Letters, June 26
Opinion
Double standard?
In Tuesday's Business section (June 24), there was a story on page B7 about B.C. billionaire and aspiring department store tycoon Ruby Liu (Hudson's Bay receives approval for sale of three leases to B.C. mall owner). In it, The Canadian Press reporter Tara Deschamps described Liu as 'a striking figure, clad in a hot pink and lime green floral shirt with a black blazer and paired with dark boots and a white Louis Vuitton purse' when she appeared at a recent Ontario Superior Court date in Toronto.
Directly below it on the same page was a story about Tesla CEO Elon Musk, another billionaire with ties to Canada (Musk bets robotaxis will give Tesla needed public lift).
Try as I might, however, I could not find a single sentence The Associated Press reporter Bernard Condon wrote about what Musk was wearing when he made his comments about driverless Tesla robotaxis. Musk's signature MAGA ball caps were not even mentioned!
Why the double standard? It couldn't possibly be because Ruby Liu is a woman, could it?
Nigel Moore
Winnipeg
Merge to the left? No.
Re: The Tory future may lie with the Liberals, Deveryn Ross, Think Tank, June 24
The notion that Manitoba's Progressive Conservative party must abandon its conservative principles and effectively merge with the Liberals under a new centrist banner not only defies political logic, it also betrays the core identity of the party itself.
The PC party was founded on conservative values of fiscal responsibility, respect for tradition, individual freedom and support for strong families and communities. It is those values that many Manitobans want as their representative. Substituting in Liberal-lite policies under the guise of 'competitiveness' isn't a solution; it's a capitulation that would only alienate our base without guaranteeing broader appeal.
The last federal election reminded us how easy it is to write political obituaries — but it also proved that new leadership can reinvigorate a discouraged base.
Conservatives are very much alive in Manitoba and Winnipeg; we're not some relic for a museum display. While we recognize that there are relationships to rebuild and forgiveness to seek, that hard work is already underway.
Obby Khan's apology in the legislature for the landfill failures, along with deputy leader Jeff Bereza's face-to-face apology to National Chief Cindy Woodhouse, are signs of that effort. Hard work is hard for a reason, but it matters.
I want to see this work continue, and I believe a strong, principled Conservative alternative can and will emerge in Manitoba.
Vanya Reimer
St. Norbert
Scam the scammer
The next time you receive a suspected scam phone call, do not immediately hang up. Listen to the caller and then calmly say, 'This phone call is being recorded for police tracking purposes. PLEASE DO NOT HANG UP.'
Believe me, they will hang up. If they do, it was a scam call. Works for me, twice in the past few days.
Barry Hadfield
Winnipeg
Trees needed
Re: Delay, delay and yet more city delays by Erna Buffie, Think Tank, June 23.
Erna Buffie, I am with you. I'm sure you feel that you are butting your head against a brick wall in a number of important areas with regard to city services.
The city is dragging its feet in establishing a City Trees Bylaw.
Like Erna, I feel that trees on public property should be protected, but also those on private property, unless there is a very good reason for them to be cut down. Our city is losing its trees at a very rapid rate; we need them now more than ever to help reduce the effects of climate change, which is the main reason for raging forest fires all over the province.
If seven other Canadian cities can pass this type of bylaw, why can't Winnipeg?
Also, we should not stall in applying for grants to buy land for parks and green spaces. These are so important to our city for young, old and all those in between. So are safe walking and bike paths. The Climate Action Plan adopted by the city seven years ago, which includes improving active transportation routes, should also be implemented as soon as possible.
After all, 2030, the year the city hopes to reach its climate action goals, is right on our doorstep; there is no more time for delays!
Marlene Beaty
Winnipeg
No to perks
Re: A provincial office in Washington makes sense, Dec. 17 – Kinew set to name U.S. trade envoy, June 19 – Kinew hires new trade rep, June 24
I agree a provincial trade office in Washington, D.C. makes sense, especially during this time of tariff threats and trade turmoil. Being onsite and able to meet with people in person is likely going to be really important if Manitoba's interests are to be properly represented and presented.
I also think the choice of the trade representative is an interesting and perhaps inspired one: Alberta-raised, dual U.S./Canadian citizenship, has worked as a reporter in Winnipeg, Ottawa, and Washington. Lots of life and work experience on how things work where it matters.
However, in light of all the things we need to spend money on here, from infrastructure to home care and health care to affordable housing, I strongly suggest that it should be a low-budget affair. Not more staff than is really needed, no outrageous salaries or perks, no unnecessary travel (and when necessary, not in business class), and no palatial residences and swank offices.
This is, after all, about public service.
Gerald Farthing
Winnipeg
Safety first
Regarding Tom Brodbeck's column on the major changes coming to Winnipeg Transit this Sunday (Curtain rising on long-overdue transit overhaul; will traffic-weary drivers hop aboard?).
He makes important points about the need for change, but fails to mention the major issue causing people to ride less; public perception of transit safety.
No improvement to frequency of service will matter if users are afraid while riding the bus.
Neil Coligan
Winnipeg
No secrets
Re: Due process followed, Letters to the Editor, June 24
Ian McIntyre is correct that the provincial council of the Manitoba Teachers' Society is the supreme decision-making authority for MTS. However, the provincial council must exercise that power within its bylaws.
Those bylaws give the authority to hire the executive director to the provincial executive. The bylaws also provide the provincial council the authority to suspend a bylaw, but this requires unanimous consent.
Given the controversy surrounding the recent decision of provincial council to directly hire the executive director, some of it coming from those who were delegates, I am surprised that there was unanimous consent on bylaw suspension.
All this may not matter to retired members such as myself, but I'm certain it does matter to many of the 16,000 dedicated active members, as they contribute more than $15 million in annual dues with an expectation for an organization committed to transparency and not having secrets.
James Bedford
Winnipeg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
Why we built the Climate Backtracker: Canada's quiet climate retreat
Those of us concerned about climate change can be forgiven for breathing a sigh of relief when Mark Carney was elected prime minister. We might not have approved of the dismal record of the Liberals on climate action, but at least we didn't end up with a Conservative government intent on supporting the fossil fuel industry at all costs. We were lucky. The worst-case scenario didn't come to pass. And maybe — just maybe — the Carney Liberals might take the need for climate action seriously. But just two months into Carney's reign, that optimism is fading. The warning signs were there from the start. Carney's first act of government was to kill the consumer carbon tax. The promise to 'build, baby, build' — Carney's nation-building rejoinder to US President Donald Trump's mantra to 'drill, baby, drill' — includes plans that could help Canada curb emissions, such as support for clean energy projects and an East-West electricity grid. But Carney's vision of Canada as an energy superpower also includes new pipelines, changes to the oil and gas emissions cap and federal impact assessment legislation. For Carney, building Canada's energy sector is likely still going to involve drilling — and a lot of it. These shifts are being packaged as pragmatic and forward-looking. But that's exactly the problem. Changes to laws, policies and programs often get stuck in place. We've seen how, in countries around the world, once taxes are lowered by one government, successors rarely raise them again. Programs beneficial to communities are modified, defunded, rolled back or eliminated, and slowly come to seem like the way things have always been. (Does anyone remember that Canada once had a social housing program?) The only way to make sure this doesn't happen is for the public to remember the fate of government policies and initiatives, so that the good ones don't disappear, while bad ones stick around and make things worse. This is why we've created the Canadian Climate Backtracker. a user-friendly, publicly-accessible record of federal government action or inaction on climate in the wake of the 2024 US election. The aim of the Backtracker is exactly what its name suggests: to record all the ways in which the Canadian government backtracks on its climate commitments. This includes not just the policies, programs or laws instituted through new bills and acts of Parliament, but also things much harder to track and remember, such as regulations, incentive programs, and international commitments to climate mitigation and environmental protection. In coming months, there will be a lot of media attention to possible changes to Bill C-59. But there will be far less attention to the lapse of programs, such as the Canadian Greener Homes Grant, which incentivized homeowners to do energy-efficient retrofits, or cuts to funding for scientists to participate in crafting the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. The Backtracker makes sure we know about these kinds of changes, too. The inspiration for the Canadian Backtracker came from a similar US initiative. The Trump administration has mounted a ferocious assault on environmental and climate change policies and measures since coming to power. Columbia University's Sabin Center for Climate Change has created the Climate Backtracker to track the announcements, commitments, plans, proposals and rules that cause this assault. The current Backtracker follows the Climate Deregulation Tracker created for the first Trump presidency and Climate Reregulation Tracker set up to record the Biden administration's efforts to undo the damage. The Deregulation tracker lists 176 actions carried out by Trump over four years. The current Backtracker already lists 158 — stark evidence of the intensity of Trump's raid on anything and everything related to the environment and climate change in the US. In Canada, the federal government isn't the only one engaged in backtracking. Provincial governments have used the election of Trump to engage in their own forms of backtracking. The recent Ontario budget sidelines renewable energy initiatives and congestion pricing and doubles down on investments in highways, mining and nuclear energy. The Backtracker is our contribution to the task of ensuring our backtracked view of environmental and climate change realities doesn't quickly become the new normal, writes Imre Szeman Alberta and Saskatchewan have put an end to industrial carbon pricing, while BC has eliminated its consumer carbon tax and decided not to renew its successful EV rebate program. And the lifting of the moratorium on uranium mining has left many Nova Scotians scrambling to figure out the impact new mines will have on their communities. The Climate Backtracker doesn't track these provincial decisions — yet. But as it develops and grows, it will pay attention to these, too, to ensure the public can see what's happening across the country, as governments use the Trump victory as cover to rapidly change direction on climate mitigation. There's already a lot of backtracking going on in Canada and elsewhere in the world. What our governments need to be doing instead is moving forward on climate change. The Backtracker is our contribution to the task of ensuring our backtracked view of environmental and climate change realities doesn't quickly become the new normal.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Ottawa's foreign aid chief eyes red tape, visibility as Canada resists cutbacks
OTTAWA – The MP overseeing foreign aid says Canada must take a more efficient, more visible approach to development and humanitarian assistance to make the case for maintaining aid spending as the United States pulls back. 'Those that are staying the course need to be more nimble and need to be more versatile,' said Randeep Sarai, secretary of state for international development, in his first major interview since taking on the role. Sarai said his top priorities in the job are to ensure Canadian aid dollars are being spent efficiently and to give Canadians and aid recipients a better idea of where the money goes. 'It doesn't mean that a sack of grain needs to have a Maple Leaf on it,' he said. While branding can play a role, Sarai said, the government can also spread its message through social media, outreach campaigns in recipient countries and possibly through provincial government-approved textbooks. 'Canadians would be happier, and I think those recipients would have a better value and respect and admiration for Canada and its aid,' he said. 'So that's definitely a priority.' Sarai said Canadians should know how their aid dollars work to, for example, flood-proof areas prone to natural disasters or provide farmers with climate-resilient crops. 'A potato seed that comes from Prince Edward Island to a remote part of the Philippines can take a family from barely sustaining themselves to being able to not only feed themselves but also put their children through education,' he said. Sarai worked as a lawyer in Surrey, B.C. before running for federal office in the 2015 election, when the Liberals under Justin Trudeau won a majority government. He became parliamentary secretary for veterans affairs in fall 2023. While his current role falls short of a full ministerial portfolio, it puts him in charge of overseeing Canada's aid budget and allows him to participate in some cabinet meetings. Ottawa spent $12 billion on foreign aid in the fiscal year that ended in spring 2024, the latest year fully reported by Global Affairs Canada. Half of that was core foreign aid spending, while $2.6 billion was for loans and development financing, mostly for Ukraine. Another $2.6 billion went to services for refugees arriving in Canada, while the rest largely went to global projects such as United Nations humanitarian appeals and preventive health projects. Sarai said knocking on doors during the spring election campaign convinced him that few Canadians know where their aid dollars are going. 'That's what my priority is — how can I communicate and share that. And how can I get the best bang for your buck, the most efficient way to get our aid to those that are most in need,' he said. Sarai said Prime Minister Mark Carney told him 'to cut some red tape' and proceed with Global Affairs Canada's ongoing reform of the bureaucracy it uses to fund development and humanitarian projects. Charities have long claimed that Canada's aid system is more cumbersome than those of its peers, with copious paperwork requirements that delay grants and freeze out smaller aid groups. The department has said it's trying to give clearer guidance so that it can keep preventing aid from being misused while allowing Canadian organizations to expand their reach by partnering with smaller, grassroots groups. Aid groups have criticized Ottawa for drastically cutting back on development work in Afghanistan since the Taliban retook the country in August 2021. Several of Canada's allies have issued blanket exemptions to terrorism-financing rules to allow development workers to pay local staff without being accused of funding terrorism through the Taliban's taxes on salaries. Ottawa has instead opted for a complex permitting system that has been widely criticized. Sarai said the broader reforms his department is undertaking will ensure Canadian organizations can access the funding Ottawa allocates for projects abroad. Canadian non-profits have been bracing for worse since the United States started slashing its aid budget. On behalf of U.S. President Donald Trump, billionaire Elon Musk placed thousands of staff at the U.S. Agency for International Development on paid leave and froze payments and shipments of aid around the world. Canadian non-profits say that many of their projects ran off systems operated by USAID or UN agencies that relied on significant U.S. funding. The aid sector has been further demoralized by the outcome of the recent G7 summit, which Canada hosted. World leaders at the summit made no major joint spending commitment to help populations facing conflict and hunger in places like Sudan, Myanmar and the Palestinian territories. Canada promised at the G7 to spend $391.3 million 'to catalyze private capital toward economic growth and development projects around the world.' Ottawa hasn't said yet where and when the funding will be used. The federal government also said it earmarked 'up to $544 million' in loans for 'new development financing in Latin America and the Caribbean.' During the spring election, Carney said he would not follow the example of the U.S. or some European countries by cutting back aid. He said Canada's approach is 'to be generous and to be effective in our support of those who are most vulnerable around the world.' Sarai said Carney's decision to maintain aid recognizes that diseases don't respect borders, that hunger and poverty lead to waves of to refugees, and that countries receiving Canadian aid are more open to Canadian trade. He said Carney's message is likely that Canadian aid needs 'to be more nimble, be more creative, so we can do more with the same amount of dollars.' The government still hasn't released a budget indicating whether the flow of aid will remain steady or see an increase or decrease. Sarai is in Brussels this week for a pledging summit with GAVI, the global vaccine alliance. Ottawa did not announce new funding for the alliance at the summit. He then heads to Spain for a UN conference on development financing with private and civil society. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. He expects to take part next month in the G20 meeting of development ministers in South Africa, and possibly a summit in the Solomon Islands focused on adaptation to climate change. Sarai said his talks with ambassadors in Ottawa and visiting dignitaries have left him surprised at the depth and scope of Canada's international reputation for multilateralism. 'The world still sees Canada as in a very good light. We don't have a history that is colonializing other countries,' he said. 'We have played important roles before, and we should continue to to play those roles.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 26, 2025.
Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Pressure building on Liberals to rethink electric vehicle mandate
OTTAWA — As Canada approaches a critical starting point for its electric vehicle goals, pressure is building on Prime Minister Mark Carney's government to rethink its plan. Starting next year, the Liberal plan to get more electric vehicles on the road will enter its first phase: mandating sales targets for car companies, which could purchase credits, including by spending on charging infrastructure, or face penalties for not complying. The government has set a target of 20 per cent of new passenger vehicles sold in 2026 must be either battery-powered or hybrid, which increases to 60 per cent by 2030 and reaches 100 per cent by 2035. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The goal is to reduce the country's emissions, taking direct aim at the transportation sector, which is among the top emitters. But with plummeting electric car sales and Canada's auto sector under duress from a trade war with the U.S, which has abandoned its electrification goals under President Donald Trump, Carney's government must now decide whether to forge ahead or reconsider a core climate policy. 'They're going to have to make adjustments,' said Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association. 'I think they know that, the industry knows that. It's really a negotiation on where those adjustments land. Is this a time for stretch goals or is this a time for reality. What's the mix?' He added that he had spoken to 'several ministers' this week. Brian Kingston, the president and CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers' Association, which represents Ford, General Motors and Stellantis and has long opposed the sales mandate, says the policy heaps on added costs at a time when keeping production in Canada has been made more difficult by U.S. tariffs 'At a time where companies are already facing tariff pressure, they are now going to face challenges selling vehicles in the Canadian market. Very difficult to make the case for Canada with this policy in place.' Ford Canada CEO Bev Goodman was among the latest to call for the mandate to be scrapped, pointing to falling customer interest. Statistics Canada bears that out, with the agency reporting a 45-per-cent drop in new zero-emission vehicles sold in March from the same month the year before. It said these new vehicles accounted for around seven per cent of vehicles sold in March 2025 — a figure critics point to as fuel to argue a 20 per cent sales target is unrealistic. When the sales mandate was introduced several years ago, Volpe said the market was better. Now, he says, 'we're not going to make it.' 'The math of not making it is punishing for companies that are all currently manufacturing in Canada, employing Canadians, both directly and buying lots of volume from suppliers.' For Joanna Kyriazis, director of public affairs at Clean Energy Canada, which, along with other stakeholders, helped the Liberals develop their zero-emission vehicle policy, she says 'flexibility' has been built into the program, which recognizes the impact on industry. The Opposition Conservatives, before the House of Commons broke for summer, also ramped up pressure on the Liberals to scrap the mandate, saying it removes 'choice' from consumers. 'The urgency and the pressure that is sort of coming across in public discussions is not quite there,' Kyriazis said. 'There's some time still to ramp up.' She said there were steps the government could take to reverse what she also notes has been a 'drop' in consumer interest, which she connects to the ending of the federal rebate program for zero-emission vehicles announced earlier in the year, and that the Liberals have campaigned on reintroducing to the tune of $5,000. British Columbia's Energy Ministry pointed to the same drop when it fielded recent questions regarding a slide presentation that was obtained by reporters, showing the province to be 'considering several changes' to its own program, noting how the drop in sales made it 'challenging' to meet its mandated target of having 90 per cent of new vehicles sold be zero-emission by 2030. Another factor that the B.C. government cited was the backlash against Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was an adviser to Trump until a public falling out. Automakers and others in the industry also warn that Tesla would stand to benefit from the sales mandate. 'The campaign that has been sort of launched against (electric vehicles) and Trump's negativity towards (electric vehicles) has had an impact on consumer sentiment,' Kyriazis said. Interest has not disappeared, she said, citing recent polling done for the group, that around 45 per cent of Canadians say they would be open to switching to electric for their next vehicle. The federal government also collected feedback from Canadians. Earlier this year, Transport Canada commissioned a survey and focus groups on Canadians' feelings about the transportation system, which included questions about the zero-emission vehicle mandate. It reported that 'no clear consensus' was found when it comes to the 2035 sales mandate, with 45 per cent of respondents saying they felt it was a 'good idea,' compared to 39 per cent who said it was not. Another 16 per cent said they were not sure. Different views also emerged, according to the focus group findings. They're going to have to make adjustments. I think they know that, the industry knows that. It's really a negotiation on where those adjustments land The report, delivered in March and disclosed as part of the government's reporting of its public opinion surveys, found 'most participants supported the idea' of a sales mandate, based on reasons that ranged from reducing greenhouse gas emissions to sending a signal to industry about the need to transition and lower costs as compared to gas-powered vehicles. Those expressing concern cited the need for charging infrastructure, as well as worries about the possibility of battery fires and how they would fare in the extreme cold. Kyriazis said more education is needed on the range capabilities of electric vehicles, as are 'more efforts from governments' to ensure charging infrastructure gets built into condominiums and apartments through changes to building codes, given that it is often young people who call these buildings home who are among the most interested in switching to electric. Expanding public charging infrastructure is also needed, particularly outside of British Columbia and Quebec, which have their own electric vehicle mandates. That, however, is 'dependent on government investment.' Kingston agrees that demand must increase for electric vehicles, including through spending on more public infrastructure. Still, he suggests rebate programs cannot be permanent, given how much they cost and the overarching goal to reach parity between the cost of electric vehicles and gas-powered ones, which he says is 'taking longer than anticipated.' Kyriazis said the government must announce when it intends to bring back the program to provide certainty to consumers waiting before deciding to make a purchase. A spokesperson for Environment and Climate Change Minister Julie Dabrusin said the government would 'look at ways to reintroduce a purchase incentive.' 'It is important to remain focused on the fact that the real threat to the Canadian auto industry right now are the unjustified tariffs from the United States, not electric vehicles, as Conservatives would suggest,' wrote Hermine Landry. 'As the new federal government works to make Canada an energy superpower, electric vehicles and the jobs in the entire supply chains required to produce them are an important part of building an economy that is low-cost, low-carbon, and low risk for investors,' Landry said. She said the policy was put in place to 'ensure Canadians have access to affordable zero-emission vehicles,' adding it was 'designed to remain effective regardless of fluctuations in (electric vehicle) sales.' 'It is worth noting that the standard for the sale of new vehicles already has flexibilities that are built in, including hybrids counting towards some of the sales targets.' National Post staylor@ Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
