These expansions are unsustainable for both the state and federal governments,' the think tank's president Andrew Cline wrote in a 2023 blog post. 'Eventually, some level of financial discipline, however small or limited, will have to be imposed. … Any discussion of expanding Medicaid coverage or eligibility should start with the understanding that current spending levels are unsustainable.'
Among the groups that rely on Medicaid the most are people with disabilities.
Stephanie Patrick, executive director at the Disability Rights Center-NH, said cuts to Medicaid 'could be devastating' for people with disabilities in New Hampshire.
'People with disabilities rely on Medicaid for not just health care,' she said, 'but for the services they need that aren't covered by private health insurance.'
People with disabilities can use Medicaid to receive the nonmedical supports they need to live in the community, such as a direct support professional or case management.
Katie Philips, of Dover, is one of those people.
'If we lose Medicaid, it would just hurt so much,' Philips said at last week's Manchester event tearfully. 'It's just been so helpful to me to have it.'
She said Medicaid has allowed her to see her doctor even though she isn't critically ill. It's also allowed her to get medications she needs.
'And I'm able to live on my own, which I'm doing a really good job at,' she added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Planned PBS, NPR cuts would overwhelmingly hit outlets in states Trump won, report finds
Planned PBS, NPR cuts would overwhelmingly hit outlets in states Trump won, report finds

CBS News

time5 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Planned PBS, NPR cuts would overwhelmingly hit outlets in states Trump won, report finds

The looming federal funding cuts to public television and radio would overwhelmingly gut outlets in states won by President Trump in 2024, according to a new congressional report. Approximately 60% of the hundreds of radio and television stations that could suffer funding cuts are in Trump-won states, according to a congressional report obtained by CBS News from Senate Democrats. The organizations that would be affected include public media outlets in cities as large as Houston and Miami, as well as smaller stations in tiny communities like Douglas, Wyoming, which has a population of 6,000 and hosts the Wyoming State Fair. The widespread cuts to public radio and television are a component of a Republican congressional plan to eliminate $9 billion in funding for programs approved before President Trump's second term began. The proposed rescissions package, which is scheduled for a House vote Thursday, includes $1.1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides funding to NPR and PBS. The cuts to public broadcasting are being touted by the Trump administration and Republicans as an effort to slash taxpayer funding for news media outlets they accuse of being "liberal" or politically biased in their content. Advocates for public broadcasting have lambasted the cuts as destructive, needless and harmful to communities that have very limited sources of local broadcast news. They also deny allegations of political bias. The list of hundreds of TV and radio outlets facing funding cuts shows a broad range of impact. Major public television and radio stations in Charlotte, North Carolina, and Washington, D.C., could each lose nearly $1 million in grants in the coming months. An FM community public radio station in Carbondale, Colorado, which touts itself as "Public access radio that connects community members to one another and the world," received $145,000 in federal grant funding last year. At each of the public media outlets, the list shows reductions that are sizable enough to potentially require staffing cuts, programming reductions or news cutbacks that threaten to exacerbate shortages of local news content. CBS News' review of proposed grant cuts shows Alabama, a state with an estimated 215 public media employees, would lose as much as $3 million in funding for its public television outlets in the coming months. In South Dakota, a sparsely populated state that nonetheless receives $3 million in funds for public broadcasting employees, the funding cuts would gut money for at least 20 media outlets, according to the report provided by congressional aides to CBS News. "The path to better public media is achievable only if funding is maintained. Otherwise, a vital lifeline that operates reliable emergency communications, supports early learning, and keeps local communities connected and informed will be cut off with regrettable and lasting consequences," said Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. "Federal funding for the public broadcasting system is irreplaceable," Harrison said. "Public media serves all — families and individuals, in rural and urban communities — free of charge and commercial free." Both PBS and NPR have sued the Trump administration over previous executive orders cutting their funding, with lawyers for both alleging that among other issues, the cuts violate the First Amendment. PBS CEO Paula Kerger previously said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" that while PBS only receives 15% of its funding from the federal government, some of its smaller stations receive up to 50% of their funding from federal sources and said the risks to the smaller stations are "existential" if the funding is cut. NPR CEO Katherine Maher has said roughly 1% of the organization's budget comes directly from federal dollars. Some of the many impacted public radio and TV stations have posted messages protesting the proposed cuts in funding. The social media account of a Baltimore public radio station leader said, "This isn't hypothetical—it's real, it's happening, and it places the future of local, trusted public media at serious risk. Let me be clear: this is not a symbolic move. If approved, this action could irreparably damage the local public media." Rural communities, often referred to as "news deserts" because of the lack of local news organizations, would suffer the brunt of the pain. According to a joint statement by Rep. Mark Amodei, a Nevada Republican, and Rep. Dan Goldman, a New York Democrat, "Rural broadcasters face significant challenges in raising private funds, making them particularly vulnerable if government funding is cut." Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat who is the vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in a statement to CBS News, "Trump wants Congress to vote to cut off public radio broadcasts our constituents count on for weather forecasts, emergency alerts, and updates on what's going on in their community—and force layoffs at local TV stations." House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has championed the cuts and sought to rally support ahead of Thursday's vote on the rescissions package. "House Republicans will fulfill our mandate and continue codifying into law a more efficient federal government," Johnson said in a statement. "This is exactly what the American people deserve." In April, the White House released a statement saying taxpayers had funded NPR and PBS "for too long" and said they've "spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'" The White House Office of Management and Budget did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Toni Biancardi returns to Burns Harbor Town Council
Toni Biancardi returns to Burns Harbor Town Council

Chicago Tribune

time8 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Toni Biancardi returns to Burns Harbor Town Council

Toni Biancardi took her familiar seat at the Burns Harbor Town Council table Wednesday evening. Porter County Democratic Party Chair Don Craft appointed Biancardi to fill the vacancy left by Nick Loving, who moved over from council to the clerk-treasurer's job. Biancardi, a Republican, had previously served for 8 years on the Burns Harbor Town Council from 2015 to 2023. She decided against seeking re-election in 2023. 'I am excited because I love my community and the opportunity to serve,' Biancardi said. Craft is empowered to make the council appointment because Burns Harbor consists of one voting precinct. All five Burns Harbor Council members serve at large. The seat was originally held by Kurt Jordan, who resigned along with his wife Jane Jordan, the town's clerk-treasurer, on May 8, 2024. Loving was appointed last June to fill Jordan's seat and now Biancardi will serve the remainder of the term, which lasts through the end of 2027. Biancardi was sworn into office Monday by Loving after she learned of her appointment. The Wednesday meeting was the first time that Loving attended a council meeting in his new position as clerk-treasurer. He received applause from those in council chambers. During his opening remarks, Loving repeated a sentiment that he expressed when he swore Biancardi into office Monday. 'There's a lot that's wrong in this world, but having Toni back in the chair is one step in making it right,' Loving said. Biancardi said that she will be working as the council's liaison to the street department. During the next few weeks, Biancardi said she will become reacquainted with the town's operations. Biancardi is on summer break from her teaching job at Westville High School. She teaches computer science, cyber security, marketing and sales and also supervises work-study-based students. Meanwhile, Loving said that he is adjusting well to his new job as clerk-treasurer. Loving complimented his predecessor, Nicole Migliorini, for helping to smooth the transition. Migliorini resigned from the clerk-treasurer's job on May 14, citing a 'toxic' work environment.

Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows
Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows

Politico

time9 minutes ago

  • Politico

Americans think Trump's big military parade is not a good use of government funds, poll shows

A majority of Americans believe President Donald Trump's multimillion-dollar parade celebrating the Army in Washington on Saturday is not a good use of government funds, a new AP-NORC poll shows. Sixty percent of Americans surveyed in the June poll said they believe the parade is not a good use of funds, while 38 percent said they believe the parade is worth the cost. Forty percent of Americans approve of Trump's decision to hold the parade, compared with 31 percent who neither approve or disapprove and 29 percent who are against the decision to hold a parade. The parade this weekend, which also coincides with Trump's 79th birthday, is expected to feature 6,600 soldiers marching along with 25 M1 Abrams main battle tanks and dozens of other military vehicles. Several generations of military aircraft are planned to fly overhead, including a World War II-era B-25 bomber, Huey helicopters similar to those used in the Vietnam War, and a P-1 biplane fighter aircraft like the ones first used in the 1920s. Trump is also expected to give a speech. The cost of the parade is estimated to cost between $25 million and $45 million, according to Army officials. Some Republicans have raised concerns over the cost. Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, told POLITICO last week he 'would have recommended against the parade' after learning of its estimated cost. In an NBC News interview in May, Trump said the amount spent on holding the parade would be 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' Most Republican lawmakers are planning to skip the parade, including Speaker Mike Johnson and several members who have previously served in the military. Only seven out of 50 congressional Republicans surveyed by POLITICO as of Tuesday said they were planning to attend. The poll also finds 60 percent of Americans disapprove of Trump's job performance, while 39 percent approve, marking Trump's highest disapproval rating in an AP-NORC poll since he returned to office in January. The AP-NORC poll was conducted June 5-9 and is based on interviews with 1,158 adults around the country. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 4.0 percentage points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store