Poll: public want care home opt out for assisted dying
It's a big day in parliament tomorrow. Both sides of the assisted dying debate are gearing up for a crunch Commons clash when Kim Leadbeater's Bill returns for its Third Reading. One key flashpoint in its recently-completed Report Stage was when Rebecca Paul's amendment to allow hospices to opt out of providing assisted dying was voted down by Leadbeater and 278 other MPs.
Now, Mr S has got his hands on some polling which shows that Paul's position is backed by nearly two-thirds of the British public (quelle surprise). According to a Whitestone Insights poll of 2,091 adults commissioned by the Scottish Council on Human Bioethics, 64 per cent of the general public agree that 'if assisted suicide were introduced in the UK, hospices and care homes should have a legal right to opt out of participating in it', with only 14 per cent disagreeing. Polling was conducted between 4 and 5 June.
When 'don't knows' are removed, this figure jumps to 82 per cent of the public who think there should be a legal opt-out. The leader of the Catholic Church in England and Wales has already warned that dozens of hospices and care homes could be forced to close if MPs approve the Bill tomorrow. Over to the House of Commons…
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Assisted dying law faces crunch Commons vote as MPs switch sides
The outcome on Friday could see the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill either clear the House of Commons and move to the Lords, or fall completely. The relatively narrow majority of 55 from the historic yes vote in November means every vote will count on Friday. As an example, the Bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted exactly the same way as they did in November, including those who abstained. A copy of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Jonathan Brady/PA) In what will be seen as a blow to the Bill, four Labour MPs confirmed on the eve of the vote that they will switch sides to oppose the proposed new law. Labour's Paul Foster, Jonathan Hinder, Markus Campbell-Savours and Kanishka Narayan wrote to fellow MPs to voice concerns about the safety of the proposed legislation. They branded it 'drastically weakened', citing the scrapping of the High Court Judge safeguard as a key reason. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch also urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has insisted the replacement of High Court judge approval with the multidisciplinary panels is a strengthening of the legislation, incorporating wider expert knowledge to assess assisted dying applications. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater (Jonathan Brady/PA) Ahead of confirmation of the four vote-switchers, Ms Leadbeater acknowledged she expected 'some small movement in the middle' but that she did not 'anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded'. She insisted her Bill is 'the most robust piece of legislation in the world' and has argued dying people must be given choice at the end of their lives in a conversation which has seen support from high-profile figures including Dame Esther Rantzen. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Ms Leadbeater has warned it could be a decade before assisted dying legislation returns to Parliament if MPs vote to reject her Bill on Friday. A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested public support for the Bill remains high at 73% – unchanged from November. The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75% from 73% in November.
The Herald Scotland
23 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lammy to meet Iranian foreign minister as Trump steps back from military action
In a statement read by his press secretary on Thursday, Mr Trump said there was still 'a substantial chance of negotiations' and said he would make a decision on deploying US forces 'within the next two weeks'. US President Donald Trump (left) and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking to the media at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada (PA) Mr Trump had previously said he 'may' join Israeli strikes against Iran and its nuclear programme, but added: 'I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Friday's meeting with the so-called E3 countries follows Mr Lammy's visit to Washington, where he met US secretary of state Marco Rubio in the White House on Thursday evening to discuss 'how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict'. The Foreign Secretary said: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon.' Adding that a 'window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution', Mr Lammy said: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.' Earlier on Thursday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had urged the US to step back from military action, saying there was a 'real risk of escalation'. It remains unclear whether the UK would join any military action, although there has been speculation that US involvement could require using the British-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers based there are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which could be used against Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer is reported to have raised legal concerns about any British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies, which could limit the extent of any support for the US if Mr Trump decides to act militarily. Meanwhile, two Labour backbenchers pushed for a 'fresh, tough approach' to Tehran. Jon Pearce and Mike Tapp, chairman and vice-chairman respectively of Labour Friends of Israel, said the UK urgently needed 'a multifaceted diplomatic, economic and national security plan to guard against the Iranian threat and force the regime to change course'. Writing in The Daily Telegraph, the pair called for tighter sanctions on Iran, the proscription of the country's Revolutionary Guard Corps and a 'comprehensive diplomatic solution' that 'eliminates once and for all' Iran's nuclear threat.
Daily Mirror
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump delays decision on Iran strikes as Keir Starmer calls for peace
Donald Trump said he was still hopeful of reaching a negotiated solution with Tehran as hostilities between Israel and Iran persist and Sir Keir Starmer calls for moderation in Middle Eastern affairs Donald Trump is holding off on deciding whether to engage in Israeli-led strikes on Iran, as Sir Keir Starmer calls for moderation in Middle Eastern affairs. The US president remains optimistic about a diplomatic resolution with Tehran and has promised to make a definitive military decision within the forthcoming fortnight, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt disclosed to the press on Thursday. Leavitt relayed the president's words: "Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision on whether or not to go within the next two weeks." Previously on Wednesday, Trump mentioned the possibility that he "may" participate in Israeli offensives targeting Iran's nuclear capacities, but also indicated: "I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do. On the same day, the UK Prime Minister had implored Trump to reconsider any military involvement, warning of a "real risk of escalation". Sir Keir acknowledged multiple dialogue sessions with the American counterparts and encouraged such diplomatic engagements as a method to resolve tensions. Foreign Secretary David Lammy delivered Britain's message advocating for diminished hostility to Washington, where a meeting was expected with Trump's senior foreign policy advisor Marco Rubio on Thursday evening. In the background of these discussions lies the burgeoning conjecture that any US offensive might leverage the British-managed Diego Garcia facility in the Chagos Islands. The B-2 stealth bombers stationed there are equipped with advanced "bunker buster" bombs, which could target Iran's subterranean nuclear site at Fordo. Attorney General Lord Hermer has reportedly voiced legal worries about UK involvement in the conflict beyond defending allies, potentially restricting support for the US if Trump opts for military action. Sir Keir Starmer has refrained from discussing Lord Hermer's counsel but emphasised that "de-escalation" is the key objective The UK's participation in any US-led military strike remains uncertain. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch expressed conditional backing for the US using Diego Garcia against Iran, while shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel indicated party support for UK engagement if necessary. Liberal Democrat chief Sir Ed Davey has urged the Government to disclose Lord Hermer's advice, warning against the UK being pulled into another unlawful Middle Eastern conflict by the US. In the meantime, hostilities between Israel and Iran persist, with Israel's defence minister issuing a stark warning to Iran's supreme leader following an assault that damaged a significant hospital in Tel Aviv. Israel Katz warned Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that he "should not continue to exist" if the Israeli military is to "achieve all of its goals". Israel has continued its offensive manoeuvres against Iran, targeting the latter's Arak heavy water nuclear reactor. While Tehran maintains the peaceful nature of its nuclear ambitions, it's notable that it stands alone as the only non-nuclear-armed state actively enriching uranium to 60%, just a technical step down from the 90% enrichment level of weapons-grade material and significantly higher than necessary for civilian power generation. In the midst of these alarming developments, an estimated 22,000 holidaymakers are desperately seeking ways out of Israel, as per information released by Israel's Ministry for Tourism. Tourism ministry chief Danny Shachar announced that the Israeli authorities are hustling to organise outbound flights under their "safe return" scheme, initially meant for Israelis coming home. The UK Government has yet to disclose the number of British citizens in Israel but has prompted those there to make their presence known to the British embassy. Despite the Foreign Office discouraging all travel to the region and having evacuated embassy staff's families, it is yet to recommend that Britons evacuate.
