Sick Leave is a Right, Not a Reward: Ngarewa-Packer
Te Pāti Māori is calling out the Government's proposed changes to sick leave entitlements as a cruel step backwards that punishes low-income, part-time, single parents and essential workers. We staunchly support the concerns raised by PSA National Secretary, Fleur Fitzsimons, that this move will disproportionately harm wāhine, who are most likely to take time off to care for sick children and whānau.
'This Government's obsession with attacking women, predominantly Māori and Pacific women, ignores equity and endangers public health' said Te Pāti Māori Co-leader, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer.
'Sick leave is a right, not a reward. Cutting sick leave reinforces inequality, fuels presenteeism, and increases the risk of outbreaks in workplaces and schools. It's a betrayal of the frontline workers this country relied on during COVID-19.
'The increase to 10 days was a hard-won gain. Workers need time to recover, not punishment for being sick. Reversing this isn't 'long-needed reform' it's short-sighted austerity' said Ngarewa-Packer.
Te Pāti Māori urges all parties to oppose any erosion of sick leave entitlements and stand with the workers who carry this country every day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Moriori Challenge Crown Over 'Tino Rangatiratanga'
Wellington, 12 June 2025 – The Moriori Imi Settlement Trust (MIST), supported by the Hokotehi Moriori Trust (HMT), has filed proceedings in the High Court at Wellington challenging the Crown's proposal to recognise Ngāti Mutunga o Wharekauri's (NMOW) tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu (the Chatham Islands). In 1870, the Native Land Court and colonial government gave 97.3% of all land on the Chatham Islands to NMOW (who arrived on an English sailing ship in only 1835), completely disregarding Moriori custom and the ancient, peaceful occupation of the islands. Instead, they applied the New Zealand Māori custom of take raupatu (claim by conquest). The Waitangi Tribunal found in 2001 that Moriori should have received 'at least 50% of the land' on Rēkohu and that 'redress by far was due to Moriori' (Tribunal recommends compensation for Moriori). Despite this, NMOW have continued to claim exclusive mana whenua and tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu. Now, the Crown appears ready to repeat these past injustices. When Moriori settled their historic Treaty claims with the Crown in 2020, the Crown gave clear and repeated assurances that it would remain strictly neutral between imi and iwi on matters of mana whenua and tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu. For this reason, those terms do not appear in the Moriori Deed of Settlement. Moriori Claims Settlement Act 2021: However, in 2022, MIST was formally advised that the Crown intended to include in the NMOW Deed of Settlement an explicit acknowledgement of NMOW's tino rangatiratanga over Rēkohu. This contradicts prior commitments made to Moriori and represents a serious breach of trust and the terms of our own Deed. The Crown maintains this does not amount to recognition of mana whenua —a position strongly rejected by MIST and supported by respected Māori legal and tikanga experts. In their view, tino rangatiratanga clearly implies exclusive chiefly authority over land. Moriori (MIST & HMT) consider the Crown's position not only disingenuous—but outrageous. Tino rangatiratanga is not a term the Crown has the right to define, limit, or politically reinterpret to suit its convenience. The implications of this recognition are profound. It would undermine the integrity and intent of the Moriori Treaty settlement—an outcome Moriori worked toward for generations. It would also risk legitimising the 1835 invasion, where two mainland tribes used violence to kill, enslave, and displace the peaceful Moriori. Under tikane Moriori, land was never taken through warfare. Even under tikanga Māori, NMOW's claims to take raupatu were not found valid by the Waitangi Tribunal. This situation raises an unsettling question: Why is this happening at all? Why would the Crown give such clear assurances to Moriori, only to reverse course and grant the very recognition it swore it would withhold? This contradiction cuts to the core of the Crown's integrity and the trust that should underpin the Treaty settlement process. This legal challenge is not intended to delay or block NMOW's redress. Moriori supports their right to a settlement— provided it does not impinge upon or undermine Moriori rights. We offered a solution: remove the offending phrase from NMOW's Deed. The Crown refused. Moriori are now calling on the Crown to honour its promise of neutrality and refrain from taking any steps that would undermine the Treaty settlement signed with us just five years ago. Anything less risks eroding trust in the Crown's commitments. With all other avenues exhausted, Moriori will now seek to be heard in the court of law. We do so reluctantly, but with a firm commitment to uphold the dignity of our karapuna (ancestors) and protect the legacy we leave for future generations of our imi (people). Me rongo (In peace)
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Minister Brooke van Velden says sick leave cuts for part-timers is what businesses want
Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden. Photo: RNZ / Reece Baker Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden says the possible sick leave cuts for part-time employees is something business owners want. At the moment everyone gets 10 paid days a year. Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden said earlier that she was looking at changes that would make leave proportionate to the number of hours worked. She told Checkpoint it was not a new idea, and she had been looking at sick leave changes alongside ongoing work to replace the Holidays Act. "I have been working away behind the scenes for about the last six months now trying to work out technical details to replace this act." When asked if it would be based on hours or days she said she could not say as cabinet had not signed off on how the changes would work. "This is something that businesses do want, they want that proportionate leave... some companies that work with part-time workers have quite a few part-time workers, you know, like a cafe or small retail shops and that's a lot of sick leave they are on the hook for." Van Velden did not give evidence on how much sick leave part-timers were taking. "That's not the reason behind doing this change," she said. "It's to do with whether it's right, and is it right that someone who is working one day a week is entitled to the same sick leave allocation as someone who works five days a week - that's what we are basing this policy on, whether it's right." She said she believed someone who worked "what we expect to be a full week", would have the full entitlement this included someone who worked 40 hours in four days. When asked about how the change may disproportionately impact women - more women than men are in part-time jobs - she said it had nothing to do with gender. "If we want true gender equality we have to stop with this disingenuous argument that women are the ones who will be losing out because woman are the ones expected to do childcare." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told Morning Report earlier he knew it was something Minister Brooke van Velden was looking into. "She looks at a whole raft of workplace relations," Luxon said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
NZ 'surprised but not totally surprised' by Israeli attack on Iran, Winston Peters says
Foreign Minister Winston Peters says New Zealand was aware of talk about a potential attack on Iran by Israel before it happened. The two countries have been launching deadly attacks on each other since Israel first struck Iran on Friday. Winston Peters said the government was "surprised, but not totally surprised". "There had been talk of that but not in a way the New Zealand government was remotely involved in, or aware of. "But our job is to keep our ears open and to be watching circumstances world-wide," he said, when asked to explain what that meant. Asked if the United States advised about the attack, Winston Peters said people should not rush to judgement at this point. He said any New Zealanders in Israel or Iran who could leave, should do so . He earlier outlined New Zealand's position on the conflict: "We want diplomacy - as we've just engaged in, in Europe recently and in Jakarta in the last few days. We want de-escalation. We want a two-state solution with Israel and Palestinians living in peace and security side by side. "We want peace and we want balance and calm, and the fact to be acknowledged that the problems in the Middle East don't come from one bad actor alone. "We don't want New Zealanders in harm's way, we don't want a nuclear Iran, we don't want civilians starving or dying in military conflict and we don't want Hamas holding hostages and terrorising Palestinians, and we don't want Israel occupying Palestinian lands." He said the current state of global affairs was probably the worst he remembered in his lifetime since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
