Row between Farage and Sarwar rages on as Reform UK leader visits Scotland
A furious row between Nigel Farage and Anas Sarwar stepped up, with the Reform chief using a rare visit to Scotland to accuse his Labour rival of 'sectarian politics'.
Mr Farage doubled down on his attacks against the Scottish Labour leader, which come in the wake of a Reform UK online ad that has already been branded 'racist' by opponents.
Mr Sarwar meanwhile insisted Mr Farage was the 'chief clown', adding that having 'finally found his way to Scotland' the Reform leader had shown 'just how totally out of touch with our country he is'.
The pair clashed after Mr Farage gave a press conference in Aberdeen, insisting his party has made 'remarkable strides in Scotland over the past year'.
Councillor Duncan Massey, who had previously been a Tory member of Aberdeen City Council, was unveiled as a latest defector to Reform, along with former Labour councillor Jamie McGuire.
Speaking as noisy protesters gathered outside the press conference, the Reform UK leader said if the polls are to be believed 'we are beginning to eclipse Labour to be the second most popular party in Scottish politics'.
Mr Farage meanwhile predicted his party would come at least third in Thursday's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, adding that if it wins it would be the 'biggest earthquake Scottish politics has ever seen'.
Much of the campaign for that Holyrood by-election has been dominated by a row over an online Reform advert, which claims that Mr Sarwar will 'prioritise' the Pakistani community in Scotland.
Speaking on Monday, Mr Farage alleged that the Scottish Labour leader has a 'record of obsession' on the issue of race – citing a speech he gave in Holyrood in 2020 as evidence of this.
Meanwhile, he insisted Reform UK 'don't talk about race at all'.
Mr Farage pointed out his party's chairman, Zia Yusuf, was someone who 'is Scottish-born, but comes from parents who come from the Indian subcontinent'.
The Reform leader continued: 'We think everybody should be treated equally. We object, very strongly, to the segmentation of people into different types.'
Adding that the Scottish Labour leader has a 'record of obsession on this issue', he referenced a speech Mr Sarwar gave in 2020 where he noted that key figures across Scotland, from the judiciary, to council chief executives to head teachers, were all white.
Mr Farage said: 'I think that speech he gave was sectarian in its very nature – 'we are the south Asian community, we are going to take over the country and take over the world'.
'We believe what he said was a form of sectarian politics and we don't like it one little bit.'
Mr Sarwar hit back, saying: 'Today, the chief clown Nigel Farage finally found his way to Scotland and showed just how totally out of touch with our country he is.
'Nigel Farage turned up, admitted he can't win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, and pledged to cut funding for Scotland's NHS and public services.
'Nigel Farage is a dangerous clown and the people of Scotland see right through him.'
Mr Farage also hit out at First Minister John Swinney, telling the Scottish Sun that the SNP leader – who has made a number of attacks against Reform – was 'anti-English'.
With the First Minister having branded Mr Farage and his party 'poisonous', the Reform leader said such 'deeply provocative' comments showed a 'sort of quite unpleasant anti-Englishness'.
Mr Swinney however told the PA news agency: 'I've always taken forward my politics on the basis of inclusion, of welcoming people, of working with others – that's what I'm about.
'Nigel Farage is the opposite of that.
'Nigel Farage stokes division, he seeks to put people against each other and we're bringing people together in Scotland to create the best future for our country.'
The row continued as Mr Farage also used his press conference to again speak out against the 'madness' of the net zero policies being pursued by the governments at Holyrood and Westminster.
He told reporters these had left the oil and gas industry, which is centred in Aberdeen, 'in serious decline'.
He insisted: 'Even the most ardent proponent of net zero has to accept the world will still be using oil and gas up until 2050 and beyond.
'And yet we have decided to sacrifice this industry as a consensus around net zero has emerged.'
As a result of this, he said parts of Scotland, England and Wales were 'literally deindustrialising before our very eyes'.
Mr Farage said: 'The madness of this is almost completely and utterly beyond belief.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Free school meal rule change to make 500,000 more pupils eligible
Any child in England whose parents receive Universal Credit will be able to claim free school meals from September 2026, the government has on the credit will be eligible regardless of their income. Currently, their household must earn less than £7,400 a year to government says the change will make 500,000 more pupils eligible, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said would "help families who need it most". The Department for Education has set aside £1bn to fund the change up to has faced scrutiny over plans to tackle child poverty in recent weeks, and is yet to decide whether to scrap the two-child benefit cap. Ministers said the changes to free school meals would save parents £500 a year and "lift 100,000 children out of poverty".They have also pledged £13m to a dozen food charities across England to "fight food poverty", by redistributing food from farms which might otherwise go to waste. "Feeding more children every day, for free, is one of the biggest interventions we can make to put more money in parents' pockets, tackle the stain of poverty, and set children up to learn," said Sir Keir. The Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said that while the rule change would cut child poverty to a degree and would be cheaper than making them universal, "other measures - such as lifting the two-child limit - would have a lower cost per child lifted out of poverty".The announcement has been largely welcomed by the education sector and organisations campaigning against child Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust charity, said it was a "significant step towards taking hunger out of the classroom".Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders union, said it was "great news"."There is much more to be done - but this is a welcome step forward," he added. Kate Anstey, head of education policy at the Child Poverty Action Group, said the extension would cover "all children in poverty and those at risk of poverty", with the current criteria only accounting for around two-thirds of those called it a "game-changer for children and families", but called on the government to go further."We hope this is a sign of what's to come in the autumn's child poverty strategy, with government taking more action to meet its manifesto commitment to reduce child poverty in the UK," she Democrats spokesperson Munira Wilson said: "This can only be a first step. To end the cost of learning crisis, the government needs to commit to auto-enrolling eligible children for free school meals, lifting the two-child benefit cap, and capping uniform costs to truly change the lives of children in poverty."Last week, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said the government was looking at scrapping the two-child benefit cap, which prevents most families from claiming means-tested benefits for any third or additional children born after April said the policy had pushed people into poverty, but scrapping it would "cost a lot of money".Charities have called for the cap to be abolished in next week's spending government is expected to announce its decision in the autumn, when it publishes its child poverty Keir said he was "absolutely determined that we will drive down child poverty" during Prime Minister's Questions on Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused him of "causing confusion" over the policy. Who can claim free school meals? The total number of children registered for free school meals in England is about 2.1 million, or 24.6% of the total pupil population, according to the latest data. Families in England need to meet certain criteria for their children to be can include receiving Universal Credit but, until the changes are implemented next September, parents also must have a household income of less than £7,400 a year, after have to apply for their children to receive them and eligible children are not automatically February, MPs on the cross-party education committee called for that to said tens of thousands of eligible children were missing out on free school meals because their parents were not claiming them - often because of language barriers or difficulty with the administrative eligibility for free school meals varies across the primary school children in London and in Wales can access free Scotland, all children in the first five years of primary school are eligible, as well as all children from families receiving the Scottish Child Payment in Northern Ireland can apply if they receive certain benefits and are below an income threshold which is approximately double the current England level, at £15,000.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer labels Israel's action in Gaza 'appalling' and dubs conduct of Netanyahu's Government 'intolerable'
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has hit out at Israel for the recent actions of Netanyahu's government in Gaza describing it as 'counterproductive', 'intolerable' and 'appalling'. On Wednesday afternoon, the Labour leader, 62, called yet again for a ceasefire between the two countries, whilst also revisiting the possibility of imposing sanctions on Israel. Claire Hanna, the leader of Northern Ireland 's Social Democratic and Labour Party, highlighted the matter during PMQs describing them as 'very dark days'. She added: 'Gaza is a stain on the soul of humanity.' The Prime Minister said Hanna was 'absolutely right' in her description of recent days on the Gaza strip. 'Israel's recent action is appalling and, in my view, counterproductive and intolerable and we have strongly opposed the expansion of military operations and settler violence and the blocking of humanitarian aid,' he told the Commons Sir Keir Starmer also said they would 'keep looking at further action along with our allies, including sanctions,' whilst asserting a ceasefire between both sides was the main goal. 'We need the hostages who've been held for a very long time to be released,' he added. 'And we desperately need more aid at speed and at volume into Gaza because it's an appalling and intolerable situation.' The Prime Minister's strong words comes shortly after an Israel and US-backed group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, stopped delivering food to three centres in Gaza. It comes after 27 Palestinians were killed and several were injured by IDF troops near a food site in Rafah, according to local officials. The IDF said its forces opened fire on a group of people they viewed as a threat after they left a designated access route near the distribution centre and approached their positions. An International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) spokesperson said a Rafah field hospital received 184 casualties, with 19 of those dead upon arrival. A further eight people died from their wounds shortly after. Video showed injured people, including at least one woman, being rushed to a medical centre on carts drawn by donkeys. However, Sir Starmer's recent remarks could re-spark a clash with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who claimed he as well as other world leaders were siding with Hamas Last May, the UK, France and Canada released a joint statement were they denounced Israel for its growing ground operation in Gaza as well as stopping aid from reaching the war-ravaged strip. 'Israel's recent action is appalling and, in my view, counterproductive and intolerable and we have strongly opposed the expansion of military operations and settler violence and the blocking of humanitarian aid,' Sir Starmer told the Commons The statement said that although Israel had 'suffered a heinous attack on October 7' and had a right to defend itself against terrorism, it described the country's escalation as 'wholly disproportionate'. 'We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions,' it read. 'If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.' Following the joint message, an incensed Netanyahu said in a post via X: 'I could never understand how this simple truth evades the leaders of France, Britain, Canada and others. 'I say to President Macron, prime minister Carney and prime minister Starmer, when mass murderers, rapists, baby killers and kidnappers thank you, you're on the wrong side of justice.' Israel has decimated huge parts of Palestine ever since October 7 attacks carried out by Hamas, killing more than 53,000 people, according to Gaza health authorities. On Tuesday, health officials said at least 18 more Palestinians were killed in other military strikes in the territory. Following the joint message, an incensed Netanyahu said in a post via X: 'When mass murderers, rapists, baby killers and kidnappers thank you, you're on the wrong side of justice.' The United Nations human rights office in Geneva said the impediment of access to food relief for civilians in Gaza might constitute a war crime and described attacks on people trying to access food aid as 'unconscionable'. The head of the U.N. agency, Volker Turk, urged a prompt and impartial investigation into the killings. Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer denied that civilians had been targeted. 'The IDF is doing everything in its power to allow Gazans to get to the humanitarian aid. The IDF is not preventing the arrival of Gazans at humanitarian aid sites. Indeed, we are encouraging it,' Mencer said. IN FULL: Joint statement from the leaders of the United Kingdom, France and Canada on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank. We strongly oppose the expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Yesterday's announcement that Israel will allow a basic quantity of food into Gaza is wholly inadequate. We call on the Israeli Government to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. This must include engaging with the UN to ensure a return to delivery of aid in line with humanitarian principles. We call on Hamas to release immediately the remaining hostages they have so cruelly held since 7 October 2023. The Israeli Government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law. We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law. Israel suffered a heinous attack on October 7. We have always supported Israel's right to defend Israelis against terrorism. But this escalation is wholly disproportionate. We will not stand by while the Netanyahu Government pursues these egregious actions. If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response. We oppose any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank. Israel must halt settlements which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians. We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions. We strongly support the efforts led by the United States, Qatar and Egypt to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. It is a ceasefire, the release of all remaining hostages and a long-term political solution that offer the best hope of ending the agony of the hostages and their families, alleviating the suffering of civilians in Gaza, ending Hamas' control of Gaza and achieving a pathway to a two-state solution, consistent with the goals of the 18 June conference in New York co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. These negotiations need to succeed, and we must all work towards the implementation of a two-state solution, which is the only way to bring long-lasting peace and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve, and ensure long-term stability in the region. We will continue to work with the Palestinian Authority, regional partners, Israel and the United States to finalise consensus on arrangements for Gaza's future, building on the Arab plan. We affirm the important role of the High-level Two-State Solution Conference at the UN in June in building international consensus around this aim. And we are committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
£350k boss at cash-strapped Scots university claims he 'doesn't know salary'
A university boss who is paid £350,000 a year yesterday said he did not know his 'precise' salary - as he did not 'carry that figure around in my head'. Professor Sir Peter Mathieson, principal of the University of Edinburgh, accepted he is 'very well-paid' but was unable to provide the exact sum. He spoke as lecturers prepare to walk out in a dispute over the university's refusal to rule out 'unacceptable' compulsory redundancies as part of plans to save £140million. The action will see members of the University and College Union (UCU) strike during an open day on June 20, followed by a further five-day walkout in September to coincide with the university's 'welcome week' for new students. Union members are also set to take part in action short of a strike, including working to contract, not covering for absent colleagues, and a 'possible marking and assessment boycott'. The UCU announced the action following a ballot which saw a 60 per cent turnout, with 84 per cent backing strikes and 93 per cent voting in favour of action short of a strike. The news came on the same day Sir Peter appeared before a Holyrood committee, where he defended his six-figure salary and acknowledged the university is not in deficit. Sir Peter insisted that paying the senior management team at the university 'nothing' would 'make largely no difference to the size of the expenditure challenge we face'. Pressed about the cuts the university is planning, including a £90million reduction in the wage bill, Sir Peter said: 'I'm confident the action we're taking now is in the best interests of the university and I am proud of the leadership my team and I are providing in delivering.' He told Holyrood's education committee he does 'not know the precise numbers' of his salary, telling MSPs when challenged on this: 'I don't carry that figure around in my head.' Sir Peter however accepted he is 'very well paid', with committee convener Douglas Ross pointing out the principal's reported salary of £418,000 is more than the combined wages of both First Minister John Swinney and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Sir Peter said when he had checked the salaries of the heads of organisations with a similar turnover to the university, 'for one of them it was £5million, for another it was £17million'. He added: 'I was made an offer by the University of Edinburgh when I was appointed and I accepted it, and I am very satisfied with the package I was offered.' He said his 'basic salary' is 'about £350,000', adding there is a pension supplement on top of this. Sophia Woodman, UCU Edinburgh University branch president, said it is 'not too late' for the strike to be averted, and she called on senior management to rule out compulsory redundancies. She said: 'Staff want a sustainable future for the university as much as anybody and we want to work with senior management to end this dispute. 'But we're clear that the use of compulsory redundancies is unacceptable. 'With the resources and reserves held by the university it can easily afford to rule out sacking staff. 'The decision to let the strike continue, with all the disruption to students that it entails and a possible marking and assessment boycott, is a matter of choice for Peter Mathieson and the university senior management. 'The union's door is open to talks and I'd appeal to them to heed this final warning, rule out compulsory redundancies and end this unnecessary dispute.' The union claimed the proposed £140million of cuts would be the 'largest ever' made by a university in Scotland, and said management have failed to make a case for cuts of this size while at the same time planning 'record' investment in buildings and infrastructure. It added that research and teaching staff are the 'backbone' of the university, and cutting them rather than buildings is a 'false economy'. Jo Grady, UCU general secretary, said: 'UCU members at Edinburgh University are ready and willing to strike to save jobs and save this university, but disruption can still be avoided. 'Edinburgh University is a wealthy university with, at the last count, over £3billion in its reserves. 'The Scottish Government should follow the lead of ministers in Wales and call on universities to use their reserves to avoid job losses.' The union said walkouts will take place on June 20 and September 8-12, with action short of a strike beginning on June 20.
