UDF seeks to avoid fallout over Welfare Party support
Kozhikode: Opposition leader V D Satheesan's explanation of Welfare Party's support to UDF—saying its parent group Jamaat-e-Islami (JEI) has changed its stance on a theocratic state—did not sit well with Sunnis and other Muslim groups.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
To prevent any backlash, Congress has started efforts to manage the situation.
On Thursday, KPCC chief Sunny Joseph met Samastha president Jifri Muthukoya Thangal in Kozhikode. Although they did not discuss Welfare Party's support to UDF, the meeting's timing is politically important. Thangal said Samastha does not back any party and that its members are free to vote as they wish.
Meanwhile, Samastha leader Ummer Faizi Mukkam, who is close to CPM, criticized Satheesan, saying he has no right to issue 'fatwas' on Islam.
"That is the job of the ulema and we are here for that," he said. He also accused JEI of promoting ideas against Islamic teachings.
On a more measured note, AP Sunni faction leader Abdul Hakim Azhari said Sunni groups do not interfere in political alliances or elections but added that its criticism of JEI is based on ideology. "JEI's ideology is built on the idea of a theocratic state. There is no sign they have given it up. Explanations from other political leaders aren't enough," he said.
We evaluate secular and democratic values and development policies of each side and inform our members of our position. Raising opinions and criticisms is a sign of political awareness and democratic alertness, helping society develop in many ways. This should continue. Seeing these opinions as political support or opposition shows a misunderstanding of how democratic discussion can work, he said.
With LDF increasing criticism of Welfare Party's support for UDF and even groups like Catholic Congress unhappy, UDF is moving cautiously to avoid any impact in Nilambur. Joseph later told the media that Thangal gave advice in good spirit. "We will accept it and move ahead," he said. When asked if his advice was related to Nilambur, Joseph said that topic was not discussed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Israel-Iran war: Which Muslim countries will support Netanyahu? Saudi, UAE, Oman, Turkey, Jordan to..., Khamenei to get...
(File) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced the launch of a large-scale military campaign, Operation Rising Lion, aimed at dismantling what he described as an existential threat posed by Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes. According to the news agency ANI report, Netanyahu said Israel had struck multiple high-value Iranian targets in a decisive first strike. Furthermore, the Israeli leader accused Iran of pursuing a nuclear weapons programme in defiance of global warnings, pointing to enriched uranium stockpiles capable of producing multiple nuclear bombs. The strikes left key military commanders and nuclear scientists dead. This decision by Israel has created tension in the Middle East. If Islamic nations unite and decide to support Iran because of it, it could escalate into a full-blown and extremely dangerous war. Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al Sudani has strongly condemned Israel's aggressive military action. According to the Al Jazeera report, the prime minister's office said in a statement, 'The Government of the Republic of Iraq strongly condemns the military aggression launched by the Zionist entity [referring to Israel] against the territory of the Islamic Republic of Iran.' Oman, which has been involved in helping with peace negotiations between the United States and Iran, condemned the Israeli attacks calling them as a 'dangerous and reckless escalation' that 'violates the principles of international law'. According to the Al Jazeera report, The Foreign Ministry in a statement stated, '[It] represents unacceptable and ongoing aggressive behaviour that undermines the foundations of stability in the region.' It added, 'Israel is responsible for this escalation and its consequences.' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has urged 'all parties to step back' and reduce tensions urgently after Israel carried out strikes on Iran, what it called a 'pre-emptive operation' targeting the latter's nuclear program. Starmer called the reports of these strikes 'concerning ' and emphasised that stability in the Middle East must be a a post on X, Starmer stated, 'The reports of these strikes are concerning and we urge all parties to step back and reduce tensions urgently. Escalation serves no one in the region. Stability in the Middle East must be the priority and we are engaging partners to de-escalate. Now is the time for restraint, calm and a return to diplomacy.' Ankara has strongly condemned Israel's airstrike on Iran, calling it a violation of international law and a reckless provocation. In a statement, Turkiye's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said, 'The air strike shows that Israel does not want issues to be resolved through diplomatic means.' According to an Al Jazeera report, Turkey has called on Israel to 'immediately halt aggressive actions that could lead to greater conflicts,' warning that such moves risk pushing the region closer to widespread instability. Ankara condemned the assault in the strongest terms, stating that continued aggression would only deepen tensions and undermine peace efforts in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia has strongly denounced Israel's recent strikes on Iran, calling them 'heinous' and deeply alarming. In an official statement posted on X, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs said,'The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia expresses its strong condemnation and denunciation of the blatant Israeli aggressions against the brotherly Islamic Republic of Iran, which undermine its sovereignty and security and constitute a clear violation of international laws and norms.' Qatar has voiced deep concern over the 'dangerous escalation' following Israel's attacks on Iran and urged the international community to act swiftly. In its official statement, Qatar called on the global community to 'urgently halt these Israeli violations.'
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Kashmiri politicians slam World's silence on Israel's attack on Iran
Srinagar, June 13 (UNI) Top Kashmiri politicians, including Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, two former CMs, a Member Parliament and a separatist leader on Friday strongly criticized the 'silence' of global powers over Israel's attack on Iran, calling it a dangerous display of 'double standards' CM Omar said that there was no justification for the attack on Iran. 'Israel went ahead on their own, calling it a pre-emptive attack, and waged war on a country. If the global powers remain silent on this, it will be truly unfortunate. What Israel has done is very similar to what Russia did to Ukraine,' Omar told reporters in Srinagar. Omar pointed out the hypocrisy in international responses. 'You raise your voice against Russia, launch campaigns. But when Israel attacks Iran, America, Europe, and others remain silent. If it is wrong for one country to attack another, it should be wrong also when Israel attacks Iran,' he said. The Chief Minister said the Middle East conflict will, of course, escalate, and it will have an immediate impact on the people in the country. ' It (Iran- Israel conflict) will, of course, escalate and will have an immediate impact on us. It has an impact on our fuel prices. It has an impact on our stock market. It has an impact on the flights that have to fly to the West. But more than that it has an impact on the sentiment of people,' Omar said. Israel on Friday launched a major attack on Iran, including nuclear sites, and killing several top figures. The attack triggered condemnation from several Kashmiri politicians. National Conference president and former Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah strongly condemned the Israeli attack on Iran, calling it condemnable and reprehensible. "This attack undermines Iran's sovereignty and security and is a blatant violation of international laws and principles," Abdullah said. The veteran leader said that Israel is breaking all records of "oppression and brutality" in Palestine. He also criticized the United Nations, stating that it has become a silent spectator of Israeli aggression and barbarism, and for the past one year and eight months, it has only issued statements regarding the continued bombings. Former CM and PDP president Mehbooba Mufti said that Israel's attack on Iran is yet another 'brazen act by a state that appears to have gone rogue'. 'The silence of the global community particularly Western powers led by the United States is both alarming and telling. This silence amounts to tacit approval,' Mehbooba said in a post on X. ' In the case of India-Pakistan tensions, the U.S. never fails to assert that its intervention has been crucial in preventing escalation. Yet when it comes to Israel's relentless bombardment of Gaza or its latest strike on Iran, that same urgency is conspicuously missing,' she said. 'These glaring double standards endanger global peace and stability. Equally disturbing is the deafening silence of the so-called Muslim countries, who remain shamelessly non-existent in the face of such grave injustice. Their inaction is not just disappointing, it's a betrayal of the very causes they claim to stand for,' Mehbooba said. NC leader and MP Srinagar Ruhullah Mehdi said that Israel has now bombed Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran, and still plays the victim. "This rogue Zionist regime isn't defending itself; it's behaving like a colonial thug. Attacking sovereign nations at will doesn't make you powerful, it makes you a terrorist state," he said in a post on X. "Iran, like any sovereign nation, now has every right to defend itself and take full, punishing revenge. The Zionist regime should pay for its crimes in Gaza, for its bloodlust, for its massacres," MP added. Kashmir chief cleric and Hurriyat Conference Chairman, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq said that Israel has become a "rogue state and a huge threat to world peace." "This is highly condemnable. While perpetuating genocide on hapless Palestinians and getting away with it, Israel is now putting the whole of Middle East in peril. It has become a rogue state and a huge threat to world peace," Mirwaiz said. "It is the moral duty of the UN and all world nations to put pressure on Israel to stop the genocide and war in Gaza and prevent Israel from targeting other nations. People of Jammu and Kashmir stand with Palestinians and Iranians against Israeli aggression on them, the Hurriyat chief said. UNI MJR BD
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Bengal's OBC list: After HC rap, who goes out, who stays, and why BJP is objecting
WITH the race to the West Bengal Assembly elections kicking into gear, and the Supreme Court set to hold a hearing on the matter next month, the Mamata Banerjee government hopes to have extricated itself from the row over its OBC list by coming out with another. On June 10, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee laid in the Assembly new OBC-A and OBC-B lists, adding 76 groups and taking the total number to 140. However, the BJP has alleged that these lists carry the same basis as what led the High Court last year to scrap all additions to OBCs since 2010 by the West Bengal government – that these are heavily skewed in favour of Muslims. Of the 140 communities in the OBC list now, 80 are Muslim. The High Court had scrapped 113 names from the list of OBCs, retaining 66, last year. Of the scrapped 113, 76 have now been added back, while two from the list of 66 have been taken out. Applications of others, the state government has said, are pending. While the names of the groups added back have been specified, it is not the case with those left out. The government has also said that the 76 new OBC groups added were shortlisted purely on the basis of recommendations of the West Bengal Commission for Backward Classes. Of these 51 were added to OBC-A (covering the 'more backward' among OBCs) and 25 to OBC-B. Between March 2010 and May 2012, 77 communities were issued OBC certificates by the state, 75 of them Muslim. Of these 75 Muslim groups, 42 got OBC status under the Left government in 2010. The first challenge in the high court was filed in 2011 on the ground that the declaration of these 42 classes as OBCs was 'based purely on religion', that 'the categorisation is not based on any acceptable data, and that the survey conducted by the (backward classes) commission was unscientific, and prefabricated… to fit the head'. In May 2012, by which time the TMC government had come to power, another 35 classes were categorised as OBC, 34 of them from the Muslim community. This too was challenged in the court. In March 2013, the West Bengal Backward Classes (Other than Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) (Reservation of vacancies and posts) Act, 2012, was notified. All 77 (42+35) new OBCs were included in the Act. Two petitions were filed challenging the Act. On May 22, 2024, the court struck down the inclusion of 113 groups in total, retaining only 66, saying 'religion indeed appears to have been the sole criterion' for granting the status. As with most cases where reservations have been challenged, the court relied heavily on the Supreme Court's Indra Sawhney v Union of India (Mandal judgment). The 1992 order had held that states must establish a backward classes commission to identify and recommend classes of citizens for inclusion or exclusion in the state OBC list. The High Court said that in West Bengal's case, between 2010 and 2012, the backward classes commission's recommendations had been made with 'lightning speed'… without using any 'objective criteria' to determine the backwardness of these classes. 'Religion indeed appears to have been the sole criterion for declaring these communities as OBCs', and the reports that the commission submitted were meant only to 'curtain and hide such religion specific recommendations', the court said. 'This court's mind is not free from doubt that the said community has been treated as a commodity for political ends', and that the classes added were being treated as a 'vote bank', it said. The court also struck down portions of the 2012 Act that allowed the state government to 'sub-classify' OBC reservations into OBC-A and OBC-B categories for 'more backward' and 'backward' classes respectively. Sub-classification is meant to address the different levels of deprivation, which the court held could only be done by referring to material collected by the commission. The High Court order coincided with the Lok Sabha campaign, and the BJP accused the ruling Trinamool Congress of seeking to take away reservation and other benefits from Hindus and giving them to Muslims. Following the court order, CM Banerjee said they would file an appeal challenging the same in the Supreme Court, adding: 'You (the BJP) are playing at A and I will play at B. If you play at C, I will play at Z.' The TMC government contended that the backward classes commission identified the classes based on applications received from citizens. In 2024, the TMC government moved the Supreme Court, along with some other petitioners. On March 18 this year, the government informed the Court that a fresh exercise was being conducted for the identification of OBCs in the state. The Court then agreed to adjourn the matter by three months and take it up in July. On Tuesday, Banerjee laid an interim report of the West Bengal Commission for Backward Classes in the Assembly. Noting that for inclusion in the OBC list, a class or citizen needs to apply 'in the prescribed proforma detailing the social, economic and educational features of that class', the report said that the commission had 'till date' recommended '179 classes for inclusion as 'Other Backward Classes' in the State list of OBCs'. Out of these, the panel said, 113 were struck down by the High Court in May 2024. 'Only 66 communities enlisted before 2010 were kept untouched.' The report added that it had now recommended 'for inclusion of 51 plus 25 classes, total 76 classes'. Out of these 76 classes, the report said, 74 had been 'delisted' by the High Court order, while two 'applied afresh for inclusion'. Sub-categorising these 76 classes, the commission said 35 fall in the OBC-A category and 41 in OBC-B. The commission's report also sub-categorised 64 of 'the 66 classes of OBCs which were not delisted' by High Court. 'The Commission after due consideration of the scores received by such 64 classes in the Benchmark Survey, recommended sub-categorisation of 14 classes in Category A (More Backward) while 50 classes were recommended to be categorised in Category B (Backward). For the remaining 2 classes, the Commission decided to conduct a fresh survey.' It added that it was still carrying out its benchmark survey as regards 41 communities. 'This process is expected to be completed within the next month or two.' In addition to this, says the report, '7 more communities have placed their applications before West Bengal Commission for Backward Classes for inclusion in the State OBC List…'. Presenting the commission's report, the CM said: 'Some corners are trying to campaign that the state government is providing reservation on the basis of religion, which is baseless… We made the new OBC-A and OBC-B lists on the basis of a scientific benchmark survey conducted by the commission and included those communities which are backward. There is no question of making OBC categories on the basis of religion.' A government notification the same day said that of the total number of OBC groups now, 80 are Muslim and 60 non-Muslim, with Muslims making up 57.14% of the total. Of the 49 in the most backward OBC-A category, 36 are Muslim; and of the 91 in OBC-B category, 44 are Muslims. Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari has alleged that the new OBC list prepared by the TMC government also has religion as criterion, and provides 'one-sided benefit' exclusively to Muslims. He posted on X Wednesday: 'OBC = Other Backward Classes. In West Bengal it means One-Sided Beneficiary Classes.' Countering Adhikari, the TMC said, 'We all know that 'Divide and Rule' is the official policy of the BJP, and your only agenda for the 2026 elections is to pit Hindus against Muslims.' It reiterated Banerjee's statement that backwardness, not religion, is the sole criterion for OBC status, and said: 'The new list was prepared with that principle in mind.'
