Trump in bid to ease fears of Chinese students
Trump in bid to ease fears of Chinese students
Donald Trump says he just wants to 'check out' individual Chinese students at institutions such as Harvard University. File photo: Reuters
US President Donald Trumps has said he wanted to assure Chinese international students in the country that they would be fine amid his administration's crackdown on academia.
Trump's administration said this week it would specifically target permissions for Chinese students in its latest broadside against US higher education.
But when asked late on Friday what message he would send to Chinese college students in the country, Trump insisted: "They're going to be ok. It's going to work out fine."
"We just want to check out the individual students we have. And that's true with all colleges," he said.
The softer tone comes after a judge on Thursday extended a temporary block on Trump's bid to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio vowed on Wednesday to "aggressively" revoke visas to students from China.
Rubio has already yanked thousands of visas, largely over students' involvement in activism critical of Israel's offensive in Gaza,but also over minor traffic violations and other infractions.
The Trump administration has been in an ongoing showdown with academia, and Harvard in particular, demanding it provide a list of students that the government is interested in, something the prestigious university has declined to do.
"I don't know why Harvard's not giving us the list. There's something going on because Harvard is not giving us a list," Trump said on Friday.
"They ought to give us a list and get themselves out of trouble," he insisted, suggesting that "they don't want to give the list because they have names on there that supposedly are quite bad."
International students on average make up just under six percent of the US university population – far below Britain, the second top destination for international students, where the figure is 25 percent.(AFP)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
an hour ago
- Asia Times
Mismanaged early voting stirs voter distrust in S Korea election
Early voting for South Korea's 2025 presidential election took place on May 29 and 30 but, as in previous years, it was marred by troubling irregularities and signs of mismanagement. In past presidential and general elections, the National Election Commission (NEC) dismissed concerns as 'simple mistakes' or 'minor mistakes.' This time, however, public awareness and scrutiny were far greater. Korean citizens actively monitored polling stations and mainstream media outlets reported on the irregularities, backed by clear evidence of procedural misconduct. Over two days of early voting, a pattern of serious breaches emerged in polling sites across multiple regions, raising alarms about the credibility of the electoral process. In Sinchon-dong, Seoul, 30 to 40 ballots were removed from the polling station – an act strictly prohibited under NEC guidelines. In Gimpo and Bucheon, Gyeonggi Province, ballot boxes intended for the presidential election were found to contain ballots from the 22nd general election in 2024. In Gangnam, Seoul, a poll worker was arrested after using a spouse's ID to vote illegally. In Yongin, ballots pre-marked in favor of Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung were discovered inside return envelopes designated for out-of-district voters. This prompted a police investigation. At another polling station, due to overcrowding, unmarked ballots were distributed to voters waiting outside. Some reportedly left the area – ballot in hand – to visit nearby restaurants before returning to vote, also in violation of NEC procedural rules. Growing suspicion of foreign influence has added further complexity. Former Chinese nationals who had acquired South Korean citizenship shared images and posts about their participation in early voting on Chinese social media platforms. This fueled public anxiety about possible Chinese interference in the presidential election. Concerns over the integrity of South Korea's election have drawn international attention. US conservative commentator Gordon G. Chang – known for his hawkish stance on China and publicly praised by President Trump (Trump said to Chang at the 2023 Conservative Political Action Committee gathering, 'I agree with almost everything you said, almost everything') – spoke out Thursday against the NEC's handling of early voting, saying, 'Fraud is widespread in the South Korean election.' Indeed, as far back as January 7 this year, Chang was spreading to his followers on X the slogan 'Stop the Steal in South Korea!' The National Election Integrity Association (NEIA), a US-based organization, sent a delegation to South Korea to observe the process. On May 30, the group released a public statement citing numerous violations in the early voting system. Among the NEIA observers is Morse Tan, former US ambassador-at-large for global criminal justice, appointed in the first Trump administration. Other members of the group are retired US Marine Corps Colonels John R. Mills (a former Pentagon cybersecurity expert) and Grant Newsham (whose articles frequently appear in Asia Times) and scholar Bradley Thayer. Faced with evidence, the NEC issued a rare apology. On May 29, the commission acknowledged problems in the early voting process. As further incidents were exposed, a second apology followed. On May 31, NEC Chairperson Rho Tae-ak stated, 'I sincerely apologize for causing confusion among the voters. We will manage more thoroughly in the upcoming election-day voting to ensure voters can cast their ballots with confidence.' Still, public skepticism remains – especially since every known error has so far favored the same candidate, Lee Jae-myung. Calls for reform are intensifying. Some South Koreans argue that early voting should be abolished altogether, citing the frequency and severity of past controversies. Others propose narrowing the four-day time gap between early voting and official election day to allow for better oversight and reduce opportunities for manipulation. A more forward-looking solution is the adoption of blockchain-based voting systems. By timestamping every action and making records immutable, blockchain technology could offer a secure, transparent alternative. Brazil offers a real-world example. In 2020, the country implemented a cryptocurrency called Decred's blockchain through the Voto Legal platform to track campaign donations transparently. Then, in 2022, Brazil again used Decred's blockchain – this time to record the official campaign platforms of major candidates. The aim was to verify the authenticity of policy proposals and fight disinformation. The 2025 South Korean presidential early voting has exposed systemic vulnerabilities that can no longer be ignored. As citizens and international observers voice growing concern, the NEC's credibility continues to erode. If South Korea is to restore public trust and protect the foundation of its democracy, bold, transparent reforms – whether procedural or technological – must move from discussion to action. Hanjin Lew, a political commentator specializing in East Asian affairs, is a former international spokesman for South Korean conservative parties.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
US hostility to Chinese students prompts many parents to look elsewhere
The Trump administration's recent moves to further restrict Chinese students' access to US education are sending ripples of doubt through families in China, prompting many to reconsider their children's academic futures abroad. For some, the American dream is giving way to more pragmatic alternatives closer to home or in other Western nations, as the United States' unpredictable approach to international students makes them ponder the returns on investment in their children's overseas education. The latest wave of uncertainty crashed ashore last week when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the US would revoke visas for Chinese students with ties to the Communist Party or those studying in 'critical fields'. That followed an abrupt suspension of student visa interviews worldwide as the administration considers stricter vetting measures, including screening of potential students' social media posts. US president Donald Trump added to parents' concerns on Wednesday, when he proposed cutting the proportion of international students at Harvard University from 30 per cent to 15 per cent, claiming that American students were losing opportunities. That remark came just days after the Department of Homeland Security attempted to block Harvard from enrolling international students, a move later halted by a federal judge. On Thursday, the Trump administration said in a court filing that it would not immediately terminate Harvard's ability to host international students, giving the university 30 days to explain why it should keep that ability.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Harvard Chinese student's graduation speech strikes a chord as Trump leads crackdown
A Chinese student's graduation speech at Harvard University emphasising 'shared humanity' and calling for global unity has gone viral, days after the Trump administration pledged to ' aggressively ' revoke the visas of students from China. Advertisement Yurong 'Luanna' Jiang is the first Chinese woman selected to be the student speaker at a Harvard graduation ceremony. Her emotional speech on Thursday was delivered on the same day that a federal judge blocked a Department of Homeland Security order seeking to prevent the Ivy League university from enrolling international students. US President Donald Trump's showdown with Harvard – which the White House accuses of maintaining ties with the Chinese Communist Party – unfolds against the backdrop of deepening US-China tensions The US State Department announced last week that it would intensify screening and 'aggressively' revoke student visas for Chinese nationals, including 'those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields'. Advertisement The move is widely believed to stem from Washington's long-standing concerns that Chinese students enrolled in advanced science and engineering programmes could be involved in espionage activities that bolster Beijing's military capabilities, posing a significant national security threat.
