Former SpaceX Engineer's Impulse Space raises $300 million to expand space tug fleet
-Impulse Space, a space technology startup developing orbital transfer vehicles commonly known as "space tugs," has raised $300 million in a late-stage funding round led by Linse Capital, bringing the company's total funding to $525 million.
Led by Tom Mueller, a founding employee at Elon Musk's SpaceX, Impulse Space is creating spacecraft designed to transport satellites between different orbital positions to meet growing demand for orbital logistics services.
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
As SpaceX's Starship and Blue Origin's New Glenn approach operational status, industry experts anticipate a surge in rideshare missions.
These launches place multiple satellites on single rockets, often requiring space tugs to deliver them to precise orbits.
CONTEXT
The funding positions Impulse Space to address increasing demand for in-space mobility across commercial, civil, and defense sectors seeking faster, cost-effective orbital transport solutions.
In-space mobility has become essential for satellite deployment, Earth observation support, and deep space exploration.
Space tugs offer satellite operators a cost-effective way to reach specific orbits without requiring customized launches.
BY THE NUMBERS
Impulse has signed more than 30 commercial and government contracts valued at nearly $200 million and is seeing more interest from across sectors.
The company has completed two missions completed using Mira, Impulse's high-thrust space vehicle.
The startup did not disclose the valuation of its funding round and did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for the information.
WHAT'S NEXT
Impulse plans to expand its workforce, accelerate research and development for long-duration missions, and scale production of its Mira and Helios space vehicles to meet increasing customer demand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
You're not Elon Musk: Here's how normal people should critique their superiors
Disagree with the boss? Badmouthing a higher-up publicly, like how Elon Musk this week called President Trump's signature bill "a disgusting abomination" on X, won't make sense for most people. But career experts said there are other, more practical ways to deliver negative feedback to a superior. "No one recommends taking to social media to criticize your boss," said organizational psychologist Alison Fragale, especially if your name is attached and you're seriously looking to drive change. "Though you might get a lot of thumbs up, it also comes with a lot of risky downside," Fragale told Business Insider. Getting loud generally isn't the best strategy As one of the world's richest men, Musk is uniquely insulated when airing grievances. The CEO of Tesla, Space X, and several other companies wields exceptional power and status, and being outspoken is part of his personal brand. For the rest of us, taking an offline, confidential approach to voicing discontent is generally best since it avoids embarrassing the recipient and inviting backlash, said Yale University management professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. That's a lesson many big-company CEOs have used in recent weeks to push back against the president's significant tariff hikes. "They've managed through private collective action to get him to move considerably," said Sonnenfeld. "They went in with the facts. They didn't try to publicly humiliate him." Musk didn't call out Trump by name in his social-media posts criticizing the president's bill, which includes cuts to Medicaid and an extension of the tax cuts that Trump and Republicans enacted in 2017. His messages, though, land as a personal attack because Trump has been aggressively touting the bill, calling it "beautiful" and pushing for Congress to pass it. "It will be the biggest Tax Cut for Middle and Working Class Americans by far," Trump wrote on Truth Social last month. Musk has said that the bill will increase the nation's already bloated deficit, undermining the months of work he put in at the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. On Wednesday, Musk asked Americans to take action to try to stop the bill from passing. "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL," he said on X. When and how to raise concerns In the workplace, career gurus generally advise people to only pipe up about concerns that impact multiple workers or a company at large. Personal grievances are best handled through a direct manager, human resources, or an employer's complaint hotline. "Not every truth needs to be said out loud," said Fragale. A collective voice creates legitimacy, which is why she also recommends gathering allies and having at least one by your side when you're ready to speak out. Consider whether you're the best person to raise the matter to someone at the top of the corporate ladder if you lack status or haven't earned the person's respect. "I have outsourced almost every aspect of my kids' education, not because I don't know how to swim or ride a bike, but because they won't listen to me," Fragale said. Meanwhile, keep in mind that you may not have all the facts as to why a superior made whatever decision you have beef with, said Bill George, an executive fellow at Harvard Business School. It's possible your criticism is unwarranted, so he recommends couching your critique as being based on what you know. "Sometimes CEOs have to make decisions for reasons that aren't apparent," George, who was CEO of the health-technology company Medtronic earlier in his career, said. "You have to understand the whole context." Only speak up to a superior when you have something meaningful to point out, said Candice Pokk, a senior consultant at human-resources consulting firm Segal. "It needs to rise to the level of their position," she said. Some business leaders say they are receptive to negative feedback as long as it's conveyed respectfully. When George was Medtronic's CEO, a manager privately told him that he'd hurt several employees' feelings during a group meeting. Though he stood by the substance of his remarks, he apologized for how he relayed them and said the feedback made him think differently about his communication style. "It caused me to reflect on it," he said. To share negative feedback, start with something positive and authentic about the individual before launching into critisicm, and keep it brief, Pokk said. "Executives want information that's bite-sized and easy to understand," she said. Dishing criticism to someone in a more powerful position can be nerve-racking, no matter how prepared and confident you are. "Couriers of bad tidings are often fearful that the messenger will get shot," said Sonnenfeld. Yet being forthcoming can pay off.
USA Today
32 minutes ago
- USA Today
Starliner launched 1 year ago on ill-fated voyage: Look back at mission's biggest moments
Starliner launched 1 year ago on ill-fated voyage: Look back at mission's biggest moments For 286 days, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams made their home among the stars as unexpected extended crew members of the International Space Station. Show Caption Hide Caption Starliner astronauts reflect on extended mission in space Astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore discussed their extended stay aboard the International Space Station. As the two astronauts selected for the Starliner's first crewed flight test, Wilmore and Williams launched June 5, 2024, on a mission to test Boeing's vehicle on behalf of NASA. The Starliner instead encountered a slew of technical issues upon reaching the ISS and undocked without its two-member crew. Wilmore and Williams then returned in March 2025 with a SpaceX mission known as Crew-9, making a water landing in Florida. One year ago, two experienced NASA astronauts boarded an experimental Boeing spacecraft known as the Starliner for a short voyage to orbit and back. If you followed the Starliner saga as a few days stretched into months, you likely remember how this story ends. Boeing's vehicle, which it is developing for NASA to make trips to and from the International Space Station, attained a certain degree of notoriety. And the astronauts who crewed the spacecraft for its maiden human flight test are now as close to being household names as astronauts can get. For 286 days, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams made their home among the stars as unexpected extended crew members of the space station. Meanwhile, back on Earth, their predicament involved intricate planning and ‒ when President Donald Trump and the world's richest man Elon Musk chimed in ‒ no small amount of finger-pointing. The astronauts, who have long since returned to Earth, have regularly spoke about relishing the extra time in the cosmos, including in an exclusive interview in January with USA TODAY. Wilmore and Williams have also downplayed their extended mission as just part of the job. On the one-year anniversary of the Starliner's doomed launch, here's a look back at the biggest moments of a now-infamous spaceflight mission that captured the world's attention. Boeing Starliner launches from Florida on crewed test As the two astronauts selected for the Starliner's first crewed flight test, Wilmore and Williams launched June 5, 2024, on a mission to test a vehicle intended to one day join the SpaceX Dragon in transporting NASA astronauts to orbit. The Starliner capsule rode to orbit atop a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center near Cape Canaveral, Florida. The highly anticipated liftoff came after several delays over the course of about a month due to troubles detected with the spacecraft, including issues with a valve in the rocket's upper stage. Starliner crew reaches International Space Station Wilmore and Williams reached the International Space Station the next day, June 6, 2024, where they were expected to remain for about 10 days before returning home. But when they made it to the orbital outpost, engineers discovered a slew of helium leaks and problems with the craft's propulsion system that for months hampered Starliner's return to Earth. NASA opts to send Starliner back without crew Williams and Wimore's fate remained uncertain for months as NASA and Boeing deliberated on how best to get them home. That decision came Aug. 24, 2024 when NASA officials announced that the Starliner wasn't safe enough to crew, and would instead undock empty and return to Earth. The move, which dealt a blow to Boeing's hopes of getting the vehicle certified for regular space travel, would also free up a docking port at the station for the spacecraft now tasked with bringing Wilmore and Williams back. Under NASA's plan, the space agency selected a SpaceX Dragon bound the following month for the space station to transport Williams and Wilmore home. And to avoid having the station be understaffed, NASA opted to keep Williams and Wilmore at the station a few extra months rather than launch an emergency mission to return them to Earth. Empty Starliner undocks, lands in New Mexico The empty Boeing Starliner then undocked Sept. 6 and made its way back to Earth for a parachute-assisted landing in the New Mexico desert. At the time, Boeing had plenty of work ahead to prepare the vehicle for routine spaceflight – including more ground tests and potential modifications to remedy its propulsion system woes. Starliner's future as a second operational vehicle for NASA to transport crews and cargo to the space station remains unclear, though the space agency appears to still be working with Boeing to make the vehicle operational. SpaceX Crew-9 mission reaches ISS On Sept. 28, 2024, NASA launched the SpaceX Crew-9 mission as planned, but with one crucial change: Just two astronauts, Nick Hague of NASA and Russian cosmonaut Aleksandr Gorbunov, headed to the space station instead of four to leave two empty seats on their vehicle reserved for Wilmore and Williams. The pair arrived a day after getting off the ground on a spacecraft. But Wilmore and Williams didn't return with them right away. Instead, the Starliner astronauts were folded into the Crew-9 mission, and Williams even became commander of Expedition 72 – overseeing all of the spacefarers living and working at the space station. The plan then became Williams and Wilmore to return with Crew-9 in 2025 once Hague and Gorbunov completed their mission. Suni Williams makes history on spacewalk If it weren't for the extended mission, Williams would not have been able to set a record Jan. 30 during her ninth-ever spacewalk. After she and Wilmore spent more than six hours venturing outside the space station, Williams has now spent a cumulative 62 hours and 6 minutes in the vacuum of space – more than any other woman in the world. Only three other people in the world have spent more cumulative time on spacewalks than Williams. President Donald Trump, Elon Musk weigh in on Starliner saga After taking office in January, President Donald Trump weighed in several times on the Starliner mission, the delay of which he blamed on the Biden administration. He and billionaire ally Elon Musk, the founder of SpaceX, began characterizing the vehicle's crew as being "abandoned" or "stuck" in space – an assertion Wilmore and Williams have oft refuted. Trump also claimed that it was he who "authorized" Musk to retrieve the astronauts, despite the return plan being in place before he was elected. However, Trump did appear to have had an influence over NASA's decision to accelerate by about two weeks the launch of a mission that replaced Crew-9. SpaceX Crew-10 launches for International Space Station That mission, unsurprisingly known as Crew-10, launched March 14 from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Crew-10 included a full contingent of four spacefarers, including mission commander Anne McClain of NASA, NASA pilot Nichole Ayers and two mission specialists from other space agencies: Japanese astronaut Takuya Onishi of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (Jaxa) and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov. After more than 28 hours traveling through orbit, Crew-10 reached the space station late March 15 – a critical step in setting the stage for Wilmore and Williams to embark on their long-awaited return trip. Starliner astronauts undock with Crew-9 Before the outgoing astronauts departed the station, they spent a few days helping the new arrivals familiarize themselves with the orbital laboratory and station operations during a handover period. Wilmore and Williams then boarded the Dragon with Hague and Gorbunov and undocked March 18 from the ISS's Harmony module, a port and passageway onto the station. Dragon carrying Starliner crew, Crew-9 lands off Florida coast About 17 hours later, the SpaceX Dragon vehicle – charred from its journey through Earth's atmosphere – deployed parachutes for a dramatic water landing March 19 off the coast of Florida. SpaceX teams then raced to retrieve the floating spacecraft and its crew of four, helping secure the Dragon and hoist it onto a recovery vessel. Once the Dragon was firmly in place on the ship's main deck, teams cut into the vehicle's side hatch to help Williams, Wilmore, Hague and Gorbunov exit. As commentators explained during NASA's livestream, the astronauts were placed onto stretchers – standard protocol after long-duration spaceflights – and taken to receive medical examinations. Once cleared, the four astronauts were taken on a short helicopter ride to board an airplane for a flight to NASA's headquarters in Houston, where they began their recovery. Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@
Business Insider
33 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk's xAl is training voice models with zombie-apocalypse chats, plumbing fails, and life on Mars, leaked docs show
What would you take from your house if there were a zombie apocalypse? What type of person would you like to live on Mars with? These are some of the questions being used to train AI voice models for Elon Musk's xAI, alongside everyday topics about DIY plumbing and trip planning, documents obtained by Business Insider show. Freelancers for data-labeling company Scale AI are being paid to record conversations with other contractors about things like colonizing Mars — a goal of Musk's — and superheroes, in a bid to make xAI's voice models sound less like a robot and more like a real person. As of April, Scale AI was running at least 10 generative AI projects for xAI, according to an internal dashboard seen by BI. The dashboard lists over 100 AI training projects for xAI and other clients, including Apple, Google DeepMind, and Meta. Scale AI's work comes as companies across the industry are pushing to make their bots more conversational and human-like to help compete for users who might pay for their premium versions. Scale AI and xAI did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider. Inside 'Project Xylophone' Business Insider obtained four Scale AI documents — two sets of project instructions, a set of instructions for reviewers who check submissions, and a conversation topic guide — that outline how 'Project Xylophone' works for xAI. The documents do not state which xAI model is being trained. In late February, Musk announced the beta rollout of a voice mode for Grok, the company's only publicly known AI model. The Scale AI project dashboard shows contractors working on Project Xylophone are asked to record short conversations, focusing on 'audio quality and natural fluency.' They are especially encouraged to join if they have experience with voice acting. The dashboard says the project is aiming for 'engaging scripts, great voice acting, and high quality audio.' Scale's dashboard is not accessible to contractors, who may not know who the client is. For Project Xylophone, gig workers located around the world can pick from hundreds of conversation topics about ethics, philosophy, business, and travel, and record answers in a variety of languages for a few dollars per task. It splits the work between an invite-only project called 'Conversations,' which gig workers do in three-person teams, and 'Grasslands,' which they do solo. 'Conversations' teams are asked to set up realistic conversations with each other over Zoom. Contributors take turns asking questions from a prompt spreadsheet, which was active earlier this week. The sheet includes more than 700 conversation starters on a wide variety of topics, including postapocalyptic survival tactics, planning trips to India, and managing anxiety and panic attacks. 'If you were designing the 'culture' for the first Mars settlement, what Earth tradition would you definitely want to recreate, and what would you be excited to leave behind forever?' reads one prompt. BI found that about 10% of the conversation prompts in the document we reviewed are science fiction-related. Examples of suggested conversation starters from the Scale AI documents What's a 'villain' in your daily life that you wish a superhero team could swoop in and fix for everyone? If the zombie apocalypse hit tomorrow, what's the first thing you'd grab from your house before making a run for it? Imagine you're the mission psychologist for a Mars colony—what personality type or quirky trait would you secretly hope to find in your fellow colonists? What's the most memorable plumbing disaster you've experienced as a homeowner—and did you try to fix it yourself or immediately call for help? Do you remember the first time you had to ask for more money or better benefits? What was going through your head? Other questions are about the US political and judiciary systems, but the set does not include hot-button political issues. In the 'Conversation' arm, instructions for 'good' conversations are explicit: 'The recording must sound extremely natural, as if you were having a casual conversation with a friend. This includes being emotional, having varied intonations, and interrupting each other! Please avoid sounding like an interview.' In the 'Grasslands' arm, solo workers are asked to create unscripted, natural-sounding recordings in their native language. Each worker is given a conversation type and subcategory, and is told to let the conversation flow, in any setting they like, with background noise encouraged. There are dozens of subcategories, like 'Socratic questioning' and 'reflective storytelling,' 'courtly love scenarios,' 'hero-villain confrontations,' or 'collaborative puzzle-solving,' sometimes with different accents, sound effects, or invented linguistic patterns required. Fast and accurate Three Scale AI contractors, who asked not to be named because they signed nondisclosure agreements, said that projects are assigned to contractors based on their skill sets. Two of the contractors said that payment for the Grassland project, which was assigned to contractors based on their location and language expertise, started with $3 per task, and was cut to $1 per task roughly a month later. Contractors have five minutes to complete each task, and each task is one recording. Once contractors have recorded an audio file, they upload it to a Scale AI contributor platform and transcribe it manually, with the Grasslands document asking for filler words such as 'uh' to be left in. 'If someone has a slight pause, we should include a comma, even if grammatically that comma is incorrect,' one of the contractors told BI. Large language models require vast amounts of quality data to improve. Recreating real-world scenarios, such as natural-sounding conversations between people, is one way to generate suitable data to feed into those models. Training Grok Project Xylophone is an example of a larger push by AI companies to inject personality into their AIs and stand out in an increasingly crowded space. BI reported last month that Meta ran a project via Scale AI asking gig workers training its AI to adopt different personas, such as 'a wise and mystical wizard" or a "hyper-excited music theory student." OpenAI's Sam Altman said in late April that the latest GPT-4o had become 'too sycophant-y and annoying,' prompting a reset to make its replies more natural. xAI has marketed Grok as a politically edgier chatbot compared to what Musk has called 'woke' rivals, with training methods that sometimes lean heavily on right-wing or contrarian views, BI previously reported. Alongside xAI's outsourced work, the company has hundreds of in-house 'AI tutors' and plans to hire thousands more, BI reported in February, showing the huge human effort involved in training AI. xAI has also ramped up its efforts to control Grok's unpredictable side. New hires are 'red teaming' Grok, stress-testing it for unsafe or policy-violating replies, especially on controversial topics and in 'NSFW' or 'unhinged' modes, BI reported in April. The safety push follows high-profile incidents, including a feature in March that allowed users to prompt Grok to use racial slurs, and, most recently, unprompted responses about 'white genocide' in South Africa. xAI blamed the latter issue on an unauthorized prompt modification. The company promised stricter code review and around-the-clock monitoring.
