logo
Govt holds extensive consultations on FTAs to protect public, industry interests: Piyush Goyal

Govt holds extensive consultations on FTAs to protect public, industry interests: Piyush Goyal

Time of India18 hours ago

Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
New Delhi: Commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal Monday said the government holds extensive stakeholder consultations on the free trade agreements (FTAs) and is pursuing these pacts while keeping in mind the interests of the domestic industry.He said that India is keeping in mind both the offensive and defensive interests of industry while negotiating these agreements.'We do all our FTAs after holding extensive stakeholder consultations and meetings. We address their (industries) concerns and needs,' he said while commemorating the third anniversary of the opening of Vanijya Bhawan India has concluded multiple FTAs in the last three years, and negotiations for more than seven trade pacts currently under progress.'Going forward also, we will do FTAs which will keep in mind national and public interests,' he added.Stressing the importance of Quality Control Orders , he said that India doesn't settle for anything second when it comes to quality.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Corporate India has a caste problem. And it is time to talk about it
Corporate India has a caste problem. And it is time to talk about it

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Corporate India has a caste problem. And it is time to talk about it

On June 23, the Indian aviation industry was again in the news, however, for all the wrong reasons. Reports started coming in of an IndiGo pilot trainee alleging caste based discrimination by his bosses. An FIR has been filed, and a police investigation is underway. Meanwhile, IndiGo has strongly refuted such claims, saying it stands for 'zero-tolerance policy towards any form of discrimination'. The investigation will take its own course, but it opens the avenue to talk about a much larger issue: Corporate India's caste problem. Post the 1990s, when the private sector started to expand immensely owing to policy changes, it was primarily the Savarna entrepreneurs who benefited greatly. Among them, the rise of Bania capital within India Inc has been mapped extensively. However, this has been perceived as an organic development, born out of inherent merit, developed in some sort of 'casteless vacuum'. However, the material realities of labour and capital are intrinsically caste-coded. The overrepresentation of communities in some sectors of the economy is directly and (often) proportionally related to the absence of other communities in the same. Babasaheb Ambedkar had analysed caste as not just a system of division of labour, but rather a division of labourers. Within corporate India, this division and categorisation of labourers is starkly visible. In the last decade or so, even as corporate culture internationally veered towards 'Diversity, Equity, Inclusion', also known as DEI practices, India Inc has remained caste-blind. Not just within corporate structures and the industry, but even within allied ecosystems — from B-schools to market commentators, journalists, and podcasters — there has been no serious or critical conversation on caste as a key variable in business management and planning. This is very surprising because most of the real economy is based on kinship networks and 'contacts' which often overlap with political funding and are ultimately mediated through caste connections. In the absence of any meaningful discourse on these intersections, the corporate understanding of Indian market realities remains stunted, myopic and unsuited for Indian needs, as it frequently over-fixates on some socio-cultural segments while invisibilising large swathes. India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal's recent comments on the lopsided nature of startup/business priorities of corporate India also seem to suggest the same. The minister's comments stirred up a debate. Most business leaders responded with a litany of complaints against the government itself and lamented the business challenges they faced. While there is certainly a lot of validity in their collective grievance, very few actually acknowledged that there was a 'priority gap'. Fewer still tried to analyse why the 'gaze' of India Inc remains limited only to a very small range of business models, often urban-situated and catering usually to high-net-worth individuals. Even as every B-school teaches its MBAs to 'think outside the box' and all industry captains talk ad nauseum about innovation — it seems that in the last 30 years no one has realistically found a way to innovatively create value for large sections of Indian masses outside those wealthy urban enclaves (almost always populated by other wealthy Savarnas like themselves). It may well be because of the lack of diversity in their leadership, in the one-dimensional, non-diverse pedagogy (in spaces of training) that celebrates itself as ground-breaking and inventive. India Inc, despite three decades of neoliberalisation, remains a social formation that is run by Savarnas, for other Savarnas and trained by Savarnas. This total ubiquity of Savarna-ness renders corporate culture in its own shape, where the omnipresent becomes the invisible. As per David Foster Wallace's allegory about the fish swimming in water does not 'see' the water, the caste stratified codes of corporate India become invisible to Savarnas within it. But almost immediately, it manifests to folks who come from different socio-cultural realities, often in hostile and contradictory ways. So much so that for many marginalised people, to survive and move ahead in India Inc, they have to internalise and validate Savarna idioms of business success. Whether it is the casteist ad campaign run by Zomato, Narayan Murthy's work-life balance ideas or Swiggy's decision for veg-only fleets (rescinded upon backlash) — that is how you emerge with statements or decisions. And on occasion, where friction within teams emerges, inherent, embedded caste prejudices come to the fore in ways that are traumatic for caste-marginalised people but may seem totally normal or par-for-the-course to other Savarnas. It remains to be seen whether this is the case in the aforementioned IndiGo matter. Irrespective of how the matter unfolds, these types of flashpoints remain an unspoken reality for the minority caste-marginalised professionals working in top positions. In most cases, one stays silent and compliant, and internalises the bias as the structure itself is coded in the vocabulary of the dominant caste. At a time when a strong online campaign is emerging against caste-based reservation among educated, elite Savarnas, it is perhaps time for India Inc to reflect upon itself and give shape to the unfulfilled promise of diversity and consider reservations in the private sector as an innovative, bold and progressive step in bridging market reforms, nation-building mandates as well as dignity to all working professionals. The writer is Associate Dean at Woxsen University, Hyderabad. His latest book is Meet the Savarnas: Indian Millennials Whose Mediocrity Broke Everything

Asean not keen to review trade pact: Government
Asean not keen to review trade pact: Government

Time of India

time13 hours ago

  • Time of India

Asean not keen to review trade pact: Government

NEW DELHI: Commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal on Tuesday said little headway was made in the review of 15-year-old free trade agreement (FTA) with Asean, despite nine rounds of negotiations since 2022. The minister's statement came days after controversy erupted over his comments on some of the Asean countries being a B-team of China. While the assertion was not taken favourably by some of the countries. which are part of the 10-nation trading bloc, the commerce department and the ministry of external affairs are seen to be on the same page, with sources confirming that there is an attempt to stonewall the talks. In 2019, Asean agreed to the review after much pushing by India, but then did not commence negotiations for almost two years. Indian authorities argued that China worked out arrangements through companies and affiliates, which allowed it to route subsidised goods through one of the countries that make up the trading bloc. The Modi govt argued that trade deal with Asean was not negotiated properly by the UPA, resulting in the terms of trade being tilted in favour of these countries, which was visible through the rising trade deficit. Officials pointed out that in return for India opening up 71% of its tariff lines, Indonesia responded for only 41% of the products, with two-thirds of the trade liberalised in the case of Vietnam and Thailand - areas where India is seeking correction. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like BMW i4. 100% Elétrico. BMW Saiba Mais Undo Addressing an event to commemorate the third anniversary of Vanijya Bhawan, the first new office block to come up along Kartavya Path, Goyal said that India was now seeking to enter into FTAs with advanced economies that were complementary and not competing for the same market. "Instead of competition, it is a spirit of collaboration," he told reporters. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

India balances all stakeholder interests in trade deals, says Commerce Minister Goyal
India balances all stakeholder interests in trade deals, says Commerce Minister Goyal

India Gazette

time14 hours ago

  • India Gazette

India balances all stakeholder interests in trade deals, says Commerce Minister Goyal

New Delhi [India], June 23 (ANI): Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on Monday emphasized that India's approach to Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with complementary economies carefully balances both offensive and defensive interests of domestic industry, ensuring no sector is left vulnerable. Speaking to media persons at the third anniversary commemoration of Vanijya Bhawan, Goyal defended the government's trade negotiation strategy, asserting that none of India's recent FTAs have faced criticism from key domestic stakeholders including micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), manufacturers, or farmers. 'We have kept the interests of our farmers, MSMEs, industry and the nation at the forefront while negotiating with countries,' Goyal stated, adding that future FTAs will continue to factor in domestic interests of all stakeholders. India currently maintains an extensive trade agreement portfolio with 14 Free Trade Agreements and six Preferential Trade Agreements in force. The government has significantly accelerated its FTA agenda over the past three years, signing several landmark deals that have reshaped India's global trade landscape. The India-UAE Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), signed in May 2022, stands out as a major achievement with 99 percent of Indian exports gaining duty-free access to the UAE market. This was followed by the India-Australia Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) in December 2022, which has provided substantial boosts to key Indian sectors including textiles, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods. The most ambitious agreement came in March 2024 with the India-European Free Trade Association Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA), which secured a remarkable $100 billion investment commitment from EFTA countries. This deal is projected to create one million jobs across various sectors of the Indian economy. Adding to this momentum, the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, announced on May 6, 2025, is expected to be signed soon, further expanding India's access to developed markets while safeguarding domestic industry interests. The minister's comments came during the commemoration of Vanijya Bhawan's third anniversary, which he described as 'a symbol of modern, efficient, and integrated governance' and a dedicated hub for India's rapidly expanding commerce and industry ecosystem. Goyal highlighted that since Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated Vanijya Bhawan three years ago, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry has achieved several significant milestones and established new benchmarks in how India conducts business globally. The minister's emphasis on balancing offensive and defensive interests reflects India's nuanced approach to international trade negotiations. Offensive interests typically involve securing better market access for Indian exports, while defensive interests focus on protecting domestic industries from unfair competition and ensuring gradual market opening where needed. This strategy appears to have yielded positive results, with stakeholders across the spectrum - from small enterprises to large manufacturers and agricultural communities - supporting the government's recent trade initiatives. The commemorative event at Vanijya Bhawan served both as a celebration of past achievements and a reaffirmation of the ministry's commitment to driving India's trade and industrial growth while maintaining the delicate balance between global integration and domestic protection. As India continues to position itself as a major player in global trade, the government's stakeholder-inclusive approach to FTA negotiations appears to be setting a new template for emerging economies seeking to expand their international economic partnerships. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store