Deep sea mining threatens the unknown
When the submarine plunged to about 10,000 meters below sea level, somewhere off the coast of Hawaii, ecologist Jeff Drazen asked the pilots to cut the strobe lights that had been guiding them through the pitch-black waters. For a moment, they continued falling to the sea floor in complete darkness.
Then, the creatures of the deep sea began dazzling the crew with a striking display of bioluminescent lights, emitting signals to one another as they encountered this new strange object in their habitat.
'It's like you are falling through the stars,' Drazen told Salon in a phone interview. 'There are twinkling lights everywhere.'
Thousands of feet below sea level, the creatures that live in the deep sea survive without direct sunlight, plants or the warmth of the sun. Much of the deep ocean is vacant, with extremely cold, lightless regions making it difficult for life as we know it to survive. Yet spectacular animals reside there, including the vampire squid, which has the largest eyes proportional to its body of any animal (though this cephalopod is neither a vampire or a squid); a pearly white octopus nicknamed 'Casper'; and, of course, the toothy Angler fish that became an internet sensation when one rose to the surface earlier this year.
Last month, President Donald Trump issued an executive order promoting deep sea mining, which is currently prohibited under international law. And on Tuesday, the Department of the Interior announced it is initiating the process to evaluate a potential mineral lease sale in the waters offshore American Samoa. As industry eyes nodules found on the ocean floor as a potential way to extract nickel, copper and cobalt for making things like electric car batteries, scientists warn that deep sea mining is likely to be detrimental to life that exists there.
'We don't know that much about the deep sea because we have explored so little,' said Jim Barry, a seafloor ecologist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 'We should make sure we know what is there before we do much to destroy things.'
The deep sea begins at about 200 meters below sea level, where light starts to diminish in a region called the twilight zone. The deepest part of the ocean lies in the Mariana Trench in the western Pacific Ocean, where the ocean floor lies almost 11,000 feet below sea level — a height that is taller than Mount Everest.
The ocean covers 71% of the Earth's surface, so classifying the deep sea as a single habitat is like classifying all land as one habitat. Just as on land there are deserts, grasslands, rainforests and the arctic, so too in the deep sea there are numerous different ecosystems that differ by geography, temperature and the animals that live there. Earlier this month, scientists witnessed the first volcanic eruption underwater for the first time.'Even if you're just looking at forests in the U.S., you wouldn't think that the forest on the East Coast is going to look the same as the forest on the West Coast,' Drazen said. 'The same is true on the sea floor, and we actually have data that shows this: The communities that you find in the east on nodules are not the same as the communities you find in the west on nodules.'
One study published in Science earlier this month found that with 44,000 deep-sea dives, just 0.001% of the deep seafloor has been visually observed — which is roughly the size of Yosemite National Park. The rest is a black box. The study authors also note 'Ninety-seven percent of all dives we compiled have been conducted by just five countries: the United States, Japan, New Zealand, France, and Germany. This small and biased sample is problematic when attempting to characterize, understand, and manage a global ocean.'
Another 2023 study estimated that scientists had identified fewer than 1,000 of up to 8,000 species in one region of the deep sea called the Clarion–Clipperton zone, which stretches the width of the continental United States and is a potential target for deep sea mining.
Scientists explore these regions in submarines like Drazen's, or they use remote-operated vehicles to collect samples and map the ocean floor. Depending on the depth of the seafloor being studied, it can take these vehicles hours to reach the bottom, Barry said.
Each time scientists go on a deep sea expedition, they encounter previously unknown species. In 2018, a team at MBARI discovered an 'Octopus Garden' of as many as 20,000 octopuses nested on the seafloor off the coast of California in the largest gathering of octopuses on the planet. In total, four of these gardens have been discovered around the world thus far.
In other expeditions, scientists have discovered creatures that evolved their enzymes to function better at high pressure, as the ocean pressure increases by about the same amount as it does on an airplane every 10 meters. Some invertebrates can live for thousands of years, and the oldest known sea sponges have been dated to be 18,000 years old, Levin said.
Overall, there are more new species being discovered than there are taxonomists to properly catalog them. The deep sea has been called Earth's last frontier as the only largely untouched place on the planet. For scientists on these trips, exploring the deep sea seems almost like they are exploring the moon or a distant planet.
'We're the first people that have ever seen some of the sites that we dive at,' Barry told Salon in a phone interview. 'In fact, almost any site you go to offshore, unless you've been there before, none of it's been viewed.'
Many species in the deep sea have developed adaptations like bioluminescence or large eyes that help them navigate the dark waters. Others living in regions called oxygen-minimum zones — also known as 'dead zones' or 'shadow zones' — have developed elaborate breathing structures that look like lungs outside of their bodies in order to maximize the surface area they use to absorb oxygen, said Lisa Levin, an oceanographer at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
On the seafloor, you can find canyons, volcanoes and vast abyssal planes. In some regions called chemosynthetic ecosystems, creatures produce food using the energy from chemical reactions rather than sunlight.
'Deep water isn't uniform, it's kind of layered, and there are different water masses,' Levin told Salon in a video call. 'It's really a whole mosaic of ecosystems and habitats.'
As remote as it may seem, the deep sea is just one degree of separation from anyone who eats seafood, Drazen said. The deep sea provides food to many species in shallower waters, like the swordfish, which dives up to 1,200 meters to feed.
The ocean also produces half of the oxygen we breathe on land and is the largest carbon sink on Earth, absorbing about 30% of all carbon dioxide emissions from humans. With the deep sea covering so much of the ocean's volume, it plays a major role in reducing the effects of global heating. Unfortunately, as CO2 emissions increase, it acidifies the ocean, which can make it less hospitable for life. Some crustaceans, for example, have a hard time developing hard outer shells made of calcium carbonate if the water is too acidic.
Not only that, but the creatures of the deep sea could provide scientists with molecules or compounds that help them develop better medicines or lead to other breakthrough discoveries. In the early 1980s, for example, scientists synthesized ziconotide, a natural pain-killer 1,000 times stronger than morphine without the addictive side effects. The molecule came from the Conus magus, a sea snail found in the deep sea. Overall, more than 60% of our drugs come from analogs in nature.
'If you think about pharmaceuticals, there's a repository of genetic material down there with all these weird animals,' Barry said. 'People want to collect deep sea animals to see if they have important, novel chemicals that could have some use for us, whether it might be antibiotics or cancer treatments or something else.'
Scientists are also still uncovering exactly how sensitive the deep sea is to environmental changes and human impacts. However, compared to shallower waters, which are more easily subjected to changes in things like temperature, acidity or oxygen levels, these environmental changes take longer to reach the deep sea. As a result, creatures of the deep sea are likely to be more sensitive and vulnerable to changes that do occur in their environment.
'Animals that inhabit shallow waters have evolved to cope with variability in environmental conditions, but in the deep sea, there's very little change in oxygen or temperature or pH across the year,' Barry said. 'A similar change in pH or oxygen [that occurs at shallower levels], might be far less tolerable for animals in the deep sea.'
Additionally, deep sea creatures are impacted by changes that occur in regions closer to the surface because many rely on food that falls from those heights. About 90% of food sources are lost every 1,000 meters deeper you go in the ocean, so any disruptions to the food supply could be detrimental to sealife at these depths, Barry said.
'When the productivity of the surface water changes, that affects the amount of detritus, or dead material, that sinks to the deep sea floor that is the food supply for those organisms,' Drazen said. 'That is reducing the food supply to the deep sea.'
Many of the minerals involved in proposed deep sea mining operations are located on black, potato-shaped nodules that lie on the seafloor. Yet a community of animals lives on the nodules themselves, and they would be eradicated if they are mined, said Lauren Mullineaux, a senior scientist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
Additionally, mining operations scrape up the seafloor, producing sediment plumes that can disrupt an area up to hundreds of kilometers away from the operating site, Mullineaux said. Even a fine dusting of this sediment might change the habitat enough to kill some of those species, she explained.
'It can take many decades for the habitat to look like it did before it was mined,' Mullineaux told Salon in a phone interview.
The ocean is a globally shared resource, and stewarding the deep sea may be society's last chance to protect the remaining virgin Earth. The majority of creatures living in the abysmal sea remain unknown to us, but in order to protect them, we must first know they exist. After all, these creatures surely have a lot to teach us about how to survive and evolve in an increasingly harsh environment.
'If we want to be sustainable stewards of the resources that we depend on, it would be nice to know what is there first,' Barry said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
In space, no one can hear you scream — But it still gets incredibly noisy
You've probably heard astronauts talking to mission control while they perform operations in space. In these recordings, you can hear the back-and-forth chatter, along with the astronaut's breathing and the background noise of their spacesuit pumping oxygen into their helmet to keep them alive. Yet, if they removed that helmet and broke the barrier of the suit shielding them from outer space, that conversation would be cut — and all sound would go radio silent. As astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson once explained on the podcast StarTalk, astronauts would be able to hear things from within the body itself — like their own heartbeat. 'The sound of silence is the sound of things that were always making noise that you never noticed before,' he said on the podcast. Sound waves are a vibration carried through some sort of medium, like air or water or in the case of the heartbeat, the body. When those vibrations reach our ears, they send a vibration through our eardrums, which is recognized in the brain as sound. Because sound needs something to travel through, it can't make its way through the vast majority of space, which is a vacuum containing essentially no particles. Interplanetary space contains just a few dozen particles in each cubic centimeter — in comparison, the air we breathe has tens of quintillions of molecules per cubic centimeter. (For scale, 10 quintillion seconds is longer than the age of the universe.) 'In the universe, an absolute vacuum is rare, and most of the universe is very low-density high-temperature plasma,' said Chris Impey, an astronomer at the University of Arizona. 'In principle, sound could travel through that, but it would have very different properties to what we are used to.' Gas clouds, dust clouds and solar winds for example, could all have sound waves pass through them, even if they are relatively low-density, said Phil Plait, an astronomer who runs The Bad Astronomy blog. The structures of many gas clouds, for example, can be formed by sound waves, or shock waves in the case that the material moves faster than the speed of sound, he explained. 'We see the effects of sound in these objects all the time,' Plait told Salon in an email. This would be nothing like the sound we are used to on Earth and wouldn't be detectable by the human ear, which can only hear a very narrow range of frequencies. You may remember the black hole in the Perseus galaxy cluster about 250 million light-years away, from which NASA detected emanating pressure waves in 2003. Although this was not a sound recording like you would hear from a microphone, NASA did convert these pressure waves into sound, albeit one that is far too low of a frequency for the human ear to detect. For what it's worth, though, they did find that the waves corresponded to the note of B-flat, about 57 octaves below the middle C note on a piano. Then, in 2022, NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory sonified this wave data into a couple of sounds the human ear could hear at frequencies 144 quadrillion and 288 quadrillion times higher than the original. (To get a sense of just how astronomical this figure is, one study estimated that there are 20 quadrillion total ants on Earth.)"What's going on is that matter is surrounding the black hole, and when some stuff falls in it can create a powerful wind that compresses the material around it, making a sound wave,' Plait said. 'We don't detect the sound itself, but we can see the ripples in the gas and they can be converted into sound we hear.' There are entire projects dedicated to sonifying data from astronomical objects. In the Cassini mission, for example, NASA detected radio waves emitted from charged particles in magnetic fields, which were converted to sound. Still, these were plasma waves, and not sound waves. However, sound has been detected within our own solar system. During NASA's Perseverance mission on Mars in 2021, the rover's microphones detected the whir of the mission's helicopter and noises created by the rover. It also detected naturally occurring sounds on the planet itself — including Martian wind. Back in 1981, Russia also reported sounds on Venus during the Soviet Venera 13 mission, which sounds like waves hissing on a beach. Yet sounds on other planets sound different than they do on Earth because other planets have different atmospheres. On Earth, the unique combination of oxygen, nitrogen and other gases, combined with the effects of gravity and solar heating, create a certain density of molecules that carries sound as we know it. In contrast, the atmosphere on Mars is roughly 2% as dense as Earth's, and its composition is dominated by carbon dioxide. Overall, sounds would be quieter and slightly muffled, and it would also take longer to reach you than it would on Earth. Some higher pitched sounds would be inaudible entirely. Interestingly, if you played a church organ on Mars, the set of flue pipes that create sound in a way similar to a flute would go up in pitch, but the reed pipes, which produce sound in a way similar to a saxophone, would go down in pitch, said Tim Leighton, an acoustics professor at University of Southampton, who created models to predict sound on other planets. Saturn's moon, Titan, is probably acoustically the closest to Earth. However, the pressure and density are a bit higher at ground level, and the speed at which sound travels through the atmosphere is lower than Earth. As a result, many sounds such as voices, flutes and organ pipes would play at a lower pitch, Leighton said. On Venus, sounds that are caused by solid objects vibrating, like harmonicas or reed organ pipes, would be pitched down because the atmosphere is dense and soupy. However, sounds from things like flue organ pipes or flutes, which are propagated through air, would be pitched higher than Earth. That's because the extremely hot temperatures on Venus make sound travel faster than on Earth. Additionally, if we theoretically heard a sound like a vocalization on Venus, our perception of the size of the creature it was coming from would be a little distorted. That's because humans evolutionarily developed a way of hearing vocalizations in which sound travels to the top of the nose of the speaker and back again in a form of echo, which we subconsciously use to estimate how large a creature is based on the tone they emit, Leighton said. On Venus, "this pulse quickly travels up to the top of the nose and back again much sooner than it would on Earth,' Leighton told Salon in a video call. 'Your brain hears that and imagines the person is about three feet tall.' As we continue exploring more distant planets, recording sound could help scientists better understand them. For example, measuring the sounds of wind on Mars could provide clues on how the planet's surface forms, Leighton explained. 'It can tell us a lot about the atmosphere and how it changes as the sun goes up and down, and how that, in turn generates winds to shape the surface of Mars,' Leighton said. 'That indicates the power of these microphones.' Sound could also help us explore planets like Jupiter and Saturn, which likely have plenty of sound to hear but have thick clouds and inhospitable conditions that make it difficult to access visually, Impey said. 'In fact, since the atmosphere is sort of opaque and you can't really see through it, it might be a way to sense what's happening better and more efficiently than you could with any sort of a camera, which wouldn't really work very well at all,' he told Salon in a phone interview. When looking for sound in the universe, astronomers have also looked back in time. Back in the early years of the universe, it was a hot plasma soup that was far more dense. That plasma carried acoustic oscillations, although still not at an audible range. However, in one research project, astronomer Mark Whittle compressed the first million years of the universe into 10 seconds, shifted up by 50 octaves so that the human ear could hear. It sounds like "a descending scream, a deep roar and a final growing hiss," he reported. About 400,000 years after the Big Bang, sound waves called Baryon acoustic oscillations rippled through the cosmos to influence how galaxies were distributed. As such, one could say that life on Earth as we know it in some way originated from a sound wave. It's not called the Big Bang for nothing, after all. 'Within that sea of brilliance, the seeds for all that we now know were already present, latent, waiting to unfold,' Whittle wrote in his report. 'Most remarkable of all, perhaps, these seeds were sounds – pressure waves coursing through the fluid.'
Yahoo
29-05-2025
- Yahoo
Animals are talking — will the legal system listen?
The character of Dr. Dolittle, who "walks with the animals, talks with the animals," was the central figure in an early 20th century series of children's books written by Hugh Lofting, acting as a kind of personal antidote to his trauma of experiencing the worst of humanity in the trenches of World War I. "A fox has his rights, the same as you and I have," the eponymous physician-turned-animal doctor said in one book. But Dr. Doolittle is eccentric and, of course, fiction. Increasingly, however, talking with the animals is becoming less of a fantasy. This doesn't just invite some fantastic conversations, but recontexualizes the rights we allot to non-human creatures. The past decade has brought a slew of new findings that are changing our understanding of animal consciousness and communication. A new study on complex communication in chimps and another about bonobos' surprising language abilities, and recent findings about how sperm whale communication works, all suggest some animals have complex communication abilities that actually resemble human language in important ways. As AI and bioacoustics, as well as other clever new techniques, bring us ever closer to talking with animals or at least listening in on their conversations — should we prepare to update the way legal systems deal with animals? "Compositionality, in a nutshell: It's the fact that we can combine meaningful units into larger structures whose meaning is derived from the meaning of the units," Mélissa Berthet, a researcher in primatologist and linguistics at the University of Zurich, who studied bonobos in Democratic Republic of Congo (they are only found in the wild in forests in DRC, south of the Congo river) over an 8-month period, explained to Salon in a video interview. Combining units of language in meaningful ways is one of the hallmarks of what human language does, and it's evidence of this in a number of animals that suggests we might not be able to use signs of language as a filter to separate humans, who get certain rights, from animals, who don't. The University of Zurich team observed a group of bonobos from a project by local biologists that had habituated the animals over 10 to 15 years, depending on the group. This meant that the animals were used to having humans around them, but Berthet's group, like the local scientists, avoided interfering with their behavior and did their best to avoid any disturbance. With this work, the hope is that the animals use essentially the same "dictionary" as they would use if there were no humans present. "I really think the meaning is not really impacted," Berthet said, though she allows that they may perhaps talk — gossip? — about humans more than they would otherwise do. There are two kinds of compositionality. In the first, and most common, individual units (like words, for humans), are combined to produce meaning. This is called trivial compositionality, and it has been observed in animals in the past. In the second kind, thought to only exist in humans, when you put two units together, the meaning of one unit will modify the meaning of the other. For example, in the phrase "a blue dress," the word blue has actually modified the word dress, giving it a different meaning than it had before. This kind is called non-trivial compositionality, and it allows us to create complex utterances. "So far, it was thought that in animals, when they could do compositionally, it was mostly restricted to trivial compositionally ... we wanted to see whether bonobos had compositionally, whether it was something that was common in their vocal system. So here we took an approach that is a bit different from former studies, because usually people would investigate one combination, and here we managed to investigated all the combinations of their vocal system." This was possible, Berthet said, because they succeeded in adapting a linguistic method used in humans to the study of animal communications. "The idea was to see whether compositionally in other species can be as extensive as in humans. Because, like I said, humans use compositionally all the time. We create very long sentences. And so we did it with bonobos. And what was interesting is that we found that four of their combinations are compositional, and all the core types that they have, so all the units can be combined in a compositional structure. So it's basically like all their words can occur in sentences, just like in humans, we can put any words in a sentence, and they can really do the same. And so for us, this is really amazing, because it shows that even though they have a very limited vocabulary, they can really use them and combine them extensively," Berthet explained. But it got better. "Among those four combinations that were compositional," Berthet went on, "we found that three of them were non-trivial. And again, this is very big, because for us, it's the first time that we really managed to show that animals can have non-trivial compositionality. So I think what it really means, in general, is that, first, humans are not the only species that can do non-trivial compositionally. Second, other animals can also use compositionally a lot. It's not just about one combination in their own system, that could be a coincidence." All this suggests that the last common ancestor of chimpanzees, bonobos and humans likely also produced compositional structures. "Compositionality is very common in human language. We use it all the time, and for some people, it's really a hallmark of human language. And there are some species that do a bit of compositionality, but it's always very limited," said Berthet. The finding that among combination types, four are compositional, means they can convey information in a flexible way just like us. "So it's basically like all their words can occur in sentences, just like in humans, we can put any words in a sentence, and they can really do the same." We have indeed known for a while that whales are intelligent creatures, with their own eerie and complex form of sound-based communication. Since the 1970s, humans have been entranced by the songs of humpback whales, for example. But another kind of whale communication, among the very social if less musical sperm whales, has more recently become a focus of research into exactly how whale communication, or language, might work. Sperm whales use a series of clicks, called codas, to communicate. Until last year, though, we couldn't really say how this form of communication — distinctly different, even alien, to our own — actually works to convey information. We had already used machine intelligence to analyze the codas, recorded using bioacoustics, and determined that both the clicks and the intervals between clicks are important. The question has been, though, how can a system of clicks and spaces, with some 150 individual coda types, defined by their characteristic sequences of inter-click intervals found globally (with different clans or groups of whales using a far smaller number), account for the social and behavioral complexity seen in these animals? Surely there must be some other factor dividing up the use of different codas to allow for more complex ways to combine them? In recent years, our technological ability to listen in on whales has grown in leaps and bounds. So too, as a result, has our understanding of their unique forms of communication, which turns out, in the sperm whale at least, to be structured, complex, and expressive. Last year, a group of researchers applied machine learning to the largest existing data set of sperm whale codas, from The Dominica Sperm Whale Project, to demonstrate that sperm whale codas can be sensitive to how they are used — that is, the context created by surrounding codas may change a given coda's intended meaning, just the way words in human sentences create a context that indicate, or change, the intended meaning of a given word. And they also showed that sperm whale codas are indeed combinatorial, similar to the compositionally shown by bonobos and chimps. The researchers, members of Project CETI, used 8719 codas recorded over 13 years ending in 2018 from the Eastern Caribbean 1 (EC-1) clan, a group of 400 sperm whales. Clans are known to have their own culture, developing unique behaviors and repertoires of coda types. Over those years, Dominica Sperm Whale Project researchers manually recorded codas, while over the last four, Project CETI scientists studied EC-1's coda repertoire using aerial drones, small computers attached by suction cups (called D-tags or acoustic biologging tags), synced underwater microphones in their hundreds, and swimming robots. The data collected in this way was then analyzed using machine learning, allowing for the sort of complex analysis needed to find patterns indiscernible to the human ear, and in no way similar to what we might expect from our knowledge of human or even primate communication. "When analysing codas exchanged between whales, we observe fine-grained modulation of inter-click intervals relative to preceding codas, as well as modification of standard coda types via the addition of an extra click. We term these contextual features rubato and ornamentation. Next, we show that the coda repertoire has combinatorial structure: in addition to rubato and ornamentation, codas' rhythms and tempos can independently be discretised into a small number of categories or types," the researchers wrote in Nature Communications this time last year. Essentially, these different features allow for coda repertoire to act as a kind of phonetic alphabet. Project CETI doesn't actually aim to talk with whales, but to listen in and translate what they're saying — ideally with permission, if they reach a point where they can understand if permission is given or withheld. The project itself is a non-profit organization funded by partners that include Amazon Web Services, Google Research, and the MOTH (More-Than-Human-Life) Program at NYU Law, which advises on the ethics and permission part, as well as universities in Canada, the U.S., the U.K. and, notably, given some of the technology involved, in Israel. "We show that all four features are sensed and acted upon by participants in the vocal exchanges, and thus constitute deliberate components of the whale communication system rather than unconscious variation. Rhythm, tempo, rubato and ornamentation can be freely combined, together enabling whales to systematically synthesize an enormous repertoire of distinguishable codas," they explain. The whales could put together long, finely detailed sequences of all of these features. Catherine Crockford, of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, an author of the new study, sees this combinatorial system as perhaps representing a transitional or intermediate phase between animal calls and language as seen in humans. Whether the chimps' bigrams should be considered like human units of communication, similar to words, or simple phrases that can be combined in longer sentences, or even like the ideograms used in some human writing is, Crockford told Salon in an email interview, the million-dollar question. 'They do differ from words and sentences, but exactly how they differ is what we are trying to figure out — and involves knotty philosophical issues, like are the signals fully arbitrary, like words are; are they intentionally produced to convey a specific message to others; are they learned; what meaning is really conveyed — these are all questions several teams of scientists are trying to address in animals,' she said. But complex communication involving compositional structures and even a degree of syntax (or word order that plays a role in determining meaning, as in human language) isn't just a mammal thing. Just as we've had to gradually acknowledge that it's not only humans, then not only primates, that are capable of complex "sentence" structures that flexibly convey meaning — whether this represents something like a transitional evolutionary phase between animal calls and human-type language, or something complex and sophisticated enough to be considered a language of its own — we now have to further expand our understanding. As it turns out, the only living descendants of the dinosaurs also seem to combine in complex ways to produce an array of meanings. Among birds, the Japanese tit offers the first experimental evidence for compositional syntax in any non-human species. Meanwhile, the southern pied babbler does not, in fact, merely babble. By playing back so-called "mobbing sequences", combinations of calls by which the birds seem to recruit other group members in response to danger and watching the reaction, scientists were able determine that the combination of two calls used for other purposes communicates information about the context — danger — and the requested action — "let's get together and fight" — in a form of rudimentary compositionally. These findings of two birds that combine individual "alarm" and "recruitment" calls to express a more complex idea using the two idea units suggests that syntax may in fact be more widespread than we thought. This, Crockford said, is the most fascinating question. 'Chimps are highly social and intelligent. They have close friends and family that they like to spend the day with and nest together with at night. But they live in dense forest where it's incredibly easy to lose each other without using sound. So their calls have become quite context-specific to firstly, tell others what they are doing: 'I'm resting', 'I'm travelling', so others know how to find them. Then they have specific calls to recruit others — to help in a hunt, to join them at food, to help them chase off a leopard or nasty neighbours — each call different. Then they have a bunch of specific calls they give when interacting with others to keep the interaction going longer, such as laughing during play, or teeth clacking during grooming,' Crockford said. And as they work on those bigrams, the researchers are beginning to understand call combinations. 'It seems they can combine two meanings together into an utterance, for example, 'rest' and 'food', which may translate into something like 'I'm staying longer at this food patch'. Telling others what you are doing, helps others decide if they want to stay and do it with you or move on. Such utterances probably mainly help bond partners to coordinate their activities in the dense forest vegetation so that they can stay together for longer,' Crockford added. By contrast, Berthet notes that bonobo communication focuses mostly on getting the group together. This makes sense, as the highly social, matriarchal primates live in fission-fusion societies, which means that they split up into smaller groups to forage during the day, then get back together again as a larger group. And whales? We don't know enough yet to say, but they seem to be gossips, the matriarchal and matrilineal society of sperm whales apparently consisting of a bunch of yentas who chit-chat all day long, talking over each other about anything and nothing for the sake of being together, while the adult men, though stereotyped as loners, may hang out together, perhaps sharing their own feelings with close friends, on the high seas. Shane Gero, the Canadian whale biologist who founded the Dominica Sperm Whale Project twenty years ago and is now biology lead for Project CETI, told NPR last year that 'it's hard not to see cousins playing while chatting … to not see moms hand over to a babysitter and exchange a few words before walking out the door, so to speak, to go eat in the deep ocean." The structures that determine our relationships with animals and their status in relation to humans were all developed many years before we understood just how much some of them are like us. Like us, that is, in areas that have historically been important in determining these things among humans, such as showing compassion for our fellows, cooperation, strategic use of tools, culture and language. We might also note that plenty of research in human psychology — not to mention our apparent failure as a species to sustainably manage the ecosystems that in turn sustain us and all life on Earth — has demonstrated that our own claims to rationality and consciousness are, well, less impressive than previously advertised. As Anne Benvenuti, a professor emerita of Psychology and Philosophy at Cerro Coso Community College in California, put it in a 2016 paper in the International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, "While convergent research on animal cognition, emotion, and behavior has increasingly pointed in the direction of animal 'personhood,' interdisciplinary research in human cognition has simultaneously confirmed Sigmund Freud's hypothesis that not only are human beings not always self-aware and rational, but also the human unconscious mind motivates much of human behavior; and that human consciousness is fragmented at best." Language is a big part of this. Back in the 1870s, Oxford professor Friedrich Max Müller argued that "there is between the whole animal kingdom on the one side, and man, even in his lowest state, on the other, a barrier which no animal has ever crossed, and that barrier is —language." The lack of flexible and open-ended communication, which occurs by means of combinatorial structures or compositionality that allows us to put just about any idea into language, was seen as the great barrier. Increasingly, this barrier is being eroded. We still don't have evidence that bonobos want to be able to inherit property or that political participation is important to sperm whales. But we now know that many animals use complex communication systems that allow them to function as groups, or communities, and that they are able to express motivation, desire, fear and harm, all feelings that have political dimensions when they are threatened. "Understanding the way [bonobos] communicate is also a way to understand what is important to them and what matters and what is relevant. So I think this is actually very important in terms of how we see them under the law. I hope it will help," said Berthet, who noted that when we started to understand that whales actually have a very complex language of their own, interest grew in protecting them. Bonobos, whose only wild populations are all in Democratic Republic of Congo, are highly endangered. "It's an area of the world that is really under a lot of threats because of all the mining and the logging. So I really hope that if we show that they have complex communication, that somehow they resemble humans in some respect, and that they have this intelligence, I might say, then I hope it will help to have concrete actions to really preserve them," Berthet said. Meanwhile, the very artificial intelligence that is increasingly allowing us to eavesdrop on animals is increasingly showing us that our own intelligence may one day be truly topped by machines, if not by the often very different but perhaps equally complex and meaningful intelligence of our fellow animals. Add the examples from psychology and the bungle we're making of the Earth we "manage," and humans don't have good evidence to put ourselves at the top of some kind of evolutionary hierarchy after all. And then this accumulating research into compositional language increasingly supports the idea that many animals are complex, sensitive and flexible thinkers. "This simple fact calls for a rethinking of foundational concepts in law and health sciences," Benvenuti wrote, nearly a decade before these latest findings. 'We now realize,' Crockford said about the chimpanzees, 'that to understand the complexity of animal 'languages', we need to study the animals' natural communication — what they communicate to each other. In the wild, chimps for example use specific calls for a number of contexts they never experience in captivity — they have a specific bark to recruit others to hunt, and other calls for territorial defense.' While the moratorium that currently exists on using chimpanzees in research in western countries, at least, is a good first step, it's not enough. And rethinking rights could also allow us to increasingly understand our animal brethren, in a kind of virtuous circle. 'We're just beginning to understand the complexity of chimp communication — as they have become critically endangered. As they are hunted by humans for the pet trade and for meat, and their forests are destroyed, their communities are broken up, risking that they lose their local cultures,' Crockford said. 'If we do not find a way to stop their decline due to human disturbance, we may never get to understand the complexities of their communication.'
Yahoo
27-05-2025
- Yahoo
Feds green-light uranium mine in Utah, first project approved under Trump's energy declaration
Former North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Interior Department secretary, waits for the beginning of a confirmation hearing before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee at Dirksen Senate Office Building on Jan. 16, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) A uranium mine in southern Utah is the first project to be approved under President Donald Trump's emergency declaration streamlining the development of energy infrastructure. Owned and operated by the Canadian company Anfield Energy, the Velvet-Wood uranium project received a green light on Friday under the federal government's new, 14-day environmental review process for energy projects. The permitting process for similar projects has taken years in the past — but in January, Trump declared a national energy emergency, slashing the environmental review process for a number of energy projects like uranium, crude oil, natural gas, coal, biofuels, geothermal and critical minerals. Trump administration expedites permitting for Utah uranium mine to a two-week process Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced the mining project in Utah would be the first to be reviewed. And on Friday, Anfield received approval from the Bureau of Land Management, or BLM. 'This approval marks a turning point in how we secure America's mineral future,' said Doug Burgum, Department of the Interior secretary, in a statement. 'By streamlining the review process for critical mineral projects like Velvet-Wood, we're reducing dependence on foreign adversaries and ensuring our military, medical and energy sectors have the resources they need to thrive. This is mineral security in action.' Sitting near the Utah-Colorado border in San Juan County about 40 miles east of Canyonlands National Park, the Velvet-Wood project is the combination of two mines —- the existing Velvet Mine, which produced nearly 400,000 tons of ore between 1979 and 1984, and the nearby Wood area, which hasn't yet been mined according to an economic assessment from Anfield. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'We are very pleased that the Department of the Interior has greenlit our Velvet-Wood project in an expedited manner,' said Anfield CEO Corey Dias in a statement. 'This confirms our view that Velvet-Wood was well-suited for an accelerated review, given that it is a past-producing uranium and vanadium mine with a small environmental footprint. The Company will now pivot to advancing the project through construction and, ultimately, to production.' Anfield has been eyeing this site for years, purchasing it in 2015 and submitting a plan of operation to the state of Utah and BLM in 2024. According to the Department of the Interior, the operation will disturb about three acres, and much of the mining will take place underground. The normal environmental review process usually takes local input into consideration, weighing environmental and cultural concerns against the project's goals. That includes a public comment period that, depending on the project, can result in thousands of comments. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE According to BLM documents, public input was not required because of the president's emergency order. Still, the region's tribal governments have concerns, as noted in BLM's environmental assessment. The agency met with representatives from the Hopi, Pueblo of Zuni, Navajo, Pueblo of San Felipe and Ute Mountain Ute tribes, all of whom were critical of the operation and the federal government's expedited review. 'The Tribal Nations expressed similar concerns with the emergency procedures, water impacts, transportation, and uranium contamination,' the BLM documents read, including worries that the mining and transportation of uranium ore, which would take place near Bears Ears National Monument, could impact cultural sites. Anfield also owns Shootaring Canyon uranium mill, located in Garfield County between Hanksville and Lake Powell. Just one of three licensed and completed uranium mills in the country, it hasn't been operational in years — Anfield says it plans to reopen the mill, although that will require additional licensing and infrastructure improvements. If it becomes operational, the mill will be used to convert uranium ore into concentrate to be used in nuclear reactors.