Oxford Pride organisers condemn political activity at event
Pride organisers have criticised political campaigning at an event where party activists were urged not to attend.Oxford's parade on 7 June was one of several UK Pride events that banned parties in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling on gender.Organisers said they were particularly upset that Oxford Socialist Party illegally collected money for striking Birmingham bin workers.The party said it wanted to "raise the need for unity between the fight for LGBTQ+ rights and the fight for workers' rights".
In a statement, Oxford Pride said it was "deeply disappointed" by the decision of two political parties to attend.It said Oxford Socialist Party collected money without a council licence.It added that activists from the party reportedly made false claims that the money was for Pride.Oxford City Council confirmed it was investigating an official complaint.Oxford Socialist Party did not comment on the allegation of false claims when approached by the BBC.In a statement, it said: "Now is the time LGBTQ+ workers and young people need to deepen ties with other workers' struggles."The extremely positive response to our presence and the solidarity shown by those attending the event towards the Birmingham bin workers shows that attempting to keep politics out of Pride does not represent the views of most of the LGBTQ+ community."In a Facebook post, the party said the bin strike collection raised £162.58.
Oxford Pride said a second group, the Socialist Workers Party, handed out literature at the event.The party commented: "On the Saturday of the Oxford Pride march we continued [our] tradition of public engagement with a stall in Bonn Square which was supported by the passing public who stopped to sign our petitions against the Supreme Court ruling and another against more austerity cuts. "Two of our members were handing out flyers for a protest against planned attacks on disabled people. "At a time when the LGBT+ community is facing the most serious of political attacks from the far right we do not think silence is an option."Oxford Pride said it had wanted to create a "safe and non-partisan space" at the event.Other Pride events, in Birmingham, Brighton, London and Manchester, have previously said political parties would not be welcome until they demonstrated a "tangible commitment to trans rights".
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Mapped: UK, US and French military base locations across the Middle East
Iran has threatened to target UK, French and US military bases across the Middle East if the help block the Iranian missile and drone retaliation for Israel's attack. Both countries have exchanged extensive aerial attacks after Israel launched a surprise missile assault on some of Tehran's nuclear facilities, uranium experts and high-ranking officials on Friday (13 June). Dozens of civilians have been killed in the crossfire. Sir Keir Starmer has announced additional British fighter jets are being deployed to the Middle East as a 'contingency support' in the region. Chancellor Rachel Reeves today insisted Britain is not at war despite sending more RAF jets to the Middle East, but said the UK could play a military role defending Israel from ongoing Iranian attacks. US president Donald Trump, meanwhile, warned Iran that an attack on its military interests in the region would be met with the 'full strength and might of the US Armed Forces'. Below, The Independent looks at where the British, French and the Americans have a presence across the Middle East. Britain's military bases The UK has three permanent military sites in the Middle East, as well as an RAF base in Cyprus in the Mediterranean. The UK opened a permanent military centre at the Al Minhad Air Base in the United Arab Emirates last March. Named after a World War II pilot, William Donnelly, the centre is a relatively small military facility equipped with a headquarters, a welfare center and accommodation. It also operates a permanent military presence in Bahrain and Oman, both of which are used by the British Navy. Its main operating base in the region is RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, home to a number of fighter jets. It also has access to the US-run Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The American presence in the Middle East is considerably larger. It operates a broad network of sites across at least 19 locations in the wider region, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. Eight are permanent, including in Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. US forces have been attacked on several occasions by Iran-backed forces since the outbreak of the latest war in Gaza and the subsequent conflicts with other state and non-state actors in the wider region. In January 2024, three American soldiers were killed and dozens more injured after a one-way attack drone hit the military base Tower 22 in Jordan, near the Syrian border. US officials blamed the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iran-backed militias, for the attack. French military bases in the Middle East The French presence in the Middle East is primarily based at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE, where it has a permanent outfit stationed there. French troops in the UAE number about 650, according to the French Armed Forces Ministry. It has also periodically operated from Jordan, combating militia forces in Syria and Iraq.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Fewer than half of young men believe abortion should be legal, poll finds
Fewer than half of young men believe abortion should be legal, far less than the general population, a shocking new poll has found. Just 46 per cent of 18 to 36-year-old men believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, compared with 71 per cent among the general population. Amid concerns about the rise of the manosphere - a growing online community of hypermasculine influencers - the Ipsos poll showed a stark drop in support for abortion in those aged under 36. Eight in 10 55 to 75-year-old men support abortion being legal in all or most cases, while three-quarters of 35 to 54-year-olds do. And, among those aged 18 to 36, more than a third of men think abortion should be illegal in most or all cases, the poll found. Labour MP Stella Creasy, a prominent campaigner in parliament for abortion access, told The Independent: 'Those [who are] complacent that abortion access is supported in this country don't understand the culture war is chipping away at all women's rights, including healthcare.' The polling comes before MPs vote this week on decriminalising abortion through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. Currently, abortions can legally be carried out within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy in England, Scotland and Wales. They must be approved by two doctors, with the health professionals agreeing continuing with the pregnancy would be riskier for the physical or mental health of the woman than having an abortion. While this is what the law stipulates, in reality, abortions can be given, whatever the person's reasoning. But an amendment tabled by Ms Creasy would see abortion enshrined as a human right, as has been done in Northern Ireland. 'The only way we can stop women being targeted in this way and ensure they have safe and legal access is to designate abortion a human right as we have in Northern Ireland, and only new clause 20 to the policing bill will do that,' she added. A rival amendment tabled by Labour's Tonia Antoniazzi - which would mean women can no longer be prosecuted for terminating a pregnancy in England and Wales - is seen as more likely to get the backing of MPs. Ms Antoniazzi told The Independent the poll should serve as 'a reminder to male MPs for the vote on Tuesday that they can't just leave this work to women'. She urged colleagues to back her amendment and added: 'This is one poll. It's important to recognise that this poll, just like every other on abortion, shows that the country as a whole remains staunchly pro-choice.' But she said the findings were a 'clear example of the fact that women's hard-won rights can never be taken for granted'. It 'underscores why we must always keep fighting to preserve and advance them, as we do,' she added. It came as a row broke out in the final days before Tuesday's votes, with supporters of Ms Creasy's amendment accusing backers of Ms Antoniazzi of a campaign to get MPs to withdraw their support. Ms Creasy fears Ms Antoniazzi's amendment does not go far enough in enshrining and protecting the right to abortion, but the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) said it has 'profound concerns' about the drafting of Ms Creasy's amendment. It called on MPs to withdraw their support for Ms Creasy's proposal and refuse to support it. Ahead of the votes, Ipsos found broad support for abortion access except among young men. The pollster also found that around half of voters think the current 24-week time limit for abortions is 'about right', with a quarter saying it is too late and just 4 per cent saying it is too early. Nigel Farage said last month that it is 'ludicrous we allow abortion up to 24 weeks' and that the law is 'totally out of date'. And, asked about illegal abortions, just over half of voters said the person who performed an abortion should face a penalty, compared with under a third who think the woman having the abortion should. Ipsos Pollster Kate Duxbury at Ipsos said: "While the majority of Britons support legal abortion, with seven in ten in favour, our polling reveals a significant fault line: less than half of young men aged 16-34 agree. 'This divergence, coupled with the fact that around half of Britons think the current 24-week limit is 'about right', highlights the complexities facing policymakers as they consider decriminalisation. It's clear that public opinion is far from monolithic, demanding a nuanced approach to this sensitive issue."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Treasury 'already drawing up tax rises for the Autumn' as grim poll shows just a fifth of Brits say Rachel Reeves had priorities right in Spending Review
The Treasury is already said to be drawing up tax rise options for the Autumn as economists warn Rachel Reeves ' plans no longer add up. Dividends and bank profits are among the areas being mooted for drumming up revenue to balance the books. The Chancellor declined to rule out tax rises again this morning, amid fears that the Israel-Iran conflict could deal another hammer blow to the prospects for growth. Meanwhile, a poll has suggested that last week's Spending Review did not go down well with Brits. Just 19 per cent thought the package had the right priorities - with 36 per cent saying it did not. More than half expect the economy to get worse over the next year. Ms Reeves insists her spending plans for the next three years are 'fully' funded. But critics have claimed the stalling economy, together with pressures on defence and a Labour revolt on benefits mean she is writing cheques with 'fantasy' money. The issues could crystalise at the Budget in the Autumn, when many believe the independent OBR will downgrade growth forecasts. GDP shrank by 0.3 per cent in April, although it has grown over the past quarter. The IFS think-tank has warned that tax rises look 'almost inevitable', ridiculing the government's claim to have identified billions of pounds in 'efficiencies' during a 'zero-based' overhaul of costs. According to the Sunday Times, a list of potential tax increases drawn up in the Treasury includes raising the bank surcharge. That is a levy on profits on top of the 25 per cent corporation tax rate. It was cut from 8 per cent to 3 per cent under the Tories, with suggestions it could return to 5 or 6 per cent. Another apparent option is increasing tax on dividends, often taken by company directors instead of wages. Currently the highest rate stands at 39 per cent - lower than the 45 per cent top rate of income tax. Removing a tax-free £500 dividend allowance would bring in hundreds of millions of pounds for the Treasury, but could punish small investors. Challenged on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that 'lots of experts' were already saying she would need to put taxes up, Ms Reeves said: 'Well we're a strong economy with strong foundations and we have weathered other shocks... 'We are still the only country to have secured a deal with the United States, and in addition we've got trade deals with India and the EU, so we are working hard as a government to strengthen our economy, to grow our economy in a way that creates good jobs here in Britain, paying decent wages, to put more money in peoples' pockets.' Options are always drawn up within the Treasury ahead of fiscal events, and not necessarily implemented. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Rachel Reeves today refused to rule out coming back with more tax rises later this year as the impact of her decisions on the economy worsens. 'Meanwhile today the Sunday Times has revealed Rachel Reeves' team have drawn up a secret tax rising dossier outlining how to hit the British people with higher taxes. This is despite the Chancellor promising not to come back for more taxes after spooking markets last year. 'The truth is Rachel Reeves is more than likely to put her hands in the pockets of British taxpayers and business to pay for her mistakes.'
