logo
Chorney-Booth: Calgary cocktail bars use creativity and science to blend imaginative new drinks

Chorney-Booth: Calgary cocktail bars use creativity and science to blend imaginative new drinks

Calgary Herald24-04-2025

Tomato and basil, strawberry and mushroom, orange and sesame. It sounds like a grocery list for a dinner party-worthy salad, but these are all flavour combinations going into drinks at a local cocktail bar.
Article content
Article content
There was a time, not so long ago, when a drink at a bar typically meant a draught beer, a glass of house wine, or maybe a highball. Most bartenders could whip up a classic like a Gimlet or a Manhattan on request, but it felt a little old-fashioned (or worse, pretentious) to order one. After the modern cocktail resurrection took hold in the mid-1990s and early 2000s, we began to see a new generation of bartenders (or 'mixologists' as we called them at the time) emerge at bars like Proof and the dearly departed Milk Tiger, testing their creative mettle and experimenting with ingredients and techniques to formulate new cocktails.
Article content
Article content
These days, local bartenders are pushing things even further, using techniques like infusion, custom-made bitters, fat-washes (a scientific process to impart the flavour of anything from duck fat to brown butter to a spirit), and elements of molecular gastronomy to create sippable works of art. One local bar setting the standard for these new drinks is Shelter, a cool little lounge in Victoria Park that recently released a unique cocktail menu based on the theory of active aroma compounds for some weird and wonderful flavour pairings.
Article content
Article content
Active aroma compounds are essentially molecules found in food (or beverages) that create a specific taste or smell and are often described as the 'building blocks of flavour.' When broken down, bartenders can identify which compounds work in harmony and pair ingredients with complementary flavours, even if common sense says they shouldn't go together. Shelter's menu started when head bartender Paulina Arteaga Vazquez worked for months on a carrot cocktail and eventually got it right when she realized the aroma compounds in carrot matched well with those in crème de violette liqueur.
Article content
Article content
'Paulina likes to follow cocktail trends and looks for different things to try out,' says Shelter's bar manager Ryan San Diego. 'She started explaining the science behind the active aroma compounds and how they work in cocktails. Our other bartenders all got hooked on it.'
Article content
That carrot and violette cocktail — which also includes mezcal, shiso sochu, hazelnut, and various other ingredients — set the bar for a full menu of drinks created by the entire Shelter bar team. Other showstoppers include a savoury brandy and leche de tigre (i.e. the marinade used to cure ceviche), banana and juniper, and the aforementioned strawberry and mushroom and tomato and basil cocktails. The drinks all have simple names, but are impressively complicated, and took considerable time to develop.
Article content
While Shelter is bold about touting the science behind its new cocktails, it's far from the only bar in the city using kitchen science to create premium sips. Tiffanie Hensel, the general manager at Milpa and one of Calgary's great bartenders, has also built a reputation for creating deliciously complicated cocktails. Since Milpa is primarily a restaurant, Hensel takes cues from the kitchen to develop interesting flavour profiles and encourages her bartenders to use culinary scraps as ingredients or garnishes in their cocktails.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge declares mistrial for remaining Harvey Weinstein rape charge, other conviction stands
Judge declares mistrial for remaining Harvey Weinstein rape charge, other conviction stands

CBC

time20 hours ago

  • CBC

Judge declares mistrial for remaining Harvey Weinstein rape charge, other conviction stands

Social Sharing WARNING: This story contains details about sexual assault and may affect those who have experienced​ it or know someone affected by it. The judge in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes case declared a mistrial on the remaining rape charge after the jury foreperson said he wouldn't continue deliberating. Deliberations ended Thursday, a day after the jury delivered a partial verdict in Weinstein's sex crimes retrial, convicting the ex-studio boss of one of the top charges but acquitted him of another. Both of those charges concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. The jury got stuck on a third charge involving accusations from Jessica Mann. The hairstylist and actor testified for days — as she did in 2020 — about the rape she said she endured in a Manhattan hotel room and about why she continued to see and have consensual encounters with Weinstein afterward. Mann is ready to go to trial a third time, said Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg after the judge ended deliberations. No new trial date has yet been set. Alleged bullying among jury The foreperson complained Wednesday that he felt bullied by another juror and said Thursday he wouldn't go back into the jury room. "No. I'm sorry," he said when asked. The jury of seven women and five men had unanimously reached decisions on the other charges last Friday, the foreperson told the judge. The verdict was delivered Wednesday only because Judge Curtis Farber asked whether there was agreement on any of the charges. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the other two counts. Weinstein denies all the charges. WATCH | Weinstein convicted on one of the charges, acquitted of another in sex crime retrial: Jury finds Harvey Weinstein guilty on one charge in sex crime trial 20 hours ago Duration 1:41 Deliberations break down In an unusual exchange with the judge during some legal arguments before the partial verdict was disclosed Wednesday, Weinstein insisted it was unfair to continue the trial after two jurors came forward with concerns about the proceedings. "I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this," said Weinstein, 73, saying the judge was "endangering" him. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view Friday, when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. He raised concerns again Wednesday. In a closed-door discussion with prosecutors, defence lawyers and the judge, the foreperson said another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and at one point vowed, "You going to see me outside." "I feel afraid inside there," the foreperson told the judge and attorneys, according to a transcript. WATCH | Appeals court overturns Harvey Weinstein's 2020 rape conviction: Harvey Weinstein's 2020 rape conviction overturned by N.Y. appeals court 1 year ago Duration 2:00 2020 conviction overturned Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. His defence portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimized to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted — twice, now — of sexually assaulting, said outside court Wednesday that the new verdict "gives me hope." Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it "a big win for everyone," even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Haley, Mann and Sokola did so. Weinstein also was convicted of raping another woman in California. He's appealing that conviction. WATCH | How the prosecution took a gamble in 2020 Weinstein trial and what went wrong: Why Harvey Weinstein's rape conviction was overturned | About That 1 year ago Duration 8:49 New York's highest court has overturned Harvey Weinstein's 2020 conviction for sexual assault and rape, a landmark ruling of the #MeToo movement. Andrew Chang explains how the prosecution knew it was taking a gamble, and where that gamble went wrong.

Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson won't deliberate
Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson won't deliberate

CTV News

time21 hours ago

  • CTV News

Weinstein case judge declares mistrial on remaining rape charge as jury foreperson won't deliberate

Harvey Weinstein jokes with press photographers in Manhattan criminal court as the jury in his retrial deliberates, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in New York. Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP) NEW YORK — The judge in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes case declared a mistrial on the remaining rape charge after the jury foreperson said he wouldn't continue deliberating. Deliberations were ended Thursday, a day after the jury delivered a partial verdict in Weinstein's sex crimes retrial, convicting the ex-studio boss of one of the top charges but acquitted him of another. Both of those charges concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. The jury got stuck on a third charge involving accusations from Jessica Mann. The hairstylist and actor testified for days — as she did in 2020 — about the rape she said she endured in a Manhattan hotel room and about why she continued to see and have consensual encounters with Weinstein afterward. Mann is ready to go to trial a third time, said Manhattan prosecutor Nicole Blumberg after the judge ended deliberations. No new trial date has yet been set. The foreperson complained Wednesday that he felt bullied by another juror and said Thursday he wouldn't go back into the jury room. 'No. I'm sorry,' he said when asked. The jury of seven women and five men had unanimously reached decisions on the other charges last Friday, the foreperson told the judge. The verdict was delivered Wednesday only because Judge Curtis Farber asked whether there was agreement on any of the charges. The third charge was over a rape accusation involving a woman who also said she had a consensual relationship with the Oscar-winning producer. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the other two counts. Weinstein denies all the charges. In an unusual exchange with the judge during some legal arguments before the partial verdict was disclosed Wednesday, he insisted it was unfair to continue the trial after two jurors came forward with concerns about the proceedings. 'I can't be judged by a situation that's going on like this,' said Weinstein, 73, saying the judge was 'endangering' him. Jury-room strains started leaking into public view Friday, when a juror asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. Then Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again Wednesday. In a closed-door discussion with prosecutors, defense lawyers and the judge, the foreperson said another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and at one point vowed, 'You going to see me outside.' 'I feel afraid inside there,' the foreperson told the judge and attorneys, according to a transcript. Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement against sexual misconduct. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. His defense portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him to court opportunity, then later said they were victimized to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted — twice, now — of sexually assaulting, said outside court Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope.' Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered. Weinstein also was convicted of raping another woman in California. He's appealing that conviction. The Associated Press generally does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted, unless they agree to be identified. Haley, Mann and Sokola did so. Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press

Weinstein jury pores over accuser's emails during deliberations
Weinstein jury pores over accuser's emails during deliberations

CTV News

time3 days ago

  • CTV News

Weinstein jury pores over accuser's emails during deliberations

Harvey Weinstein appears in state court in Manhattan for his retrial on Tuesday, June 10, 2025 in New York. (Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP) Warning: This story contains graphic details. NEW YORK — Jurors in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial appeared to be focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretched into a fourth day Tuesday, with no further sign of interpersonal tensions that flared earlier. The jury had requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein. Jurors deliberated through the morning without sending any further requests. During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein's lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she 'compartmentalized' the pain he caused her. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he's accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola. Weinstein didn't testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers. Weinstein was one of the movie industry's most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges. The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times. One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Then on Monday, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were 'pushing' others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein's past and going beyond the charges. The foreperson didn't specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017. Yet another juror soon asked to speak to the court, where she opined that things were 'going well.' By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was 'making good progress.' There was progress Tuesday on at least one front: Jurors ultimately were given coffee, as requested, Judge Curtis Farber said. He hadn't initially thought the state court system could provide it. Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola's allegation was added last year, after New York state's highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial. Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named. Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press Resources for sexual assault survivors in Canada If you or someone you know is struggling with sexual assault or trauma, the following resources are available to support people in crisis:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store