Lawmakers cut a tribal liaison with prisons from the budget. Tribes say they think it would help.
Flags of the 11 Native American tribes of Wisconsin in the Wisconsin State Capitol. (Wisconsin Examiner photo)
At a state prison in Stanley, Wisconsin, participants in a Native American-focused group take part in traditional cultural practices.
According to Ryan Greendeer, executive government relations officer with the Ho-Chunk Nation, Stanley Correctional Institution's chaplain recently reached out to the tribe with requests for the group's programming.
The chaplain wanted teaching materials, as many materials in the current selection were old. He said that men learn songs and Native language with the materials, as well as history and culture.
The chaplain said the men are eager to learn more about all things Native, according to Greendeer. He was also seeking a larger pipe bowl and poles to help build a new lodge. The pipe has a history of ceremonial use.
The prison's annual report for fiscal year 2024 mentions a Native American smudge and drum group. The report says that each month, several religious organizations and volunteers come in to hold various services, and the list includes 'Sweat Lodge (Native American).'
There were 79 American Indian or Alaska Native people at Stanley Correctional as of April 30, according to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC).
Gov. Tony Evers' budget recommendations for corrections included a tribal liaison position for the DOC. The liaison would be responsible for working with Native American tribes and bands on the agency's behalf.
Each of the governor's cabinet agencies has already set at least one staff member to be a tribal liaison. The governor's proposal would create a new position, set aside for the job of tribal liaison for corrections.
Evers also proposed creating a director of Native American affairs in the Department of Administration and tribal liaisons in several other agencies, including the Department of Justice and Department of Natural Resources.
'Gov. Evers' commitment has been—and always will be—to ensure that the state maintains strong partnerships with the Tribal Nations by recognizing and respecting the needs and perspectives of the Nations and Indigenous people,' Britt Cudaback, communications director for the governor's office, said in an email.
The Legislature's Joint Finance Committee removed the proposed positions in May, along with hundreds of other items proposed by Evers.
'Unfortunately, [Evers] sends us an executive budget that's just piles full of stuff that doesn't make sense and spends recklessly and raises taxes and has way too much policy,' Joint Finance Committee co-chair Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said in May.
Tribes already work with the state, including the Oneida Nation, which is located in northeast Wisconsin. The tribe told the Examiner that it continues to work with the state to make sure incarcerated Native Americans have proper access to culturally based practices and resources.
With a tribal liaison that can help navigate the corrections system, the tribe's efforts to make sure resources are provided and distributed appropriately make better progress, the tribe said.
'These efforts will continue whether or not a tribal liaison position exists, although the impact on incarcerated individuals who use culturally based resources may be greater as efforts take longer,' the tribe said.
The Oneida Nation said it 'supports tribes' efforts to ensure incarcerated members maintain access to appropriate support services as provided by tribal, state, and federal laws.'
Maggie Olson, communications coordinator for the St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin, said the tribe is not located close to the corrections facilities where their tribal members are incarcerated. This is a significant barrier, she said.
'It would be nice to be able to have a better handle on where our people are within the system to ensure they are having their spiritual and cultural needs met,' Olson said in an email to the Examiner. 'It is much easier (at this time) to meet religious needs (think Christianity) within the correctional system than it is to meet the spiritual and cultural needs of Native Americans within the system.'
A great first step would be having a dedicated person who can build relationships with incarcerated Native Americans, she said.
In a statement, the tribe said the liaison 'would be a start to developing and enhancing tribal input with State initiatives.' The tribe said it wants to work with the DOC on access to supportive services in county jails.
Olson said she met DOC Secretary Jared Hoy at an event on June 5 and that they had a great discussion about the potential benefits of a tribal liaison at the agency.
'With the uncertainties surrounding federal funding, we are hopeful state funding will be increased to tribal programs in Wisconsin,' Olson said.
The tribe's criminal justice work involves partnership with the DOC. In the St. Croix Tribal Reintegration Program, case managers work with tribal members before and after their release from prison or jail, the tribe said. The program has a memo of understanding with the Department of Corrections, providing guidance for working relationships between tribal reentry and probation.
All of the governor's cabinet agencies have consultation policies that say how they will work with tribal governments. Agencies and tribal elected officials have annual consultation meetings to talk about programs, laws and funding that may affect the tribe.
Discussions at the annual state-tribal consultation tend to be about high-level policy, but they can delve into specifics, Greendeer said. He gave an example related to tribal members who are on probation or parole.
'For example, a topic that keeps coming up is re-entry programming for enrolled tribal member offenders,' Greendeer said. 'A concern discussed at a recent consultation was that probation/parole officers might not consider tribal norms/values, citing a lack of eye contact in saying a client is disengaged or disconnected.'
The co-chairs and vice-chairs of the Joint Finance Committee did not respond to requests for comment. DOC communications director Beth Hardtke did not answer a question from the Examiner about the responsibilities and goals of the tribal liaison position.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alaska House Judiciary Committee to hold a fact-finding hearing on ICE detention in state prisons
The entrance to the Anchorage Correctional Complex is seen on Aug. 29, 2022. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon) The Alaska House Judiciary Committee plans to hold a hearing June 20 on the use of Alaska Department of Corrections facilities to house and supervise federal detainees for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The announcement comes following news of DOC holding 42 people arrested and detained by ICE from out of state over the weekend, housed at the Anchorage Correctional Complex, amid a nationwide immigration crackdown. DOC is currently housing 39 ICE detainees, according to a department spokesperson on Friday. Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage, chair of the judiciary committee, said the goal is to gather information on the terms and conditions of detention for the state detaining people for ICE. 'It's really more a fact-finding hearing just to make sure that we understand exactly what's happening in a situation that, to my knowledge, hasn't happened before,' Gray said in a phone interview Thursday. 'Some of the concerns that we have that we're just curious to learn more about are how much contact they have with their families, with legal representation, and access to medical care,' he said. 'Those sorts of things are things that we want to make sure that they have.' The hearing is planned for June 20 at 1 p.m. at the Anchorage Legislative Information Office, and will be streamed live on the Legislature's website and Gavel Alaska. The committee has invited officials with the Department of Corrections, Department of Law, the American Civil Liberties Union of Alaska and attorneys representing several of the men to present. Gray pointed to immigration status as a civil legal issue, and not a criminal one. 'And my limited understanding of what's happening in DOC right now with these detainees is that they are not being afforded those additional rights and freedoms that would come to someone who would be at an ICE detention facility,' he said. ICE has not responded to multiple requests for comment, including on what criminal or civil charges are being brought against the men. One man being held in Alaska custody, Albert Khamitov, was granted asylum by an immigration judge for ''clear evidence of state sponsored persecution' of LGBTQ+ people in Russia,' the Seattle Times has reported. The U.S. government appealed that asylum decision and he has remained in detention while fighting the case. Gray said he's been speaking with several attorneys representing the men currently detained, who have raised the issue of whether they are receiving adequate translation services while in Alaska custody. Gray said he's been told DOC staff are using Google Translate to communicate with detainees, which he said is inadequate. 'I want to hear from DOC, I want them to talk about how they're handling this issue. But the fear is that folks have been removed to Alaska, cannot communicate with the people who are, you know, managing them, and have no way of contacting their friends and family from where they came,' he said. 'I just can't imagine what that must be like for them. So I hope that my fear is unfounded.' DOC spokesperson Betsy Holley said Friday via email that the department is using translation services. 'We have long had, and utilize professional translation services: Language Link, Language Line Services, Alaska Interpreting Alliance, and Big Language Solutions,' she said. 'Additionally, we have many bilingual staff members. The facility chooses the service based on availability at the time the need arises.' The department did not respond to requests for comment on the concerns around conditions of detention, access to communication with families and attorneys, as well as access to medical care, by Friday at 4 p.m. Gray said he's also concerned about the state's risk for potential litigation around standards of detention. 'Our facilities were not designed for this. Our personnel were not trained for this,' Gray said. 'My fear is that there's going to be some very well-founded litigation about these folks being here that the state is going to have to pay for. It is not going to break even. This is going to end up costing Alaska a lot of money, is my fear.' Questions remain around why the men were transferred to Alaska from the Tacoma ICE Detention Facility, as two men were transferred back to Washington state within one day, according to the Department of Corrections. 'There are rights that are guaranteed to people in the United States, regardless of their immigration status, a person cannot be incarcerated without knowing what the charges are against them, without the right to legal representation, without the right to defend themselves,' Gray said. 'I have fear that these folks aren't being awarded these rights as they should be, but I will reserve judgment.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Israel-Iran Conflict Pushes Shipping, Defense ETFs Higher
Shipping ETFs jumped and Israeli funds slipped after Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear-enrichment facilities and other sites sparked concerns about the region's stability and ocean transit costs surged. The Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET), which tracks futures contracts in the crude-oil-shipping market, jumped 11%. The Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY), which provides exposure to ocean transit of dry-bulk transport for products like iron ore, coal and grain, jumped 1.2%. Shipping rates surged on worries that fighting in the Middle East would create havoc in the Strait of Hormuz, a globally critical oil transit route, causing ships to reroute and take longer journeys. Very large crude carrier rates for Middle East to Asia routes jumped 40% this morning as ships planned routes that avoided Iranian waters, according to FXEmpire. Crude oil prices jumped, pushing the United States Oil Fund LP (USO) up 5.8%, while defense ETFs like the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD) advanced. Broad-market ETFs like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) slipped. 'Historically, we have seen that political instability in the Middle East that potentially impacts energy supply or transportation can cause ETFs like BWET to react,' said Aniket Ullal, head of ETF research & analytics at CFRA. BWET jumped 21% between October 2023 and April 2024 when the Houthi rebels in Yemen began attacking ships in the Red Sea, he said. 'Investors may be concerned that Israel's recent preemptive strike on Iran may impact energy markets and transportation through the Red Sea, especially if nonstate actors like the Houthis are drawn into the conflict,' he explained. Israel-focused ETFs fell after the attack, which Israel launched after Iran threatened to increase its nuclear-enrichment program. The ongoing attacks killed high-ranking military officials, including Gen. Hossein Salami, head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. Israel-focused ETFs—Source: FactSet The iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) lost 1.2%, while the ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) fell 1.1%.Permalink | © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOP legislators approve $220 million increase for special education, $1.3 billion in tax cuts
Joint Finance Co-Chair Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said at a press conference ahead of the meeting that he would tell advocates who wanted the 60% rate that the state budget has to be 'right-sized' and 'affordable.' (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) After many delays, the Wisconsin Joint Finance Committee met Thursday evening to approve its plan for K-12 education spending that included a 5% increase to special education funding for schools and its $1.3 billion tax plan that targets retirees and middle-income earners. Lawmakers on the powerful budget-writing committee went back and forth for nearly three hours about the plans with Republicans saying they made significant investments in education and would help Wisconsinites while Democrats argued the state should do more for schools. The committee approved a total of about $336 million total in new general purpose revenue for Wisconsin's K-12 schools — only about 10% of Gov. Tony Evers' proposed $3.1 billion in new spending. Special education costs will receive the majority of the allocation with an additional $220 million that will be split between the general special education reimbursement and a subset of high-cost special education services. The special education reimbursement funding includes $77.2 million in the first year of the budget, which will bring the rate at which the state reimburses school districts to an estimated 35%, and $151 million in the second year bringing the rate to an estimated 37.5%. It's well below the $1.13 billion or 60% reimbursement for special education that Evers had proposed and that advocates had said was essential to place school districts back on a sustainable funding path. Education advocates spent the last week lobbying for the additional funding — and warning lawmakers about the financial strain on districts and the resources the students could lose. Ahead of the meeting Thursday, Democrats and a coalition of Wisconsin parents of students with disabilities spoke to the urgent need for additional investment in the state's general special education reimbursement rate. 'Everywhere we've gone in the state of Wisconsin, whether it's rural school districts, urban school districts, whether it's school districts that have passed referendums and those that haven't, they all say the same thing — 60% primary special education funding is absolutely necessary for our schools to succeed,' Rep. Tip McGuire (D-Kenosha) said at the press conference. 'You can see that we have had a cycle of referendum throughout Wisconsin, and that cycle has to end.' The special education reimbursement peaked at 70% in 1973, according to the Wisconsin Policy Forum. After falling to a low of 24.9% in 2015-16, the state's share of special education costs has been incrementally increasing with some fluctuations. The Republican proposal represents, at maximum, about a 5% increase to the current rate by the second year. According to budget papers prepared by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the investment lawmakers made last session was meant to bring the rate to 33.3%, but because it is a sum certain rate — meaning there was only a set amount of money set aside, regardless of expanding costs — the actual rates have been 32.4% in 2023-24 and an estimated 32.1% for 2024-25. Joint Finance Co-Chair Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said at a press conference ahead of the meeting that he would tell advocates who wanted the 60% rate that the state budget has to be 'right-sized' and 'affordable.' 'The governor's budget has always [had] reckless spending that the state can't afford, and so we're choosing to make key investments and priorities, and these investments today will be some of … the largest investments you'll see in the budget,' Born said. The committee also added $54.5 million to bring the additional reimbursement rate for a small number of high-cost special education services to 50% in the first year of the budget and 90% in the second year. The high-cost special education program provides additional aid when costs exceed $30,000 for a single student in one year. According to DPI, in 2025 only 3% of students with disabilities fell in the high-cost special education category. In 2024-25, the program only received $14.5 million from the state. Evers had proposed the state invest an additional $18.5 million. Republicans on the committee insisted that they were trying to compromise and making a significant investment in schools — noting that education likely will continue being the state's top expenditure in the budget. Meanwhile, Democrats spoke extensively about the need for higher rates of investment, read messages from superintendents and students in their districts and said Republicans were not doing what people asked for. 'High needs special education funding only reaches about 3% of Wisconsin's special education students,' Rep. Deb Andraca said. 'You're getting a couple good talking points, but you're not going to get the kinds of public schools that Wisconsin kids deserve.' During the committee meeting, Sen. Julian Bradley (R-New Berlin) criticized Democrats for saying they would vote against the proposals. He said Democrats would vote against any proposal if it isn't what they want. 'If we all voted no, we would return to base funding, which was good enough by the way for the governor last budget because he signed it,' Bradley said. 'There would be no increases, but instead we've introduced a motion which will increase funding.' McGuire responded by saying he wouldn't vote for a proposal that is 'condemning the state to continuing the cycle of referendum,' which he said Republicans are doing by minimally increasing the special education reimbursement rate and not investing any additional money in general aid. 'Wisconsinites across the state are having to choose between raising their own property taxes' and the schools, McGuire said. The Kenosha School District, which is in McGuire's legislative district, recently failed to pass referendum to help reduce a budget deficit. School leaders had said a significant increase in the special education reimbursement would prevent the district from having to seek a referendum again. 'They had a $19 million budget gap, and if this state went to 60% special education funding, you know roughly where we promised we would be, that would've gone down to $6 million,' McGuire said, '…$13 million of those dollars are our responsibility. That's been our failing, and we should live up to that.' 'What are we arguing about? We're putting more money in,' Sen. Patrick Testin (R-Stevens Point) said.'I would think that when this gets to his desk, Evers would sign this because it is a bigger increase than any of what he proposed while he was state superintendent.' McGuire said the investment in the high-cost special education is also good, but only applies to a small number of schools and students. 'You know, what would benefit all school districts in the state and will benefit all students who need special education? The primary special education reimbursement rate, which you put at 37.5[%], but everyone says should be at 60[%].' McGuire said. 'I don't think this is your intention, but I don't believe that we should be exchanging children who need our assistance for other children who need our assistance. Why can't we just help all of the kids who need our help?' Rep. Tony Kurtz (R-Wonewoc) said that the increase for high-cost special education will have a significant impact on some schools, especially smaller ones, and students, even if it's not many of them. 'To get 90% for them is huge for any of our rural districts. One child, which deserves an education, can break the bank for our small districts,' Kurtz said. 'Is it perfect? No, it's not perfect, but we have to stay within our means.' Committee co-chair Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) echoed Kurtz's comments saying that there will be 'a lot of districts that are going to be awful happy about that.' 'They've been worried about sometimes, a student moves into the district, and it's of incredibly high, high needs,' Marklein said. The committee also declined to include additional general aid for school districts. Republicans on the committee said there was already a $325 per pupil increase to districts' revenue limits built into the budget from last session due to Evers' partial veto. The increase gives districts the option to raise property taxes, though it doesn't require them to, and does not include state funding for the increase. Sen. Romaine Quinn (R-Birchwood) told lawmakers not to forget about the increase, saying the 'insulting part about that is that everyone gets it. There are schools that don't need that,' Quinn said. '72% of my districts spend less than [the schools of] my Democratic colleagues on this panel.' School Administrators Alliance Executive Director Dee Pettack, Wisconsin Association of School Boards Executive Director Dan Rossmiller, Southeast Wisconsin School Alliance Executive Director Cathy Olig and Wisconsin Rural Schools Alliance Executive Director Jeff Eide said in a joint letter reacting to the proposal that lawmakers failed to hear the voices school leaders, parents and community and business leaders. 'While the $325 revenue limit authority exists, it is not funded by the state. Instead, it is entirely borne by local property taxpayers. In addition, school districts will not see the requested support in special education,' the leaders stated. 'Because of the lack of state support in these two critical areas, school districts will be left with no choice but to ask their local taxpayers to step up and shoulder the costs locally, regardless of their ability to pay.' The leaders said the state was investing minimally and school districts will continue to struggle to fund mandated primary special education programs. State Superintendent Jill Underly called the Republicans' proposal 'irresponsible' in a statement Friday and said it 'puts politics ahead of kids and disregards educators and public schools when they need support the most.' 'Our public schools desperately need and deserve funding that is flexible, spendable and predictable,' Underly said. 'This budget fails to deliver on all three. Once again, those in power had an opportunity to do right by Wisconsin's children — and once again, they turned their backs on them.' The committee also approved $30 million for the state's choice school programs, $20 million for mental health services in school, $250,000 for robotics league grants, $750,000 for a single school, the Lakeland STAR Academy (a provision that Evers vetoed last session), $100,000 for Special Olympics Wisconsin, $3 million for public library system aid, $500,000 for recovery high schools and $500,000 for Wisconsin Reading Corps. Republican lawmakers also approved tax cuts of about $1.3 billion for the budget Thursday evening after 8 p.m., including changes to the income tax brackets and a cut for retirees in Wisconsin. Born and Marklein said the cuts would help retirees and other Wisconsinites afford to stay in the state. 'These are average, hard-working people in our state that will benefit from our tax cut,' Marklein said. The income tax change will allow more people to qualify for the second tax bracket with a rate of 4.4% by raising the qualifying maximum income to $50,480 for single filers, $67,300 for joint filers and $33,650 for married-separate filers. This will reduce the state's revenues by $323 million in 2025-26 and $320 million in 2026-27. People currently eligible for the second tax bracket include: single filers making between $14,680 and $29,370, joint filers making between $19,580 and $39,150 and married separate filers making between $9,790 and $19,580. Wisconsin Republicans have been seeking another significant tax cut since the last budget cycle when Evers vetoed their proposals. After the rejection, Republicans started to narrow their tax cuts proposals to focus on retirees and a couple of other groups with the hope of getting Evers' approval. When negotiations on this year's budget reached an impasse, Evers had said he was willing to support Republicans' tax goals, but he wanted agreements from them, too. The proposal also includes an exclusion from income taxes for retirees that would reduce the state's revenues by $395 million in 2025-26 and $300 million in 2026-27. 'This isn't a high-income oriented kind of thing,' Marklein said during the meeting. 'It just helps a lot of average people in the state of Wisconsin, so it's very good tax policy.' Democrats appeared unimpressed with the tax proposal. The Legislative Fiscal Bureau told lawmakers that the income tax change would lead to about a maximum impact of $253 annually for married joint filers, $190 annually for single filers and $127 for married separate filers. 'So roughly $5 a week for a married couple,' McGuire said. McGuire said that Democrats just have the perspective that Wisconsin could invest more in the priorities that residents have been expressing. 'We heard from a lot of people about what they need,' McGuire said in reference to school districts. 'We also know that as they've been attempting to get those funds they've had to go to referendums across the state, and… we think that's harming communities and making it more difficult for people. As a perspective, we believe that that's a good place to invest in dollars.' The committee also voted to provide additional funding for the Wisconsin technical colleges, though it is, again, significantly less than what was requested by Evers and by the system. The proposal will provide an additional $13 million to the system. This includes $7 million in general aid for the system of 16 technical colleges, $2 million in aid meant for grants for artificial intelligence, $3 million for grants for textbooks and nearly $30,000 to support the operations of the system. Evers had proposed the state provide the system with $45 million in general aid Sen. LaTonya Johnson (D-Milwaukee) said the differences between Evers' proposals and what Republicans offered were stark. 'We hear my GOP colleagues talk about worker training all the time and this is their opportunity to make sure that our technical colleges have the resources that they need to make sure that we are training an adequate workforce,' Johnson said, noting that the state could be short by 1,000 nurses (many of whom start their education in technical colleges) by 2030. 'I've never had an employer complain about having an educated workforce, not once, but I have heard employers say that Wisconsin lacks the skill sets and educational skills they need. It seems my Republican colleagues are more concerned with starving our institutions of higher education, rather than making sure they have the resources they need.' Testin said the proposal was not a cut and that Republicans were investing in technical colleges. 'We see there's value in our technical colleges because they are working with the business community … getting students through the door quicker with less debt,' Testin said. 'Any conversations that this is a cut is just unrealistic. These are critical investments in the technical system.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
