Egypt deports dozens more foreign nationals heading for march to Gaza
CAIRO - Egyptian authorities on Friday detained or deported more foreign nationals seeking to join a pro-Palestinian march to Gaza.
Hundreds of international activists arrived in Egypt this week for the Global March to Gaza, an initiative aimed at pressuring Israel to end its blockade of the enclave.
Organisers said on Thursday people from 80 countries were set to begin the march to Egypt's Rafah Crossing with Gaza.
Egypt's Foreign Ministry has said visits to the Rafah border region must be coordinated in advance with Egyptian embassies or government entities, and underlined the need to follow official procedures to ensure safety and security.
Organisers say they coordinated with Egyptian authorities, and have urged the government to release those detained.
Groups of foreign participants were being held at checkpoints, and sit-ins had begun at two locations on the road leading to the Rafah crossing, organisers said.
They said police were stopping vehicles about 30 km (20 miles) from Ismailia, close to the Sinai peninsula, en route to Rafah, nearly 300 km away. Police were forcing passengers with non-Egyptian passports to disembark, they said.
Security sources confirmed that at least 88 individuals had been detained or deported from Cairo airport and other locations.
Officials at Cairo International Airport said new directives were issued to airlines requiring all passengers travelling to Egypt between June 12 and 16 to hold confirmed return tickets.
Three airport sources told Reuters on Thursday at least 73 foreign nationals had been deported on a flight to Istanbul after authorities said they violated entry protocols, and that about 100 more were at the airport awaiting deportation.
Israel's defence minister told the Israeli military on Wednesday to prevent demonstrators entering Gaza from Egypt, and said the march was a threat to Israeli and regional security. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
40 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Iran says talks with US ‘meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending
Iran earlier accused the US of being complicit in Israel's attacks, but Washington denied the allegation. PHOTO ILLUSTRATION: REUTERS Iran says talks with US 'meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending CAIRO - Iran said the dialogue with the US over Tehran's nuclear programme is 'meaningless' after Israel's biggest-ever military strike against its longstanding enemy, but said it is yet to decide on whether to attend planned talks on June 15. 'The other side (the US) acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime (Israel) to target Iran's territory,' state media on June 13 quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei as saying. 'It is still unclear what decision we will make on Sunday in this regard,' he was quoted as saying. He said Israel 'succeeded in influencing' the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without Washington's permission, accusing Washington of supporting the attack. Iran earlier accused the US of being complicit in Israel's attacks, but Washington denied the allegation and told Tehran at the United Nations Security Council that it would be 'wise' to negotiate over its nuclear programme. The sixth round of US-Iran nuclear talks was set to be held on June 15 in Muscat, but it was unclear whether it would go ahead after the Israeli strikes. Iran denies that its uranium enrichment programme is for anything other than civilian purposes, rejecting Israeli allegations that it is secretly developing nuclear weapons. US President Donald Trump told Reuters that he and his team had known the Israeli attacks were coming but they still saw room for an accord. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Iran says talks with US 'meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending
Iran's and U.S.' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration Iran says talks with US 'meaningless' after Israel attack, but yet to decide on attending CAIRO - Iran said the dialogue with the U.S. over Tehran's nuclear programme is "meaningless" after Israel's biggest-ever military strike against its longstanding enemy, but said it is yet to decide on whether to attend planned talks on Sunday. "The other side (the U.S.) acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime (Israel) to target Iran's territory," state media on Saturday quoted foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei as saying. "It is still unclear what decision we will make on Sunday in this regard," Baghaei was quoted as saying. He said Israel "succeeded in influencing" the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without Washington's permission, accusing Washington of supporting the attack. Iran earlier accused the U.S. of being complicit in Israel's attacks, but Washington denied the allegation and told Tehran at the United Nations Security Council that it would be "wise" to negotiate over its nuclear programme. The sixth round of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks was set to be held on Sunday in Muscat, but it was unclear whether it would go ahead after the Israeli strikes. Iran denies that its uranium enrichment programme is for anything other than civilian purposes, rejecting Israeli allegations that it is secretly developing nuclear weapons. U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters that he and his team had known the Israeli attacks were coming but they still saw room for an accord. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Sydney is racing to build more homes as housing prices soar. But where is the land?
The city of 5.6 million people has a growing population and spiralling property and rental prices that have made it one of the world's least affordable cities. PHOTO: REUTERS Sydney is racing to build more homes as housing prices soar. But where is the land? SYDNEY – Australia's most populous and least affordable city Sydney has a problem: It desperately needs more housing but is struggling to find a large parcel of empty land on which to build it. The city of 5.6 million people has a growing population and spiralling property and rental prices that have made it one of the world's least affordable cities. But the authorities want to end the urban expansion into undeveloped or greenfield sites in the outer fringes, which has resulted in remote suburbs that are as far as 80km from the city centre and that often lack adequate services. Instead, local and state governments have been looking for large, open or convertible spaces within existing urban areas. Like Singapore, which will develop new housing precincts at Bukit Timah Turf City and the former Keppel Golf Course, Sydney planners have been on the lookout for available parcels that could be redeveloped. Turf City is set to have 15,000 to 20,000 public and private homes over the next 20 to 30 years, while the Keppel site will have about 9,000 homes. But the authorities in Sydney are struggling to find similar sites. The New South Wales Government proposed converting a racecourse, called Rosehill Gardens, into a 'mini-city' of 25,000 new homes as well as a train station. The 140-year-old racecourse spans 57ha of prime real estate, about 25km west of the city centre. The government offered A$5 billion (S$4.2 billion) – about 128 times the value of the land – to buy the racecourse from the Australian Turf Club, which owns and operates it. But the club's members voted against the proposal on May 27 in a 56 to 44 per cent vote, due to a sentimental attachment to the racecourse and concerns its loss would damage the city's racing industry. The government is now searching for a 'Plan B' to try to meet its target of building 75,000 new homes a year, to keep up with population growth and improve affordability. Various proposals have emerged, including the site of the 2000 Olympics, an inner city port, and a dilapidated former main road. NSW Premier Chris Minns on June 10 warned that Sydney was losing younger residents who could not afford to live in the city. 'Housing persistently is our biggest challenge, not just in the economy but in terms of intergenerational fairness and equity and giving young people an opportunity,' he said in a speech to business leaders. 'A city without young people is a city without a future, and the leading reason for that is we're not building enough houses.' Sydney has the most 'impossibly unaffordable' housing in the world after Hong Kong, according to the most recent Demographia International Housing Affordability report in 2024. The average prices for houses and apartments in Sydney are A$1.5 million and A$860,000, respectively, while the average rental costs A$775 a week. Associate Professor Laurence Troy, an expert on urban renewal from Sydney University, told The Straits Times that the government should compulsorily acquire the racecourse, which was one of the few remaining brownfield – underused or abandoned -– sites that could be converted into large-scale housing. 'Clearly we still need to build more housing because the population is still growing,' he said. 'We are basically running out of brownfield sites. If Rosehill is of such strategic importance, why is the government letting the land holders hold them hostage?' But Mr Minns has so far ruled out compulsorily acquiring the racecourse. A potential option could be to expand housing at the site of the Sydney Olympics, a 430ha site about 19km west of the city centre. The site currently has a mix of sports and entertainment venues, parklands, commercial developments and housing. The government is planning to build 13,000 homes on the site by 2050, but is set to fall far short of its target of 10,700 homes by 2030. The lack of development at the site has been blamed on delays due to toxic waste contamination at the site, which was formerly an industrial area, as well as insufficient transport options. Another option could be to shut the last operating port in Sydney harbour at Glebe Island near the city centre and replace the site with housing. But business groups say the port is crucial for the transport of building materials, and its closure could add to construction costs. Another proposal is to develop housing along Parramatta Road, a main road that is being superseded by new underground roadways. But experts say an impediment will be pollution from the road traffic, which could pose health problems. Professor Nicole Gurran, an urban planning expert from Sydney University, said that adding to the housing supply in Sydney did not necessarily depend on findin g a 'sugar hit' such as a racecourse. 'We have abundant zoned sites that are appropriate for housing development,' she said. However, the authorities largely left it to market forces to instigate construction. In recent years, she said, high interest rates and construction cost s have discouraged developers. 'While prices are stagnant and people are struggling to get loans, and with affordability so poor and banks so cautious to lend, it is hard to get projects off the ground,' she said. Professor Troy also said the government should focus on the type of housing it wants to build, rather than depending on the creation of a quick-fix 'mini-city'. Instead of building high-rise towers, which are less popular with families and property buyers, or large houses in greenfield sites, Sydney should build more medium-density housing – such as terraces and low-rise apartments – which are popular and can increase the city's overall housing density. 'We need to look at the spaces we have and think about how we can do it better,' he said. Jonathan Pearlman writes about Australia and the Pacific for The Straits Times. Based in Sydney, he explains matters on Australia and the Pacific to readers outside the Oceania region. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
