While Public Land Advocates Celebrate House Bill Victory, Several Troubling Provisions Were Passed
An incendiary provision that would have required the sale of more than 500,000 acres of BLM land in Nevada and Utah was removed from the federal budget bill late Wednesday, however the legislation working its way through Congress will still reshape how Americans engage with their public land.
The mega reconciliation bill, which cleared the House of Representatives last night by a single vote, includes cuts to land-management agency budgets, acceleration of logging and mining on public land, and the requirement that nearly every acre of eligible federal land be opened to oil and gas leasing. Also remaining in the bill is a green light for mining activity near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, the most-visited wilderness area in the United States.
The budget package now goes to the Senate, where it's expected to face further revisions — and further opportunities for the public to influence their senators.
Led by all House Democrats and a coalition of break-away Republicans including Rep. Ryan Zinke (R — Montana), two controversial elements were stripped from the House version of the budget bill at the last minute: a requirement to sell 547,000 acres of BLM land in Utah and Nevada, and approval of the so-called Ambler Road in Alaska. The road would provide all-season access to mining claims in the pristine Brooks Range.
While the public-land sale provision got most of the attention from the conservation community in the weeks since it was slipped in as a last-minute amendment, the Ambler Road withdrawal was cheered by Hunters & Anglers for the Brooks Range, a coalition of 65 groups that has resisted its construction for years.
'In every opportunity for public comment on the proposed Ambler Industrial Road, the hunting and fishing community has stood up and spoken out against this project that risks the wild and remote qualities of the Brooks Range,' said the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, a member of the coalition, in a prepared statement.
The balance of the natural-resources portion of the budget bill retains many of the elements on its initial draft. They include the reinstatement of withdrawn mineral leases for metal mining in the watershed of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, opening vast areas of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil exploration, cuts to land-management agencies that are expected to impact visitation as early as this summer, an eye-popping expansion of coal mining and timber harvesting on public land, expedited permitting, and prohibition on protests of most natural-resources regulations.
'Selling our shared public lands to pay for tax cuts for the rich was and is an awful, un-American idea, and we appreciate Rep Zinke's work to keep it out of the bill,' says Lydia Weiss, senior director for government relations at The Wilderness Society. 'His colleagues never should have considered it in the first place.'
Weiss says that the conservation community has had a 'destabilizing' week.
'On Monday this was the worst bill in environmental history,' she said. 'Late Wednesday night some of the worst provisions were dropped. We are relieved, and yet this remains the worst bill in environmental history.'
Here's a look at the most contentious elements of the bill that the Senate will consider as early as Friday.
The bill would explicitly re-establish mineral leases sought by the mining company Twin Metals Minnesota, a subsidiary of the Chilean conglomerate Antofagasta PLC. The company plans to develop an underground copper, nickel, cobalt, and platinum metals mine about nine miles southeast of Ely, the gateway community to the Boundary Waters. Developers claim the project would bring more than 750 full-time jobs to the area. Critics claim it could pollute one of the last remaining pristine waterways on the continent, which attracts some 150,000 visitors every year.
The bill also rescinds Public Land Order 7917, which withdrew from mineral leasing 225,000 acres of the Superior National Forest in the headwaters of the Boundary Waters. The acres are expected to be available for sulfide-ore mining.
The bill requires four oil and gas lease sales in ANWR's Coastal Plain over the next 10 years, mandating that no less than 400,000 acres be offered in each sale, and that sales be conducted in each odd year for the next decade. The bill further reissues canceled oil leases by accepting the highest bid valid from the January 2021 lease sale. All previous environmental analyses regarding oil development on Alaska's Coastal Plain are to be rescinded within 90 days of the bill's passage.
The bill mandates quarterly lease sales in Wyoming, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Nevada, and Alaska, but the budget act also mandates lease sales in 'any state where there is land available for oil and gas leasing under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920.' This includes federal land adjacent to national parks and monuments.
In addition to cuts mandated by the Department of Government Efficiency and reduced annual budgets for federal land-management agencies, the bill eliminates all remaining Inflation Reduction Act funding for the National Parks Service, including an estimated $267 million for critical park staffing needs. The National Parks Conservation Association estimates work-force reductions of 33 percent since 2010, including 13 percent this year.
The bill requires a 25 percent increase in timber harvest over 2024 levels on both Forest Service and BLM lands, and apparently circumvents the 2001 Roadless Rule by allowing logging to occur in some Inventoried Roadless Areas.
While frivolous lawsuits have delayed and stopped many public-lands developments, the bill doubles down on eliminating public appeals. It would revise the National Environmental Policy Act to allow private project sponsors to pay an optional fee of 125 percent of the estimated cost of a NEPA analysis for expedited review. Decisions in this opt-in arrangement would be immune from judicial review. Most leasing provisions in the bill have a rider that makes those projects immune from litigation.
The House version of what's called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act has been transmitted to the Senate. It's unclear whether the Senate will simply ratify the House version or decide to write its own budget bill. If the latter, then the entire bill drafting process will begin in respective Senate committees.
The portions of the budget that deal with public-land management, oil and gas and mineral development, and logging will go to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. That committee, like its counterpart in the House, has been charged with finding $1 billion in either savings or revenue to contribute to the overall budget.
'The House Natural Resources Committee over-performed and raised, through their policy recommendations, close to $14 billion,' observes Weiss. 'It's possible the Senate committee could try to match that or stick closer to their $1 billion contribution. All those details still have to be worked out.'
Read Next: House Passes Bill That Would Deregulate Suppressors, Eliminate the $200 Tax Stamp
For hunters, anglers, outdoor recreators, and other folks whose protests to the land sales caused that provision to be dropped may need to ready themselves for another campaign, depending on the budget's path through the Senate.
'We are very hopeful that the Senate reads the room,' says Weiss. 'Selling off our public lands cannot pass in the House. The more the American people learn about what the House just passed, the more certain we are that the Senate will not follow suit.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'
Sen. Ted Cruz was with a fuming President Trump as Elon Musk viciously attacked his former ally online Thursday — with the Texas Republican saying the spat made him feel like he was a kid in the middle of a divorce. 'I was sitting in the Oval as this unfolded. Trump was pissed. He was venting,' the Republican senator revealed on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Friday. 'I was sitting there, and the tweets were coming…. Elon was saying some really harsh things.' The SpaceX and Tesla billionaire went on a multi-day social media offensive against Trump, panning the president's 'big, beautiful' reconciliation bill 'disgusting' and urging Congress to kill it. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk fumed after Trump spoke out about the simmering feud. Cruz, who's friends with both former bros, called their very public break-up this week 'incredibly painful.' 'These are two men whom I know very well, they're both good friends of mine,' he said. 3 President Trump and Tesla billionaire Elon Musk came to blows on social media this week, ending their bromance. AFP via Getty Images 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' 3 Ted Cruz talked about the break-up this Friday on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz.' Verdict with Ted Cruz/Facebook Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week — with Trump threatening to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts to Musk's companies and Musk claiming Trump was holding out on making the Jeffrey Epstein files public because he's in them. 3 Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week. Getty Images 'It just went from zero to 11 instantaneously,' said Cruz. 'These are two alpha males who are pissed off. And unfortunately, they're unloading on each other … They're angry, it's not complicated.' Cruz and his co-host commented that they thought both men are right — Trump's big beautiful budget bill has to get passed but the government has to tackle the deficit more as Musk argued. 'Unfortunately, Elon is working under the assumption that Congress actually wants to do the job and save our country,' said podcast co-host Ben Ferguson. 'And I think Trump is working under the reality that there's a lot of people in Congress that actually aren't looking out for the American people.' Musk on Saturday deleted his post about the Epstein files in a sign he was ready to throw in the towel. But Trump made it clear he wasn't interested in kissing and making up anytime soon. 'I have no intention of speaking to him,' he told NBC News.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump warns Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
President Donald Trump vowed his former friend Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' should he choose to support the Democratic party following their very public feud. Trump delivered the warning in an interview with NBC News, during which he also said he had 'no intention of speaking to' the tech billionaire any time in the near future, citing the online threats and insults he hurled in recent days. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump said Saturday. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful,' he added. 'You could not disrespect the office of the president.' Asked directly whether he believes their relationship to be permanently over, Trump replied: 'I would assume so, yeah.' The world's richest man backed Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the 2024 election, shelling out nearly $300 million in a bid to land them in the White House. In the months following their win, Musk cemented himself by Trump's side, appearing at press conferences, parties and public events, while professing his 'love' for the president. But relations ruptured between the pair on Tuesday, when Musk ripped into the Republicans' 'Big, Beautiful' budget bill aimed at enacting much of Trump's agenda. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his X social media platform. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He said the bill would undermine much of his efforts to trim federal spending during his brief period with Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On Thursday, he then blasted the president and accused him of being an ingrate, saying, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Mere hours later, the SpaceX founder dropped the 'really big bomb' when he alleged Trump appeared in the 'Epstein files,' referring to a trove of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes, including those who were involved. That post was deleted Friday night. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' Trump said Saturday when asked about his reaction to Musk's allegation. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.' The president also fired back in a series of press appearances and social media posts. He threatened to not only terminate Musk's government contracts, but to get rid of his Tesla as well. Sources told NBC News the electronic vehicle is still parked outside of the White House. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to federal contracts with SpaceX. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' As for his budget bill, Trump believes his feud with Musk has actually been positive, telling NBC the Tesla CEO helped bring it to the public's attention. 'I think, actually, Elon brought out the strengths of the bill because people that weren't as focused started focusing on it, and they see how good it is,' Trump said. 'So in that sense, there was a big favor. But I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken.'


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
White House slams LA ‘insurrection' as protests erupt over deportation raids
The White House slammed protests in Los Angeles on Saturday after some residents expressed outrage over raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, described demonstrations at the city's federal building as an 'insurrection.' 'An insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States,' Miller wrote in a Saturday post online. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said more than 800 protesters gathered to challenge the arrest of dozens of individuals by 'assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings' on Friday. Demonstrations continued near the sites of raids on Saturday, with authorities also conducting a raid in the nearby Paramount. McLaughlin said Los Angeles Police did not respond to the incident on Friday. 'A message to the LA rioters: you will not stop us or slow us down. @ICEgov will continue to enforce the law,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote on the social media platform X Saturday. 'And if you lay a hand on a law enforcement officer, you will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,' she added. McLaughlin said there's been an uptick in assault on law enforcement officers across the country. 'Our ICE enforcement officers are facing a 413% increase in assaults against them. And we have seen, in recent days, their family members being doxxed and targeted, as well,' she wrote on Saturday. 'Make no mistake, politicians like @RepJeffries, @AOC, and @Tim_Walz are contributing to the assaults of our officers through vilification and demonization—calling ICE the modern day Nazi gestapo and calling for their doxxing,' she added. Some California Democrats said the arrests were illegal and condemned the detainment led by Trump administration officials as an 'abuse of power.' They said they were denied access to the ICE facility where immigrants were being held amid concerns about the welfare of detainees. 'That's not a misunderstanding—it's a violation of federal law,' Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.) wrote in a Saturday post on X. 'I'm demanding @Sec_Noem launch an immediate investigation. If her agency won't follow the law, she needs to answer for it,' he added.