
Aid cuts push global funding down by a third in 2025, UN data shows
The UN has warned that aid funding for dozens of crises around the world has dropped by a third – worth billions of dollars – against a backdrop of Donald Trump having slashed US funding and other nations, including the UK, having announced cuts.
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which coordinates aid organisations in their humanitarian responses, reports that for the 44 crises it has prioritised this year, only around 11 per cent – or $5.4 billion (£4bn) – of the $46.2bn required total funding for its response plans has been funded so far this year.
According to Anja Nitzsche, chief of resource mobilisation at OCHA: 'Coverage of needs is only [around] 10 per cent, which is significantly lower than the 15 to 18 per cent funding we normally see,' says Nitzsche. 'We are only around two-thirds of where we are in a typical year, so the trajectory is not good.'
The biggest contributor to the drop is cuts to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) programmes, with US funding for humanitarian crises down by 42 per cent, almost a billion dollars, over the first five months of the year compared to the same period last year, according to OCHA.
In the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a region long ravaged by violence, humanitarian aid cuts are biting hard.
Speaking to The Independent, Oxfam DRC director Manenji Mangundu describes how aid cuts came 'at the worst possible moment' in the country's current conflict, with intensifying clashes between between armed groups and government forces pushing many of the 700,000 people who have been living in refugee camps around the city of Goma to try and return to their ruined villages for the first time in several years.
'Our staff have harrowing stories about how people eat anything they can find, feeding their children with leaves and scraps scavenged from market floors,' Mangundu says. 'Many sell their belongings, such as goats or mobile phones, at very low prices to obtain food or medicine. Others beg for food or money, incur debts they are unable to repay, or steal from fields to survive.'
These are the desperate measures people are resorting to in order to survive in an environment with drastically reduced aid, with
USAID has traditionally been DRC's largest humanitarian aid donor, providing some $920 million in 2024, or 67.9 per cent of DRC's humanitarian aid total, as tracked by ). So far in 2025, however, the US has slipped into fourth place behind the EU, UK, and Germany, with the US providing just $36.5m, or 13.8 per cent of the country's humanitarian aid total.
Oxfam reports that in eastern DRC increased use of untreated river water and stagnant water for drinking, food preparation and personal hygiene is increasing the risks around diseases like cholera.
'In the surrounding villages, people have no choice but to fetch dirty water from the rivers and consume it untreated,' says Bahati Samuel, a father of seven children who has returned to his village of Mitumbala, in DRC's North Kivu province.
'Since our return, eating has been a serious problem, and it's not certain that we will find something to fill the belly,' Samuel adds.
Meanwhile, in some extreme cases, women and girls are being forced into sexual exploitation in exchange for food or money, while families pressuring girls into marriage to access dowry payments or food assistance from the in-laws.
One NGO source in the country, speaking on condition of anonymity, describes how women and girls in the region are resorting to hiding during the day to avoid threats such as forced recruitment, exploitation, or physical harm. 'The severe underfunding of gender-based violence response services means that survivors have limited access to the support they urgently need,' they say.
Data suggests that the impact of USAID cuts is being felt severely on the ground around the globe, with a survey of 1,000 aid partners carried out by OCHA finding that 79 million people are no longer expected to be helped with humanitarian assistance this year as a result of the decision in Washington, while geographic coverage of humanitarian support from USAID also declining by 33 per cent this year.
The impact of cuts is being felt particularly profoundly in certain countries. Reports from aid workers in the Western Ethiopian region of Gambella, which has been shared with The Independent by Oxfam, reveals that life-essential water and sanitation services for 388,000 South Sudanese refugees only have confirmed funding until June 2025, due to US cutting support for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).
Humanitarian funding for the Haiti response, for example, has declined by almost half compared to the same period in 2024, even as humanitarian needs for the country have increased by 30 per cent. Meanwhile, war-torn countries including Yemen and DRC – as well as countries in the conflict-affected and climate-vulnerable Sahel region of Africa such as Nigeria, Niger, and Chad – have all received 10 per cent or less funding for their OCHA humanitarian aid funding plans so far this year.
Climate change is a growing driver of humanitarian crises globally, making extreme weather events such as droughts or flooding more frequent, and exacerbating existing crises. But OCHA data shows that humanitarian funding plans for helping deal with such events this year is being found particularly wanting. Mozambique's drought response plan has received just two per cent of its required funding, Malawi's drought response plan receiving eight per cent of its funding, Zimbabwe's drought response plan receiving ten per cent of its funding, and Vietnam's response plan to Typhoon Yagi and floods receiving six per cent of its funding.
Job cuts by humanitarian organisations in recent months are also set to impact the rollout of those aid programmes that survive the cuts.
The World Food Programme is planning to cut up to 30 per cent of its staff, while the International Organisation for Migration has said it will need to lay off over a third of its workforce. Meanwhile, Save the Children has said job cuts will 'impact upwards of 2,300 country office staff', World Vision has said it will cut some 3,000 workers, while OCHA itself has said it will cut its workforce by 20 per cent.
The UN and NGOs are streamlining and refocusing their operations in response to the funding crisis. OCHA says that it will scale back its presence and operations in Cameroon, Colombia, Eritrea, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Gaziantep, and Zimbabwe.
That prioritisation comes after Tom Fletcher, the UN Under-Secretary-General in charge of OCHA, earlier this year called for a 'humanitarian reset' in response to the cuts, which he believes will see humanitarian organisations 'regroup, reform, and renew' their approaches.
But shifting strategy can only go so far to make up for the dearth in resources. According to Oxfam's Mangundu, life-saving humanitarian responses are already being prioritised over everything else in Eastern DRC – and there is still not enough money to make ends meet.
'The needs are greater than the means to respond adequately to this crisis,' he says. 'The most basic needs for survival — food, clean water, medical care, blankets and protection — are in short supply and will be worse if funding is not secured as soon as possible.'
Cuts to non-life-essential work can also have a devastating impact, the OCHA's Nitzsche adds. 'The crises we are dealing with are complicated and multi-faceted,' she says. 'If there is no emergency shelter for women and girls, or no psychological support for survivors of extreme trauma, that is a really big deal.'
Despite all of these difficulties, Nitzsche nonetheless stresses that OCHA will continue to do all that it can to support organisations in meeting the needs of the most vulnerable people around the world.
'It has definitely been tough, and pretty existential this year,' she says. 'But even if it feels like we have taken a punch to the gut, though we might be a bit groggy, we are not knocked out yet.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Spending review could mean cuts in Wales
Some public services are likely to face cuts if the NHS swallows extra funding announced for Wales in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review, experts have is a warning that "tough choices loom", even though the budget is expected to grow over the next three said it was investing in public services by boosting the Welsh government's Plaid Cymru accused Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan of "asking for very little and getting exactly that". The Welsh government can raise taxes, but most of what it spends comes in a grant from the funding will be £22.4bn a year on average over the next three years as a result of the spending review. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), an independent think tank, said funding for the day-to-day running of public services would grow about 1.2% above inflation."While an increase overall, that will likely require tough choices and indeed real terms cuts for some services," the IFS's David Phillips said."Increases in funding for the Welsh NHS could easily absorb most, if not all, of this increase."He said Welsh Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford will "have to decide carefully which areas to prioritise and which to cut back".About half the Welsh government's budget is already spent on times for hospital treatment have risen to record highs in recent Wednesday, the chancellor announced a real-terms increase of 3% to day-to-day funding for the NHS in will result in extra funding for Welsh ministers to spend as they Guto Ifan from the Wales Governance Centre warned: "If the Welsh government decided to transfer that money to the health service in Wales, which would still be below the historical growth in health spending, it would mean difficult settlements for everything else in the budget."I would imagine that the Welsh government would have to make cuts to services outside health under this settlement." Reeves' spending review reveals how much funding will be available after next May's Senedd also announced £445m for new rail projects in Wales, following years of complaints that Wales has not had a fair share of backed plans for five new stations in Cardiff, Newport and Monmouthshire, and rail upgrades in north Minister Eluned Morgan said: "Wales will see significant extra investment in rail infrastructure, coal tips safety and Welsh communities will see real benefits that improve lives and create opportunities."Treasury minister Torsten Bell said there would be "record levels of spending happening in the Welsh government" and said previous Conservative governments "consistently let down Wales" on capital spending which pays for said the cash fell short of what Wales needed and criticised a ten-year timeline for the scheme - Labour sources said most of the cash would be spent much Cymru finance spokesperson, Heledd Fychan, said: "Public services, already teetering on the brink in Wales under Labour face further cuts as a consequence of Labour's First Minister asking for very little and getting exactly that."Welsh Conservative Senedd leader Darren Millar said the amount of rail funding was "shameful"."Today's rail spending announcement is an insult to the people of Wales," he added.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Public will pay price for police funding squeeze, say chiefs
Officer numbers will have to be cut as the public 'pay the price' for the lack of funding for policing in the spending review, police chiefs said. Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to restore neighbourhood policing is 'some way off' they said, after Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, announced that police funding would increase by £2.1 billion between 2026 and 2029 — an average real-terms increase of 1.7 per cent. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) said this would leave a shortfall of £1.2 billion and lead to forces 'cutting headcount to balance the books'. The Police Federation said the public would 'pay the price', while the Police Superintendents' Association (PSA) accused the government of a 'shameful abandonment of the police service'. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is understood to be planning to review police funding in the autumn, when she will pressure the chancellor for extra money to meet Labour's pledge to recruit 13,000 police officers. Police chiefs said that without extra funding, the money would have to be found through rises in council tax or cuts to other policing services. Gavin Stephens, the NPCC chairman, said the funding rise would 'cover little more than annual inflationary pay increases' and that progress on the prime minister's key missions, such as halving violence against women and cutting knife crime, would be slower. Sir Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said police numbers would fall, adding: 'I remain concerned that this spending review could result in insufficient funding for the Met and fewer police officers.' Starmer's promise to recruit 13,000 neighbourhood police officers was one of Labour's flagship policies in last year's general election. Paul Sanford, chairman of the NPCC's finance co-ordination committee, said: 'While we are looking at a 1.7 per cent increase, once pay is accounted for, once our non-pay pressures are accounted for, we think it will be incredibly difficult for the commitment to deliver the additional 13,000 neighbourhood police officers within this funding envelope. 'We've made some progress. We have a good 3,000 already recruited but based on this settlement, that does look a real challenge for us … Certainly we are going to be some way off unless some significant levers are going to be pulled. Any further progress towards the 13,000 without new money would only come from making savings in our budgets.' Sanford said it was impossible to predict what the neighbourhood policing shortfall would be. Labour's initial announcement said the 13,000 officers would comprise 4,000 police community service officers, 3,000 special constables, 3,000 existing officers and 3,000 new police constables. Stephens added that 'the size and shape of the police workforce will inevitably have to change'. He said: 'The amount falls far short of what is required to fund the government's ambitions and maintain our existing workforce. This is against a backdrop of increasing crime rates, with new and escalating threats from organised crime and hostile states, and more offenders being managed in the community as a result of an overstretched criminal justice system.' Sanford said the overhaul of sentencing laws, which will scrap short prison sentences and release some prisoners after they have served just a third of their sentence, would pile further pressure on police budgets. Additional investment in the Probation Service to monitor offenders would take time to phase in, he said, leaving police to deal with the consequences of more criminals on the streets. 'There isn't any additional money to deal with that. This will increase the workload of police officers.' Tiff Lynch, acting national chairwoman of the Police Federation, accused the chancellor of failing to listen to police officers or the home secretary. She said: 'This spending review should have been a turning point after 15 years of austerity that has left policing, and police officers, broken. Instead, the cuts will continue — and it's the public who will pay the price. 'As rank-and-file officers kit up for night duty this evening, they'll do so knowing exactly where they stand in the government's priorities. It is beyond insulting for cabinet ministers to call on police to 'do their bit' when officers are overworked, underpaid and under threat like never before. 'They are facing blades and bricks, managing mental health crises, while battling to protect their own, and carrying the weight of trauma and financial stress home with them every day.' Nick Smart, president of the PSA, said it was a 'shameful abandonment of the police service' and warned that the government was failing in its first duty of keeping public safe. He said: 'Today's funding announcement is a huge blow to the police service, which has once again been placed at the bottom of the government's list of priorities. It is the first duty of government to keep its citizens safe, yet today we see no evidence of a commitment to doing this. 'Many of the government's election pledges centred around a commitment to 'safer streets', promising the public that it would meet ambitious targets such as halving knife crime. Yet the lack of investment announced today means we will continue to struggle to deliver the basics, to maintain officer numbers, cover inflationary costs, cover pay awards and function as we are, let alone move forward on new public safety and transformation initiatives.'


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Government to invest £20m in Warndon community initiatives
An area of Worcester has been chosen as one of 25 parts of the country to receive up to £20m in regeneration government cash, which is spread over the next 10 years and earmarked for "community-led regeneration", was announced in Wednesday's Spending Review by the chancellor, Rachel West, in the north-east of the city, is among the areas to benefit, with local residents welcoming the news.A government spokesperson said it wanted to ensure "places that have been too easily left behind are no longer ignored." Labour MP for Worcester Tom Collins said Warndon had been "badly let down" in the past."We will work locally to make sure this money is controlled by local people and brings the type of real change that the people of Worcester deserve," he details of how the money will be used are yet to emerge, the government said it would "support improvements people can see on their doorstep, champion local leadership, foster community engagement and strengthen social cohesion".The funding would prioritise the needs of local people, Collins said, and support "projects that residents can see and feel". 'Forgotten area' The announcement went down well with local people who spoke to BBC Radio Hereford and Worcester on Wednesday. "You have children running wild, at night, on motorbikes," one man said."We need a lot more activity which we haven't got - and I think all it needs is a little bit more thinking, and more activities for the youngsters to do."He said the area had been "very let down" and there had not been enough investment."We seem to be on the bottom level," he said it was "about time" the area had more money to spend on projects - in particular for families and younger people."Families need more things to do, you do see some poor sights," he people told the BBC that they felt suggested the money could be spent on a new library and a swimming pool. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.