Why a Trump 'fest' could be just the tonic for a special relationship under strain
It was perhaps not quite how officials, in London at least, had envisaged the announcement of the state visit would be made.
In the Oval Office, Donald Trump revealed the news in his own way.
"I was invited by the King and the great country. They are going to do a second fest - that's what it is. It is beautiful," he said during an impromptu Oval Office moment.
The question was, did this "fest" - which Mr Trump suggested could happen in September - amount to the much hyped second state visit for the American president?
Or was this actually just the smaller visit that had been offered two months ago as an initial bilateral visit at which the state visit would be discussed?
Back in February, Sir Keir Starmer presented the president with a letter from King Charles and the offer of a state visit.
The letter proposed an initial meeting between the King and the president to discuss details of the state visit at either Dumfries House or Balmoral, both in Scotland, close to Mr Trump's golf clubs.
The King wrote: "Quite apart from this presenting an opportunity to discuss a wide range of issues of mutual interest, it would also offer a valuable chance to plan a historic second state visit to the United Kingdom… As you will know this is unprecedented by a US president. That is why I would find it helpful for us to be able to discuss, together, a range of options for location and programme content."
As he revealed the news of his "fest" with his "friend Charles", Mr Trump said: "I think they are setting a date for September…"
Sources have since confirmed to Sky News that it will amount to the full state visit.
Read more from Sky News:Gang war gripping major cities
'Even more important'
It's possible the initial less formal presidential trip may still happen between now and September. Mr Trump is in Europe for the NATO summit in June and is due in Scotland to open a new golf course soon too.
"It is the second time it has happened to one person. The reason is we have two separate terms, and it's an honour to be a friend of King Charles and the family, William," the president said.
"I don't know how it can be bigger than the last one. The last one was incredible, but they say the next one will be even more important."
His last state visit in 2019, at the invitation of the late Queen, drew significant protests epitomised by the giant blow-up "Baby Trump" which floated over Parliament Square.
Britain's trump card
September is a little earlier than had been expected for the visit. It may be an advantage for it to happen sooner rather than later, given the profoundly consequential and controversial nature of the first few months of his second term.
The decision by the British government to play its "state visit trump card" up front back in February drew some criticism.
And since February, Mr Trump's position on numerous issues has been increasingly at odds with all of America's allies.
On Ukraine, he has seemingly aligned himself closely with Vladimir Putin. His tariffs have caused a global economic shock. And on issues like Greenland and Canada, a member of the Commonwealth, he has generated significant diplomatic shock.
A risk worth taking
Mr Trump is as divisive among the British public as he is in America. Sir Keir is already walking a political tightrope by choosing the softly softly approach with the White House.
The UK government chose not to retaliate against Mr Trump's tariffs, unlike some allies. Sir Keir and his cabinet have been at pains not to be seen to criticise the president in any way as they seek to influence him on Ukraine and seek an elusive economic deal on tariffs.
On that tariff deal, despite some positive language from the US side and offers on the table, there has yet to be a breakthrough. A continuing challenge is engaging with the president for decisions and agreements only he, not his cabinet, will make.
British officials acknowledge the risk the state visit poses. In this presidency, anything could happen between now and September.
But they argue British soft power and Mr Trump's fondness for the Royal Family and pomp - or a "fest" as he calls it - amount to vital diplomatic clout.
For a special relationship under strain, a special state visit is the tonic.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
26 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
My theory for why Trump's agents target Dodger Stadium and Winchell's Donut House
Well, we could just cancel baseball. And, to be safe, every doughnut shop in Los Angeles should be closed pending investigation. Some Dodgers fans might be undocumented, which could explain why federal agents were camped near Dodger Stadium on Thursday but denied entry. Or there could be another reason. Roughly a quarter of the players in Major League Baseball are from outside the country. Those foreigners have visas, as I understand it, but these days, the Trump administration has made clear that temporary protected legal status is no guarantee against ejection. Not from a game, but from the country. Has anybody checked Shohei Ohtani's papers lately? Or those of Teoscar Hernández, Kim Hye-seong or Yoshinobu Yamamoto? And what about the doughnuts? It's no secret in Los Angeles that a lot of doughnut shops are run by immigrants. So it can't be a coincidence that, on Wednesday, agents arrested several men at a bus stop near a Winchell's Donut House in Pasadena. State Rep. Judy Chu (D-Monterey Park) posted comments and video on social media. 'As you can see, these ICE agents are pointing guns at innocent individuals, no warrants, no explanations, just fear and intimidation,' Chu wrote, adding that agents 'masked and armed like a militia' constitute an 'absolutely vile' abuse of power. This country is under threat like never before. Immigrants playing baseball, making doughnuts, hustling construction jobs at day laborer sites, changing the diapers of seniors with physical and cognitive disabilities. But for all of that, it can be a little difficult at times to follow the Trump administration's thinking. One day we were told the plan is to make 3,000 arrests a day. Then Trump quickly reversed course, saying raids on farms, hotels and restaurants would be curtailed because he learned in a shocking revelation from employers that 'our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.' Then, almost immediately, the administration is back to going after everyone. I have a hunch as to why that is. First of all, it's worth noting that consistency has long been an issue for the president, so much so that he should be wearing flip-flops at all times. To the Oval Office, to the golf course, to bed. Everywhere. And yet, although we're used to him saying one thing and doing another, I think something else is at play here. Trump has kept some campaign promises but struck out on key vows, and he's not a guy who handles defeat well. Grocery prices were supposed to drop on Day One and a new age of American prosperity was about to begin. How's that going, folks? He was going to end the war in Ukraine before he even took office, and then put an end to the war in the Middle East. Hmmmmmmmm. He was going to usher in a new era of budget accountability with his buddy Elon Musk leading the way. Well, that was a quick and ugly divorce, and Trump's 'big beautiful' budget bill adds $3 trillion to the national debt. We know Trump loves to watch television, so we can only assume that after he threw himself a birthday party with a military parade on Saturday, he had to have caught news clips of millions of Americans marching at 'No Kings Day' rallies across the country, including in red states. Ouch. I'm wondering if Trump saw the same sign I saw at the El Segundo demonstration, which was about a certain wife who hasn't spent much time in the White House: 'If Melania doesn't have to live with him America shouldn't have to either.' Weak men, under duress, flex their muscles. Trump can deport, and so he will. It could ruin the economy, but that won't stop him. Catch a Dodgers game while you can, and stock up on doughnuts.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump to make a decision on Iran within two weeks
President Donald Trump has set a two-week deadline to decide if the United States will strike Iran. "Based on the fact that there is a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place in the near future, I will make my decision of whether or not to go within the next two weeks," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday, reading a statement from the president to reporters. Leavitt said Trump would prefer a diplomatic solution, but the president — in consultation with the National Security Council — is weighing U.S. military intervention to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to a recent POLITICO report. The U.S. is the only country with the military capacity to destroy Iran's nuclear program. 'Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' Leavitt said. 'All they need is a decision from the supreme leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon, which would of course pose an existential threat not just to Israel, but to the United States and to the entire world.' The comments came at the end of a week of heightened tension in the decades-long conflict between Israel and Iran. As Iran and Israel lobbed rockets at each other, Trump left the Group of Seven conference early and has convened multiple meetings in the Situation Room. The conflict has divided Trump's coalition, driving a rift between an isolationist faction and hawks who have long sought to hobble Iran. Leavitt said Trump has long maintained his position that the U.S. should interfere to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and quoted his comments on the subject from more than a decade ago. 'The president has made it clear he always wants to pursue diplomacy, but believe me, the president is unafraid to use strength as necessary,' Leavitt said. 'And Iran and the entire world should know that the United States military is the strongest and most lethal fighting force in the world, and we have capabilities that no other country on this planet possesses.' Leavitt declined to answer whether the president wanted regime change in Iran, which has been a goal of hawks like Sen. Lindsey Graham and a red line for MAGA isolationists.
Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Federal judge halts Trump's plan to cut funding for sanctuary states that refuse to cooperate
A federal judge in Rhode Island issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday, blocking the Trump administration from denying federal transportation funds to states that do not cooperate with immigration enforcement authorities. Twenty Democratic-led states brought a lawsuit against President Donald Trump's administration, challenging a new Department of Transportation (DOT) policy of withholding or terminating federal funding to any state or local government that does not comply with immigration-enforcement policies. During Trump's first day in office, he issued a sweeping executive order that would deny federal funds to "so-called sanctuary jurisdictions." U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell Jr. issued the preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's efforts on Thursday, saying it is "unconstitutional and/or unlawful" because it violates the Administrative Procedure Act. McConnell also said the Trump administration's action is ultra vires – or done beyond one's legal authority – and exceeds Congress's powers under the Spending Clause. Under the preliminary injunction, the Trump administration is "prohibited from implementing or enforcing the Immigration Enforcement Condition as set forth in the Duffy Directive," McConnell wrote. He also said the defendants are "prohibited from withholding or terminating federal funding based on the Immigration Enforcement Condition as set forth in the Duffy Directive absent specific statutory authorization." "Defendants are prohibited from taking adverse action against any state entity or local jurisdiction, including barring it from receiving or making it ineligible for federal funding, based on the Immigration Enforcement Condition, absent specific statutory authorization," the ruling continued. "The Court forbids and enjoins any attempt to implement the Immigration Enforcement Condition, and any actions by the Defendants to implement or enforce the Immigration Enforcement Condition." Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for comment on the matter. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, even this week, has warned "rogue state actors" who do not cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and federal immigration enforcement that they may be on the hook to clean up their own mess. Most recently, Duffy directed his comments toward California officials who have distanced themselves from immigration enforcement while riots and protests continue to break out in places like Los Angeles. Duffy has suggested political leaders work better with the Trump administration. "The USDOT will not fund rogue state actors who refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement," Duffy said Monday. "And to cities that stand by while rioters destroy transportation infrastructure — don't expect a red cent from DOT, either." Duffy said in April that federal grants come with the obligation to adhere to federal law. "It shouldn't be controversial – enforce our immigration rules, end anti-American DEI policies, and protect free speech. These values reflect the priorities of the American people, and I will take action to ensure compliance," he said.
