logo
Why scores of English councils could go bankrupt when hidden Send debt reappears

Why scores of English councils could go bankrupt when hidden Send debt reappears

The Guardian30-03-2025

The staggering cost of England's special educational needs and disability (Send) crisis shows no sign of easing. A Guardian investigation has revealed councils will overspend on Send services by nearly £2bn over the next year, pushing their accumulated deficits to at least £5.2bn by 31 March 2026.
The date is crucial because that is when the £5.2bn debt, hidden away off local authority books using an accounting fix for seven years, is due to come back on to the balance sheets, threatening to instantly bankrupt scores of town halls.
The government faces a massive headache: not just what to do about the rapidly increasing billions of historic Send debt, but how to keep a lid on future Send spending, which shows no sign of abating. There are no easy fixes.
The last government tried to keep a lid on Send spending by paying millions of pounds in 'safety valve' grants to scores of councils to help them develop better ways to 'manage' parental demand for Send support. Very few of the schemes have had the desired effect of driving down costs.
Of the 131 councils that responded to the Guardian, 79 signed grant agreements with the Department for Education (DfE). Only three are forecasting they will not be in deficit next year. Some of those that have slowly ground their way to near break-even say when the grants finish they will hurtle rapidly back into the red.
City of York council, the only authority surveyed by the Guardian that is projecting its accumulated Send budget deficit to move into surplus next year, was sceptical about keeping its head above water in future. 'Unless the system is changed, we will go back into deficit quite quickly,' said Bob Webb, York council's executive member for children, young people and education.
Attempts to change the system, however, could put councils and ministers on a collision course with parents and campaigners. Councils are clear they want changes to the law to give the authorities more control over which children get specialist Send support and where they are educated.
Parents say more crude attempts to ration access to education, health and care plans (EHCPs) – formal assessments that give children the legal right to Send support – will not fix a problem caused primarily by the inability of mainstream schools to meet Send pupils' needs, and those needs are not going away.
'Parents are banging their heads against a brick wall trying to get schools to give support to their children, and they get knocked back,' said Tania Tirraoro of the campaign group Special Needs Jungle.
Tirraoro said it was wrong to blame the financial woes of councils on parents exercising their legal right to Send support. '[The government] needs to write off those [council] debts. Then you need to keep writing those debts off until a programme of early intervention support and better inclusion has worked its way through the system.'
The government has put an extra £1bn into Send services and plans to create 10,000 more specialist places in mainstream schools. It is clear it wants to reform Send – a white paper is expected this summer – and that a new system must be financially sustainable. No decisions have been made yet about what to do with the deficits.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Jane Hayman, the director for Send and inclusion at Norfolk county council, said the current system is 'broken' and 'pits parents against schools'. Norfolk's Send deficit is forecast to reach £183m in a year's time. Hayman expects the government to step in to bail out the council: 'It cannot be ignored,' she said.
Not everyone is so sure. Mike Cox, the deputy leader of Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole council, whose forecast deficit will hit £168m by 31 March 2026, up £60m in a year, predicts: '[Government] is going to keep kicking the can down the road. The only thing that will change is that the can will get bigger and harder to kick.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Whitehall officials tried to cover up grooming scandal in 2011, Dominic Cummings says
Whitehall officials tried to cover up grooming scandal in 2011, Dominic Cummings says

Sky News

time9 hours ago

  • Sky News

Whitehall officials tried to cover up grooming scandal in 2011, Dominic Cummings says

Whitehall officials tried to convince Michael Gove to go to court to cover up the grooming scandal in 2011, Sky News can reveal. Dominic Cummings, who was working for Lord Gove at the time, has told Sky News that officials in the Department for Education (DfE) wanted to help efforts by Rotherham Council to stop a national newspaper from exposing the scandal. In an interview with Sky News, Mr Cummings said that officials wanted a "total cover-up". The revelation shines a light on the institutional reluctance of some key officials in central government to publicly highlight the grooming gang scandal. In 2011, Rotherham Council approached the Department for Education asking for help following inquiries by The Times. The paper's then chief reporter, the late Andrew Norfolk, was asking about sexual abuse and trafficking of children in Rotherham. The council went to Lord Gove's Department for Education for help. Officials considered the request and then recommended to Lord Gove's office that the minister back a judicial review which might, if successful, stop The Times publishing the story. Lord Gove rejected the request on the advice of Mr Cummings. Sources have independently confirmed Mr Cummings' account. Mr Cummings told Sky News: "Officials came to me in the Department of Education and said: 'There's this Times journalist who wants to write the story about these gangs. The local authority wants to judicially review it and stop The Times publishing the story'. "So I went to Michael Gove and said: 'This council is trying to actually stop this and they're going to use judicial review. You should tell the council that far from siding with the council to stop The Times you will write to the judge and hand over a whole bunch of documents and actually blow up the council's JR (judicial review).' "Some officials wanted a total cover-up and were on the side of the council... "They wanted to help the local council do the cover-up and stop The Times' reporting, but other officials, including in the DfE private office, said this is completely outrageous and we should blow it up. Gove did, the judicial review got blown up, Norfolk stories ran." 3:18 The judicial review wanted by officials would have asked a judge to decide about the lawfulness of The Times' publication plans and the consequences that would flow from this information entering the public domain. A second source told Sky News that the advice from officials was to side with Rotherham Council and its attempts to stop publication of details it did not want in the public domain. One of the motivations cited for stopping publication would be to prevent the identities of abused children entering the public domain. There was also a fear that publication could set back the existing attempts to halt the scandal, although incidents of abuse continued for many years after these cases. Sources suggested that there is also a natural risk aversion amongst officials to publicity of this sort. Mr Cummings, who ran the Vote Leave Brexit campaign and was Boris Johnson's right-hand man in Downing Street, has long pushed for a national inquiry into grooming gangs to expose failures at the heart of government. He said the inquiry, announced today, "will be a total s**tshow for Whitehall because it will reveal how much Whitehall worked to try and cover up the whole thing." He also described Mr Johnson, with whom he has a long-standing animus, as a "moron' for saying that money spent on inquiries into historic child sexual abuse had been "spaffed up the wall". Asked by Sky News political correspondent Liz Bates why he had not pushed for a public inquiry himself when he worked in Number 10 in 2019-20, Mr Cummings said Brexit and then COVID had taken precedence. "There are a million things that I wanted to do but in 2019 we were dealing with the constitutional crisis," he said.

Government urged to look at Surrey County Council's Send services
Government urged to look at Surrey County Council's Send services

BBC News

time11 hours ago

  • BBC News

Government urged to look at Surrey County Council's Send services

The government has been urged by an MP to investigate the way Surrey County Council provides special educational needs and disabilities (Send) the House of Commons on Monday, Surrey Heath's Liberal Democrat MP Al Pinkerton said the authority had the highest number of tribunals in which parents challenged decisions in the asked the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson: "Will she do what so many parents ask me – can she please launch an immediate investigation into Surrey County Council and its conformance with its legal obligation?"Phillipson said she would come back to the MP. Lincoln Jopp, the Spelthorne MP, also asked if the government was looking at what was causing the rise in demand when it came to said the education department was keen to "understand some of the drivers".Surrey County Council has been approached for a comment. The council previously said it was investing £260m in Send services and increasing specialist places.

Whitehall officials tried to convince Michael Gove to go to court to cover up grooming scandal in 2011
Whitehall officials tried to convince Michael Gove to go to court to cover up grooming scandal in 2011

Sky News

time11 hours ago

  • Sky News

Whitehall officials tried to convince Michael Gove to go to court to cover up grooming scandal in 2011

Whitehall officials tried to convince Michael Gove to go to court to cover up the grooming scandal in 2011, Sky News can reveal. Dominic Cummings, who was working for Lord Gove at the time, has told Sky News that officials in the Department for Education (DfE) wanted to help efforts by Rotherham Council stop a national newspaper from exposing the scandal. In an interview with Sky News, Mr Cummings said that officials wanted a "total cover-up". The revelation shines a light on the institutional reluctance of some key officials in central government to publicly highlight the grooming gang scandal. In 2011, Rotherham Council approached the Department for Education asking for help following inquiries by The Times. The paper's then chief reporter, the late Andrew Norfolk, was asking about sexual abuse and trafficking of children in Rotherham. The council went to Lord Gove's Department for Education for help. Officials considered the request and then recommended to Lord Gove's office that the minister back a judicial review which might, if successful, stop The Times publishing the story. Lord Gove rejected the request on the advice of Mr Cummings. Sources have independently confirmed Mr Cummings' account. Mr Cummings told Sky News: "Officials came to me in the Department of Education and said: 'There's this Times journalist who wants to write the story about these gangs. The local authority wants to judicially review it and stop The Times publishing the story'. "So I went to Michael Gove and said: 'This council is trying to actually stop this and they're going to use judicial review. You should tell the council that far from siding with the council to stop The Times you will write to the judge and hand over a whole bunch of documents and actually blow up the council's JR (judicial review).' "Some officials wanted a total cover-up and were on the side of the council... "They wanted to help the local council do the cover-up and stop The Times' reporting, but other officials, including in the DfE private office, said this is completely outrageous and we should blow it up. Gove did, the judicial review got blown up, Norfolk stories ran." 3:18 The judicial review wanted by officials would have asked a judge to decide about the lawfulness of The Times' publication plans and the consequences that would flow from this information entering the public domain. A second source told Sky News that the advice from officials was to side with Rotherham Council and its attempts to stop publication of details it did not want in the public domain. One of the motivations cited for stopping publication would be to prevent the identities of abused children entering the public domain. There was also a fear that publication could set back the existing attempts to halt the scandal, although incidents of abuse continued for many years after these cases. Sources suggested that there is also a natural risk aversion amongst officials to publicity of this sort. Mr Cummings, who ran the Vote Leave Brexit campaign and was Boris Johnson's right-hand man in Downing Street, has long pushed for a national inquiry into grooming gangs to expose failures at the heart of government. He said the inquiry, announced today, "will be a total s**tshow for Whitehall because it will reveal how much Whitehall worked to try and cover up the whole thing." He also described Mr Johnson, with whom he has a long-standing animus, as a "moron' for saying that money spent on inquiries into historic child sexual abuse had been "spaffed up the wall". Asked by Sky News political correspondent Liz Bates why he had not pushed for a public inquiry himself when he worked in Number 10 in 2019-20, Mr Cummings said Brexit and then COVID had taken precedence. "There are a million things that I wanted to do but in 2019 we were dealing with the constitutional crisis," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store