
Copper wire, tube imports hit multi-year highs in FY25; cathode shipments fell 34% year-on-year
India's copper cathode imports declined 34 per cent year-on-year in 2024-25 (FY25), largely due to a three-month supply disruption triggered by a quality control order (QCO), even as imports of downstream products such as wire, tubes, and sheets surged to multi-year highs.
While copper cathode imports dropped sharply, imports of key downstream copper products climbed in FY25 — wire rose 17 per cent y-o-y, tubes and pipes 30 per cent, and plates, sheets, and strips 49 per cent.
In India, copper is classified as a critical mineral given limited domestic production and high demand in conventional and emerging technologies—from air conditioners and transformers to electric vehicle (EV) batteries and wind turbines. It is also seen as a bellwether of economic activity owing to its extensive application across sectors.
From an average of 27,000 tonnes each month between April and November 2024, copper cathode imports fell to around 2,000 tonnes per month between December and February, after the QCO went into effect from December 1. Then, in March 2025, imports recovered slightly to 16,000 tonnes, official trade data showed.
India relies on imports for about 30 per cent of its copper cathode demand, a key raw material for wire, tubes, and sheets. The Adani Group's new Gujarat smelter, scheduled to reach peak capacity this financial year, is expected to make the country self-sufficient for the near-term.
Cathode imports recover as three-month QCO disruption eases
In FY25, India imported 2.39 lakh tonnes (Rs 19,134 crore) of copper cathode, 34 per cent less than 3.63 lakh tonnes (Rs 24,552 crore) in the previous financial year. Amid sharp drop in imports between December to February, two metals trade associations filed a petition against the Union Mines Ministry, which issued the QCO, alleging that the quality norms have caused 'acute shortages' in supply.
The petition added that domestic producers could 'charge exorbitant and irrational rates' as imports decline. The case will be heard by the Bombay High Court on June 27.
However, a rebound in copper cathode imports in March to around 16,200 tonnes indicates that supply constraints are easing. Official sources told The Indian Express that no shortage was recorded on account of the QCO, and that the Mines Ministry has filed its response to the petition in court.
The steep drop in imports stemmed from compliance issues among exporters, especially Japanese suppliers who dominate India's copper cathode imports. The QCO mandates that both domestic producers and foreign suppliers obtain the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification to sell copper cathode in India. Most Japanese producers received certification only after the QCO took effect, and some continued to face minor challenges in ensuring compliance post-certification.
'Roughly 50 per cent of copper cathode demand is in the winding wires segment, which has faced no issue in availability post-December. There has been no impact on downstream sectors,' sources said. Delays in BIS certification were caused by Japanese smelters taking over six months to apply, despite ample time and extensions, they added.
Copper wire, tube, sheet imports surge in FY25
Downstream copper imports climbed to multi-year highs in FY25, defying the slump in cathode shipments. Copper wire imports—primarily from the UAE—rose 17 per cent from 1.31 lakh tonnes in FY24 to 1.54 lakh tonnes in FY25, with their value jumping 29 per cent to Rs 12,653 crore.
Widely used in electrical wiring, motors, and transformers for its high conductivity and durability, copper wire imports in FY25 hit a five-year high, though still below the over 2 lakh tonnes imported in FY19 and FY20.
Similarly, copper tubes and pipes imports—primarily from Vietnam—jumped 30 per cent to 1.14 lakh tonnes, the highest since FY18, valued at Rs 10,157 crore. Copper tubes and pipes are used in air conditioning, refrigeration, and heat exchangers. Copper plates, sheets and strips imports—used in electrical busbars and transformers—surged 49 per cent to around 30,000 tonnes, valued at Rs 2,725 crore.
Imports of copper products rose despite the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) enforcing a QCO on these items from October 19, 2024, initially for large and medium enterprises. Growth persisted due to potential stocking-up before enforcement, longer timelines for small (January 2025) and micro (April 2025) units, exemptions for certain tubes and export-use products, and timely grant of BIS certification to some foreign manufacturers.
Domestic cathode output rises, new smelters coming online
Domestic copper cathode production rose 12.6 per cent to 5.73 lakh tonnes in FY25, driven primarily by Hindalco Industries Ltd, which holds a 70 per cent market share and has a capacity of 5 lakh tonnes. Production last year surpassed the previous peak of 5.55 lakh tonnes recorded in FY23.
Vedanta's Sterlite Copper, with a smaller capacity of 2.16 lakh tonnes, contributed 26 per cent of cathode in FY25. Notably, India remained self-sufficient in copper cathode until 2018, when Vedanta's Tuticorin plant was shut down over environmental violations.
Adani's Kutch Copper Ltd produced 22,000 tonnes (4 per cent share) in its first year, with a smelter capacity matching Hindalco's at 5 lakh tonnes. Production is expected to ramp up to full capacity by October, with sources stating, 'Once the Adani plant is fully operational, India's entire cathode demand will be met internally.'
Additionally, the JSW Group plans to establish a 5 lakh-tonne copper smelter in Odisha by 2028-29. With India's per capita copper consumption still at 0.6 kg—well below the global average of 3 kg—demand is set to surge. To meet this, India's smelting capacity must expand as global supplies tighten.
Product
Quantity (in lakh tonnes)
Growth (in %)
2024-25 value (in Rs crore)
2023-24
2024-25
Copper cathode
3.63
2.39
-34
19,134
Copper wire
1.31
1.54
17
12,653
Copper tubes and pipes
0.88
1.14
30
10,157
Source: Department of Commerce Trade Data
Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Licences of 24 fertilizer dealers suspended after raids in Gujarat
Gandhinagar: The state agriculture department conducted surprise raids at dealerships selling chemical fertilizers on Saturday to prevent misuse. In the state-wide raids conducted across 16 districts, the licences of 24 dealers were suspended, the govt said on Sunday. The govt stated that the inspections were carried out to ensure that sufficient fertilizer stocks are available to farmers for the kharif season. An official statement mentioned that the inspections were conducted by 32 teams of the agriculture department on Saturday in 16 districts. The inspections involved checking the physical stock of fertilisers, the stock in POS machines and verifying records of govt-approved dealers of chemical fertilizers. "In total, 57 dealers across 16 districts were inspected, and show-cause notices were issued to dealers for various reasons. The licences of 24 dealers were suspended due to irregularities found in the fertilizer stocks at 24 locations," the statement said. An estimated 1,090.64 metric tonnes of fertilizers worth 1.78 crore were prevented from being sold, and further legal action was taken. During the inspection, sale of fertilizer stocks was verified with 101 farmers," the statement added. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo In the first raid conducted by the agriculture department, discrepancies were found at 17 locations, and an estimated stock of 718.47 metric tonnes worth approximately 1.14 crore was prevented from being sold. The statement added that a total of 31 show-cause notices were issued for various reasons, and the licences of 17 dealers were suspended. In the second round of inspection, another 31 dealers were also subjected to raids. A total of 372.17 metric tonnes of unauthorized stock worth Rs 63.65 lakh was prevented from being sold. Show-cause notices were issued to the dealers for various reasons, and the licences of seven dealers were suspended.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tata-govt body bank guarantee case: HC refuses to intervene
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court has disposed of a writ petition filed by Tata Projects Limited, which sought restoration of status quo, directing the company to seek remedy before the commercial court. The petition concerned the encashment of a performance bank guarantee of Rs 167.46 crore by the Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (CHiPS), the nodal agency for driving IT growth and implementing IT and e-Governance initiatives in the state. A division bench of Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas and Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad heard the petition filed by Tata Projects. The company sought restoration of the status quo ante, asking for the return of the Rs 167.46 crore to State Bank of India and the issuance of an identical bank guarantee. Alternatively, Tata Projects requested CHiPS to deposit the amount in an interest-bearing account until the dispute's resolution. According to court records, CHiPS had issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the selection of a Master System Integrator (MSI) for the BharatNet Phase-II Project in Chhattisgarh. A dispute arose between Tata Projects and CHiPS during the commercial contract. Previously, Tata Projects had filed writ petition, in which a single bench of the high court on 2 July 2024, granted interim protection, restraining respondents from encashing the performance bank guarantee. This writ petition was later disposed of on 30 April 2025, with the court re-delegating the parties to approach the commercial court. Subsequently, Tata Projects filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The commercial court, on 3 May 2025, ordered an interim status quo regarding the invocation of the bank guarantee. However, after the respondents filed their reply, the commercial court disposed of the application on 6 May 2025, vacating the status quo order. The initiation of the bank guarantee encashment process led Tata Projects to approach the high court. Senior counsel Kishore Bhaduri, appearing for Tata Projects, argued that CHiPS's conduct was fraudulent and high-handed, misleading the court and misusing its power by attempting to invoke the bank guarantee. Counsel for the respondents and the state argued that the writ petition was not maintainable, as Tata Projects had remedies available under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, or under the Chhattisgarh Madhyashtham Adhikaran Act, 1983. The high court observed that an arbitration clause existed in the agreement and that Tata Projects had already approached the commercial court. The court ruled that the writ petition was not maintainable at this juncture. However, it granted Tata Projects the liberty to pursue statutory remedies before the commercial court. The court also clarified that the respondents were free to raise objections regarding the maintainability of any application. The High Court directed the commercial court to consider and decide any interim application or application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the petitioner expeditiously and in accordance with the law. The high court also made it clear that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, leaving it to the commercial court to decide independently.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Insurance firm directed to pay 11L for unfair trade practice in settling claim
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh state consumer disputes redressal commission directed an insurance firm backed by a public-sector bank to pay Rs 11,16,801 to a Raipur-based firm for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in settling a vehicle insurance claim. The commission also awarded Rs 50,000 for mental agony and Rs 5,000 towards litigation costs. The order, passed by President Justice Gautam Chourdiya and Member Pramod Kumar Varma, set aside an earlier ruling by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur, which dismissed the complaint as premature. The commission noted that keeping the claim pending for an extended period, especially after the damaged vehicle was handed over as per the insurer's instructions, amounted to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. "After accepting the surveyor's assessment, instructing disposal of the damaged vehicle, and its actual disposal, it was improper for the insurer to raise further objections. Keeping the claim pending despite receiving the wreck value amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. The insurer is liable to pay the remaining Rs 11,16,801, along with compensation for mental agony and litigation costs. The district commission erred in holding the claim premature, making its order unsustainable and liable to be set aside," remarked the consumer commission on the case. The firm's car, insured with the insurance firm, met with an accident on Nov 8, 2019. The insurance company assessed the loss at Rs 11,16,801 and instructed the complainant to hand over the damaged vehicle to a salvage buyer, who paid Rs 13,30,000. The firm alleged that despite these actions and assurances of payment, the remaining amount of Rs 11,16,801 was not disbursed. A complaint was filed before the district commission seeking the balance amount and compensation. The insurance firm, in its defence, said that the claim was pending as the complainant did not provide clarifications and relevant documents regarding the incident. The state commission, however, observed that the insurer already acted upon the surveyor's settlement recommendation and instructed the disposal of the vehicle's wreckage. The commission noted that after proceeding towards settlement and the disposal of the wreckage, it was improper for the insurer to raise further objections. The insurance company has been directed to pay the remaining assessed loss of Rs 11,16,801 with 6% annual simple interest from the date of filing the complaint until realisation, along with the compensation and litigation costs.