Gunman fatally shot at Michigan church had attended services in past year
The man who opened fire outside a Michigan church filled with worshippers before he was struck by a vehicle and then fatally shot by security staff had attended services there a couple of times in the last year and his mother is a member, police said.
The gunman, identified as Brian Anthony Browning, 31, did not have any previous contacts with local police or a criminal history, but may have been suffering a mental health crisis, the Wayne police department said in a news release.
Churchgoers attending a Sunday morning service at CrossPointe Community church in Wayne spotted the gunman driving recklessly and then saw him exit his car wearing a tactical vest and carrying a rifle and a handgun, the police chief, Ryan Strong, said at an evening news conference.
The man began firing as he approached the church, striking one person in the leg. A parishioner driving a pickup truck hit the man and the church security team locked the front doors and exchanged gunfire with the man, police said. At least two staff members shot him, Strong said. About 150 people were inside the church at the time.
'We are grateful for the heroic actions of the church's staff members, who undoubtedly saved many lives and prevented a large-scale mass shooting,' the chief said.
The shooting occurred in Wayne, a city of about 17,000 people located about 25 miles (40km) west of Detroit. One member of the security team was shot in the leg and was listed in stable condition at a hospital after undergoing surgery, the news release said. No one else was hurt.
Police executing a search warrant at Browning's home in Romulus, about 5 miles south of Wayne, found additional rifles, several more handguns and a large amount of ammunition, the news release said.
Browning's mother did not respond to a Facebook message sent on Sunday by the Associated Press.
Worshipper Wendy Bodin said she heard a loud 'boom' and when she looked outside, she saw a man sprawled out on the grass in front of the church. 'I thought he got hit or crashed his car or was hurt,' Bodin told WXYZ-TV. 'And another lady saw and pointed to me and said, 'Oh my, call 911!''
The deputy chief of Wayne police, Finley Carter III, said hours later that it was too early to know a motive. The FBI deputy director, Dan Bongino, said on X that bureau 'leadership and support teams' were at the church and helping with the investigation.
Messages left by the AP on Sunday on voicemail and a Facebook page for the church were not immediately returned.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Uber and Lyft fighting against laws to make rideshare services safer in multiple states, according to reports
Uber and Lyft are spending thousands of dollars a month to fight lawmakers over legislation that could make their services safer, a new report states. The companies, which dominate the U.S. rideshare market, have a history of mounting lobbying campaigns to either override or preempt safety and worker protection bills at all levels of government. The companies deploy a range of tactics: threats to exit markets if bills are passed, issuing a blizzard of public messaging, or directly pressuring lawmakers. In Rhode Island, Uber has spent $50,000 this year on lobbyists, according to Stateline 's analysis of the state's lobbying database. Lyft has been splurging around $5,000 a month on its lobbying efforts in Rhode Island, according to the report. Both rideshare giants are pushing back against legislation that would require fingerprinting as part of a criminal background check of drivers in the state. Lyft's public policy manager, Brendan Joyce, stated that the requirement relies on data from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information System, which he testified in April is 'incomplete' and noted that checks 'disproportionately impact and have potential discriminatory effects on communities of color.' Colorado legislators introduced a bill earlier this year aimed at increasing safety regulations and enhancing background checks for Transportation Network Companies. The bill, which passed both chambers of the Colorado General Assembly, was spearheaded by State Representative Jenny Willford, who alleged she was sexually assaulted by a man posing as a rideshare driver in February last year. Prosecutors charged suspect Mukhammadali Mukadyrov with unlawful sexual contact last month. In response, Uber devised the 'Save Rides – Urge a Veto' campaign, which displayed a stark message to users when they opened their app. Last month, the company requested that Colorado Governor Jared Polis block the bill, arguing that it features poorly thought-out provisions that would be costly for the company. An Uber spokesperson stated it was 'developed behind closed doors and driven by the financial interests of billboard attorneys, not the needs of Coloradans.' Uber threatened to withdraw its services from the state if the bill were to become law. Lyft also wrote to the governor, claiming that the legislation could harm operations. Following the threats to leave, Polis vetoed the bill in late May, stating that it 'would impose unworkable regulations on (rideshare companies) and potentially jeopardize the continued operation in Colorado.' In Oregon, both Uber and Lyft formally opposed a bill that would give drivers more rights, better pay, and stronger job protections. The companies pushed back against the bill, which passed the state Senate earlier this month, claiming it would increase the price of rides and make the job more rigid. Uber's Public Policy Manager Zahid Arab testified that the bill contained 'unclear and unreasonable requirements that could undermine safety.' In 2024, both Uber and Lyft threatened to leave Minneapolis over a proposed law that would require the companies to pay drivers more when operating within the city limits. A compromise was ultimately reached, and both continue to operate throughout Minnesota.
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bride shot dead on wedding night in France
A bride has been shot dead by a masked assailant at her wedding in a village in south-east France. One of the attackers also died and three other people, including a 13-year-old child, were injured in the attack, which happened in the village of Goult, Luberon. The identity of the suspects is unknown, but police believe the incident may be drug-related. At about 4.30am on Sunday, the bride, 27, and the 25-year-old groom were leaving the wedding party when they were confronted by four masked assailants who opened fire. Initial reports suggested one of the attackers had been run over by the couple's car as the groom tried to escape, but Florence Galtier, the Avignon prosecutor, referred to the suspect as having been shot 'in the exchange'. About 28 people were present at the gathering during the attack, police said. One woman, thought to be the groom's sister, was lightly injured. According to the prosecutor, the attackers arrived by car and carried several weapons, but fled on foot. The groom, said to be from Cavaillon, is well known to the police, with 26 entries in the criminal records database, according to a police source cited by Le Figaro. The bride, from Apt, Provence, was not known to the authorities. 'I'm ruling nothing out' An investigation into a murder by an organised gang has been opened by police, and several police cars blocked access to the scene on Sunday morning. Didier Perello, the Goult mayor, said: 'I'm angry. I'm outraged.' Mr Perello did not rule out possible score-settling, saying: 'I'm ruling nothing out. Absolutely nothing. 'We're close to towns, I won't name them, where unfortunately, we've already seen this kind of thing before.' According to the mayor, the village hall had been booked by the couple in March. 'The hall had been rented for a wedding by people who don't live in the commune,' he added. Restaurant owner Guillaume Molinas, 50, told AFP he feared that the tragedy would 'give the village a bad name', adding: 'The last major incident in the village was 125 years ago.' The French government has recently vowed to ramp up the fight against drug-related crime. Another shooting took place at about 6am on Sunday in the city of Avignon, in the same Vaucluse region. A man was shot dead in the Cap Sud shopping centre area, while a second person was injured and is in a serious condition.
Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Walmart and Target threaten shoppers with $2,500 fines
Consumers could be hit with fines of up to $2,500 for taking a shopping cart off the property at major retailers like Target and Walmart. Roughly two million carts vanish from stores each year — costing companies an estimated $175 million annually to replace Several states throughout the US have proposed and passed bills with the hopes of solving this problem, as well as coming up with ways to keep carts from leaving the premises. The issue isn't new, but it's getting more attention as retailers escalate their fight against rising shoplifting and in-store losses. Fighting to survive its second bankruptcy, Rite Aid began rolling out locked display cases nationwide after the pandemic. Shoppers have also looked for tricks on how to open cases themselves. Other measures implemented by retailers for theft protection include hidden barcodes on products, and advanced technology like Walmart's robotic parking lot security guard. One of the biggest changes retailers are making to prevent thefts is axing self-checkouts. Dollar Tree removed machines from 12,000 stores, and found themselves experiencing an 8 percent sales boost. With retailers doing everything they can to prevent shoplifting, these are some of the states that don't tolerate shopping cart disappearances. Arizona Arizona residents are at risk of civil lawsuits if they steal a shopping cart from a retailer. Each thief could receive a fine of up to $250, depending on the cart's worth, and first-time offenders could also face criminal charges. Shoppers who are charged with theft may also be required to pay an additional fee of up to $500. It's unclear how often Arizona residents steal shopping carts, but the city of Phoenix is on the verge of requiring retailers to install locking wheels or GPS devices on them as a way to lower the chances of them going missing. California Select California stores have been enforced to impose prevention plans to decrease the chance of cart thefts Shoppers in California who steal a cart 'with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive the owner or retailer of possession ' will charged with a misdemeanor. Fines for this charge can be up to $1,000, and some thieves could even be sentenced to six months in jail. Shopping cart theft is growing in the Golden State, and San Jose even began enforcing a rule last month requiring large retailers with over 76 carts to invest in prevention plans. San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan revealed these plans include locks, deposit systems, and retrieval services that can all serve as 'better security' in parking lots. Florida Customers in Florida can be charged with a misdemeanor and receive a $100 civil fine if they steal a shopping cart from a retailer's parking lot. However, the price could grow depending on how long the individual has the cart in their possession. This law is also enforced on residents looking to steal a retailer's laundry carts, or altering or obliterating any identifying marks or serial numbers. Thieves who receive severe penalties for the offenses could expect a fine of up to $1,000 or more and a possible year-long jail sentence. Hawaii Shoppers in Hawaii who swipe a store's carts and abandon them in public places could receive up to a $500 fine and 30 days in jail. Honolulu got the ball rolling on passing the bill to make cart stealing illegal in 2023 after approximately 4,823 of them were stolen the year before. 'This is clearly intended for the homeless and I'm surprised the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) isn't here,' public testifier Natalie Iwasa said in a 2023 meeting via Island News. Illinois Illinois offers the highest shopping cart steeling fine at $2,500 Thieves who are caught stealing shopping carts could receive a fine of up to $2,500 depending on the price of the cart and prior criminal records. However, if the theft were to occur in Chicago, shoppers would typically only face a $200 fine. If the stealer were to be charged with a misdemeanor over the theft in Illinois, they could also be sentenced to one year in jail. Nevada Shopping cart thefts in Nevada are classified as misdemeanors, as the items typically cost less than $1,200. This action is considered to be petty larceny, which can result in a $1,000 fine or up to six months in jail. The costs would be applied to each cart that's stolen by the shopper. New York Shoppers in New York could receive a $100 civil fine if they snag a store's shopping cart without consent. Depending on how extensive the theft is, the culprits could be charged with a misdemeanor. If that is the case, the thieves could receive a fine of up to $1,000 per cart and up to a year in jail. The cost of the stolen property is a prime factor in how much money or jail time the stealer could potentially receive. Texas If cart stealers were to be charged with a Class B misdemeanor, they may be required to pay up to a $2,000 fine Any shopping cart theft is considered to be a Class C misdemeanor, meaning the fine won't be too severe. The shoppers who commit this crime will usually be fined up to $500. However, if the thief were to have other offenses on their record, it could raise the penalty from Class C to Class B. This change would hike the fine up to $2,000 at most, a 180 day jail sentence, or both. Washington Many cities in Washington state impose a $50 fine to anyone who removes a shopping cart without store permission. A few places can also charge an additional $50 on impound fees. In some cases, thieves could be charged with a misdemeanor, and potentially spend up to 90 days in jail and pay a $1,000 fine at most.
