Heat pumps: Can you have them in older, larger houses?
Heat pumps are seen as a key to cutting carbon emissions from homes, but experts say 'myths and misinformation' still abound about the technology.
While cost is a barrier for many people, even with a £7,500 Government grant, homeowners in bigger, older properties with cash available may still have concerns, from disruption to whether the tech will work for them.
But experts and people who have taken the plunge say heat pumps – electric-powered systems that use ambient heat from the air or ground for heating and hot water – can work, even where a traditional gas boiler might have struggled.
Retired GP Richard Smithson, who lives with his wife in an Edwardian six-bedroom semi-detached villa in North Tyneside, made the switch from a gas boiler two and a half years ago, to 'reduce our carbon footprint and also to try and act as a pioneer, an example to other people that it can be done'.
Their home already had double-glazing, but the installation, which cost £11,000 after a then-£5,000 government grant, involved underfloor insulation, replacement radiators and zoning the heating system.
Mr Smithson said he was 'pleasantly surprised' at how easily the two-week installation was, and added: 'This house was never that warm with the gas boiler, I'd say it was warmer now with the heat pump.'
Homeowners are advised to keep the heating on at a constant temperature all the time, enabling the building to store warmth in walls to reduce heat loss and enable the heat pump to run most efficiently.
It means the heat pump works hardest overnight, when variable tariffs give Mr Smithson cheaper energy for charging his electric car.
As a result, he says his electricity bill is less than they were previously paying for gas.
He added: 'Some people say how long is it before you get your money back?
'That's irrelevant, if you're a retiring professional who's fairly well-off, which you will be if you live in this kind of house, and you get a big lump sum, do you spend it on a round-the-world cruise or do you spend it on a heat pump.
'To me there's only one answer – get a heat pump.'
Nick Barr, who is renovating a detached five-bedroom Edwardian house in south London, said he really liked the efficiency of heat pumps, but 'I wasn't sure a heat pump could work on such a big or old house'.
But his installer was an engineer who understood how to calculate the heating requirements and design the system, with correctly-sized radiators, pipework, and energy efficiency improvements.
His heat pump is efficient, 'elegant' and extremely quiet, he added.
'It's not cheap, but if you're putting something in new or if you've got to replace a system, it does make sense.'
And he said: 'The number one thing is to get a heat-loss calculation assessment for the building. That allows you to make the right, informed decisions going forward.'
He said he has no regrets.
Andy Balaam, a software engineer, opted for a heat pump for his family's detached, four-bedroom Victorian home in Surrey in 2021, to limit its climate impact.
He said the installation was 'surprisingly OK', but they needed a good company which came back to adjust the system in the first couple of weeks to get it working properly.
'I was worried whether it was going to make the house warm, I was worried it was going to cost a lot of money and worried if it was going to be reliable,' he said.
While the heat pump is 'not attractive and it's noisy', it is out of the way at the side of the house, and Dr Balaam said: 'It absolutely warms our house effectively, it's much nicer than it was before.'
Leah Robson, managing director of Dr Balaam's installers, Your Energy Your Way, which primarily deals with clients whose properties are hard to heat with heat pumps, says the level of comfort is something people 'really don't expect about' them.
'People are genuinely concerned, often they're struggling to heat their home as it is,' she said.
'And when you turn up and say, 'yes, you can have a heat pump and yes, you will be able to run it all day and it won't cost you any more to run than your gas boiler', people are understandably a little bit sceptical.'
She talks to customers about living with a heat pump, and conducts heat loss assessments and tests for draughts that can be easily fixed.
The type of installations the firm carries out are 'not cheap projects', she said, and 'sometimes it's just not the right thing but, typically, even in a solid wall house, if it's got double glazing and reasonable loft insulation we can fit a heat pump'.
That is backed up by a demonstration project led by the Energy Systems Catapult (ESC) which found heat pumps could be successfully installed in all types of homes.
Some 8% of the 742 homes which had heat pumps installed for the project were pre-1919 properties, the majority of which were detached or semi-detached, even though it was 'more challenging' to install in older homes because of the constraints of the project.
Daniel Logue, from ESC, said monitoring found the house age and type did not have any impact on the efficiency of the heat pumps.
'If a trained installer says that your house could have a heat pump, and installs it correctly, it should perform well regardless of the type or age,' he added.
David Cowdrey, acting chief executive at The MCS Foundation, which oversees the certification of home renewables, said: 'There is a lack of public information about heat pumps, leading to a proliferation of myths and misinformation about how and where they work.'
He urged the Government to lead a public information campaign to counter myths and encourage uptake of heat pumps in all kinds of properties.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer Says No Obstacles Left in Finishing US-UK Trade Deal
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said there are no 'hiccups or obstacles' remaining in the way of finalizing a trade deal with the US and indicated that an agreement would likely come soon. Starmer's comments, ahead of a summit meeting with other G-7 leaders in Canada this weekend, follow negotiations between US and UK officials in London aimed at hashing out the details of the pact he and US President Donald Trump announced last month.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How do I check my state pension?
The state pension system is so complex that errors and missing records are not uncommon – but figuring out if you are being underpaid is essential. Leaving an error unchecked could cost you tens of thousands of pounds over the course of your retirement. In this guide, Telegraph Money explains how to check if you're receiving the full state pension that you deserve. You will also find a clear, step-by-step process to follow so that you can review your National Insurance record and state pension forecast. We will cover: Understanding your state pension entitlement How to check your state pension entitlement What to do if your state pension is underpaid Checking state pension FAQs Your state pension will depend on when you were born and how long you paid National Insurance contributions when you were working. The two key factors that determine how much state pension you are entitled to are: Your date of birth: this determines whether you receive the basic or new state pension. Men born before April 6 1951 and women before April 6 1953 receive the basic state pension. If you were born after this then you will receive the new state pension, which is usually higher. National Insurance (NI) contributions: under the new system, post April 2016, in order to receive the full state pension, you need to have a track record of around 35 years of NI contributions, with a minimum of 10 to qualify for anything. For people under the 'old' system, the full state pension is currently £176.45 per week, which is worth £9,175 each year. For the younger cohort of retirees on the new state pension, this is £230.25 per week, or £11,973 per year. If there are gaps in your National Insurance record, your state pension forecast will likely be below the full amount. This could happen for a range of reasons: if you have taken a career break or worked abroad, for example. Gaps can also arise from earning a low income where you're not required to pay National Insurance, or being self-employed and not making adequate contributions. You might also notice gaps if you are a married woman or widow who stopped paying reduced rates of NI, sometimes called the 'small stamp', when they were phased out in 1977. Alice Haine, of the broker Bestinvest, said HMRC had already identified several instances where people's state pension entitlements were incorrect. 'This particularly affects married women, widows, divorcees and those aged over 80, with the errors caused by a range of issues – from the complexity of the pension system to IT glitches, or information recorded incorrectly on people's records,' she said. 'While the Government is working to resolve this, it is always wise to follow up if you feel you have not been notified of a mistake yet or suspect your case has not been identified.' Find out when you can start claiming your state pension using our state pension age calculator. Log in to the Government website to view your state pension forecast. This will tell you how much you're on track to receive by the time you hit state pension age. You will need your Government Gateway ID and password to access the service, although you will be able to request this information if you do not have it. Check for incomplete years or partial contributions that could lower your forecast. If there are incomplete years in your record, such as where you only worked for part of the year, your state pension forecast will look smaller. Again, you can use the Government website to check. You can also request a printed National Insurance statement online, by phone or by post if you live abroad. Read the Government guide to calling the helpline. Alternatively, you can write to HM Revenue and Customs to request a statement at the following address: National Insurance contributions and Employers Office, HM Revenue and Customs, BX9 1AN. If your forecast appears incorrect, you should contact the Pension Service or HMRC immediately for clarification. Do not panic if you think your state pension payments are too low – you can work with the Government to fill in gaps in your NI record and boost your pension. There are two main ways to do this: Paying voluntary National Insurance contributions Claiming National Insurance credits If you think there are gaps in your record, you must check to see if paying voluntary contributions is the right route for you, as in some cases they do not always boost your payments and you could be wasting money. You can plug gaps by topping up the years or part-years which you've missed during the previous six years. To see whether you could boost your state pension payments by making voluntary contributions, check with the Government's Future Pension Centre. It can be reached on 0800 731 0175, or +44 (0)191 218 3600 if you are calling from outside the UK. The line is open from 8am to 6pm. If you're already claiming the state pension, contact the Pension Service on 0800 731 0469. If the pension forecast isn't for the full amount, then making contributions could help you in the long-run. You don't have to pay to fill all the gaps in one hit. You can call HMRC on 0300 2003500 to find out how much you'll need to pay, and what difference it will make to your state pension payments. There are various factors you should consider before making a payment – including whether you will eventually accrue enough years without making one. More on this below. If you do decide to top up, you'll need to contact HMRC on the same number, or by post, and obtain an 18-digit reference number. You can use this number to pay online, at your bank, or via online banking. The telephone number is 0300 2003500. Once the payments are confirmed, the extra NI years you've bought will be added to your record. You may also be able to claim NI credits at no cost. You may be eligible for a credit if you meet any of the following criteria: You care for a child as a grandparent or other eligible family member over 16 but are under the state pension age In receipt of jobseeker's allowance On sick pay In receipt of maternity or paternity allowance Ms Haine added that people on the basic state pension may also be able to boost their payments if they are married or in a civil partnership, or if their partner has died. She said: 'There is also the option to access the information of someone who has died who may have been underpaid, with their family or heirs potentially eligible for the underpayments. 'The Department for Work and Pensions has a dedicated portal for people to access this information, so have the date of birth and death of the person underpaid to hand, as well as the last-known address and the full details of their spouse or civil partner.' If there are gaps in your record, this could lower your state pension forecast and how much money you will receive after retirement. However, you can make voluntary contributions or may be eligible for NI credits to help bridge the difference. If you're close to the state pension age and don't have 35 full qualifying years of contributions, it can be a smart move to top it up. Each year completed will boost your state pension by £6.58 a week, or £342 a year. For the 2025-26 tax year, the cost per week is £3.50 for Class 2 contributions, and £17.75 for Class 3. Some years cost less to top up than others: for example, if you worked part-time and paid some NI, then that would be cheaper to fill than a completely blank year. It could be as little as one week's contribution. If you're still a long way from reaching state pension age, it likely won't make much sense to pay voluntary contributions. You cannot get the money back if you overpay and you will likely make enough contributions through work anyway. You may also find that you can fill in the missing contributions for free with National Insurance credits. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves is leaving Britain defenceless
Last week, the Prime Minister said that we 'need to see the biggest shift in mindset in my lifetime: to put security and defence front and centre – to make it the fundamental organising principle of government'. The unfolding crisis in the Middle East underscores the need to do so. Now, more than ever, our national security must be the Government's overriding priority, trampling on any other competing demands for government money and ministers' time. But it isn't. This noble organising principle seems not to apply where it matters most: the Government's economic strategy. In her spending review this week, the Chancellor gave us her own definition of security: 'securonomics'. This ugly word, reeking of socialist greyness and uniformity, means – to quote Rachel Reeves – 'government must step up to provide security for working people and resilience for our national economy.' She is right about the need for economic resilience. For years, it has been clear that, in a turbulent world, the scale and structure of debt, combined with anaemic growth, makes our economy highly vulnerable to global shocks. Yet instead of rebuilding a fiscal buffer, the Chancellor has left us with a fiscal wafer so thin it could crack at the merest tap. Instead of bringing debt down, it will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today – and the cost of servicing it is already more than we spend on defence. And instead of supporting growth – critical to everything – the Government has suffocated it with higher taxes. Next, how has the Chancellor helped deliver 'security for working people'? For most working people, job security – the ability to find and keep a steady job – is key. Yet job insecurity is rising. By raising National Insurance on employers – a £25bn jobs tax – Rachel Reeves has provoked the biggest fall in employment in five years. Unemployment is ticking up. The broader definition of 'security' obviously encompasses our nation's defence. Although defence spending is set to rise to 2.5 per cent GDP during this Parliament, this is clearly not enough. At the upcoming Nato summit, the UK will be pressed to raise it to at least 3.5 per cent. But in Wednesday's spending review, what was the Chancellor's 'choice'? To give the NHS, not defence, a bigger slice of government largesse. 90 per cent of the total increase in spending from 2025-6 will go to health. The NHS will see a record cash investment: real-terms, day to day spending is set to increase by 3 per cent per year, costing an extra £29 billion. A government that sees defence as the organising principle of government would not have made that choice. It would have made the case that we need to move from a state that prioritises welfare to one that prepares for warfare. And as part of a strategy to put debt on a gradual downward path, it would have made tough decisions on spending overall – starting with a reform of incapacity and disability benefits, which now cost more than the defence budget. Instead, as her speech took us from spending more on affordable homes, to car production to training to buses in Rochdale, the Chancellor disorganised her Downing Street neighbour's organising principle, showing it the respect Tracey Emin had for her bed. There is only one conclusion one can draw from all this. Last week, when the Prime Minister said we need to make security and defence 'the organising principle of government', he left off four words: 'for this week only'. Lord Bridges of Headley is a former government minister; he was Chairman of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee between January 2022 and January 2025 Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
