Judge deems some of Trump's National Institutes of Health grant cuts illegal
Donald Trump's administration broke the law when it terminated more than $1 billion in medical research grants the president claimed were linked to "DEI", a federal court has ruled.
In a blistering judgement issued on Monday, District Judge William Young — a Reagan appointee — said he had "never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable" in his 40 years as a jurist.
He ordered the government to immediately reinstate numerous National Institutes of Health research grants canceled as part of Trump's war against any program perceived to favor people of color, transgender people, or other minorities.
"You are bearing down on people of color because of their color," Young told the defendants. "The Constitution will not permit that... have we fallen so low? Have we no shame?'
The lawsuit blocks a small portion of the 2,100 research grants that Trump has canceled — representing a total of about $9.5bn in funding — with other grants to be decided later.
A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, NIH's parent agency, said it was "exploring all legal options" and might appeal the judgement.
"HHS stands by its decision to end funding for research that prioritized ideological agendas over scientific rigor and meaningful outcomes for the American people,", the spokesperson said.
Judge Young's ruling concerned two separate lawsuits that were heard together, one by a coalition of academic researchers and unions led by the American Public Health Association and one by a group of Democrat-led states.
The scientists' lawsuit argued that NIH had violated its usual science-based review process, as well as federal regulations and specific orders from Congress to fund research into health disparities.
The grants varied widely in topic, from cardiovascular health through alcohol abuse in minors to the differing impact of certain medications on different racial groups.
The Trump administration has claimed that it is slashing "DEI" initiatives because they discriminate against other Americans by unfairly privileging minorities.
In court, Trump's lawyers said that the NIH's grant cuts were "sufficiently reasoned" and that the agency has "broad discretion" to offer or rescind grants "in alignment with its priorities".
But Judge Young held that although the Trump administration had a legal right to "extirpate affirmative action" if it saw fit, the grant cancelations had been "arbitrary and capricious" and broken government rules.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump: Reason for G7 exit ‘much bigger than Iran ceasefire'
Donald Trump has denied claims he left the G7 summit early to work on a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, insisting the reason was 'much bigger'. The president returned to Washington after just one day in Canada, instructing the National Security Council (NSC) to be ready in the Situation Room upon his return. Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, suggested Mr Trump left early to work on a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Mr Trump hit back on Truth Social: 'Wrong! He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire. Much bigger than that. Whether purposely or not, Emmanuel always gets it wrong. Stay Tuned!' There has been speculation that Mr Trump has intelligence that Iran is about to strike a US base in Iraq, raising fears America could be dragged into the war. The Pentagon has expanded its military presence in the Middle East as tensions escalate between Israel and Iran, sending refuelling planes and an additional aircraft carrier. Karoline Leavitt, Mr Trump's press secretary, said on Monday evening that the president would leave 'because of what's going on in the Middle East'.
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled
LONDON, June 17 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump is hoping to secure American dominance in semiconductors over China. The president wants to bring production of chips back to the U.S., while courting allies. But success will take years and much more capital, while looming tariffs and unclear export rules add cost and confusion. When it comes to stimulating a key industry, the U.S. strategy is falling short. For an example of how to approach state-backed industrial planning, look to China. The People's Republic has already become a powerhouse in making solar panels and batteries for electric vehicles. A decade ago, President Xi Jinping launched his 'Made in China 2025' plan with the intention of reducing the country's reliance on foreign semiconductors from 85% to around 30%. The urgency was clear: chips had overtaken oil as China's largest import. Nearly a decade later, China has not met its goal, but local capacity is ramping up. Of the 51 wafer fabrication plants currently under construction worldwide, 23 are in China, according to an industry expert. It's a direct result of government funding: state-led investment in chips has probably exceeded $150 billion since 2014, according to, opens new tab the Economist Intelligence Unit. Little wonder that the U.S. is worrying about its dominance of advanced chips and artificial intelligence. While Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei says, opens new tab the Chinese tech giant's chips are still one generation behind U.S. rivals, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab CEO Jensen Huang has said Huawei's latest processors are approaching parity with the $3.5 trillion company's cutting-edge H200 graphics processors. These are central to training advanced AI models. Chinese players like DeepSeek are also showing signs of catching up. For the Trump administration, maintaining the U.S. lead starts with safeguarding demand for American products. That means ensuring key international customers in Europe and the Middle East don't drift toward Chinese suppliers. It's one reason Trump scrapped his predecessor Joe Biden's 'diffusion rule', which set country-specific quotas for advanced chips. The rule risked restricting previously friendly nations' access to semiconductors, pushing them into Huawei's arms. On the supply side, Trump wants to bring manufacturing back onshore. As most advanced chips are still made in Taiwan, any diversification of supply chains makes sense. The $52.7 billion Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act -- which includes, opens new tab $39 billion in subsidies for domestic chip manufacturing -- is a start, but progress is slow. The bill only releases funds as projects meet staged milestones. Trump has criticised the act, while also using it to force private companies to crank up investment stateside. Taiwanese giant TSMC ( opens new tab, for instance, committed to spending over $100 billion in the U.S. as it finalised state funding of $6.6 billion. GlobalFoundries (GFS.O), opens new tab this month pledged, opens new tab $16 billion alongside a $1.5 billion subsidy. Tariffs are another of Trump's favoured tools. He has asked the Commerce Department to investigate chip supply chains under Section 232, citing national security. But applying levies to semiconductors is fraught. For a start, the U.S. imports relatively few chips, but lots of products which contain them. Semiconductors worth less than $40 billion arrived in the country in 2024, while the U.S. imported electronic goods worth $486 billion, according to the International Trade Centre. Trying to impose tariffs on components inside devices like laptops and iPhones would be tricky. There's no easy way to tell where the chip was made once it's been packaged. Even if the Trump administration can successfully tilt the playing field towards domestic manufacturing, however, resilience still comes at a price. Proposed subsidies would make the cost of building semiconductor fabrication plants in the United States as competitive as in Asia, according to an industry analyst. But running those plants in a high-wage economy is another challenge: McKinsey & Company estimates operating costs are 35% higher in the U.S. than in Taiwan. Buyers of U.S.-made chips for cars or medical machines would have to absorb that premium or pass it on to customers. It also implies that semiconductor firms will need ongoing support in the form of tax breaks or operational subsidies as they shift supply chains. However, Trump has made hostile noises about the costs of the CHIPS Act. One key incentive, a 25% investment tax credit for every dollar chipmakers spend on capital expenditures, is set to expire unless renewed. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has hinted at possibly withholding further subsidies unless paired with broader tax legislation. The administration's stance on immigration, especially from China, is another impediment. Nvidia's Huang reckons around half of global AI researchers are Chinese. Meanwhile, nearly a third of chip companies' design engineers are in mainland China – the same proportion as in the United States, according to BCG data. The administration's policy on export controls also remains in flux. Though it has rolled back the 'diffusion rule', nothing has replaced it. Crafting bespoke export agreements with every partner like the United Arab Emirates will be time-consuming. Other potential measures, such as banning shipments of chip-making equipment made by the likes of ASML ( opens new tab to China, would require cooperation from key allies in Japan and the Netherlands. It would also require U.S. equipment makers like $114 billion Lam Research (LRCX.O), opens new tab to sacrifice revenue which could be as much as 30% of the total top line. Trump's chaotic and go-it-alone instincts on tariffs risk undermining the partnerships he will need to isolate China. China's chip campaign still falls short in several areas, including scale and efficiency. But Beijing's strategic clarity, persistence, and willingness to absorb long-term costs signal its serious intent. By contrast, Trump's U.S. chip revival is at best half-assembled. Follow Karen Kwok on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.
ITV News
19 minutes ago
- ITV News
‘Evacuate Tehran' – Trump issues warning as Israel expands strikes in Tehran
US President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning from the G7 summit in Canada telling people in Tehran to immediately leave as the conflict between Israel and Iran increases. 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' Trump wrote Monday night before returning to Washington early from the G7 summit. 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' he added. Earlier, the Israeli military had called for some 330,000 residents of a neighborhood in the city centre to evacuate. Tehran is one of the largest cities in the Middle East, with around 9.5 million people. Israel appeared to be expanding its air campaign on Tehran five days after its surprise attack on Iran's military and nuclear programme. Israel says its sweeping assault on Iran's top military leaders, nuclear scientists, uranium enrichment sites and ballistic missile program is necessary to prevent its longtime adversary from getting any closer to building an atomic weapon. The strikes have killed at least 224 people since Friday. Iran has retaliated by launching more than 370 missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel. So far, 24 people have been killed in Israel and more than 500 wounded. On Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced on X that Trump would be leaving the summit early, following a dinner with heads of state. 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State,' she wrote. Meanwhile, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth headed to the White House Situation Room to meet with the president and his national security team. Hegseth didn't provide details on what prompted the meeting but said on Fox News late on Monday that the movements were to 'ensure that our people are safe". Downing Street declined to comment on Trump's early exit. Before leaving the summit in Canada, Trump joined the other leaders in a joint statement saying Iran 'can never have a nuclear weapon' and calling for a 'de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.' The statement said: 'We, the leaders of the G7, reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East. 'In this context, we affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel. We also affirm the importance of the protection of civilians. 'Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza. 'We will remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.' The Foreign Office has advised against all travel to Israel, but Britons already in the country now face difficulties getting home, with the airspace closed due to the conflict with Iran. The Prime Minister said the UK was issuing advice for British citizens in Israel to register their presence. 'All of us are giving advice to our citizens for British nationals in Israel, we're giving advice today to register their presence, so there will be a portal for that,' he said. Downing Street said its key message to British nationals in Israel was to stay near shelter and follow the advice of local authorities. This advice comes as Israel increases its military operations. On Monday, Israeli military spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said his country's forces had 'achieved full aerial superiority over Tehran's skies.' The military said it destroyed more than 120 surface-to-surface missile launchers in central Iran, a third of Iran's total, including multiple launchers just before they launched ballistic missiles towards Israel. It also destroyed two F-14 fighter planes that Iran used to target Israeli aircraft, the military said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the Israeli strikes have set Iran's nuclear program back a 'very, very long time". So far, Israel has targeted multiple Iranian nuclear program sites but has not been able to destroy Iran's Fordo uranium enrichment facility. The site is buried deep underground — and to eliminate it, Israel may need a US 'bunker-busting' bomb that uses its weight and sheer kinetic force to reach deeply buried targets. Israel does not have the munition or the bomber needed to deliver it. Iran has promised to end their retaliatory strikes on Israel were their rivals to do the same but that has so far shown little sign of happening. Many eyes will now turn to the US and art-of-the-deal Donald Trump as a potential peace broker in the region, as Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi highlights on X: 'It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like Netanyahu. 'That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy.'
