Senate committee considers taming IT department as part of ongoing budget effort
Sen. Katie Fry Hester (D-Howard and Montgomery) is sponsoring a bill she said would bring accountability to the Department of Information Technology and help ensure major IT projects are delivered on time and on budget.. (File photo by Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters.)
The chair of the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee Wednesday said his committee will look to resolve how the state handles major information technology projects, saying the current process has resulted in money 'going down a hole.'
Some lawmakers are dismayed by the Department of Information Technology, which has shied away from taking control of major projects since it was founded im 2002. Senate Budget and Taxation Committee Chair Sen. Guy Guzzone (D-Howard) characterized managing such projects as a money pit at a time when the state stares down a $3 billion budget gap.
'This is a mess. It was a mess even before 2002, quite frankly, and some of this — the DoIT solution — was supposed to help all of that,' Guzzone said during a committee hearing Wednesday. 'We have not, in my opinion, in all the years I've been around, ever seen an actual solution to our problem. The money has been, unfortunately, going down a hole in many ways and in many projects. And it's really a shame.'
Guzzone's comments followed testimony on a proposal to impose stringent reporting requirements for the department. It also comes on the same day that the Board of Public Works approved a more than $400 million IT contract with dozens of contractors.
'It's been a long time, and the lack of clarity, authority and management and oversight really has led to poor project management, cost overruns and failures,' said Sen. Katie Fry Hester (D-Howard and Montgomery) and sponsor of the Senate Bill 705.
Hester pointed to a scathing audit of the agency and its failures to properly manage the MDThink project. That mismanagement increased costs to $588 million — 80% more than the initial estimate, Hester said, calling it 'pretty sad.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
'In recent years, the state has also spent millions on the development of IT projects that produced inadequate computer systems. Some of the reasons for project failures point to poor project management, lack of initial planning, insufficiently trained personnel, and Maryland must take steps to safeguard its growing investment in valued resources,' she said.
Hester said the current system lacks accountability for delivering projects on time and on budget, describing it as 'contractors overseeing contractors overseeing contractors.'
Officials from the department did not testify at the hearing Wednesday. In a 'letter of concern,' Melissa Leaman, deputy secretary of the department, said the bill duplicates existing reports and 'would impose a significant burden while providing minimal value.'
Leaman also cited security and procurement concerns.
'We strongly urge the committee to reconsider SB 705 and instead engage in a collaborative effort to refine our current reporting structure in a way that balances transparency, efficiency, and security. We remain committed to ensuring accountability and providing valuable information while protecting the integrity of state IT projects and operations,' her letter said.
Despite the concerns in Leaman's letter, Guzzone signaled an interest in taming the problem. Guzzone said the committee could use Hester's bill and may also look at language in the budget to bring the agency to heel.
'We're going to work hard on this,' Guzzone said. 'This is not something that we need … with all the challenges we have financially. This has got to get handled, and it's going to get handled. It's going to take a while, but it's something that must be done.'
Earlier in the day, the Board of Public Works voted to approve a statewide IT contract involving 39 companies. The 10-year deal, valued at more than $400 million, was pulled from a board agenda two weeks ago after Hester and Sen. Stephen S. Hershey Jr. (R-Upper Shore) wrote a letter expressing concerns about the contract and numerous bidder protests and appeals filed with the Maryland Board of Contract Appeals.
State officials asked the board to approve the contract even though the appeals and protests had not yet been resolved.
Department of General Services Secretary Atif T. Chaudhry said the state 'has a duty to protect essential services that directly impact public health and safety for over 2 million residents across the state, which is nearly one-third of the state's population, particularly including programs such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, also referred to as SNAP, supplemental Social Security Income, also referred to as SSI, child welfare support, foster care services and countless more.'
Chaudhry also cited concerns about federal funding which is now guaranteed through October.
During the board meeting, Leaman said the agency takes 'seriously our role as stewards of taxpayers' dollars.'
The changes being made to how the department oversees major IT projects reflect current best management practices, she said, 'but we recognize that transitioning to new practices is hard and will take agencies time.'
The board approved the contract 2-0. Comptroller Brooke Lierman recused herself citing advice of ethics counsel. A spokesperson for Lierman declined to elaborate on the conflict, citing a policy of not commenting beyond the comptroller's announcement
Following the board vote, Hershey criticized the approval for jumping ahead of the ongoing protests and appeals.
Hershey said it may not be incumbent on the legislature to dig in on what he said was 'a budget issue.' He said lawmakers 'can also do a lot with budget language and forcing an agency to comply with the will of the legislature. We have avenues that we believe are able to be used.'
'At the end of the day, these are taxpayer dollars, and the state has to find a better way to manage them and assure taxpayers that they're being spent cost effectively and efficiently,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maryland launches new loan program for laid-off federal workers
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-8th) addressed a crowd of hundreds outside NOAA's Silver Spring headquarters in March, just days after the Trump administration cut hundreds of jobs from the agency. (Photo by Jack Bowman/Maryland Matters) Marylanders affected by federal layoffs this year can now apply for an interest-free state loan to help them pay the bills in the short term, according a press release Thursday from the state Department of Labor. The Federal Emergency Loan Program is directed at the thousands of Maryland residents who have lost jobs in the federal government so far since the Trump administration began slashing the federal workforce to cut down federal spending. The loan program was created this year under the new Protect Our Federal Workers Act, sponsored this year by Majority Whip Jazz Lewis (D-Prince George's) and signed into law in April. The law expands the use of two current employee-assistance funds so they apply to federal workers laid off as the Trump administration rushes to slash the size of government. It also expands the authority of the attorney general's office to take legal action on behalf of laid-off federal workers in some instances, and it creates an expedited state hiring program for workers who lost jobs due to administration cuts. 'Let's be clear — these federal workers didn't lose their jobs because they failed us,' Lewis said in a written statement. 'They lost them because of reckless decisions in Washington that turned public servants into political targets. These are our neighbors, our veterans, our civil servants — people who dedicated their lives to this country.' Federal layoffs drag down state employment gains for second month, new numbers show The program offers a $700 interest-free loan for residents who qualify. Those residents must have been terminated from a federal job since Trump took office, in a mass layoff, relocation, or closure of a unit of the federal government, or in a similar situation beyond their control. Former federal workers must also demonstrate that they are experiencing 'financial hardships' caused by the loss of their job in the loan application. Recipients have 180 days to pay the loan back, though they can ask for a 90-day extension if hardships continue. Federal contractors are not eligible for the loan. 'This loan program is an important piece of Maryland's larger effort to respond to federal job loss, providing emergency financial assistance while we are also working to connect thousands of Marylanders to new job opportunities and help with career transition,' Maryland Labor Secretary Portia Wu said in a written statement Thursday. Maryland's workforce is uniquely susceptible to the effects of the federal layoffs, and its economy is heavily reliant on federal employment, due to the state's proximity to Washington, D.C., though the exact scope of the impact to the state is challenging to calculate, according to labor department officials. So far, about 1,600 federal unemployment claims have been filed since the Trump administration started in January, the department said. In addition to the new loan program, the Moore administration is also working to connect laid-off federal workers with state jobs, among other measures, in an effort to mitigate those impacts. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
After rumblings, Maryland referendum campaigns fall short
Jay Falstad, executive director of the Queen Anne's County Conservation Association, holds a statewide referendum petition form. Falstad was among the farmers leading a referendum campaign against the Renewable Energy Certainty Act, which focuses on solar farm siting. The effort fell short. (Photo by Christine Condon/ Maryland Matters) Though there were some rumblings, no one turned in petitions to challenge actions of the Maryland General Assembly via referendum this year, state elections officials say. At least two laws, both focused on energy policy, were in the crosshairs this year. One group — which registered itself as the Maryland Environment, Labor and Industry Coalition — planned to challenge the Next Generation Energy Act, and focus its campaign on trash incinerators, which will no longer receive a renewable energy subsidy under the law. Another group, led primarily by Maryland farmers, started collecting signatures to challenge the Renewable Energy Certainty Act, which focuses on solar farm siting in the state. But ultimately, neither group submitted signatures before the May 31 deadline, when they needed 20,053. To actually get on the ballot in 2026, groups would have needed to assemble about 60,000 signatures by June 30. The lack of submissions means Maryland will go another year without a statewide referendum on the ballot. The last one was in 2012, when voters petitioned to get same-sex marriage on the ballot, and ultimately the electorate approved it. This year, both groups had pushed for Gov. Wes Moore (D) to veto their bills, but he signed each during his final bill signing session of the year, on May 21. With just 10 days until the deadline, a representative of the MELIC group said a formal signature campaign was unlikely. But the farming community decided to throw the Hail Mary, and collected thousands of signatures in an attempt to hit the cutoff. The solar bill essentially prohibits local governments from establishing zoning rules that preclude large solar fields, and sets uniform statewide standards for solar sites. But farmers are particularly concerned by a provision that caps solar facilities to 5% of 'priority preservation areas,' or agricultural land, in any one county. They argue the ceiling is too high, and could take too much farmland out of production. Many believe that no farmland should be used for solar panels whatsoever. 'While this cap is certainly better than nothing, it still leaves thousands of acres of farmland open to commercial solar development,' wrote Maryland Farm Bureau President Jamie Raley in a recent statement. 'The result of this bill is concerning, but it only strengthens our resolve to keep fighting for Maryland's farmland.' Jay Falstad, a leader of the solar energy petition effort, said that his group amassed just under 20,000 signatures before they ran out of time. They estimated that they would have needed at least 23,000 to meet the state's cutoff, because signatures are frequently tossed out for non-compliance with a strict set of state rules. But Falstad, who is a founder of Farmers Alliance for Rural Maryland, or FARM, said that a State Board of Elections official initially informed him that he'd have until Monday, June 2 — the next business day after the May 31 deadline — to make the submission. Falstad was shellshocked when officials reached out on May 30 to say he'd only have until midnight on the 31st. He's confident he could have reached the cutoff number with a few extra days. 'We would have made the necessary number, had it not been for this accelerated timeline,' said Falstad, who is also the executive director of the Queen Anne's County Conservation Association. 'The momentum was on our side.' Jared DeMarinis, Maryland's state administrator of elections, said that the initial communication, allowing until June 2, was in error. While other state election deadlines, such as business contribution filings, can move to the next business day, the ballot petition filing deadline cannot move, under the state constitution, he said. 'When we found out of a mistake, we made sure that they were aware of it,' DeMarinis said. 'It is in the Maryland constitution, so it's not like it was hidden in any sort of fashion.' Regardless of the outcome, Falstad said he was impressed by the strong response to the petition drive. Organizers received signatures from each Maryland county, he said, although the effort was focused in rural areas on Maryland's Eastern Shore, as well as in Montgomery, Harford and Carroll counties, Falstad said. Falstad himself collected signatures on the Eastern Shore at fairgrounds and ballfields, farm stores and local parks. 'We had people running from their car to the pavilion to sign the petition through rain and thunder,' Falstad said. 'The level of commitment and dedication on the part of people that wanted to sign the petition was inspiring.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
$10 million in loans from state fund pledged to Ellicott City flood prevention projects
Ellicott City's Main Street has been hit hard by flooding in recent years, but the North Tunnel and Maryland Avenue Culvert projects are expected to divert tens of thousands of gallons of stormwater per second to prevent future floods. (Photo by Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters) An effort to mitigate devastating flooding in Ellicott City is moving forward with the announcement of two $5 million loans to complete projects that will divert storm-driven flash flooding away from downtown Ellicott City businesses. The $10 million in loans are the first of from a state account created in 2021. In Ellicott City, the money will go toward two projects designed to move tens of thousands of gallons of floodwater per second off Main Street. State and county officials are already looking to other projects, even as its ability to secure federal loans and disaster recovery aid remains uncertain. 'At a time when we're watching the federal government cancel supports for emergency management and telling states and local jurisdictions that if tragedy happens, you are now on your own, in Maryland, we're choosing to move differently and actually invest in our local jurisdictions, both in preparation and also in recovery,' Gov. Wes Moore said Wednesday as he toured the site. Officials said the projects could be duplicated in other areas prone to similar floods including an area of western Maryland ravaged last month by flood waters. 'It'll be used 100% here' in Maryland, said Department of Emergency Management Secretary Russ Strickland. 'It's not dependent on federal money, which, right now, obviously, we're in a very uncomfortable situation with Washington.' In January, President Donald Trump called for eliminating the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and FEMA in April said it was canceling funding for the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, or BRIC, program. The move hit funding earmarked for fiscal years 2020-2023, putting roughly $1 billion in projects approved in the Chesapeake Bay watershed in jeopardy. Scores of federal lawmakers — Republicans and Democrats — have called for BRIC funding to be restored. The Ellicott City projects, meanwhile, will proceed with state money. Tunneling equipment — a 300-foot long device nicknamed 'Rocky' — is expected to begin cutting a channel a mile long and 18-feet wide through granite 150 feet below ground. It will stretch from the west end of Ellicott City and terminate at the Patapsco River, with the capacity to move 26,000 gallons of water per second from downtown Ellicott City to the river. A second project, called the Maryland Avenue Culvert, will move water from the Tiber-Hudson branch to the Patapsco River. The two projects are part of a massive effort to make the historic mill city prone to flooding more resilient. The county is coupling the projects with water retention ponds. Three ponds, with a combined capacity of over 12 million gallons, are already been built. Others remain in the design phase. Howard County Executive Calvin Ball (D) called it 'the single largest public works project' in county history. 'When complete, these projects will work together to reduce the quantity and the velocity of water on Main Street during major flooding events, and make Ellicott City a national, if not international, model of resiliency,' Ball said. Moore said the projects will 'save lives … but also help save the community and will also help save the state money.' 'Because, you know, what's more expensive than preparing for the next big flood? Having to recover from the next big flood — immeasurably more expensive,' he said. Moore said every dollar spent on flood mitigation saves taxpayers 'an average of $6 in return when it comes to recovery costs.' Flood-prone Ellicott City has seen three major events since 2011, including what was called a once in a 1,000-year storm in 2016, when flooding along Main Street damaged buildings and killed two people. Two years later, another storm dumped 8 inches of rain in two hours on Ellicott City. The floods resulted in plans to make the area more flood-resilient, demolition of some buildings, debris clean up after big storms, an alert system, automated gates to high-ground areas and the stormwater retention ponds and diversion systems. Initial cost estimates of $82 million in 2019 had grown to $130 million four years later due to costs of expanding the project — most notably the north tunnel project — and 'external economic factors,' including inflation. But the project also grew more expensive as officials widened the diameter by 20% and more than tripled its length to a mile. FEMA cancels $1 billion for flood prevention projects in Chesapeake Bay region Money for the project comes from a revolving loan fund created in 2021. 'Even as we were fighting for Ellicott City, we realized that this was a bigger problem than this one town and the rest of the state could learn from us,' said Sen. Katie Fry Hester (D-Howard and Montgomery), who sponsored the Resilient Maryland Revolving Loan Fund and who was at Wednesday's event. She said the Northeast has seen 'a 70% increase in extreme rainfall since the 1950s and the Chesapeake Bay could rise by five feet, by 2050. I've seen some horrible projections where we're looking at $19 billion worth of damage if we do not invest. But that is not what we're doing, because we are being proactive.' The $10 million in loans for the Ellicott City project are about half the state's revolving account. Strickland said so far there has been little competition for the money. Jurisdictions that use the money agree to pay it back over time. Strickland said a repayment agreement with Howard County has not been finalized. Del. Courtney Watson (D-Howard) said Wednesday the projects in Ellicott City could be a model for other parts of the state. 'We were lucky enough to be the first to be able to put these policies in place, to be able to figure it out, to do something that's never been done before, to solve a tedious, complex public infrastructure project and puzzle for threats that didn't exist 20 years ago,' Watson said. 'We hope to model and assist other jurisdictions who are facing the same type of problems, such as Westernport,' she said. More than 5 inches of rain fell in Allegany and Garrett Counties on May 14, triggering flash floods that overwhelmed roads, schools and homes, and damaged utilities. Areas including Westernport and Lonaconing were some of the hardest hit. Moore declared a state of emergency in the region — an early step toward seeking aid from FEMA. Strickland said initial damage estimates could be completed as early as next week. The threshold for seeking federal aid comes in at around $12 million, he said. 'I think we're going to meet that,' Strickland said. Strickland said he's 'cautiously optimistic' that federal aid will still come through, but is also looking at contingency plans. One such plan would use money from the state's disaster recovery fund as well as a catastrophic event fund. When asked if the funds could cover the potential $12 million in damages, Strickland said: 'I think it would be very close.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
