There's Growing Anger Over Mexican Flags Flown At LA Protests. Here's What Everyone Is Getting Wrong.
As protests broke out in downtown Los Angeles in response to ICE raids and the Trump administration's immigration policies, a number of protesters held up Mexican flags. Some brandished them with U.S. flags. Others waved only Mexican flags.
In a city as diverse and Latino as LA ― approximately 48.6% of the city is Hispanic or Latino ― Mexican flags have long been a fixture at protests and celebrations: May Day marches, previous protests of ICE policies, Dodgers World Series championships parades.
But for national audiences watching the protests, the sheer number of Mexican flags on display proved divisive: For every headline that read 'Mexican flag symbolizes pride in Los Angeles protests' there were at least double that criticized the flag's presence over the weekend.
'How Mexican Flag Photos Are a Gift to Donald Trump,' politics reporter Dan Gooding wrote in Newsweek, while right-leaning tabloid the New York Post deemed the footage and photos as 'the perfect propaganda footage for Trump.'
By Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was alluding to the flags in his testimony to a House panel. Though he couldn't identify what legal authority President Donald Trump had to deploy the National Guard and Marines to LA, he said troops need to be called in 'if you've got millions of illegals and you don't know where they're coming from, they're waving flags from foreign countries and assaulting police officers and laws.'
Even centrists and those on the left had conflicted feelings about the flags. So did Kevin M. Kruse, a history professor at Princeton University and the author of 'White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism.'
'Look, protesters can wave whatever they want, but as someone who's written about protests like this, I'd politely suggest if you're trying to dispel racist claims that you're an army from a foreign country, maybe *don't* wave a foreign country's flag as you square off against US troops?' he wrote on social media.
Kruse noted that both Martin Luther King Jr. during the Civil Rights Movement and Cesar Chavez during the '1,000 Mile March' for farmworker rights in California used the American flag as a visual argument that the movement was wholly American.
The post quickly went viral, with others agreeing with Kruse that what's happening now felt like a big PR blunder.
Kruse was met with a wave of criticism, too: As Latino communities continue to come under attack ― with ICE and military agents in tactical gear raiding their places of work and routine immigration check-ins ― whose place is it to question their peaceful means of protest?
'If you want more American flags at protests, you are welcome to go to the protests and fly one. No one will stop you. You yourself can create that picture of tolerance and pluralism,' attorney and political pundit Will Stancil wrote on Bluesky. 'But don't sit on the sidelines and tell a community under racist assault not to assert its right to exist.'
Later in the day, Kruse deleted the post, apologizing for being a little 'tone deaf.' '[I'm] still very much behind these protests and hope my worries will prove to be misplaced,' he wrote.
Tone deaf is how Ian B. Bautista, a Milwaukeean of Mexican descent, saw criticism like Kruse's. For Bautista and many other Mexican Americans, the flag of Mexico is as American as apple pie ― or at least an Our Lady of Guadalupe candle. We're a melting pot, and at this point, the Mexican flag is deeply ingrained in Chicano culture ― and LA culture ― too.
'The Mexican flag is no more 'foreign' to El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles del Río de Porciúncula than the Dodgers, lowriders, the Coliseum, pupusas, Kendrick Lamar, Korean BBQ, the beach, Hollywood or the Lakers,' Bautista wrote on Bluesky, invoking LA's original Spanish name.
If there is a protest involving anything even marginally concerning Mexican American or Latino rights, expect to see a Mexican flag, he told HuffPost.
'Almost 100 out of 100 times, when a Mexican-American or [Chicano] protests, it's safe to bet that the Mexican flag will be depicted in banners or signs,' said Bautista, who works for a nonprofit in the community building field.
That's certainly true in Los Angeles, which was once Mexican territory. LA was a Spanish city until 1821, when Mexico gained independence from Spain, and California fell under the rule of the newly created Mexican nation.
In 1848, at the end of the Mexican–American War, the region and the rest of California were purchased as part of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and became part of the United States.
In the wake of that, LA has seen 'generations and generations of colonial and military violence, one that regularly targets Mexican, Black and Native people for the U.S. political desires,' said Michael Lechuga, the chair and an associate professor in the Department of Communication and Journalism at the University of New Mexico.
That all-too recent history only emboldens today's Latino Angelenos to reach for the Mexican flag in times of protest.
For Bautista, he's personally more inclined to wave an American and Mexican flag simultaneously when he protests or celebrates his community. He's not alone; some protesters in LA have held up flags that are half Mexican, half American in design.
Still, those criticizing protesters waving exclusively Mexican flags are coming from 'a very privileged place,' Bautista said.
'Racists ― as has been proven throughout our nation's history ― will express and assert racism without reasons,' he said. 'If a 'foreign' flag ― and it's arguable that the Mexican flag is 'foreign' to Los Angeles ― sets off racists or provides optics that are not according to white-centered perceptions of what 'America' is, then so be it.'
Social movements and protests have always been fundamentally visual in nature: Think of the lone man standing in front of a tank in Tiananmen Square, or the transformative role videos on social media played in the Arab Spring uprisings.
'In the U.S. today especially, we have largely moved away from political dialogues and moved toward symbol wars,' Lechuga said.
While the Mexican flag has a rich history and meaning removed from current events in the U.S., Lechuga said that today it's used as a silent, visual-only response to the xenophobic and inciting rhetoric the Trump administration has used to characterize people from Mexico and those from Latin American at large: 'drug dealers,' 'criminals,' 'rapists.'
'In other words, the Mexican flag at this week's protests is a symbol of resistance,' he said. 'When 'Mexicanness' is the target of this administration, holding the object that's seen as the quickest reference to it is rebellious.'
'And maybe, at this point in history, the Mexican flag is a stand-in for all migrants and for those that support them,' he said. 'The conflation of all Latin Americans with 'Mexicanness,' for instance, is pretty common.'
Leisy J. Abrego, a professor of Chicana/o and Central American Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles, agrees that the Mexican flag has taken on larger symbolism in the U.S. immigration debate.
'The current president and his administration are saying in words, policies, and chaos-inducing actions that they hate immigrant communities,' she said. 'Whether they are immigrants, children or grandchildren of immigrants, the protesters are putting their bodies on the line for their own and other people's dignity.'
In a moment when the highest leaders of this country want to deny them a sense of belonging, embracing the Mexican flag is not anti-American, per se, but a symbolic reminder that there's another place to belong, Abrego siad.
'The flags from Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua are just reminders that immigrants can belong in multiple places,' she told HuffPost. 'Most importantly, though, these protesters are there to protect their community visibly and make the statement proudly that immigrants are not alone.'
Some have noted that it didn't seem to be much of a problem to those on the far right when Jan. 6 protesters brought their other flags to the U.S. capitol. Lechuga has thought about it, too, as the 'what flag belongs' debate has waged this week.
'In addition to several Confederate flags and original 13-star colonial U.S., there were some people on Jan. 6 waving a South Vietnamese flag and Indian flag,' he said. 'Some who believe that the far right and largely anti-communist movements associated with those flags are the reason why some protesters brought them to the riot.'
As for whether the number of Mexican flags at the protests is 'perfect propaganda' for Trump, Lechuga thinks you could make the case that the president's team is adept at turning almost anything into propaganda for its agenda.
'It's easy for an outside observer of the situation to give advice to protesters, like an armchair quarterback with no skin in the game,' he said. 'But I am not sure if it's the job of the demonstrator to convince the ICE agents or Marines that they are not an angry invading mob of foreign nationals.'
What flags they'll bring to the function probably isn't the top priority on the minds of most people at these protests.
'More than anything, these folks are out there trying to keep their families and friends from being illegally kidnapped by a secretive federal agency,' Lechuga said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Barabak: Trump could help feed hungry people. Instead he's throwing a vanity parade
On Saturday, on the streets of Washington, Donald Trump will throw himself a costly and ostentatious military parade, a gaudy display of waste and vainglory staged solely to inflate the president's dirigible-sized ego. The estimated price tag: As much as $45 million. That same day, the volunteers and staff of White Pony Express will do what they've done for nearly a dozen years, taking perfectly good food that would otherwise be tossed out and using it to feed hungry and needy people living in one of the most comfortable and affluent regions of California. Since its founding, White Pony has processed and passed along more than 26 million pounds of food — the equivalent of about 22 million meals — thanks to such Bay Area benefactors as Whole Foods, Starbucks and Trader Joe's. That's 13,000 tons of food that would have otherwise gone to landfills, rotting and emitting 31,000 tons of CO2 emissions into our overheated atmosphere. It's such a righteous thing, you can practically hear the angels sing. "Our mission is to connect abundance and need," said Eve Birge, White Pony's chief executive officer, who said the nonprofit's guiding principle is the notion "we are one human family and when one of us moves up, we all move up." Read more: Barabak: Putting the bully in bully pulpit, Trump escalates in L.A. rather than seeking calm That mission has become more difficult of late as the Trump administration takes a scythe to the nation's social safety net. White Pony receives most of its support from corporations, foundations, community organizations and individual donors. But a sizable chunk comes from the federal government; the nonprofit could lose up to a third of its $3-million annual budget due to cuts by the Trump administration. "We serve 130,000 people each year," Birge said. "That puts in jeopardy one-third of the people we're serving, because if I don't find another way to raise that money, then we'll have to scale back programs. I'll have to consider letting go staff." (White Pony has 17 employees and about 1,200 active volunteers.) "We're a seven-day-a-week operation, because people are hungry seven days a week," Birge said. "We've talked about having to pull back to five or six days." She had no comment on Trump's big, braggadocious celebration of self, a Soviet-style display of military hardware — tanks, horses, mules, parachute jumpers, thousands of marching troops — celebrating the Army's 250th anniversary and, oh yes, the president's 79th birthday. Marivel Mendoza wasn't so reticent. "All of the programs that are being gutted and we're using taxpayer dollars to pay for a parade?" she asked after a White Pony delivery truck pulled up with several pallets of fruit, veggies and other groceries. Mendoza's organization, which operates from a small office center in Brentwood, serves more than 500 migrant farmworkers and their families in the far eastern reaches of the Bay Area. "We're going to see people starving at some point," Mendoza said. "It's unethical and immoral. I don't know how [Trump] sleeps at night." Certainly not lightheaded, or with his empty belly growling from hunger. Those who work at White Pony speak of it with a spiritual reverence. Paula Keeler, 74, took a break from her recent shift inspecting produce to discuss the organization's beneficence. (Every bit of food that comes through the door is checked for quality and freshness before being trucked from White Pony's Concord warehouse and headquarters to one of more than 100 community nonprofits.) Keeler retired about a decade ago from a number-crunching job with a Bay Area school district. She's volunteered at White Pony for the last nine years, on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. "It's become my church, my gym and my therapist," she said, as pulsing rhythm and blues played from a portable speaker inside the large sorting room. "Tuesdays, I deliver to two senior homes. They're mostly little women and they can go to bed at night knowing their refrigerator is full tomorrow, and that's what touches my heart." Keeler hadn't heard about Trump's parade. "I don't watch the news because it makes me want to throw up," she said. Told of the spectacle and its cost, she responded with equanimity. "It's kind of like the Serenity Prayer," Keeler said. "What can you do and what can't you do? I try to stick with what I can do." It's not much in vogue these days to quote Joe Biden, but the former president used to say something worth recollecting. "Don't tell me what you value," he often stated. "Show me your budget, and I'll tell you what you value.' Trump's priorities — I, me, mine — are the same as they've ever been. But there's something particularly stomach-turning about squandering tens of millions of dollars on a vanity parade while slashing funds that could help feed those in need. Michael Bagby, 66, works part time at White Pony. He retired after a career piloting big rigs and started making deliveries and training White Pony drivers about three years ago. His passion is fishing — Bagby dreams of reeling in a deep-sea marlin — but no hobby can nourish his soul as much as helping others. He was aware of Trump's pretentious pageant and its heedless price tag. "Nothing I say is going to make a difference whether the parade goes on or not," Bagby said, settling into the cab of a 26-foot refrigerated box truck. "But it would be better to show an interest in the true needs of the country rather than a parade." Read more: Arellano: Trump wants L.A. to set itself on fire. Let's rebel smarter His route that day called for stops at a middle school and a church in working-class Antioch, then Mendoza's nonprofit in neighboring Brentwood. As Bagby pulled up to the church, the pastor and several volunteers were waiting outside. The modest white stucco building was fringed with dead grass. Traffic from nearby Highway 4 produced an insistent, thrumming soundtrack. "There are a lot of people in need. A lot," said Tania Hernandez, 45, who runs the church's food pantry. Eighty percent of the food it provides comes from White Pony, helping feed around 100 families a week. "If it wasn't for them," Hernandez said, "we wouldn't be able to do it." With help, Bagby dropped off several pallets. He raised the tailgate, battened down the latches and headed for the cab. A church member walked up and stuck out his hand. "God bless you," he said. Then it was off to the next stop. Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people.' The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, ___ Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago.

25 minutes ago
China appears to downplay US trade deal Trump said was 'done'
HONG KONG and LONDON -- A spokesperson for China 's Ministry of Commerce on Thursday appeared to downplay what President Donald Trump said Wednesday was a "done" trade deal addressing export restrictions on rare earths and semiconductors. Speaking at a press conference, the spokesperson characterized the outcome of this week's trade negotiations in London as a "framework" to consolidate what was agreed to at negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland, in May. This week's talks in the U.K. represented the "first meeting," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson did not offer further details on what was agreed this week, telling reporters, "New progress was also made in addressing each side's trade concerns." On rare earths, the spokesperson said China would issue export licenses based on "reasonable needs" and noted that "compliant applications have already been approved." Trump on Wednesday framed the talks as having reached a deal. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on Truth Social, adding that the relationship between the world's two leading economic powerhouses was "excellent." Trump said that the U.S. would get "a total of 55% tariffs" with China's tariffs set at 10%. Trump added, "Full magnets and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick referred to the agreement as a "handshake for a framework." Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping will now have to approve the framework, Lutnick said. That step would appear to mean there were some concessions that both leaders did not give their negotiating teams authority to negotiate away. "Once that's done, we will be back on the phone together and we will begin to implement this agreement," Lutnick said. "The two largest economies in the world have reached a handshake for framework."