logo
Sudan crisis: How a parallel RSF government could destroy the nation

Sudan crisis: How a parallel RSF government could destroy the nation

Middle East Eye09-03-2025

The crisis in Sudan remains profound, devastating and largely neglected by the international community. As the conflict persists and the suffering of the Sudanese people escalates, prospects for a resolution appear increasingly dim.
While this might superficially appear to be a confrontation between two warring factions, however, the underlying dynamics are far more complex–shaped by internal political cleavage and strategically instrumentalised by global actors to cast shadows over war governance in Sudan.
After the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) recently regained vast swathes of territory from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) - including Um Rawaba in North Kordofan, and major parts of Sennar, Gezira and Khartoum - army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan announced the imminent formation of a new government.
In his announcement during an address to civil political forces in Port Sudan, Burhan said the anticipated government could be 'either a caretaker government or a wartime government', with an objective to support the SAF in 'freeing Sudan from rebels'.
His announcement was bolstered by the Sudanese foreign ministry releasing its roadmap for peace, which outlined several key steps, including the launch of an inclusive national dialogue, the formation of a transitional cabinet of independent technocrats, and constitutional amendments that secured broad support.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The roadmap also noted: 'Laying down arms and evacuating civilian objects are prerequisites for any talks with the rebels. No ceasefire will be accepted unless the siege on El Fasher is lifted, followed by the withdrawal of the RSF militia from Khartoum, West Kordofan, and the Darfur states.'
These developments come as the Sudanese Coordination of Civil Democratic Forces (Taqadom) recently dissolved into two separate coalitions with two different visions.
Opposition alliance
The majority of civilian factions formerly aligned with the Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC), which was part of Taqadom, have declared the formation of a new political coalition dedicated to ending the war. Dubbed the Civil Democratic Alliance of Revolutionary Forces, this new entity is led by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, reflecting a strategic realignment among civilian political actors.
Conversely, the majority of armed groups, alongside certain bodies that aligned with the FFC after the 2021 coup, have consolidated their position within an opposing alliance, which aims to usher in a parallel government within territories currently under the RSF's control. Notably, the official name of this alliance was announced later at a conference in Nairobi as "Sudan Founding Alliance".
Composed of some FFC entities and several civil society groups, Taqadom was founded in October 2023 and had its inaugural conference the following spring in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa. The coalition was dissolved earlier this month at a virtual meeting, amid a dispute over forming a parallel government. This was the result of well-coordinated engagement between the RSF and its allies in Taqadom that ceased to exist after its dissolution.
FFC, a pro revolution alliance, comprising democratic political parties and civil society groups, was established during Sudan's third revolution.
Sudan turmoil: There will be no winners in the generals' war Read More »
The Sudan Founding Alliance launched its inaugural session in Nairobi on 18 February, where leaders and allies of the RSF discussed a charter that would lay the groundwork for a parallel government.
Among the attendees were Abdelaziz al-Hilu, the leader of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North; Ibrahim al-Mirghani, a leader in the Democratic Unionist Party; and National Umma Party leader Fadlallah Burma Nassir, whose attendance came as a shock, as his party opposes the formation of a parallel government.
Rabah al-Sadiq, a prominent figure in the National Umma Party, described Nassir's participation as 'political suicide for him and an attempt to slaughter the party'. The party also issued a statement noting that it 'did not authorise' Nassir or any other member to represent it at the Nairobi conference.
Hilu addressed the session as a keynote speaker. 'The cards of religion, tribe and ethnicity are just obstacles used by the ruling elites in Khartoum to exclude those outside the circle, and we want to put an end to this matter starting today,' he said.
A few hours after the inaugural session, Sudan's foreign ministry condemned Kenya for hosting the conference, citing 'disregard for its obligations under international law, the Charter of the United Nations, the Constitutive Act of the African Union, and the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide'. The ministry separately denounced a massacre committed by the RSF in el-Geteina in White Nile State, which killed 433 people, including newborn babies.
Risk of secession
The Kenyan government was unapologetic, explaining that hosting the conference came in the context of supporting peace by providing a non-partisan platform for affected parties, and pointing to Kenya's long history of conflict resolution within the continent.
Concerns that an RSF-backed government could struggle to gain international legitimacy may lead to the perception that this development is merely propaganda, and not a genuine threat to Sudan's political stability. But multiple scenarios remain plausible, and the events in Nairobi underscore the Sudanese political system's inability to independently resolve its crises.
Ushering in a parallel government during an active conflict would signal a serious risk of secession, potentially leading to Sudan's second partition, following the independence of South Sudan in 2011. But the circumstances today differ significantly.
A new history of fragmentation - another tale of a country with two governments - was thus set in motion
South Sudan achieved independence through a peaceful referendum in which its people exercised their right to self-determination, resulting in Sudan's loss of a historically and politically significant region. Any future secession within Sudan would likely come at an immense cost, driven by violent conflict and significant human suffering.
Establishing a new government in RSF-controlled areas would not only challenge the political authority of the country's Port Sudan-based government, but also potentially exacerbate ethnic tensions, escalating into widespread violence that could threaten the nation's stability and pave the way for a new war.
Despite these challenges, Sudan still has an opportunity to maintain national cohesion and preserve its unity. Achieving this will require strong political will, a heightened sense of national responsibility, and a commitment to prioritising the collective interests of the country and its citizens in seeking a sustainable resolution to the ongoing crisis.
Ultimately, the responsibility for ending this war rests primarily with the Sudanese people - particularly civilians - as long as the international community remains disengaged. Amid significant shifts in the global geopolitical order, the likelihood of substantive external intervention is dubious.
Despite various indications pointing to the failure of a parallel government, Sudan will never be the same after the Nairobi conference. A new history of fragmentation - another tale of a country with two governments - was thus set in motion.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli soldiers brazenly kill Palestinian who held hands in air
Israeli soldiers brazenly kill Palestinian who held hands in air

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Israeli soldiers brazenly kill Palestinian who held hands in air

Israeli soldiers shot dead a Palestinian man after he approached them with his hands in the air during a raid in the old quarter of Nablus in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday. The man, who was not identified, was one of what the Israeli military said were two terrorists who were "eliminated" after attempting to snatch a weapon from a soldier. Footage and photos of the incident show a man wearing a white shirt, dark trousers and a red cap walking towards soldiers positioned at the entrance to a narrow passageway in one of the old city's lanes. Once close, he appears to talk to them, arms still raised, before a series of shots ring out. Subsequent photos show the man lying on the ground, a red stain on his shirt, with another person also prone on the ground nearby, as soldiers stand over them. The Israeli military said that "as a result of the attempt to steal the soldier's weapon, several bullets were fired, moderately injuring one soldier, and lightly injuring three additional soldiers". In addition to the two deaths, Palestinian medics reported dozens of people injured during the raid as a result of either beatings by Israeli soldiers, being hit by shrapnel and from inhaling tear gas. The Palestinian Red Crescent said many of the injured had to be treated within the old city after its ambulances were blocked from entering. The Israel military said it arrested six wanted people, and seized weapons during a search of "over 250 structures" during the operation. AFP reported that dozens of military vehicles entered the city shortly after midnight, after a curfew had been announced over loudspeakers the day before. The raid was focused on the old city, a densely populated area bordering a large downtown square where young men and boys gathered to burn tyres and throw stones at the armoured vehicles. Israeli flags were raised over the roofs of buildings that had been turned into temporary bases for Israeli troops during the raid. Nablus is located in the northern West Bank, a Palestinian territory occupied by Israel since 1967. The territory's north has been the target of a major Israeli military operation dubbed "Iron Wall" since January 21, two days after the start of a ceasefire in Gaza. Violence has surged in the West Bank since the start of the Gaza war, triggered by the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack by the Palestinian militants group Hamas on Israel. At least 938 Palestinians, including fighters but also many civilians, have been killed in the West Bank by Israeli soldiers or settlers, according to data from the Palestinian Authority. During the same period, least 35 Israelis, both civilians and soldiers, have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military raids, according to official Israeli figures.

US ambassador to Israel does not think Palestinian state is Washington goal
US ambassador to Israel does not think Palestinian state is Washington goal

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

US ambassador to Israel does not think Palestinian state is Washington goal

An independent Palestinian state no longer appears to be a goal of US foreign policy, Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, has said. In an interview with Bloomberg that was published on Tuesday, Mr Huckabee also said that if a Palestinian state were to be formed, it would not be in the West Bank. 'Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it,' Mr Huckabee said, adding that those changes probably will not happen 'in our lifetime'. 'I don't think so,' he said when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy. Regarding a hypothetical location for any eventual state, Mr Huckabee suggested a piece of land could be carved out of a Muslim country rather than asking Israel to make room. 'Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?' said Mr Huckabee, 69, using the biblical name the Israeli government favours for the West Bank, where about three million Palestinians live under occupation. Palestinians say that Israel has made a formation of a state nearly impossible by building more and bigger Jewish settlements in the West Bank and undermining Palestinian authorities, while doing little to stop settler violence against Palestinians. European and Arab countries have been working to promote the creation of a Palestinian state led by the Palestinian Authority, which controls parts of the West Bank, as part of a process to end the 20-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. A conference in New York on June 17, sponsored by France and Saudi Arabia, will be focused on such a state with the idea that the Palestinian Authority lead a multilateral effort to drive Hamas from Gaza and rebuild the coastal strip. Asked how the war could be brought to a conclusion, Mr Huckabee placed the blame for it on Hamas, designated a terrorist organisation by the US and European Union, saying the Iran-backed group must free its remaining hostages for the conflict to end. Concern is building among international governments that Gaza's two million inhabitants are facing starvation after Israel barred aid for several weeks from early in March to put pressure on Hamas. A US-Israeli group, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, has been working to deliver supplies in recent days but its work has been marred by violence.

Scarcity of currency adds to misery of war and hunger in Gaza
Scarcity of currency adds to misery of war and hunger in Gaza

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Scarcity of currency adds to misery of war and hunger in Gaza

A shortage of currency in Gaza is pushing thousands of families deeper into poverty, as traders increasingly demand payment in cash and residents are forced to pay high fees to black market operators to convert funds in online accounts into banknotes. Bank branches in the territory are no longer functioning after more than 20 months of war between Hamas and Israel military that has devastated the Palestinian territory and displaced most of its population. Essential goods such as food and medicine are scarce after nearly two months of an Israeli blockade on humanitarian aid, pushing prices beyond the reach of most residents even when they are available. 'For the past two months, cash has all but disappeared,' Mohammed Al Haddad, 39, a resident of Gaza city, told The National. 'If I want to get 1,000 shekels ($287) in cash, I have to transfer 1,800 shekels. That's nearly half my money gone before I even buy food.' Mr Al Haddad, as a government employee, still receives a salary from the Palestinian Authority in the occupied West Bank, even though Hamas has run Gaza since it seized control of the territory in 2007. Mr Al Haddad is paid through online bank transfer, but cannot pay for goods digitally because banks in Gaza suspended a widely used payment app after several hacking attempts. In any case, most shops no longer accept such payments. He believes the aid blockade and shortage of currency – the Israeli shekel is used in both Gaza and West Bank – is part of Israel's war strategy. 'It's as if the occupation wants to create a new crisis, an economic collapse driven by cash shortages and rising hunger,' he said. Murid Al Mabhouh, 30, who was displaced from his home in Jabalia Camp to Gaza city, said the situation was 'suffocating'. 'We're under siege, under bombardment, living through famine, and we have to pay 40 per cent just to withdraw the little money we have.' Mr Al Mabhouh said people had no choice but to pay the high commissions charged by black market currency traders. 'There are no functioning banks, no official oversight, and the authorities are silent. It's not just exploitation, it's injustice on top of injustice,' he said. 'The money we're trying to access is for food, medicine, and paying off debts. Now we lose nearly half of it to commission traders getting rich off our suffering.' Mr Al Haddad said videos posted on social media showed that traders were able to import some goods in recent days, but 'it's all non-essential – instant noodles, snacks, breadcrumbs'. 'And everything is cash only, at outrageous prices,' he said. Amid the outcry, Gaza's Chamber of Commerce has accused some traders in Gaza of working with suspicious actors to obtain Israeli permits to import non-essential goods. 'These permits are being sold for hundreds of thousands of shekels for a single truckload of items that people don't even need,' said Aed Abu Ramadan, director of the Chambers of Commerce, Industry, and Agriculture in Gaza, told The National. 'This is unacceptable. It violates both commercial and national ethics.' He said that such practices are draining the last of the population's cash, pushing families to the brink while enriching a handful of traders. 'We've urged merchants not to engage in these deals. They drive prices up, increase suffering, destabilise the market, and destroy any hope for fair competition.' Mr Abu Ramadan called for immediate oversight by Gaza's authorities and co-operation with official agencies to prevent further economic manipulation. 'People are already crushed. We must not let profiteering deepen this humanitarian catastrophe.' With inflation spiralling, cash inaccessible, and markets flooded with overpriced, non-essential items, Gaza's families are left with shrinking options. As financial lifelines disappear, aid dependency increases, and with it, fears of long-term economic and political manipulation. 'This isn't just about money,' Mr Al Haddad said. 'It's about dignity. About whether we'll ever live normal lives again, or just survive, one overpriced bag of rice at a time.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store