
Why the US faces legal battles over Ten Commandments display in schools
A 6-foot-tall privately funded Ten Commandments monument is seen on the Arkansas Capitol grounds, in Little Rock. (AP File Photo)
A wave of legal challenges is emerging across the US over laws that mandate the display of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms. At the center of these disputes is a growing tension between religious symbolism and constitutional protections of religious freedom.
Most recently, a group of seven families in the state of Arkansas has filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that a new law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in all public school classrooms infringes on their constitutional rights. As reported by the Associated Press, the law is set to take effect in August and was signed earlier this year by Republican Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
Families say law promotes religious coercion
The families, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom from Religion Foundation, argue that the law violates the First Amendment.
Their complaint states that forcing religious texts into public education "unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture," as quoted by the Associated Press.
The lawsuit specifically challenges the permanent and prominent placement of the Ten Commandments in classrooms and libraries, which the plaintiffs say creates an environment of religious coercion.
The families involved in the case include those who identify as Jewish, Unitarian Universalist, or nonreligious. They plan to request a preliminary injunction to prevent the law from being enforced when schools reopen.
Legal precedent and national implications
According to attorneys for the plaintiffs, the Arkansas law defies long-standing US Supreme Court rulings on the separation of church and state. They argue it contradicts established precedent that prohibits government-endorsed religious displays in public education.
Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said the law would "create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment" and "infringe on our rights as parents," as reported by the Associated Press.
Though Arkansas is currently under legal scrutiny, it is not alone. Louisiana passed a similar law, but its enforcement was blocked by a federal judge before it was set to take effect. As noted by the Associated Press, no school in Louisiana has posted the Ten Commandments yet, as litigation is ongoing.
Texas is also expected to adopt a comparable law, with the governor expressing support.
Officials respond cautiously amid legal review
The lawsuit names four school districts—Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs, and Springdale—as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools told the Associated Press the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts have not responded. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office is reviewing the lawsuit and considering its legal options, according to the Associated Press.
As debates over religious freedom and public education escalate, the outcome of these cases could shape how religion is treated in classrooms across the US.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
Covert Drone Base, Smuggled Weapons: Inside Mossad's Secret Ops In Iran Before Israeli Strikes
Last Updated: The Israeli agency reportedly smuggled precision weapons into central Iran and hid them near key defence systems Israeli security officials on Friday said that the Mossad spy agency smuggled weapons and set up a covert drone base inside Iran ahead of Friday's powerful airstrikes on key military and nuclear sites. The strikes, part of what Israel has called Operation Rising Lion, have dealt a serious blow to Iran's military leadership. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to the Associated Press, said that Mossad successfully smuggled precision weapons into central Iran and hid them near key defence systems. These included surface-to-air missile batteries. The weapons were activated just as the Israeli strikes began, helping disable Iran's defences from within. In addition, the Israeli agency reportedly established a hidden base within Iran to launch explosive-laden drones. During Friday's assault, these drones were used to hit missile launchers near Tehran, according tot the officials. Friday's strikes killed several of Iran's top military and security figures. Among them were Major General Hossein Salami, the commander of the elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and Major General Mohammad Bagheri, the chief of staff of Iran's armed forces. Also killed was Ali Shamkhani, a senior adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and a key diplomatic figure. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed that one of the main targets was Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, calling it as the 'heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme." Iran later confirmed the site had suffered damage. This attack marks one of the most serious escalations in West Asia in recent years, with analysts calling it a significant blow to Tehran's defence structure. Iran responded by launching around 100 drones toward Israel in retaliation, according to the Israeli military, which said it was working to intercept them. Location : Israel First Published: June 13, 2025, 16:10 IST


India.com
32 minutes ago
- India.com
Iran-Israel war: How powerful are Shahed-136 drones that Iran has fired towards Israel? they are capable of..., target is...
Shahed 136 (File) Iran-Israel war: Iran has launched more than 100 Shahed-136 drones towards Israel in retaliation to the latter's airstrikes on Iranian cities, including capital Tehran on Sunday. According to media reports, the Jordanian Air Force is trying to intercept the Iranian drones and missiles in its airspace before they reach Israel. Iran is known for its drone capabilities, and the Shahed drones are among the deadliest in its drone arsenal. Let us find out how powerful these Iranian military drones are. How powerful is Iran's Shahed-136 drone? The HESA Shahed 136 is a loitering munition system (LMS) designed and developed by Iran to serve as a low-cost kamikaze or suicide drone, used to take out strategic enemy targets such as bunkers and air defense systems. The Shahed 136 has been extensively used by Russian forces during the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, and is also known by its Russian designation Geran-2. Introduced in 2020, the Shahed 136 is a single-use kamikaze drone that explodes after diving into its target, causing extensive damage. It has a range of up to 2500 kilometers, which means it can easily reach deep inside Israel, which is located around 1800 kms away from Iran. The Shahed 136 can reach speeds of up to 200 kmph, but lacks stealth and can be easily detected by radars due to its relatively slow speed. However, these drones are often launched in swarms to overwhelm enemy air defenses, making them difficult to intercept. The Iranian LMS drone has a payload capacity of 40-50 kg, packing enough firepower to damage small military bases, buildings, or target soldiers, but not enough to affect larger, hardened structures like nuclear plants. The Shahed 136 is a propeller-driven drone, which flies at a low altitude of 3000-4000 meters to avoid detection by radars, and can cause damage within a 50-100 meters. When will Shahed 136 reach Israel? The aerial distance between Iran and Israel is about 1600-1800 kilometers, which means the Shahed 136 will take around 8-10 hours to reach its targets inside Jewish nation, depending upon factors like wind speed, and direction. The Iranian drone swarm has currently been spotted flying over Iraq and Jordan, indicating they have already traveled for 2-3 hours, and may reach Israel within the next 3-5 hours if not intercepted. The Associated Press (AP), quoting the (Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), said the Jordanian Air Force has intercepted and destroyed dozens of Shahed 136 drones and Iranian missiles over its airspace, while the Israeli Air Force (IAF) is trying to intercept them outside Israel's borders using F-35 fighter jets and Patriot missile defense systems. Iran-Israel war On early Sunday morning, Israel launched its fiercest attack on Iran, unleashing a wave of air strikes on Iranian cities, including capital Tehran, in which several top Iranian nuclear scientists and military commanders, including IRGC chief Hossein Salami, commander Ghulam-Ali Rashid, nuclear scientist Dr. Mohammad Tehranchi, nuclear scientist Dr. Fereydoon Abbasi and Iran's Armed Forces Chief of Staff Major General Mohammad Bagheri. Following the attack, Tehran has vowed vengeance, stating that its response will be anything beyond what Israel and ally, the United States, could ever imagine, triggering the fears of a full-scale Iran-Israel war.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Trump's America is driving away the brightest minds in the world
In a recent call, I spoke with a student from Mumbai who had just been denied a US student visa — despite an Ivy League admit, full funding, and a spotless academic record. The reason? 'Potential immigration intent.' No explanation. No second chance. Unfortunately, this isn't an isolated case — it's the new normal. As someone who has spent nearly two decades helping students around the world access top-tier education , I'm witnessing a dangerous shift: America, once the epicenter of academic opportunity, is now sending a different message - you're not welcome here. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Kulkas yang belum Terjual dengan Harga Termurah (Lihat harga) Cari Sekarang Undo Columbia & Harvard : The campus crackdown (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Late 2024 saw student-led protests erupt at Columbia University , calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and institutional divestment from Israeli-linked companies. These demonstrations sparked national outrage particularly among conservative lawmakers and pro-Israel groups who accused the university of allowing 'anti-Semitic hate speech' to flourish. Live Events In early 2025, the Trump administration responded with a formal investigation, citing potential Title VI violations for failing to protect Jewish students. Education Secretary Linda McMahon even threatened to strip Columbia of its federal funding and accreditation: a move seen by many legal experts as political overreach aimed at silencing campus dissent. Harvard didn't fare any better. After student groups released a statement criticizing Israeli policy, the university found itself under federal scrutiny. Trump officials questioned not just free speech on campus, but also Harvard's DEI programs and alleged 'left-wing indoctrination.' Civil rights lawsuits are being considered. Anti-terrorism statutes are being explored. The message is clear: campuses are being punished not for lawbreaking, but for ideological divergence. Visas: A bureaucratic wall Meanwhile, outside these campuses, international students are struggling just to get in. According to the 2025 INTO Global Survey, 28% of South Asian students, including many from India, cited visa processing delays as their top challenge. In major cities like New Delhi and Mumbai, wait times stretch 180 to 300 days, causing students to miss orientations, housing deadlines, and even entire semesters. Despite advocacy from leading bodies like NAFSA and the American Council on Education, the US government has yet to reinstate the COVID-era interview waiver program. Consular staffing remains unchanged, even as Indian students now make up the second-largest international student population in the U.S. (over 270,000 in 2024). Add to this the alarming rise in F-1 visa rejection rates — 36% globally in 2023 — with disproportionately higher rejections in India, Nigeria, and the Middle East. Many denials are issued to students with admits from top-ranked universities, often under vague justifications like 'intent to immigrate.' This isn't due diligence. It's systemic gatekeeping. From your feed to your future In April 2025, the Trump administration added another layer of scrutiny: mandatory social media vetting for all F, M, and J visa applicants. Consular officers are now directed to examine five years of social media activity. Applicants have been penalized for: Sharing anti-war posts. Supporting campus protests. Liking or following pages critical of US foreign policy. There's no transparent rubric for these decisions. Legal experts warn this practice threatens free expression, especially when students are held accountable for content that would be constitutionally protected for American citizens. Revocations without recourse Perhaps most alarming is the surge in SEVIS deactivations and visa revocations. In early 2025 alone, over 1,300 international students — largely from China and the Middle East — had their valid US visas retroactively cancelled, often due to alleged links to institutions tied to the Chinese government. No appeal process. No compensation. Just abrupt exits and lost semesters. Indian students aren't yet targeted, but the anxiety is palpable. In an increasingly unstable geopolitical climate, one controversial post or political affiliation could be enough to unravel years of academic planning. What's at stake Top faculty at MIT have raised the alarm: 'We're training the best minds in the world only to lose them to other nations because they feel unwelcome or unsafe here.' They're right. Students are already choosing Canada, Australia, and Europe — countries rolling out fast-track visas, transparent policies, and public commitments to international education. America's loss is their gain. Universities are fighting back. Institutions are launching legal aid clinics, financial support for disrupted students, and workshops on rights and documentation. Advocacy groups are lobbying hard for transparency and reform. But time is running out. The US must decide whether it wants to remain the beacon of global education — or watch that light dim, student by student, dream by dream.